Subject: WHAT IF HILLARY WINS ELECTION BUT IS THEN INDICTED BY FBI?
If any member of the Democratic Party – Kaine, Biden, Kerry, (or Bill Clinton) etc were to step into the Presidency, Clinton would still be driving the bus – it would just have to be ’supposedly’ invisible…… sort of like her criminal enterprises are invisible now (NOT!)
WHAT IF HILLARY WINS ELECTION BUT IS THEN INDICTED BY FBI?
With less than two weeks before November 8, James Comey of the FBI just announced he is reopening their investigation into Hillary Clinton‘s private email system. So with Hillary now the target of a criminal investigation, what happens if she is indicted or relinquishes her candidacy before the election, or even after. According to LawNewz.com here are some different scenarios:
1. If Clinton is indicted before the election
It’s highly unlikely an indictment would come before November 8. If it did, the indictment itself wouldn’t mean that Clinton could no longer run, as an indictment is only an accusation, not a conviction.
2. If Clinton steps down before the election
Should Clinton relinquish her candidacy before the election, the Democratic National Committee has a special meeting where they would choose a new candidate. Since we are exactly 11 days away from the election, there is one major problem: The ballot deadlines have passed in nearly every state. So the Democratic leadership would likely have to wage a public campaign to tell voters that if you vote for Clinton/Kaine, you are really voting for Biden (or whoever it maybe)/Kaine. Then the electors would have to change their vote for the new ticket when they meet on December 19th, 2016.
3. If Clinton wins the election and is indicted before the inauguration
Should Clinton be indicted after winning the election but before officially taking office, she could try to play beat-the-clock and hope to take office before her case concludes. Once a person is in office as President, it gets even more complicated, as we’ll see later. Should Clinton be indicted and convicted prior to her inauguration, and end up in jail, she may be deemed incapacitated, in which case Section 3 of the 20th Amendment kicks in and the Vice President-Elect, in this case Tim Kaine, would become President.
4. If Clinton wins the election and steps down before the inauguration
If Clinton becomes President-Elect and decides to step down before her inauguration, either due to being indicted or out of fear that an indictment may be imminent, it would be similar to the situation just described, and Kaine would become President. However in a situation where a candidate steps down after the general election, but before the Electoral College chooses the winner, federal law says the electors would be able to vote for whomever they want, although states may pass their own laws controlling this situation.
5. If the investigation continues after the election and Clinton wins and is inaugurated before a decision is made. Could Clinton be indicted when she becomes President?
The law is unsettled when it comes to this situation, but most opinions tend to believe Clinton would luck out, due to the philosophy that Presidents — and only Presidents — are immune from prosecution while in office.
The Department of Justice addressed this in a memorandum by the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) in 1973. That memo said that prosecution of a sitting President would undermine the power of the executive branch and its ability to function. In 2000, a new memo reviewed that determination and agreed that a President is immune from indictment and prosecution for the duration of their time in office. Of course, that memo acknowledged that no court has ruled on this issue yet. It almost happened during the 1974 Watergate scandal.
Sign up to get alerts about Dennis Michael Lynch’s upcoming Donald Trump film and breaking news.
“Your purpose will only be found in service to others, and in being connected to something far greater than your body/mind/ego.” ~
Dr. Wayne Dyer
FINALLY! ITALY SHOWS SOME COJONES, infuriating Muslims by shutting down multiple illegal mosques to prevent children from being radicalized by Islam
Thousands of Muslim headbangers gathered outside Rome’s Colosseum to protest the closure of small, illegal mosques and other places of worship in the Italian capital. The group gathered outside the iconic ancient Roman building to lift their asses to Allah as they promoted their right of freedom to worship. (Something Christians don’t get in Muslim countries)
UK Daily Mail An imam led the group in chants of ‘Allah Akbar’ which means ‘God is great,’ as they kneeled to the ground facing the Colosseum. The protest was organized by a Bangladeshi group, Dhuumcatu, which has complained that smaller or more informal mosques in Rome have been branded illegal by authorities for building violations.
At least 1.6 million Muslims live in the country but there are only a handful of mosques officially registered with the Italian government. Most worship takes place in houses and Islamic cultural centres.
Muslim held up signs reading in Italian ‘To close a place of worship is against faith’ during the demonstration
But, Italy’s Interior Minister Angelino Alfano said in August that ‘mini mosques in garages’ should not be allowed as it makes them difficult to monitor, possibly raising the risk of radicalisation. The Dhuumcatu Association, said police had closed three improvised mosques in Rome in last few months.
Sikdir Bulbul, 41, is an Italian citizen who has lived in Rome for 16 years. He said the mosque he helped establish in 2012 was shut down in September. He added: ‘Friday prayer is very important to us so today we have come to the Colosseum. Otherwise where else can we pray?’
Muslim children joined in the peaceful protest with un-Islamic signs about ‘peace and love’
Protesters attached placards to lamp post near the Colosseum stating they want City Hall to intervene. On its Facebook page the Dhuumcatu Association said there needed to be clearer rules on setting up mosques. A statement read: ‘We are sick of the criminalisation of our places of worship. There are no relevant regulations, and we cannot invent solutions independently of the authorities.’
The peaceful protest was criticized by conservative politicians. Gian Marco, leader of the anti immigration Northern League, said: Muslims today who decided to pray in front of the Colosseum had to be stopped. It was a scene that was unacceptable’.
A statement from the protesters read: ‘We are sick of the criminalization of our places of worship. There are no relevant regulations, and we cannot invent solutions independently of the authorities’
The Colosseum has great significance in the largely Catholic country. It is generally regarded by Christians as a site of the martyrdom of believers during the Roman Empire’s persecution of the religion.
A cross now stands outside the building inscribed with the words: ‘The amphitheater, one consecrated to triumphs, entertainments, and the impious worship of pagan gods, is now dedicated to the sufferings of the martyrs purified from impious superstitions’.
Italian Government Shuts Down Illegal Mosques And Tells Muslims To Obey The Law, Muslims Freak Out And Have Massive Prayer Demonstration In Front Of Coliseum, Italian Government Stands By Its Word And Doesn’t Back Down
Good for Italy for standing up to the Muslims. Likewise, it is fitting that Muslims should pray in front of the Coliseum. After all, it was a place where many Christians were martyred out of hatred for Christ, and how more fitting that Muslims, whose religion hates Christ, should make their disrespectful petitions as close as possible to the place where Christians were martyred:
Muslims know darn well they can pray anywhere. This is clear as the sky on a sunny day. They chose to pray in front of the coliseum because of its significance to the martyrdom of Christians, and not that they are against it, but that they support it. Mark my words, if these people had the opportunity to do what the pagan Romans did to the Christians, they would as soon as it was advantageous to them.
You will never have peace with Muslims in society because Islam does not want it. The only peace that you will have is a hudna– a temporary armistice whose sole purpose is to stop the assault against the Muslims so they can reconstitute themselves, only to wage an attack later. There is never any peace in Islam- there is conquest or submission, but no peace.
Do not be fooled by these pleas for “religious tolerance.” Islam does not tolerate anything except Islam. It is simply a front to get themselves deeper into Italy with the intentions of making conquest later. This was nothing less than an attempted show of force, and kudos to the Italian government for shutting down the mosques and so far not backing down in the face of Muslim complaints.
CHRISTIANS ARE BEING KILLED AND RAPED EVERY SINGLE DAY, PLEASE CLICK HERE TO MAKE A DONATION TO OUR RESCUE TEAM THAT WILL SAVE THE LIVES OF CHRISTIANS FROM PERSECUTION
OUR TIME ONLINE RUNS SHORT. SHOEBAT.COM FACES DAILY HARASSMENT BY FACEBOOK AND EACH TIME IT IS A DIFFERENT EXCUSE. IT IS BEST TO REACH US BY EITHER GOING DIRECTLY TO SHOEBAT.COM OR THROUGH OUR NEWSLETTER. CLICK HERE TO JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER, AND CONTINUE EDUCATING YOURSELF ON WHAT THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA WON’T REPORT