In a letter dated June 13, 2012, to the State Department Inspector General, five Republican members of Congress—Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, Trent Franks of Arizona, Louie Gohmert of Texas, Thomas J. Rooney of Florida, and Lynn Westmoreland of Georgia—claimed that Abedin “has three family members – her late father, her mother and her brother – connected to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and/or organizations.” The five members of Congress alleged that Abedin had “immediate family connections to foreign extremist organizations” which they said were “potentially disqualifying conditions for obtaining a security clearance” and questioned why Abedin had not been “disqualified for a security clearance.”
A few weeks ago the Clinton Gang was relishing in glee, FBI director Comey brushed aside evidence (a joke for sure on gross negligence) that would have convicted anyone else and decided to overlook the preponderance of the evidence in deciding not to recommend Jail the Bird Clinton be indicted. That was then, now is now, Comey has re-opened the case in a turn of events that not even a Republican would dream of predicated on new evidence and allegations that may implicate the lying Clinton. This is political theater at its best.
Elijah Cummings ( another liar) weighed in yesterday on the new revelations. (click)If his statement doesn’t make you laugh we don’t know what will. At this point in time we have no idea what the FBI has turned up emails on the computer used by Anthony the pervert Weiner, who is the husband of Huma Abedin, The BIG LIE by Cummings when he said the case was never closed, then how can it be reopened. Cummings is a liar first rate indeed. Hillary’s top aide. Hillary Clinton now comes out with a statement recommending that Comey release the emails immediately.
It’s obvious that something big is happening here, Abedin has bunkered down, not heard or seen since the story broke. Hillary wants the emails released ASAP so she can move forward with her divisive campaign. Having a concubinage relationship with Huma, one would think that Clinton has her private number. Apparently there is more to the story; we can only think what will happen when the facts come out.
Why did the gumshoes not get that device and those e-mails before? The answer could involve the FBI decision not to use a grand jury and subpoena power, but instead to take the highly unusual route of making informal agreements with Clinton and her team, including giving five people immunity.
JAIL THE BIRD
And another lie by the BIRD when Hillary says only the Republican members of Congress originally received the letter when in fact the letter was sent to the respective members of Congress at the same time.
With the Clintons it never stops, accepting money from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain and anyone else who wanted a favor she now goes on the offensive telling the world she blames them for funding the Madrassas schools that spread Wahhabism. Trump weighs in by telling her to give the money back. Of course this won’t happen; with the Clintons, money is accepted with the quid pro quo. “We always take care of our partners.”
Clinton says she is happy to use the words, “radical Islam.” What does happy mean here? is she happy like going to a party? Her remarks follow:
“Well, the problem is that that sounds like we are declaring war against a religion. And that, to me, is, number one, wrong,” Clinton told ABC News. “I don’t want to do that because, number one, it doesn’t do justice to the vast numbers of Muslims in our own country and around the world who are peaceful people. (Yeah right, peaceful until they blow someone up)
“Number two, it helps to create this clash of civilizations that is actually a recruiting tool for ISIS and other radical jihadists who use this as a way of saying we’re in a war against the West,” Clinton added. (clash of civilizations, we have a class of civilizations since the year Mohammad went on his warpath – the lady is sick, failing to realize the damage she and Obama has done to this country)
“We have to admit it s complex challenge, but we are absolutely up to facing it,” Clinton added. (we are facing it? After eight years of Obama we are facing it ? Clinton will no doubt do what Obama has done. NOTHING! Remember her aide, Huma Abedin, is a Muslim with extended connections to Saudi Arabia.
We know it is all political, if Jane Doe did what Hillary Clinton did she would be spending time in the slammer. There is a massive cover-up going on here; similar to the IRS Lerner taking the 5th. America will not believe the DOJ if they give Clinton a pass. She not only broke one law she broke close to a dozen more. On obtaining office she signed a non-disclosure agreement.
On January 22nd, 2009, Hillary Clinton signed a Non-Disclosure agreement, or NDA, where she agreed to protect highly classified information, and a failure to do so could result in criminal prosecution.
“I have been advised that any breach of this Agreement may result in my termination of my access to SCI (Sensitive Compartmented Information) and removal from a position of special confidence,” the NDA reads.
“I have been advised that any authorized disclosure of SCI by me may constitute violations of United States criminal laws, including provisions of Sections 793, 794, 798 and 952, Title 18 United States Code…” These are provisions of the Espionage Act, and as Fox recently reported, 18 USC 793 subsection (f) is of special interest to the FBI investigation as it includes “gross negligence” in the handling of national defense information.
The investigation is a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION contrary to Hillary Clinton’s repeatedly saying otherwise.
America wants justice. Lynch says she will look at the facts when presented to them by attorneys working with the FBI and DOJ. The question is this, “if they indicate she broke the law” will Lynch bring charges against her.
The time has come to jail the Bird, throw away the key for good.
Is Hillary Clinton Above the Law?
By Julia Limitone Published February 24, 2016 FBI FOXBusiness
During an interview with the FOX Business Network’s Maria Bartiromo, California Republican lawmaker Darryl Issa provided detailed analysis of Hillary Clinton’s email probe.
“It is a crime to release source and methods. Scooter Libby went to jail just for saying he didn’t remember something related to sources and methods that he actually didn’t have anything to do with. David Petreaus is now a convicted criminal because he released information to his biographer,” he said.
“It is serious business to release information that may be classified or to deal with in a way that is wrong…It’s not a punishable crime to have an email server. It is a punishable crime to use that in a way that is reckless to American secrets.”
Issa shared his views on FBI director James Comey in particular and how the Justice Department has handled the case so far.
“I hear you say he’s [Comey] a solid citizen. What I would say is this Justice Department, so far, including the FBI director haven’t found the ability to indict any members of the administration, including Lois Lerner… The fact is Lois Lerner was not presented to a Grand Jury — that was a failure to enforce a statute. We have a similar situation in that no matter what we send to the FBI, they don’t seem to find much and the case is closed,” he said.
He also discussed what’s next for the email investigation.