Is Hillary Clinton’s behavior linked to a medical breakdown do to stress, or does she have post concussion symptoms or does she have a narcissistic psychological disorder.

CLICK HERE for the almost 2 hour video. Remember Clinton said she fell down and hit her head, but did she? Perhaps she had a stroke! Was this the case? If so, can she devote herself full time to the presidency? The video is very revealing, a must view by all Americans.




Former Secretary of State, Colin Powell (Clinton is trying to pin it on me), is now the FALL GUY. Reminding you he served the country honorably under two presidents. However, he is now the target of the Lying Clinton.  Yes,  Hillary pulled out the Alinsky card once again; blaming Powell for giving her the wrong advice regarding emails. Who do you believe? Stupid question! Powell or the Lying Clinton.

The backdrop, one year into Clinton using her private server, at a dinner party hosted by Clinton. Madeline Albright asked former secretaries what advice they would offer to Clinton.
“Toward the end of the evening, over dessert, Albright asked all of the former secretaries to offer one salient bit of counsel to the nation’s next top diplomat,” Conason wrote. “Powell told her to use her own email, as he had done, except for classified communications, which he had sent and received via a State Department computer … [Powell] confirmed a decision she had made months earlier – to keep her personal account and use it for most messages.”

Powell’s office later released a statement to NBC News, saying he “has no recollection of the dinner conversation.” However, “He did write former Secretary Clinton an email memo describing his use of his personal AOL email account for unclassified messages and how it vastly improved communications within the State Department.” she asked Powell how he handled his emails. Powell’s office later released a statement to NBC News, saying he “has no recollection of the dinner conversation.” However, “He did write former Secretary Clinton an email memo describing his use of his personal AOL email account for unclassified messages and how it vastly improved communications within the State Department.”

RNC Chairman Reince Priebus hoped on the news as well as Powell’s comments, saying, Clinton “seems incapable of telling the truth.”
“Clinton’s pattern of serial dishonesty is completely unacceptable for a candidate seeking the nation’s highest office, and her refusal to tell the truth and own up to her poor judgment is a preview of how she would conduct herself if elected president,” Priebus said in a statement Monday. “Even worse, this news comes on the heels of the Clinton camp falsely trying to pin her email woes on Colin Powell, raising serious questions about whether she lied to the FBI.”
The bottom line here is that the LYING CLINTON is trying to cover her tracks.


Well here is the change that we were promised…  Do you like it?

No Bible in her hand!
Supreme court, here we come

First Muslim Woman Judge Carolyn Walker, hand-picked by President Obama, sworn in as judge of the 7 Municipal District, Brooklyn by holding the Holy Quran at Brooklyn Boro hall on December 10, 2015, it was a Historic Day!!
Since the Quran forbids all law but Sharia Law, I guess she will head the first Federally sanctioned Sharia Court.  Kinda makes you proud, doesn’t it?
Gives me chills up my legs said Chris Mathews.
Very little media coverage on this ……Another chink in the armor, no one cares, until it’s too late!
Step by step by step….this is how our culture will end.
Obama supporters, your “Destroying America” dream is coming true……

This can’t be forwarded enough….  OBAMA obamamaskisis


Mohammad strikes again! Fifty people attending a wedding party south of Istanbul were delivered piecemeal to their maker. Hands, legs and heads everywhere. A brutal scene of pure terror meant to sow unrest in the once Christian country.

Erdogan has a violent accusatory mindset, blaming the Kurds, Israel, ISIS for his country’s ills. He sees a conspirator, coup or assassin behind every Mosque. Erdogan’s own words there is “absolutely no difference” between ISIS, Kurdish rebels and the movement behind the U.S.-based cleric Fethullah Gulen, calling them terrorists. There is only one word to describe this anti American despot, “KILLER.” 

No one has claimed responsibility for today’s attack. According to news reports a 12-14 year girl suicide bomber pulled the trigger. Erdogan has seized control of the media effectively turning Turkey into an autocratic regime; opponents are afraid of what is next.

The Europeans have it right so far, rejecting Turkey’s entrance into the European Union (EU). What sets Europe apart from Turkey is their Islamic identity while Europe on the whole is Christian.  And don’t forget that Turkey, mainly consisting of an Asian people, was an invading country under the Ottomans; Greece, Bosnia and Spain fell in their wake. That brings us to Turkey today. A NATO member under the iron hand of Islamist Erdogan who has no trouble stirring the pot of racism, blaming others for his faults.

Case in point, the Kurds who have been clamoring for their own country without success. Turkey is adamant that the Kurds are Turks and not minorities, therefore by acquiescing to their demand it would open the floodgates for others. That is a self serving argument. And with ISIS one mile from the Turkish border on the ready to massacre the Kurds in Syria, Erdogan says let them die, we will not help with their defense.


Did you notice the subtle change in your neighborhood? Foreigners walking the streets at all hours, many of them Middle Eastern types that stand out like a sore thumbs; wearing apparel akin to bath robes or pajamas. Do you wonder what these people are thinking, why they pray five times a day, are you suspicious of them?

Why are they here in the first place? They hate what we stand for; why come to America? Are they plants, lone wolfs, suicide bombers in waiting? newhavenpeople2 Who brought them here? Are they illegal aliens? What foreign lands did they come from?

Britain and France have experienced such an influx. After decades these foreigners have not assimilated into their Western Christian Culture, this is anathema to them. Did they come for financial reasons? Why are so many on the dole?

By dressing in burqas and hijabs do they pose a threat, do they incite? It seems that the French think so. France has outlawed face covering since 2010, this includes  masks, helmets, balaclavas, niqābs, including the burqa 

To many of Westerners, dressing like this is confrontational. It sends a message that they will not assimilate into our culture. They become adversarial with their demands. Others say that this is what America is all about. Wrong! Assimilation in language, culture and dress is what brings us together. Outrageous behavior does not. Failure to transition into the mainstream will keep them looking in; outsiders they will always be.

We still wonder why the Saudis, Egyptians, Jordanians, Kuwaitis, Qatar and the Emirates have not taken them in. Do they know something we don’t?


Not long ago Hillary Clinton took a HEAD dive resulting in a blood clot on her brain. Questions remain about her health, but recently they became more intent. Click here for Hillary the BOBBLEHEAD. Did her neurologist tell her to bobble in order to alleviate some kind of brain injury?

And what about the (click here) seizure, this was no fun thing, but a serious indication that there is something wrong with her health. Americans want to know what is wrong with the most corrupt politician since Eva Peron. Questions arise when she won’g release her medical records.

PLEASE CLICK HERE to VIEW THE COMPLETE VIDEO, IT IS IMPORTANT FOR THE VOTERS TO KNOW WHO THEY ARE CASTING A VOTE FOR. It is not only apparent, but obvious that Hillary the liar Clinton has a cognitive disorder; she is psychological unfit to become President?liesCHAPPAQUAhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqbDBRWb63s

Is Hillary have LSD flashbacks? Click here to watch Hillary go down like the Benghazi operation.


Is Hillary Clinton getting support from DEPEND?Depend FIT-FLEX UnderwearIs she suffering from incontinence?

Where to get Depend®

Get more from your adult diapers. Find discreet Depend® products online and in stores


The Liberal-Progressive agenda got its start many moons ago. With the appointment of Supreme Court Justices with the liberal bent the road to Armageddon was began to take shape. Mind you this did not happen over night, it was a slow process similar to Chinese water torture. Decisions were beginning to be decided, not based on the Constitution, but based on political expediency. What politicians could not do by legislations was done by the Judge who legislated from the bench. We have seen that in the most recent decisions by the court. A most startling example is the requirement by North Carolina that a first time voter present a photo ID’s before voting.

The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against North Carolina in this case. The State has asked for a stay of the ruling. Barely three weeks after a federal appeals court issued a blistering ruling overturning a North Carolina voter registration law that it called a deliberate attempt to suppress the black vote, Republicans across the state are fighting back. What set the liberals off was the early voting period being reduced from (Click)17 to 10 days. This they said affected people of color and restricted their participation in elections.

However, this is only one instant of a Liberal Court dictating how far a state can go in setting voting requirements. It is beyond anyone’s imagination that voters can’t produce the required photo IDs. For instance, those citizens who will be voting no long in advance what the requirements are. For a first time 18 year old voter and an elderly person who never cast a vote procuring the required identification should not be a hardship. Both potential voters had at a minimum one year to secure the proper documents. So where is the hardship?

It doesn’t end here, recent comments by two of the most flaming liberals on the Supreme Court gives pause. Bader Ginsburg and Sotomayor went rogue, beyond the pale in their comments. Once again indicating their progressive agenda. How they can be impartial in rendering a decision is highly suspect.

In Ginsberg’s own words:

“He is a faker,” she said of the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, going point by point, as if presenting a legal brief. “He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. … How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that.”
Toobin: Justice crossed a line
Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s slam of Donald Trump  The Legend in Her Own Mind is mentally incompetent to sit on the bench; a biased mind formed at birth. Biased beyond belief for a sitting Judge to manifest personal comments regarding individual politicians. What gets our goat is she wonders how Trump got away with not turning over his tax returns; the irony here is that she didn’t mention Hillary Clinton not turning over all of her emails. Nor did she mention the pass on Obama back in 2008. 
Turning to the Latino on the bench, Sotomayor, another anti white bomb thrower if there was ever on. Her biases were also embedded at birth.

The Supreme Court issued an extraordinarily disappointing 5–3 decision on Monday, June 20, 2016 in Utah v. Strieff, a Fourth Amendment case about police searches. Yet the terrible ruling came with a bright spot: In a powerful and groundbreaking dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor lambasted the majority for its heartless and illogical rejection of Fourth Amendment freedoms, invoking the Justice Department’s Ferguson report, echoing Black Lives Matter, and even citing Ta-Nehisi Coates.


Mark Joseph Stern is a writer forSlate. He covers the law and LGBTQ issues.

Strieff itself involves a fairly simple question of constitutional law. Typically, when police illegally stop an individual on the street without reasonable suspicion, any fruits of that stop—such as the discovery of illegal drugs—must be suppressed in court, because the stop was “unreasonable seizure” under the Fourth Amendment. Strieff gave the justices an opportunity to affirm this constitutional rule. But instead, Justice Stephen Breyer joined the court’s four conservatives to add a huge loophole to that long-established doctrine. In an opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas, the court found that if an officer illegally stops an individual then discovers an arrest warrant—even for an incredibly minor crime, like a traffic violation—the stop is legitimized, and any evidence seized can be used in court. The only restriction is when an officer engages in “flagrant police misconduct,” which the decision declines to define.

Sotomayor, who dominated oral arguments in Strieff, refused to let the majority get away with this Fourth Amendment diminution without a fight. In a stunning dissent, Sotomayor explains the startling breadth of the court’s decision. “This case allows the police to stop you on the street, demand your identification, and check it for outstanding traffic warrants—even if you are doing nothing wrong,” Sotomayor writes, in a dissent joined in part by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. “If the officer discovers a warrant for a fine you forgot to pay, courts will now excuse his illegal stop and will admit into evidence anything he happens to find by searching you after arresting you on the warrant.”

“Most striking about the Court’s opinion,” Sotomayor notes “is its insistence that the event here was ‘isolated,’ with ‘no indication that this unlawful stop was part of any systemic or recurrent police misconduct.’ ” But in truth, “nothing about this case is isolated.” Sotomayor then dives into the widespread police misconduct that has dominated headlines for several years, focusing on the Department of Justice’s Ferguson report to demonstrate that “outstanding warrants are surprisingly common.”

The Department of Justice, Sotomayor writes, “recently reported that in the town of Ferguson, Missouri, with a population of 21,000, 16,000 people had outstanding warrants against them.” That means 76 percent of Ferguson residents have, under the court’s decision, effectively surrendered their Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizure. “In the St. Louis metropolitan area,” moreover, “officers ‘routinely’ stop people—on the street, at bus stops, or even in court—for no reason other than ‘an officer’s desire to check whether the subject had a municipal arrest warrant pending.’ ”

But Sotomayor’s bravest moment arrives when she announces that, “writing only for myself, and drawing on my professional experiences, I would add that unlawful ‘stops’ have severe consequences much greater than the inconvenience suggested by the name.” (Sotomayor cites previous opinions, citations that I’ve excised for clarity.)

Sotomayor forgets to address why the high percentage of existing warrants of those who live in the Black and Latino community. She fails to address that 75% of children are born out of wedlock, that there is a family breakdown due to the liberal progressive mindset that anything goes and it is “all whitey’s fault.”



New Black Panthers Call Milwaukee Riots “a War”!  By Tim Brown August 17, 2016The Constitution

Breitbart reports:

“The people against terrorism, and tyranny in their community is not a civil war. When you are speaking about civil war, you are talking about a country fighting against a country. This is oppressed people fighting against a racist, white supremacist police system. Which is meant to oppress a certain group of people. More than likely black people and poor people around the country.”

“What you see is people lashing out and fighting against the system. As it is said in the Second Amendment, you know. So this is not new. The people in this country have always defended themselves against tyranny. So I can’t liken this to a civil war. No it’s not. Is it a war? Yes, it is. It’s a war against black people because we’re the ones being murdered. We’re the ones being killed. So there’s been a war against us. But is it a civil war? I can’t say that that’s the case.”

However, instead of Omowale recognizing the real problem, he is only escalating a skin color war, not a war against tyranny

The shooting or armed suspects that took place in Milwaukee over the weekend resulted in several riots. However, the rioting is happening due to lack of knowledge and lack of justice. Even Omowale acknowledged that his knowledge was limited, but still pushed the narrative that the incident was “basically the same old, same old that is happening around the country. Black men are being murdered.”

So, there you have it from the racist Black Panthers leader. He doesn’t have enough information to determine what happened or why, but hey, everyone is after the black man. I would laugh if the man and his ideology were not so serious.

Aaron Klein, who interviewed Omowale, read to him a description of the incident from theNew York Times.

The violence erupted after an officer killed a man who the police said was armed with a semiautomatic handgun and who fled after a traffic stop.

The police said two uniformed officers stopped two people in a car at about 3:30 p.m. on Saturday. The police did not provide details on why the car was stopped.

Both occupants ran from the car. During the pursuit, Mr. Barrett said, an officer ordered the man to drop his gun and fired when he did not, striking the man in the chest and an arm. He said the gun held 23 rounds.

The gunman, described by the police as a 23-year-old Milwaukee man with a lengthy arrest record, died at the scene.

“You say the man was running. If he’s running, then most definitely he is running in the opposite direction away from the police officer,” Omowale replied. “Now could have gotten shot in the chest? Now that is possible because he could have turned in which direction he needed to go.”

“With a gun, don’t forget,” Klein reponded. “And the police did tell him to put the gun down.”

“You are only telling me the police’s version,” Omowale retorted. “See the other man is dead. He can’t give his version.”

“We have seen so many times where police officers have made statements but yet cameras have come out to catch them in their lies,” Omowale added. “So it’s gotten to the point where America does not believe when a police officer says that someone turned toward them with a gun. And again having a gun does not justify killing someone.”

“This incident just took place last night,” he concluded. “We haven’t really had a chance to sit down and discuss the issue, to organize on it. Again, I remind you I just found out about it basically at the same time the rest of America found out about it. We have Black Panthers, the People’s New Black Panthers, Huey P. Newton Gun Club, based around the country. So I imagine there will be some type of Panther presence in Milwaukee if there is not already.”

Reposted with Permission from Freedom Outpost.


You do have to admit that Blacks and Hispanics get the short end of the stick when it comes to public education. Yes there are exceptions but in the broad scheme of things minority school children attend, for the most part, failing schools. This is due to many causes. The majority of students in these schools are from single parent families; hence the teachers spend a great deal of time on discipline, secondly one parent families have many chores thereby neglecting their responsibility in helping the child with homework or in fact seeing that it was done in the first place. Another major cause of concern is the education of the parent, in many cases they were dropouts, so engaging their children in meaningful conversations become a dead issue.

The liberal elites designed today’s education experience, for the most part, particularly in suburbia it works fine. However, when one peers into the inner city experience he/she sees a different picture. Mayhem is everywhere. Teachers in many instances are on the defensive, fearful of what an irate student may do. This has been caused by state board’s of education and the progressive politician. Discipline is no longer the stick that it once was. For instance a teacher, in many states and localities, can’t lay a hand on a student, even to break up a fight. The cops are responsible for this. Disciplining destructive students is not any easy task. Classes are disrupted effectively limiting their classroom learning. Teachers now become baby sitters. This very rarely happens in suburbia. Who to blame for this?  We can point many fingers, but it is obvious the liberal progressive cabal put the rules in place.

As we enter prime time in November, the decision on who to vote for becomes more acute. The Black parents need to understand who they are voting for and why. This is not too difficult of a decision. Looking behind and in front of the scenes makes the choice easy. The American Federation of Teachers (AFT) has come out in favor of Hillary.  Resolution of the AFT, “Hillary Clinton is a tested leader who shares our values, is supported by AFT members, and is prepared for a tough fight in order to champion the interest of students, families and communities”

Why does the AFT support Hillary? There is a one word answer, UNIONS. Hillary Clinton is vehemently against Charter Schools because they do not fall under the rules. They are successful in their own right and challenge today’s paradigm. A reminder once again that tenure teachers who do not measure up to today’s standards cannot be fired; they end up in the minority districts teaching down the inner city youth.

Many issues are at work here; for instance the AFT supports illegal aliens. This is detrimental to legal students, especially Blacks. Extra time is necessary to bring Hispanics up to speed, money that would to into the hiring of support personnel, tutors, mentors etc, to help failing or below standard Black students is not available. In reality the Blacks are like slaves of the Education Plantation. Suffering meted out like the plantation whip.

A look at the New York Charter School System is a prime example of what can be done to what is being done. Success Academy is the quintessential example of the dichotomy between public and charter schools; one flunks the other succeeds. Charters are a threat to the TEACHER’S UNION who control the public education agenda.

The message to the Black Parents, when voting ask yourself who is best for your child, who is in the pockets of failing teachers and unruly unions. You can make a difference, cast your vote for the future not the past. Despite her public pronouncements you must look behind the scenes and only then you will see who is pulling the scenes. Don’t fall for this trap again. They take your vote for granted. Do the right thing for a change, break away from the plantation mindset. It will benefit your child in the long run.

Click here for a message from Donald Trump.