OUT FOR THE KILL

“The Donald” defeated a left wing progressive criminal in 2016; this lying “B” would be in jail now if it weren’t for the politicized FBI; a cover-up that makes Watergate look like a candy store heist. Any other person would be doing time and a lot of other things. But she is still mouthing off like nothing happened. Having the FBI, once a sacred institution, become an arm of a political party is pure unadulterated Treason. Trump won fair and square, they lost and now have suffer the consequences. However, this is not the case with a swarm of do nothing liberal progressive criminals. They will do anything, including murder, to stifle Trump and his agenda. Insiders loyal to Clinton crushed any evidence that would confirm here guilt. This was an independent agency of the U.S. government involved in a KGB scheme to protect one of their own. Remember the progressive agenda of Socialism is actually a true and tested autocratic dictatorship the likes of Marx, Lenin, Chavez and Castro.

The hearings go on and soon Kavanaugh will be sitting on the Supreme Court. This will be a milestone for the conservative movement. Since the court took a left turn with Earl Warren and continued on through Kennedy the social anarchists have basically gotten their way. Now, it is in our grasp to change the courts political philosophy. The ANTIFA crowd is out for the kill; they see their hedonistic political agenda taking a big time hit that will last for decades. They can’t get things done on the legislative side so they relied on the courts at every level to legislate from the bench.

Republicans let Obama’s two picks, Sotomayor and Kagan, slip right through – no protests from the conservatives. (from the Washington examinerDemocrats are upset about where the Supreme Court has been heading not because it isn’t doing its job, and not because it is overly partisan, but because they don’t like the fact that cases going there are increasingly being decided based on the Constitution and the law and not on motivated reasoning in search of liberals’ pet causes.

Any outside observer with a minimal intelligence knows full well that the FBI colluded with Hillary Campaign to bring down Trump from the get go. This inner coup started with the hiring of Fusion GPS.  SEE BELOW FOR PREVIOUS POSTS.

ANKLE BRACELETS WARRANTED

Finally, the truth has come out – how, when and why? We are not of the uninitiated, we are well informed, knowing full well a bald face lie from the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. The guilty have been outed notwithstanding the Mueller investigation. By the way his investigation is a complete sham. He is a shill for Comey and company, protecting the guilty while harassing the innocent, therefore any indictments he brings or arrests he makes borders on collusion.

They have delved into areas that were never authorized, squeezed heads with far fetched codes, but they will never come clean on why they have failed to investigate the Russian colluding democrats under Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, the Podesta Group head honcho Tony Podesta, Fusion GPS, Wasserman-Schultz, Huma Abedin, etc.  For instances bringing a charge against Michael Flynn for lying to the FBI is a farce. His whole investigation is built on animosity against the Republicans and specifically Trump. But we must move on because the real criminals are escaping from the grasp of the law.

Back to Attorney General Sessions – yes he recused himself from the Russian investigation, not relevant to what has to come, but that doesn’t mean he doesn’t have the power to arrest Hillary “jail the bird” Clinton, Wasserman-Schultz, Rice, Slick Willie, Anthony Weiner, Huma Abedin, Loretta Lynch, Koskinen, Strozk, McCabe, Tony Podesta and any other number of lying, cheating, thieving players in this scam of scams.

The question we have regarding Sessions; has somebody threatened to chemically alter his manhood?

COMEY CAUGHT HOLDING THE SMOKING GUN – THEN PAGE AND STRZOK COVER UP THE CRIME

Fox News Channel logo.svg

The original script read like this,  “grossly negligent” when referring to Hillary Clinton’s crimes. Those pivotal words have a distinct legal meaning, and are drawn directly from a federal statute, 18 U.S.C. 793(f), which makes it a felony to handle classified documents in a “grossly negligent” manner. But what happened?

Under questioning, Comey admitted to the Inspector General Michael Horowitz that he authored the May 2 statement and penned every word of it himself. But then he offered the implausible claim that “he did not recall that his original draft used the term ‘gross negligence,’ and did not recall discussions about that issue.”

Metadata shows that on June 6, the FBI’s lead investigator on the case, Peter Strzok, sat down at his office computer to cleanse his boss’s statement of the vexing term, “gross negligence.”  With the help of his paramour and FBI lawyer Lisa Page, the words “extremely careless” were substituted to make Clinton appear less criminally culpable. Page told the IG that “to use a term that actually has a legal definition would be confusing.”

Strozk and Page also expunged from Comey’s statement his reference to another statute that Clinton had plainly violated. She should have been charged under the statute’s “intent” provisions.  With Comey’s consent and encouragement, the pair sanitized his findings of fact and contorted his conclusions of law. Clinton, who had not even been interviewed by the FBI yet, was free and clear. The investigation was a sham.

Comey may not have remembered writing the words that should have indicted Clinton, but he had complete recall of his inability to read the law. He told the IG he thought “Congress intended for there to be some level of willfulness present even to prove a ‘gross negligence’ violation.” If Comey had ever read the legislative history, he would have known that in 1948, Congress amended the original Espionage Act of 1917 to add a “gross negligence” provision that did not require intent or willfulness.

Just as Comey, Strzok, Page and company conspired to clear Hillary Clinton, they likewise concocted their “insurance policy,” a scam investigation of then-candidate Donald Trump. The FBI had no legal basis to initiate its investigation into Trump and his campaign. Facts were invented or exaggerated. Laws were perverted or ignored.  The law enforcers became the law breakers.  Comey’s scheme to leak pilfered presidential memos in order to trigger the appointment of his friend, Robert Mueller, as special counsel was a devious maneuver by an unscrupulous man. Comey’s insinuation that the president obstructed justice was another canard designed to inflame the liberal media.  Sure enough, they became his witting accessories.

Compare all of this – that there was never any credible evidence that Trump or his campaign collaborated with Russia to win the presidency – with the fact that there was ample evidence that Clinton had broken the law.

This is the story of “The Russia Hoax.”

HARRY REID – A CRIMINAL BY NO OTHER NAME – A VAIN ATTEMPT TO TAKE DOWN THE FREELY ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

To protect Hillary “lock her up” Clinton in the run for the White House FAKE information given to pugnacious Senator, “Harry Black Eye” Reid was the meal ticket utilized to sabotage the Trump run for the Presidency of the United States.  JOHN BRENNAN! Yes Brennan, under the head of the CIA under Obama told Reid not to release it, but did he?

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) sends a letter to then-FBI Director Comey voicing concern over Russian interference in the election and asking Comey to open an FBI investigation.

 – The Washington Times – Saturday, May 12, 2018

Then-Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid released a letter in the heat of the 2016 election alleging Trump-Russia collusion even though the CIA director at the time urged him not to, according to a person familiar with their conversation.

Mr. Reid’s Aug. 27 letter to the FBI appears to mark the first time a Democrat officially accused President’ Trump’s campaign of colluding with the Russian government to hack his party’s computers.

The letter has come to represent for conservatives the “deep state” — Obama loyalists leaking unproven allegations to the press against Mr. Trump and his people to ruin the campaign, the transition and the White House.

“The evidence of a direct connection between the Russian government and Donald Trump’s presidential campaign continues to mount,” Mr. Reid wrote to FBI Director James B. Comey.

Mr. Reid wrote and leaked his letter after receiving a secret telephone briefing from then-CIA Director John Brennan.

The retired senator has portrayed the letter as having the blessing of Mr. Brennan, a fierce Trump critic who suggests the president is beholden to Russian President Vladimir Putin for fear of blackmail.

But now the Brennan side rebuts Mr. Reid’s contention that the then-CIA director was actively trying to leak damaging anti-Trump information during the election.

Nick Shapiro, former deputy chief of staff for Mr. Brennan as CIA director, told The Washington Times that his ex-boss considered the information sensitive. He expressly urged Mr. Reid to confine the information to private discussions with Mr. Comey.

That August, Mr. Brennan was briefing the so called “gang of eight” congressional leaders on Russian computer hacking and on suspicious that Trump people were involved.

Mr. Shapiro, now a Brennan adviser, provided this version of the Brennan-Reid phone call:

“Brennan used the same exact notes to brief Reid as he used with the other members of the Gang of Eight. In fact, most of the conversation was spent with Senator Reid telling Brennan what he had heard about Russians and the Trump campaign. Senator Reid informed Brennan that he was in the process of drafting a letter to Comey about his concerns. When Senator Reid asked Brennan whether he could reference this information in the letter to Comey, Brennan said ‘no,’ as the intelligence was being tightly controlled and he was worried that the letter would get out into the public. Brennan told him that Comey had been fully briefed on the intelligence and if he wanted to, it would be better to talk to him about it in a secure manner when he returned to D.C. instead of putting it in a letter.”

Mr. Reid, Nevada Democrat, wrote the letter anyway. And it was leaked to The New York Times and then migrated throughout the mainstream media.

It contained references to a Trump aide traveling to Moscow and allegedly meeting with two sanctioned Kremlin figures — an allegation contained in the Democratic Party-financed dossier written by ex-British spy Christopher Steele. The unnamed person is Carter Page, who has denied under oath he ever met the two people named by Mr. Steele.

The dossier at that point had not been published. The FBI possessed copies and had opened a counter-intelligence investigation into Russia meddling the previous month.

Mr. Reid’s version of his phone call from Mr. Brennan is contained in the best-selling book, “Russian Roulette,” which embraces the Trump-Russia conspiracy and promotes the Steele dossier.

The book says:

“Reid also had the impression that Brennan had an ulterior motive,” the authors said. “He concluded the CIA chief believed the public needed to know about the Russian operation, including the information about the possible links to the Trump campaign. When Reid later was asked if Brennan directly or indirectly had enlisted him to push information held by the intelligence community into the public realm, he told an interviewer, ‘Why do you think he called me?’ “

Mr. Shapiro, Mr. Brennan’s adviser, said that specific book excerpt is inaccurate. He also told The Times that rather than trying to sell Trump-Russia collusion during the campaign, the Obama White House and Mr. Brennan stayed silent.

The Washington Times submitted questions to Mr. Reid’s associates at a public policy institute in Nevada where he serves as co-chairman. The queries went unanswered.

Mr. Reid did not stop his drumbeat on Trump-Russia. After Mr. Steele leaked his dossier narrative to selected reporters in Washington, Yahoo News, whose Michael Isikoff co-authored “Russian Roulette,” wrote a story.

But The New York Times dampened the narrative with an Oct. 31 story headlined, “Investigating Donald Trump, FBISees No Clear Link to Russia.”

Mr. Reid was furious

Adam Jentleson, his deputy chief of staff, tweeted, “I’ll say it: NYT interviewed Reid for this story. He said things contrary to the story. NYT discarded the interview.”

“Maybe some want to know why the NYT seemed to cover for Comey’s FBI? Maybe even some at the NYT? Maybe not? I’m just asking questions,” Jentleson said. The New York Times would go on to become one of journalism’s chief proponents of Trump-Russia collusion.

The Washington Times has examined Mr. Steele’s series of collusion charges and found that none has been confirmed independently and publicly at this point. Special counsel Robert Mueller continues to investigate.

However, the FBI’s investigation remained a secret during the campaign. Despite public pressure, including public letters from then-Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid on August 29 and October 30, 2016, the latter claiming that the FBI was concealing “explosive information about close ties and coordination between Trump and his top advisers, and the Russian government,” the FBI did not disclose its investigation until after the election. In fact, on October 31, 2016, The New York Times reported that FBI officials had not found evidence demonstrating links between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.
David Kris is a founder of Culper Partners LLC. He previously served as assistant attorney general for national security, associate deputy attorney general, trial attorney at the Department of Justice, general counsel at Intellectual Ventures, and deputy general counsel and chief ethics and compliance officer at Time Warner. He is the author or co-author of several works on national security, including the treatise National Security Investigations and Prosecutions, and has taught at Georgetown University and the University of Washington.

The Carter Page FISAs are out via the Freedom of Information Act. Here are a few observations, relatively brief but still just a bit too long for Twitter.

First, a huge amount of information is redacted in these FISA applications, but they still represent a monumental disclosure to the public. The government considers FISA applications to be very sensitive—and their disclosure, even heavily redacted, may have long-term, programmatic consequences long after we’re finished with President Trump. The government seems to have accepted that FOIA applies to FISA. Without taking a position on the issue it made me recall this Lawfare post that argues to the contrary.

Second, for those who don’t remember, the controversy about these FISA applications first arose in February when House intelligence committee Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes released a memo claiming that the FBI misled the FISA Court about Christopher Steele, the former British secret agent who compiled the “dossier” on Trump-Russia ties and who was a source of information in the FISA applications on Page. The main complaint in the Nunes memo was that FBI whitewashed Steele—that the FISA applications did not “disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign in funding Steele’s efforts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior and FBI officials.”

In response to the Nunes memo, the Democrats on the committee released their own memo. That memo quoted from parts of the FISA applications, including a footnote in which the FBI explained that Steele was hired to “conduct research regarding Candidate #1,” Donald Trump, and Trump’s “ties to Russia,” and that the man who hired him was “likely looking for information that could be used to discredit [Trump’s] campaign.”

Based on this back and forth between the HPSCI partisans, I wrote on Lawfare at the time that the FBI’s disclosures on Steele “amply satisfie[d] the requirements” for FISA applications, and that the central irony of the Nunes memo was that it “tried to deceive the American people in precisely the same way that it falsely accused the FBI of deceiving the FISA Court.” The Nunes memo accused the FBI of dishonesty in failing to disclose information about Steele, but in fact the Nunes memo itself was dishonest in failing to disclose what the FBI disclosed. I said then, and I still believe, that the “Nunes memo was dishonest. And if it is allowed to stand, we risk significant collateral damage to essential elements of our democracy.”

Now we have some additional information in the form of the redacted FISA applications themselves, and the Nunes memo looks even worse. In my earlier post, I observed that the FBI’s disclosures about Steele were contained in a footnote, but argued that this did not detract from their sufficiency: “As someone who has read and approved many FISA applications and dealt extensively with the FISA Court, I will anticipate and reject a claim that the disclosure was somehow insufficient because it appeared in a footnote; in my experience, the court reads the footnotes.” Now we can see that the footnote disclosing Steele’s possible bias takes up more than a full page in the applications, so there is literally no way the FISA Court could have missed it. The FBI gave the court enough information to evaluate Steele’s credibility.

There’s also more detail on the previous disclosure from the House intelligence committee Democrats’ memo on how Steele went to the press with the “dossier” when FBI Director James Comey sent his October 2016 letter to Congress disclosing the possible newfound importance of the Weiner laptop in the Clinton investigation. According to the FISA applications, Steele complained that Comey’s action could influence the election. But when Steele went to the press, it caused FBI to close him out as an informant—facts which are disclosed and cross-referenced in the footnote in bold text.

While I am sure people will try, my initial impression is that with all the redactions it is going to be very tough to figure out the full scope of information supporting the Court’s repeated finding of probable cause to believe that Carter Page was an agent of Russia. There is a mention of two Russians, one of whom pleaded guilty to being an unregistered agent of a foreign government and was sentenced to 30 months, but even that is disconnected from the redacted discussion that precedes it. Substantively, the government seems to have hewed as closely to the prior disclosures as it could in applying FOIA.

But it is worth noting that—and as the Democrats previously pointed out—the judges who signed off on these four FISA applications were all appointed by Republican presidents, including one George H.W. Bush appointee (Anne Conway), two George W. Bush appointees (Rosemary Collyer and Michael Mosman) and one Reagan appointee (Raymond Dearie). I know some of those judges, and they certainly are not the types to let partisan politics affect their legal judgments.

This illusion to the Republican appointed judges is in fact not telling the whole story because,  the FISA applications did not “disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign in funding Steele’s efforts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior and FBI officials.”

ARE WE PISSED OFF! YOU BET WE ARE. WE WANT JUSTICE NOW!

DO YOU HEAR US NOW” that is the shibboleth of 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014. But the greatest roar occurred on November 8, 2016 as Trump scored an unpredictable landslide victory over a CRIMINAL. YES A CRIMINAL. She thought time was on her side according to polls. But circumstances beyond her control served up a major disappointment. However, there were people inside the DEEP STATE that would protect her until hell freezes over.

We are patiently awaiting for the Orange Jump suit to be placed on America’s NUMBER ONE CRIMINAL. The Clinton Mob Syncdiate has been scamming its way ever since Slick Willie became Governor of Arkansas. Hillary’s first scam was on cattle future contracts.  

Hillary Rodham Clinton was allowed to order 10 cattle futures contracts, normally a $12,000 investment, in her first commodity trade in 1978 although she had only $1,000 in her account at the time, according to trade records the White House released yesterday.

The computerized records of her trades, which the White House obtained from the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, show for the first time how she was able to turn her initial investment into $6,300 overnight. In about 10 months of trading, she made nearly $100,000, relying heavily on advice from her friend James B. Blair, an experienced futures trader.

And don’t ever forget the unfortunate death of Vince Foster. Clinton’s partner in that infamous Arkansas law firm. Vince, as the official line goes, was not able to handle the hubbub in Washington. The lying, cheating, scamming became too heavy for him to bear. In his eyes the only way out was suicide. But did he really take his own life? There are doubters.  His body was found in a park with a bullet through his head and a gun in his hand.

The latest controversy among others was the death of Seth Rich. Image result for the hangman's noose old western movie

Two weeks before the Democratic National Convention in July, Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich was shot and killed in his Washingtonneighborhood. His family and Metropolitan D.C. police have said his death was the result of a botched robbery. But conspiracy theories have circulated in right-wing and conservative social and news media spheres fueling unsubstantiated rumors that Rich’s killing was political in nature.

Ten months later, the unsolved homicide and the conspiracy theories attached to it reached their biggest audience yet when they aired on Fox News, bringing fringe speculation about Rich’s death into the mainstream.

Here’s how the rumors took off.

JULY 10, 2016

Seth Rich is killed

Before dawn, 27-year-old Rich spoke to his girlfriend, Kelsey Mulka, over the phone as he walked home from a bar. Just days before, Hillary Clinton’s campaign had offered him a new job that would bring him to New York.

As the couple talked, Mulka heard voices on the other end. Rich abruptly ended the call.

Then gunshots rang out.

AUG. 9, 2016

Julian Assange fuels conspiracy rumors

“Our sources take risks,” WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said in an interview with a Dutch television program, just after addressing Rich’s murder.

When asked if he was implying that Rich was a source for WikiLeaks, which on July 22 released thousands of emails from DNC accounts — centering around Clinton, her campaign and the DNC’s treatment of Sen. Bernie Sanders — Assange cryptically responded.

“We don’t comment on our sources,” he said. “We have to understand how high the stakes are on the case.”

QUESTION: WHY HAVE NO DEMOCRATS BEEN CHARGED WITH A CRIME. For instance Wasserman-Shultz, Huma Abedin, Podesta and others. Why?

What we want now is to bring justice to these perpetrators; white collar criminals in their own right deserve the maximum penalty allowed by law. We must keep up the pressure to insure that justice will be done and those guilty will pay the ultimate price for their crimes. 

THE FIX WAS IN -DONNA BRAZILE WHACKS HILLARY CLINTON AND THE DNC

Bring criminal charges against Clinton – lock her up. Bernie caved in to the wishes of a criminal. Donna Brazile lays it all out.

House Speaker Paul Ryan expressed outrage Sunday about recent revelations that Democrat Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign cut a deal with the Democratic National Committee that effectively eliminated any potential primary challenger’s chances of winning the party nomination, saying, “this takes the cake.”

“We’ve all said the Clintons live above the law,” the Wisconsin Republican told “Fox News Sunday.” “But this takes the cake.”

Lock her up Hillary saw to it that the Democrats would lose the election. Her campaign bred hate and division. Her nemesis was (click) Bernie Sanders who pressed her like road kill. Sanders though had theMO” and if nominated would have most likely beaten Trump. Bottom line is that the vein Hillary (Jail the Bird) was responsible for the Republican victory. Thanks to the egomaniac Hillary for her help.

Inside Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the DNC

When I was asked to run the Democratic Party after the Russians hacked our emails, I stumbled onto a shocking truth about the Clinton campaign.

November 02, 2017I had to keep my promise to Bernie. I was in agony as I dialed him. Keeping this secret was against everything that I stood for, all that I valued as a woman and as a public servant.

“Hello, senator. I’ve completed my review of the DNC and I did find the cancer,” I said. “But I will not kill the patient.” 

PREVIOUS POST BELOW

SAY IT AIN’T SO DONNA!

CNN has severed ties with the Democratic strategist Donna Brazile, after hacked emails from WikiLeaksshowed that she shared questions for CNN-sponsored candidate events in advance with friends on Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

Ms. Brazile, a veteran political analyst for the network, was already on leave from CNN since becoming interim chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee. On Monday, CNN said it had accepted her formal resignation on Oct. 14.

THE SYSTEM IS RIGGED

Allegations concerning news bias that were meant to help the Clinton campaign are true. Liberals own the media, with the exception of a few. Journalists, most graduates of progressive universities who were fed by liberal professors the socialist manifesto new world order. Anyone who disagrees with them is called a RACIST.

Upon rendering their biased stories they slanted the facts to fit their cause, leaving out many of the incriminating details that would undermine their claims. As the story below highlights, insiders, liberal journalists, who profess to be independent and fair minded, work behind the scenes to help progressives such as HRC to achieve their goals, one way or another.  Be vigilant Patriots, watch for voter fraud, it is out there, contrary to what the Democrats tell us. 

THE TWO MONKEY SEE NOTHING, KNOW NOTHING AND DO NOTHING

We are speaking once again about two criminals; Debbie Wasserman Schultz and John Podesta. They don’t know diddley squat. Their brain has turned into mush when questioned, a typical Democrat convenient reply.  They did no evil and saw no evil. Yeah right! Once head of the DNC, Wasserman Schultz and the ex-campaign manager of the disastrous Clinton implosion know nothing about the $12 mil they paid for a Russian dossier. Like all denials coming from their lips, this one is too hard to digest. It falls in the same category as Hillary’s email convulsion, “like with a cloth.” However, this time is different because they meant to entrap Trump by the utilization of a foreign propaganda machine. Joseph Goebbels would be so proud of them. BTW he was a German Nazi politician and Reich Minister of Propaganda of Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945. And we can’t forget Saul Alinsky who mentor these two sleaze bags. Rules for Radicals.pngJust imagine the s..t these mental midgets would have pulled if Hillary mounted the throne. A Stalin archipelago would have been prepared for conservatives. That was not out of the realm of possibility. We know now what they had in mind, total control of the government; from judges on down the line to the local police force. It didn’t happen and that is a good thing.

Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta and former Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz both privately denied to congressional Russia investigators that they had any knowledge about an arrangement to pay for opposition research on President Donald Trump, three sources familiar with the matter told CNN.

 WE WANT ANSWERS! LOCK THEM UP, MAKE THE LIARS TALK

WAKE UP SANDER’S SUPPORTERS – YOU WERE PLAYED LIKE A SUCKER – NOW IT IS TIME TO RETURN THE FAVOR – MAKE HER FEEL THE BERN ONE MORE TIME

Clinton and here minions worked behind the scenes in preventing Bernie Sanders from securing the Democrat nomination for president. From the start it was a done deal; the shibboleth was Hillary and no one else. Surprise though, Sanders started to make his case cutting into Clinton’s once insurmountable lead, then all stops were pulled to crash the Sander’s party. Debbie Wasserman Schultz gang raped him with insulting emails forcing her to resign – actually she was fired.

So now the proverbial fork in the road is upon the Sander’s supporters; do they vote for a lying criminal who stole the nomination from the man they truly supported or do they hold their nose and vote for a stinking liar? They have three choices, Donald Trump, Ron Johnson or Jill Stein. Our recommendation to them is to vote their conscience and do the right thing which is to not vote for “Jail the Bird” Clinton. She stole the party’s nomination in broad daylight.

Wake up Sander’s supporters to what the Lying Clinton has done to you, she stole your vote.  You played fair and square and she did not. Do you think she will change once in the White House. No way, she will continue to subvert the United States in real time. No one will believe a word she says.

We are counting on you to indict Hillary at the voting booth. She deserves no less.  This is your last chance to make HRC to feel the BERN. Politics is a blood sport, time for you, the millennials, who worked the streets, the phones, the neighborhoods for Bernie Sanders to ditch the b…h on November 8. You were stiffed, time to return the favor. 

EVERY DEMOCRAT IS GUILTY BY ASSOCIATION

Do not let them fool you, every, repeat, every Democrat is guilty of association with Obama and his policies. They voted 100% for Obamacare, 100% for Harry Reject Reid, 100% for Nancy Pelosi. By the way, Reid has not allowed a vote on any controversial issue because he knows that the Republicans with a few renegade (in trouble like Landrieu of Lousiana) Democrats will side with the Republicans thereby inflicting harm to Obama’s policies. But most of all Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the DNC mouth, has refused to confirm that Democrat candidates are aligned with Obama’s policies. Do not be fooled by her double speak.

Obama offered fodder to Republicans during a speech in Evanston, Ill., earlier this month when he said that “I am not on the ballot this fall … but make no mistake, these policies are on the ballot, every single one of them.”

THE DEMOCRAT POLITICS OF LIES

The old saying goes like this, “if you tell a lie so many times you will start to believe it yourself.” And to a politician of the Democrat stripe, this not only goes for them, but they have indoctrinated many Americans and the news media that this is true. The latest examples are the IRS scandal and Benghazi.

For instance, the administration pushed out Susan Rice to brief the public that the terrorist attack on our Benghazi embassy was triggered by a film. Funny thing was no one saw the film or even heard of it. As the story matriculated so did the lies. Hillary Clinton, a wanna be liar in chief, then said the film was responsible for protests around the globe; not embassy specific. Again questioned about the killing of Ambassador Stevens, Clinton resorts to obfuscation when she admonishes the listeners that the attack was spontaneous and we did not have assets on the ground to neutralize the attack. Now it has come to our attention that we did have assets on the ground only one mile from the compound, but their mission was delayed by a CIA command. Who will you believe, the political distortion of the Obama administration or the men on the ground?  More to come on Fox Saturday night.

Women are always a good subject, brow beaten over and over again in every election. You heard the allegations, Republicans are against women’s health, Republicans are for paying women lower wages, Republicans have a Muslim philosophy when it comes to women preventing them from breaking through the glass ceiling. This is a lie of a gargantuan portion. When it comes to women’s health we are all on board, but the Democrats persist by saying women should be free to have an abortion.  Dissecting these unfounded allegations is a lot easier than the procedure most abhor, but most feel that sometimes an abortion is necessary to protect a women’s health. Only the left wing agitators and far right religious zealots, the triumvirate of Obama Reid Pelosi constantly beat the drums on this subject. Enough already.  And this week the Democrat party head Debbie Wasserman-Schultz said that Governor Walker gives women the back of his hand. A disgusting comment later retracted, but without an apology and with it the same lying allegations continued. Vitriolic diatribe dished out under the guise of the same old mantra.

One of the largest lies is that the Republicans will make you breath poisonous air, drink contaminated water. This is the most preposterous of allegations one can imagine. Every Republican is for clean air and potable drinking water. Republicans are fisherman and most of all they love open space, big sky type country, clean rivers and uncontaminated fish. Another blasphemous and unfounded allegation. What the Republicans are against are unrestrained regulations and unnecessary burdens that prevent economic progress. Think Keystone XL.

Turning swords into plowshares. Year right; Obama has done a good job at that. The world is now in chaos. The libs have opened up jails and all hell has broken loose. We don’t hear much about Egypt right now – the General has decimated the Muslim Brotherhood. Obama didn’t like having the Muslim Brotherhood outlawed; he said it was undemocratic, coup d’etat.   Iraq and Syria are being burned to the ground by a barbaric Muslim caliphate condoned by Obama. Not standing ones ground as we should have unleashed a world wide enemy hell bent on our destruction. Obama has given them the key and invitation to plunder and wreck carnage throughout the Muslim world.  Vladimir Putin has stared Obama down in the Ukraine conflict. As the country shudders under today’s lying administration we watch impatiently as Rome burns.

What more evidence do we need to understand the threat that exists to our very survival and way of life than the daily warped vision of the Obama et al administration. Expect more of the lies going forward because it is US against them. And we are a mortal threat to the multitude of lying naysayers who threaten our freedom and liberty.