With the 2018 election season approaching and their jobs at stake, House Republicans were in no mood to WALK THE TALK. The effort to replace Obamacare was filled with so many loopholes causing the Conservative Caucus to walk out. We don’t blame them. As President Trump said, Obamacare will fall on its own knife. Premiums will lift skyward this year forcing many to abandon the welfare ship. More will be without insurance than ever before;  then and only then will they clamor for repeal. Keep in mind that these RINOs, who ran on the shibboleth, “repeal Obamacarewere all talk but no action. When push came to shove they fell in with the Democrats. Not wanting to take possession of the repeal with a bill filled with so many entitlements that it was difficult for the Conservative Caucus to swallow.

The Republicans do not realize that they are in a war. The Democrats do not compromise on any issue. Take Neil Gorsuch for example. He should slide right through, but no, Schumer, the idiot that he is, demands 60 votes.

Go Nuclear guys, go Nuclear on every bill this session. Change the rules. Image result for nuclear explosion


Please accept our humble apologies, we unfortunately distributed fake news. Our wild ass guess was incorrect. The perpetrator of yesterday’s carnage was named Khalid Masood. Masood, who died Wednesday after police shot him on Parliament grounds, was known to authorities and had a range of previous convictions for assaults, including grievous bodily harm, possession of offensive weapons and public order offenses.

Not far from the Tower of London, but within walking distance to Big Ben, Westminster and Parliament Clock Tower - Palace of Westminster, London - May 2007.jpg, London was brazenly attacked in broad daylight by a Jihadist bent on spreading the word of Allah; authorities have not revealed his  name but a wild ass guess would be inclined to say it most likely to be Mohammad, Mammoud, Abdullah, Yassin, Ahmed, Hamza or Youssef. Taken to a local hospital, the killer was pronounced dead a short time later. Latest count, four dead and more than 40 injured, seven of those are in critical condition.

Seven held after Westminster attack

A second victim is named as a minister says the attack is linked to Islamic terrorism “in some form”.


Click here for more from Fox News.
From the Daily Star: Arrests in Birmingham part of the investigation. Scotland Yard said eight people have now been arrested as part of the investigation into the Westminster terror attack.


CLICK HERE for the OBAMA RUSSIAN CONNECTION. “Open mike – more flexibility

Has FBI director Comey lost his marbles? Incomprehensible remarks during Congressional testimony manifest an incompetence of those who have reached the highest positions in government. Comey has put nothing on the table accept false allegations, fake news, biased interpretations, innuendo and personal bias and animus. Sargent Joe Friday’s famous quote ” just the facts” was not part of Comey’s repertoire.  After three and half hours we know nothing, nada, zilch.

To top off the day Fox News gave Judge Napolitano the pink slip. What caused this? Well the Judge has alluded to Obama etal engaging the British spy agency in the cloak and dagger surveillance of the Trump Tower and campaign. The spy agency was alleged to bug the Tower for a Russian connection. The story will play out, but as we know with the Hillary server fiasco, Comey will, quote on quote, say that Trump was “CARELESS.” A BUFFOON he is.

We take the “Donald” at his word that he will produce evidence of electronic surveillance. So far Trump has been right on.





During the past century America has not experienced many earth shattering political upheavals. Yes the changing of the guard did take place, but the evil bureaucracy continued on a sustained path upward and outward. Examples of profligacy are earth shattering; to give succor to illegals and Muslim refugees when our veterans are starving is Patriotic Blasphemy. However, this is small potatoes on a global scale. Forces are beginning to surround us from all sides; these threats must be addressed.

Trump’s November 8th volcanic victory has sent the tectonic plates in a new direction. The many aftershocks ostensibly will gobble up the exhausted progressive agenda. Soon, the Supreme Court will be fully manned. Gorsuch, hopefully will bring a more conservative constitutional enlightenment in decision making, breaking the standstill that now exists. Image result for earthquake crevices

But turning to the world stage where we find many wannabee Napoleons who have stepped up during the weak eight year apology tour of Obama. The saber rattling boy man despot of North Korea is one of them. Is he about to meet his match? We don’t know how to say Allahu Akbar in Korean, but to constantly intimidate, provoke and yearn for a fight with the United States is a quick route to suicide. On the diplomatic front Rex Tillerson has has read the riot act; “all options are on the table.”

If China does not collar the boyman, Trump will. Our suggestion to end the North Korean provocations is simple as 1, 2, & 3. Give China an ultimatum, stop North Korea from their nuclear ambitions in 90 days, if not, on the 91st day exports from China to the United States will be halted. This will enrage the 250 million Chinese workers who suddenly will find themselves on the street. China would suddenly find themselves between a rock and hard place. Not wanting to address a raging populace with military means, one that has gotten use to the good life, Beijing would then use their leverage to bring North Korea to heel. We bet they will act quicker than the Japanese  tsunami that hit Fukushima

The Iranian mullahs and their Revolutionary Guards have a long arm, it has reached far and wide, spreading the message of Sunni Islam in an attempt at world hegemony. Their arch enemy Israel has not taken their threats lightly. They are prepared for the Mother of all confrontations. On all sides they face enemies, but none greater than Iran. If not them it will be the United States that acts to halt their nuclear ambitions. Their cooperation with North Korea is well known. A few years back Israel took out a half built nuclear plant supplied by Pyongyang in the Syrian hinterlands. There is little doubt that Israel is in the forefront of nano warfare. Most likely their microscopic like robotic insects have invaded Iran’s nuclear facilities. Supplied by  our DOD with bunker busters, Israel, when the time is right, will drop the big boy in a takeout of Tehran’s nuclear facilities.

However, with all that being Israel would not hesitate to level Iran if push comes to shove. And it will come! Their proxies, Hezbollah, will never let sleeping dogs lie. Having a Iran enclave bordering Israel with weapons of mass destruction is something Israel will have to address and ultimately eliminate in the not too distant future.  The expectation of a confrontation, either it be an infiltration or a missile barrage is expected at anytime. Israel is prepared for such an event. Lebanon too is becoming a Hezbollah stronghold. Any wartime strategist knows that surprise is the best offense; expect Israel to be proactive with first strike capability; taking out as much infrastructure as possible before the enemy regains a foothold is the type of operation that they will employ with dispatch.

Next up is the Congressional battlefield. More danger lies there than a pit full of rattle snakes.


Belgacem arrived at the airport and attacked a military patrol in the south terminal.

He tried to seize a servicewoman’s automatic weapon, put his gun to her head and said: “I’m here to die for Allah. In any case people are going to die.

He was then shot dead by two other soldiers.

A copy of the Koran was found on his body, Mr Molins added.


The gunman who attacked soldiers at Orly airport in Paris on Saturday told his father he had “screwed up” earlier and wanted forgiveness.

Ziyed Ben Belgacem, 39, was killed after he put a gun to a soldier’s head saying he wanted to “die for Allah”.

Earlier on Saturday, he was involved in a shooting and then a carjacking.

His father told French radio Belgacem had phoned after the first attack to say he had “screwed up with a gendarme”, before proceeding to Orly.

Belgacem is described as having been radicalised in prison, and was on a police watch-list.

His criminal record included convictions for armed robbery and drugs offences, Paris prosecutor Francois Molins told reporters late on Saturday.

Intelligence agents searched his home in Garges-les-Gonesse, north of Paris, for evidence of Islamist sympathies, but reportedly found nothing. However, traces of cocaine were discovered during the search.

The sequence of events

Early on Saturday morning, Belgacem was stopped at a checkpoint in Garges-les-Gonesse, north of Paris.

He fired at police with a pellet gun before escaping in a car that was later found abandoned.

Police say he then stole a car at gunpoint from a woman at Vitry, south of Paris. That car was later found at Orly airport.


Belgacem arrived at the airport and attacked a military patrol in the south terminal.

He tried to seize a servicewoman’s automatic weapon, put his gun to her head and said: “I’m here to die for Allah. In any case people are going to die.”

He was then shot dead by two other soldiers.

A copy of the Koran was found on his body, Mr Molins added.

His father and brother were taken in for questioning in the aftermath of the attack. The brother remains in custody.

Speaking to Europe 1 radio on Sunday, the father said his son was not a terrorist, but someone who “never prayed and he drank”.

“This is what happens under the influence of drink and cannabis,” the father said.

He said he had received a phone call from Belgacem after his initial attack in which he said: “Dad, please forgive me. I’ve screwed up with a police officer.”

Then he hung up saying he was on the motorway.

The BBC’s Hugh Schofield in Paris says the picture is building up of a man on the criminal fringes of society, who also consorted with Islamist radicals.

Orly – located 13km (8 miles) south of Paris – is the capital’s second-largest airport.

The attack came at a sensitive time. France has presidential elections starting next month and remains under a state of emergency.

The soldiers at Orly were part of Operation Sentinel – involving thousands of soldiers deployed to provide back-up to the police after the Charlie Hebdo attack in January 2015 and the Paris attacks of November 2015.


UPDATE” Geert hauled in 19% of the vote and will be a force to be reckoned with. His campaign resonated in Holland; from a blip on the radar screen, Wilder’s party is now part of the main stream. From Geert, he thanks you for supporting his valiant effort.


Geert Wilders to Muslims, “you are not welcome here.


by BRUCE BAWER March 13, 2017 12:15 PM Voters have an opportunity to reverse a disastrous immigration policy. Where would we be without the Netherlands? In its 17th-century golden age, it helped pioneer capitalism, individual liberty, and peaceful religious diversity. Even today, it punches far above its weight both economically and culturally. Yet this country of just under 17 million people has also been at the forefront of the single most disastrous multinational policy of our time: the post-war decision to take in hordes of unvetted immigrants from the Muslim world. This big-hearted but soft-headed folly (in which the general public had no say) involved several catastrophically misguided assumptions: that people born and bred under deeply corrupt political systems would, upon finding themselves in a staggeringly generous welfare state, seek out jobs, work hard, and contribute to the economy rather than set about fleecing the government; that people whose native cultures were characterized by sexual repression, sexual inequality, and sexual violence could quickly and easily assimilate into one of the planet’s most peaceable, equitable, and sexually liberated societies; and, above all, that devout believers in Islam who had never in their lives questioned the doctrine of jihad, the wickedness of Jews, the subordinate status of infidels, and the justness of punishing apostasy and homosexuality with death (and who, if literate, might never have read any book other than the Koran) could become proud, law-abiding citizens of a diverse and sophisticated secular democracy. No, the post-war immigrant wave wasn’t a total mess. Today, Sikhs and Hindus in the U.K. are more productive and prosperous, on average, than ethnic Britons; in the Netherlands, residents who trace their roots to the former Dutch colonies of Indonesia and Suriname have proven, by and large, to be success stories. The same can’t be said, however, about Dutch Turks and Arabs, above all Moroccans, who formed — and, for the most part, continue to live in — claustrophobic sharia enclaves marked by high unemployment; low levels of integration: such formerly exotic phenomena as female genital mutilation, forced cousin marriages, and “honor killings”; and a profound contempt for infidel society, upon which its young male residents have inflicted growing levels of brutal crime. (A 2011 government report found that 40 percent of Dutch Moroccans between ages twelve and 24 had been arrested, fined, charged, or accused of a crime in the previous five years — a striking statistic, given the reluctance of many victims to report crimes and of many police officers to take aggressive action in Muslim communities.) As elsewhere in Europe, secular Muslims, Ahmadi Muslims, ex-Muslims, and others who left the Islamic world precisely because they wished to escape sharia and live in freedom have found that their own rights are of less interest to authorities than the demands of patriarchal religious and community leaders. Yet even as Islam in the Netherlands grew apace — both Amsterdam and Rotterdam are now about 25 percent Muslim (by comparison, the figure for the U.S. is only 1 percent) — precious few Dutch officials and media commentators dared to address the issue. The result? First, the brief, meteoric political career of Pim Fortuyn, whose no-holds-barred criticism of Islam won him immense support and brought him tantalizingly close to the premiership prior to his murder on May 6, 2002 (the country’s first peacetime political assassination since 1672). Second, the grisly murder, on November 2, 2004, of writer and director Theo van Gogh, whose short film Submission, about Islam’s abuse of women, had outraged his Dutch-Moroccan jihadist killer, Mohammed Bouyeri — who, in a note stuck to Van Gogh’s corpse with a knife, vowed that the Netherlands and America, too, would soon be brought down. Third, the successful effort by the political establishment to anathematize Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Dutch-Somali member of the parliament who had quit Islam after 9/11 and become an eloquent critic of her former faith — and who, in 2006, emigrated to the U.S., where she has remained a powerful voice on the subject. And fourth, the rise of parliament member Geert Wilders, who, after being expelled from the People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (or VVD, in its Dutch abbreviation) in 2004 for his “extreme” views on Islam, formed the Freedom party (PVV). For the Dutch establishment, Wilders has been public enemy No. 1 ever since. On several occasions, he’s been called on the carpet by intelligence, security, and Ministry of Justice officials who’ve demanded that he moderate his anti-Islamic language. In 2008, a coalition of political, business, academic, and religious leaders conspired unsuccessfully to freeze him out of the public square. (“Geert Wilders,” said its leader, “is evil, and evil has to be stopped.”) Although Wilders is thoroughly persuasive in his insistence that his opposition to Islam is rooted in a devotion to individual liberty, free speech, freedom of religion, women’s equality, and gay rights, the Dutch media have routinely labeled him “far right,” and foreign reporters (some of whom don’t know any better, and some of whom do) have echoed this misrepresentation. Because of death threats, he’s lived with bodyguards around the clock since 2004. In 2009, he was briefly banned from the U.K. He’s twice been put on trial, essentially for violating limits on free expression. The first time, in 2011, he was acquitted; last December, he was found guilty. His crime? He asked supporters at a political rally whether they wanted more or less of the European Union. They shouted back: “Less!” Did they want more or less of the Labor party? “Less!” And, last, did they want more or fewer Moroccans? “Fewer!” No, it wasn’t the most delicate way of raising the issue, nor one that was fair to every individual Moroccan. But Wilders has never taken the delicate approach. In the Netherlands, that probably wouldn’t work. The country has long run on the principle that the only way to manage a small, ideologically diverse, and conflict-shy democratic country is to seek, patiently and respectfully, to hammer out a national consensus on every issue — a consensus with which every segment of the populace will be happy. This approach worked pretty well generations ago, when Catholics, Protestants, Jews, and nonbelievers alike aspired to live and let live under a secular government. But when pious Muslims who buy into classical sharia lock, stock, and barrel become part of the mix, this kind of consensus is impossible unless the non-Muslims are willing to sacrifice major tenets of democracy on the altar of sharia. Many leading Dutch figures have, indeed, demonstrated a willingness to make just such a sacrifice. Job Cohen, while mayor of Amsterdam from 2001 to 2010, proposed that, in the name of social harmony, Dutch authorities let Muslim men conduct their marital relations in accordance with sharia law — meaning that they should be allowed to have intercourse with their wives at will, to beat them if they resisted, or, presumably, to do even worse to them if they ventured outside of the home with their heads uncovered or (heaven forbid) exchanged a friendly word with an infidel male. Dutch author Ian Buruma agreed, calling in his book Murder in Amsterdam (2006) for an “accommodation with . . . Muslims” that would involve allowing “orthodox Muslims” to “consciously discriminate against their women.” (Writing about Buruma’s book in The New York Review of Books, British intellectual Timothy Garton Ash approved.) Then there’s Piet Hein Donner, who was the Dutch minister of justice from 2002 to 2006. When a 2006 poll found that 63 percent of Dutchmen viewed Islam as “incompatible with modern European life,” Donner’s reaction was to repudiate their implicit rejection of Islamic law and to look forward, sanguinely, to a time when Muslims would form the majority of the Dutch population: “If two-thirds of all Dutchmen wanted to introduce sharia tomorrow,” he insisted, “it would be a disgrace to say, ‘This is not permitted.’” As it happened, while Dutch elites were embracing appeasement in this pusillanimous fashion, Islam was dramatically transforming the Netherlands — especially its major cities and many of its mid-sized ones — in ways that have made it, among much else, more dangerous for women, for gays, and for Jews. Often it has seemed that Wilders is the only public figure talking frankly about any of this. During the last couple of years, consequently, the PVV has risen in the polls even as support for the Labor party, the longtime powerhouse of the Left, has almost totally collapsed. Meanwhile, in response to Wilders’s growing strength, the VVD (whose leader, Mark Rutte, is the current prime minister, heading up a VVD/PvdA coalition cabinet) has proffered watered-down versions of the PVV’s proposed immigration reforms. As the Netherlands closes in on its March 15 parliamentary elections, however, the PVV and VVD are neck and neck. Late February brought a shock: A member of Wilders’s security team, a Dutch Moroccan whom the government identified only by the Kafkaesque name “Faris K.,” was arrested for having possibly shared confidential information with a jihadist group — the very possibility of which, needless to say, only underscores the grim realism and urgency of Wilders’s message. At this writing, all that has been established for certain is that in 2007, Faris was investigated for criminal ties, and his brother Mohammed was dismissed from the Utrecht police force for leaking state secrets to lawbreakers. A victory at the polls by the PVV would amount to a third earth-shaking populist rejection of a leading Western nation’s political establishment. “It was really crazy to include a man with such a history on a police team where he was indirectly responsible for Wilders’s security,” veteran Dutch journalist Carel Brendel told me by e-mail. “This is the more worrying as the Brussels terror attacks showed that criminals and jihadists sometimes work together.” But such craziness is standard practice in the Netherlands, where authorities still hesitate to institute sensible safeguards for fear of being considered racist. So what will happen on March 15? In the wake of Brexit and the election of Donald Trump (both of which Wilders applauded), a victory at the polls by the PVV would amount to a third earth-shaking populist rejection of a leading Western nation’s political establishment. Yet given the number of major parties in the Netherlands (no fewer than eleven are represented in the parliament), and given the flat-out refusal of every last one of them ever to form a government with the PVV, it’s extremely unlikely that Wilders will end up as prime minister. Hans Moll, a former journalist for the newspaper NRC Handelsblad, tells me that as bad as things have gotten in Europe, most Dutch voters still haven’t been traumatized enough to shake off their deep-rooted pragmatism and will therefore “grant the VVD another chance.” Brendel agrees, stating flatly that Wilders won’t be a part of the next government “and he knows it.” They may be right. Which would be sad news, for another VVD victory will amount, at best, to a postponement of the necessary and inevitable — and, at worst, to a failure to grasp one last opportunity to rescue Dutch liberty before it’s too late. — Bruce Bawer is an American writer who has lived in Europe for 19 years. He is the author of Surrender: Appeasing Islam, Sacrificing Freedom and While Europe Slept: How Radical Islam Is Destroying the West from Within. This article appears in the March 20, 2017, issue of National Review.

Read more at:


We have previously addressed the suicide bomber who rules Turkey; a wild man with an iron fist rule. A trouble maker consistently fanning the flames of all those who hate Islam. A Muslim miscreant, he has now drawn the wrath of Germany and the Netherlands. How? by calling Netherlands policy of stopping Turkish rallies a Nazi tactic. Germany is aghast, Merkel was shocked that the term Nazis was used. In fact the Nazi is Erdogan, he is guilty of stifling free speech, jailed thousands, firing hundreds of thousands of judges, police, military, imams, foreigners, intellectuals, elitists and the usual suspects; he shut down the free press and demand the United States hand over Fetullah Gulen.

Turkey is now run by the same thugs that toppled Egypt’s Morsi. One thing stands out here, Turkey is a member of Nato. Obama never weighted in on the Turkish situation because, like Erdogan, Obama is a secret member of the Brotherhood.

Remember his reaction when the General al-Sisi interrupted Morsi’s reign of suppressing the freedoms of its citizens. Obama went berserk, stopped military aid, halted imports and pulled our Diplomatic core. This did not happen in Turkey and we know why. Obama is one of them.  But now Trump rules – he is not about to bow to Allah. 

NATO and the United States looks the other way when it is to their advantage, Turkey is strategically located enabling NATO and the U.S. coalition to use Turkish airspace; Turkey needs to be fore warned that their place in history will be dictated by their actions against the NATO countries and their diplomatic transgressions. For instance their sending weapons to the Palestinians aboard the MV Mavi Marmara. Israel intercepted the MV in international waters during its voyage to Gaza. Fighting erupted and 9 members on the MV were killed.

Click here for Israel and the Kurds. Could this be the reason why Erdogan hates Israel.

The Kurds and Kurdish-speaking Yezidis are once again caught in the grip of the Sunni-Shia vice · Against this background and often isolated, their special relationship with Israel stands out for the good: military advice, equipment and training are only some of the ways Israel has helped the Kurdish struggle for independence · “They only have trust in Israel,” says Brigadier General (res.) Tzuri Sagi, the man who led the Kurds to their stunning victories against Iraq in the sixties and seventies.

Erdogan has unleashed a tirade on the Kurds who make up a substantial number of citizens living in Turkey – approximately 20,000,000. Turkey is afraid of them breaking away. Kurds in Turkey and Iraq have defended themselves against outside forces, particularly the Iraqi shias and the pro-Assad forces.

In the latest act of incitement Erdogan spews vile from his rabid mouth that Israel is “playing with fire” concerning their actions on the Temple Mount.  However, Erdogan fails to mention the real crime against humanity is the actions regarding the Hagia Sophia. Once the center of Eastern Christendom, Constantinople competed with Rome.

From the date of its construction in 537 until 1453, it served as a Greek Orthodox cathedral and seat of the Patriarch of Constantinople, except between 1204 and 1261, when it was converted to a Roman Catholic cathedral under the Latin Empire. The building was a mosque from 29 May 1453 until 1931. It was then secularized and opened as a museum on 1 February 1935.Hagia Sophia Mars 2013.jpg

In 1453, Constantinople was conquered by the Ottoman Turks under Sultan Mehmed II, who ordered this main church of Orthodox Christianity converted into a mosque. By that point, the church had fallen into a state of disrepair. Nevertheless, the Christian cathedral made a strong impression on the new Ottoman rulers and they decided to convert it into a mosque.[9][10] The bells, altar, iconostasis, and sacrificial vessels and other relics were removed and the mosaics depicting Jesus, his Mother Mary, Christian saints and angels were also removed or plastered over. Islamic features—such as the mihrab, minbar, and four minarets—were added. It remained a mosque until 1931, when it was closed to the public for four years. It was re-opened in 1935 as a museum by the Republic of Turkey. Hagia Sophia is currently (2014) the second-most visited museum in Turkey, attracting almost 3.3 million visitors annually.

Before the world pays attention to this Turkish imbecile they must demand that the Hagia Sophia be restored to its rightful place in history. It is noteworthy to remind those Christians that Turkey once 100% Christian is now outnumbered by Muslims, 80,000,000 to less than 200,000. this is a manifestation of the treatment Christians receive in the Muslim world.



In two days the Dutch Master, Geert Wilders, will be asking for the vote of all patriotic citizens of the Netherlands. He is the odds on favorite to win. DutchMastersCigars.jpg

Geert Wilders is one of the key players in Wednesday’s Dutch election, and one of the most prominent and controversial populist leaders in Europe. As the founder and leader of Party For Freedom (PVV), Mr Wilders has rallied against the “Islamification” of the Netherlands. Geert Wilders op Prinsjesdag 2014 (cropped).jpg

If elected, Mr Wilders has promised to deliver a total “de-Islamification” of the Netherlands.

Bookmakers Betfair has made PVV the favourite to take the most seats with odds of 8/13, with VDD behind them at 5/4. However this does not necessarily mean that Mr Wilders will become the next Prime Minister. The Dutch parliament relies on coalition governments, and so far none of the main political groups have expressed an interest in working with the anti-EU party.

There is more work to do if he wins. The competing parties are not in the compromising mood. This will cause chaos. However, we believe Mr. Wilders will be able to put through a coalition government.

Wilder says he’s convinced that if something isn’t done to stop the spread of Islam across the West, our whole way of life will vanish and we’ll all live in Muslim-ridden slums, assaulted for our Christianity and love of free speech. To make his case, Wilders regularly takes politicians from around the world on tours of majority-Muslim neighborhoods in the Netherlands, offering them a glimpse of their future if they don’t beat back Islam.



Prior to the Spanish Conquistadors conquering Mexico the country was under the hegemony of the Aztec empire. The Aztec of Central Mexico built a tributary empire covering most of central Mexico. The Aztec were noted for practicing human sacrifice on a large scale. Along with this practice, they avoided killing enemies on the battlefield. Their warring casualty rate was far lower than that of their Spanish counterparts, whose principal objective was immediate slaughter during battle. This distinct Mesoamerican cultural tradition of human sacrifice ended with the Spanish conquest in the 16th century. Over the next centuries Mexican indigenous cultures were gradually subjected to Spanish colonial rule. One could say that the Spanish were ruthless killas. 

The Spanish first learned of Mexico during the Juan de Grijalva expedition of 1518.  The Spanish conquest of the Aztec Empire began in February 1519 when Hernán Cortés arrived at the port in Veracruz with 500 conquistadores. After taking control of that city, he moved on to the Aztec capital. In his search for gold and other riches, Cortés decided to invade and conquer the Aztec empire.

Storming of the Teocalli by Cortez and his troops. Emanuel Leutze. Painting, 1848

When the Spaniards arrived, the ruler of the Aztec empire was Moctezuma II, who was later killed. His successor and brother Cuitláhuac took control of the Aztec empire, but was among the first to fall from the first smallpox epidemic in the area a short time later. Unintentionally introduced by Spanish conquerors, among whom smallpox was endemic, the infectious disease ravaged Mesoamerica in the 1520s. It killed more than 3 million natives as they had no immunity. Other sources, however, mentioned that the death toll of the Aztecs might have reached 15 million (out of a population of less than 30 million) although such a high number conflicts with the 350,000 Aztecs who ruled an empire of 5 million or 10 million. Severely weakened, the Aztec empire was easily defeated by Cortés and his forces on his second return with the help of state of Tlaxcala whose population estimate was 300,000. The native population declined 80–90% by 1600 to 1–2.5 million. Any population estimate of pre-Columbian Mexico is bound to be a guess but 8–12 million is often suggested for the area encompassed by the modern nation.

The deaths caused by smallpox are believed to have triggered a rapid growth of Christianity in Mexico and the Americas. At first, the Aztecs believed the epidemic was a punishment from an angry god, but they later accepted their fate and no longer resisted the Spanish rule. Many of the surviving Aztecs believed that smallpox could be credited to the superiority of the Christian god, which resulted in their acceptance of Catholicism and yielding to the Spanish rule throughout Mexico.

The territory became part of the Spanish Empire under the name of New Spain. Mexico City was systematically rebuilt by Cortés following the Fall of Tenochtitlan in 1521. Much of the identity, traditions and architecture of Mexico developed during the 300-year colonial period. The capture of Tenochtitlan and refounding of Mexico City in 1521, marked the beginning of a 300-year-long colonial era during which Mexico was known as Nueva España (New Spain). The Kingdom of New Spain was created from the remnants of the Aztec hegemonic empire. Subsequent enlargements, such as the conquest of the Tarascan state, resulted in the creation of the Viceroyalty of New Spain in 1535. The Viceroyalty at its greatest extent included the territories of modern Mexico, Central America as far south as Costa Rica, and the western United States. The territorial evolution of Mexico after independence, noting the secession of Central America (purple), Chiapas annexed from Guatemala (blue), losses to the US (red, white and orange) and the reannexation of the Republic of Yucatan (red).

The indigenous population stabilized around one to one and a half million individuals in the 17th century from the most commonly accepted five to ten million pre-contact population. The population decline was primarily the result of communicable diseases (particularly small pox) introduced during the Columbian Exchange. During the three hundred years of the colonial era, Mexico received some 400,000 to half a million Europeans, 200,000 to 250,000 Africans and 40,000 to 120,000 Asians. The 18th century saw a great increase in the percentage of mestizos (The Penguin Atlas of World Population History.

Agustín de Iturbide became constitutional emperor of the First Mexican Empire in 1822. A revolt against him in 1823 established the United Mexican States. In 1824, a Republican Constitution was drafted and Guadalupe Victoria became the first president of the newly born country. In 1829 president Guerrero abolished slavery. The first decades of the post-independence period were marked by economic instability, which led to the Pastry War in 1836. There was constant strife between liberales, supporters of a federal form of government, and conservadores, who proposed a hierarchical form of government.

During this period, the frontier borderlands to the north became quite isolated from the government in Mexico City, and its monopolistic economic policies caused suffering. With limited trade, the people had difficulty meeting tax payments and resented the central government’s actions in collecting customs. Resentment built up from California to Texas. Both the mission system and the presidios had collapsed after the Spanish withdrew from the colony, causing great disruption especially in Alta California and New Mexico. The people in the borderlands had to raise local militias to protect themselves from hostile Native Americans. These areas developed in different directions from the center of the country.

Wanting to stabilize and develop the frontier, Mexico encouraged immigration into present-day Texas, as they were unable to persuade people from central Mexico to move into those areas. They allowed for religious freedom for the new settlers, who were primarily Protestant English speakers from the United States. Within several years, the Anglos far outnumbered the Tejano in the area. Itinerant traders traveled through the area, working by free market principles. The Tejano grew more separate from the government and due to its neglect, many supported the idea of independence and joined movements to that end, collaborating with the English-speaking Americans.

General Antonio López de Santa Anna, a centralist and two-time dictator, approved the Siete Leyes in 1836, a radical amendment that institutionalized the centralized form of government. When he suspended the 1824 Constitution, civil war spread across the country. Three new governments declared independence: the Republic of Texas, the Republic of the Rio Grande and the Republic of Yucatán.

Second Republic and Second Empire (1846–1867)

Benito Juárez, 26th President of Mexico

The 1846 United States annexation of the Republic of Texas and subsequent American military incursion into territory that was part of Coahuila (also claimed by Texas) instigated the Mexican–American War. The war was settled in 1848 via the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Mexico was forced to give up more than one-third of its land to the U.S., including Alta California, Santa Fe de Nuevo México and the territory claimed by Texas. A much smaller transfer of territory in what is today southern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico—known as the Gadsden Purchase—occurred in 1854.

The Caste War of Yucatán, the Maya uprising that began in 1847, was one of the most successful modern Native American revolts. Maya rebels, or Cruzob, maintained relatively independent enclaves in the peninsula until the 1930s.

So it be that the HISTORY OF MEXICO is one of conquest and revolt. The Spanish were red blooded killers, guilty today of mass murder and plunder. Their philosophy of conquest seeks no end. They are intent on  Spanishizing the Estados Unidos. Until they conquer America their appetite will not be satisfied.

When Mexican President’s lectures us it is necessary to turn the tables on their Spanish Ancestor killing machine. Americans must and will stand up to this Spanish onslaught. The Latino/Hispanic mind knows no end, seeking to monopolize public opinion and blame White Americans for their lot in life. The European Caucasian is in no way responsible for their misery. Time to stand up and throw their violent colonial history back in their face.   


Image result for BORDER WALL


There is a similarity to the Spanish invasion and that of the growing Muslim population. Evan a blind man can see what they plan on accomplishing, a slow but territorial takeover of America. A warning to America, wake up now tomorrow may be too late.

Thank you Wikipedia for insightful history of Mexico who provided the bulk of the above information.