Hey Sandy, we caught you with your pants down. Bronx Girl, my ass. You are a fraudster.
TO AGAINST TRUMP YOUR CAREER IS OVER
Thom Tillis announces retirement from Senate after clash with Trump
Trump had promised to interview potential primary challengers against the North Carolina Republican following Saturday’s crucial vote.
Sen. Thom Tillis, one of the two Republicans to vote against advancing President Donald Trump’s “big, beautiful bill,” plans to retire from the Senate at the end of his term.
The North Carolina Republican announced on Sunday that he would not seek reelection in the 2026 cycle. Tillis would have been among the most vulnerable Republicans running next year, and faced threats from Trump to find a challenger after his vote against the president’s agenda Saturday night.
KEY GOP SENATOR DEFECTS ON CRUCIAL VOTE, IMPERILING TRUMP’S ‘BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL’ IN NARROW MAJORITY
The lawmaker voted against advancing the bill, and is likely to vote against final passage, because deep Medicaid cuts inside the colossal bill brought on the changes to the Medicaid provider tax rate.
Tillis railed against the slow death of bipartisanship in Washington in a statement.
“In Washington over the last few years, it’s become increasingly evident that leaders who are willing to embrace bipartisanship, compromise, and demonstrate independent thinking are becoming an endangered species,” he said.
SENATE REPUBLICANS RAM TRUMP’S ‘BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL’ THROUGH KEY TEST VOTE
U.S. President-elect Donald Trump smiles during Turning Point USA’s AmericaFest at the Phoenix Convention Center on December 22, 2024 in Phoenix, Arizona (Rebecca Noble/Getty Images)
Tills gave a shout-out to former Sens. Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema for their unwillingness to not “cave to their party bosses to nuke the filibuster for the sake of political expediency.”
“They ultimately retired and their presence in the Senate chamber has been sorely missed every day since,” he said.
“It underscores the greatest form of hypocrisy in American politics. When people see independent thinking on the other side, they cheer,” he continued. “But when those very same people see independent thinking coming from their side, they scorn, ostracize, and even censure them.”
He said that the choice broke down to spending time with his family, or spending another six years in Washington navigating the “the political theatre and partisan gridlock.”
TRUMP’S ‘BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL’ FACES REPUBLICAN FAMILY FEUD AS SENATE REVEALS ITS FINAL TEXT
UNITED STATES – JUNE 24: Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., is seen after the Senate luncheons in the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, June 24, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
“It’s not a hard choice, and I will not be seeking re-election,” he said.
His decision to retire tees up what will likely be a competitive race in North Carolina, and ones that Democrats will look to pounce on quickly.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
It also comes after Trump spent much of Saturday evening, while Vice President JD Vance, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and his leadership team worked over holdout fiscal hawks, blasting Tillis as a “grandstander” and vowing to interview potential primary challengers.
“Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the Primary against ‘Senator Thom’ Tillis,” Trump said on Truth Social. “I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks, looking for someone who will properly represent the Great People of North Carolina and, so importantly, the United States of America. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” The lawmaker voted against advancing the bill, and is likely to vote against final passage, because deep Medicaid cuts inside the colossal bill brought on the changes to the Medicaid provider tax rate.
Tillis railed against the slow death of bipartisanship in Washington in a statement.
“In Washington over the last few years, it’s become increasingly evident that leaders who are willing to embrace bipartisanship, compromise, and demonstrate independent thinking are becoming an endangered species,” he said.
SENATE REPUBLICANS RAM TRUMP’S ‘BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL’ THROUGH KEY TEST VOTE
U.S. President-elect Donald Trump smiles during Turning Point USA’s AmericaFest at the Phoenix Convention Center on December 22, 2024 in Phoenix, Arizona (Rebecca Noble/Getty Images)
Tills gave a shout-out to former Sens. Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema for their unwillingness to not “cave to their party bosses to nuke the filibuster for the sake of political expediency.”
“They ultimately retired and their presence in the Senate chamber has been sorely missed every day since,” he said.
“It underscores the greatest form of hypocrisy in American politics. When people see independent thinking on the other side, they cheer,” he continued. “But when those very same people see independent thinking coming from their side, they scorn, ostracize, and even censure them.”
He said that the choice broke down to spending time with his family, or spending another six years in Washington navigating the “the political theatre and partisan gridlock.”
TRUMP’S ‘BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL’ FACES REPUBLICAN FAMILY FEUD AS SENATE REVEALS ITS FINAL TEXT
UNITED STATES – JUNE 24: Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., is seen after the Senate luncheons in the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, June 24, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
“It’s not a hard choice, and I will not be seeking re-election,” he said.
His decision to retire tees up what will likely be a competitive race in North Carolina, and ones that Democrats will look to pounce on quickly.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
It also comes after Trump spent much of Saturday evening, while Vice President JD Vance, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and his leadership team worked over holdout fiscal hawks, blasting Tillis as a “grandstander” and vowing to interview potential primary challengers.
“Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the Primary against ‘Senator Thom’ Tillis,” Trump said on Truth Social. “I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks, looking for someone who will properly represent the Great People of North Carolina and, so importantly, the United States of America. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”
Alex Miller is a writer for Fox News Digital covering the U.S. Senate.
AYATOLLAH, BEATEN TO A PULP, STILL THE PUSSING FROM HIS TRAP
So we have it, the consensus is that Iran’s nuclear facilities have been totally destroyed. This is the opinion of those in the know. However, the Mother of all Mouths, the Slime Bag Ayatolla Khamenei, continues to sprout from vitriolic diatribe from the mouth that Iran had a big victory.
The tyrant is high on Iran Shine – Aragh sagi – little does he realize his life is shorter than a gypsy mouth. When he comes to, if ever, he will understand the mean of being handed his ass in a wheel barrow.
The Western World laughs at his diatribe which is only for public consumption. When the people of Iran realize what happened (currently no internet) they will call for the Shit Heads Hanging.
But don’t be surprised if he is shot point blank by one of his comrades who comprehend the idiocy in his satanic remarks. There are members of his inner circle who disagree with Ayatollah Amoeba. The calling for his head will begin with the Iranian people, Their well being subordinated to ayatollah’s ambitions to destroy Israel.
The future revolution is still on hold because the good citizens fear the IRGC commandos who rule via the gun, sending fear into the populace. Soon, we hope to see an uprising of monumentous dimensions that the great Allah cant’s stop.
LIBERALS GO YELLOW PANTS
After the 6-3 decision, the three liberals on the Supreme Court were reportedly seen running into their chambers for incontinence protection.
The look on their faces was as if the devil himself, after staring them in the eye, caused them to lose control of their bodily functions. Add into the rebuke, thrown by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, at Ketanji Brown Jackson, was an Octagon event. Don’t expect a rematch on this one; Jackson did not wake up from the count – last seen at the psychiatric hospital.
To quote Justice Kagan from 2022, “In the Trump years, people used to go to the Northern District of California, and in the Biden years, they go to Texas. It just can’t be right that one district judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks and leave it stopped for the years that it takes to go through the normal process.”
Kagan wants the whole cake so she can devour it like the legions of her supporters who continue to grow fat on the taxpayers dime.
And Sotomayor has the instinct of a hypotized dog. She could not smell a buried bone if her life depended on it. The Latina’s instinct is to follow the liberal herd toward Armageddon. Don’t forget her famous quote, “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life”.
SUPREME COURT JACKSON BELIEVES THAT HUNTING REPUBLICANS IS HER NUMBER ONE OBLIGATION
Trump celebrates Supreme Court limits on ‘colossal abuse of power’ by federal judges
Trump lamented the ‘handful of radical left judges‘ who blocked his executive orders
Trump singled out the author of the majority opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, for writing “brilliantly,” and also praised Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas, plus Chief Justice John Roberts, for joining the majority.
A universal injunction can be justified only as an exercise of equitable authority, yet Congress has granted federal courts no such power,” she added.
Coney Barrett took a swipe at Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, saying that her argument was “at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: [Jackson] decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”
In her dissent, Jackson warned that the ruling allowed the president to “violate the Constitution” and presented “an existential threat to the rule of law.”
If Jackson was in the home of her ancestors she would be holding a spear looking for Dr. Livingston, we presume.
Birthright citizenship is next. Read the following to understand the essential elements.
14th AMENDMENT, READ IT AND WEEP
PROGRESSIVES LAUGH AT TRUMP’S 14TH AMENDMENT INTERPRETATION
Legal scholars can debate the merits of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, but the final say in the debate is left to the Supreme Court.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/up-250000-children-born-illegal-migrants-2023-preliminary-report
The birthright citizenship debate exploded back into the national discourse this week after President Donald Trump signed an executive order banning it.
Trump’s ban was slated to take effect on Feb. 19, but a federal judge in Seattle on Thursday temporarily blocked the order. Some experts believe the issue will eventually be settled by the Supreme Court.
Should the ban eventually go into force, it would likely impact tens of thousands of children born to the parents of illegal immigrants.
Below is a previous post concerning the 14th Amendment, read it and come to your own conclusion.
Fox News Anchored in Stupidity on 14th Amendment
Ann Coulter, VDARE, August 19, 2015
By my count–so far–Fiorina, Chris Christie, Rick Perry and the entire Fox News commentariat are unfamiliar with a period of the nation’s history known as “the Civil War.” They seem to believe that the post-Civil War amendments were designed to ensure that the children of illegal aliens would be citizens, “anchor babies,” who can then bring in the whole family. (You wouldn’t want to break up families, would you?)
As FNC’s Bill O’Reilly authoritatively informed Donald Trump on Tuesday night: “The 14th Amendment says if you’re born here, you’re an American!”
I cover anchor babies in about five pages of my book, Adios, America, but apparently Bill O’Reilly and the rest of the scholars on Fox News aren’t what we call “readers.”
Still, how could anyone–even a not-very-bright person–imagine that granting citizenship to the children of illegal aliens is actually in our Constitution? I know the country was exuberant after the war, but I really don’t think our plate was so clear that Americans were consumed with passing a constitutional amendment to make illegal aliens’ kids citizens.
{snip}
“Luckily,” as FNC’s Shannon Bream put it Monday night, Fox had an “expert” to explain the details: Judge Andrew Napolitano, Fox’s senior judicial analyst.
Napolitano at least got the century right. He mentioned the Civil War–and then went on to inform Bream that the purpose of the 14th Amendment was to–I quote–“make certain that the former slaves and the native Americans would be recognized as American citizens no matter what kind of prejudice there might be against them.”
Huh. In 1884, 16 years after the 14th Amendment was ratified, John Elk, who–as you may have surmised by his name–was an Indian, had to go to the Supreme Court to argue that he was an American citizen because he was born in the United States.
He lost. In Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94, the Supreme Court ruled that the 14th Amendment did not grant Indians citizenship.
The “main object of the opening sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment,” the court explained–and not for the first or last time–“was to settle the question, upon which there had been a difference of opinion throughout the country and in this court, as to the citizenship of free negroes and to put it beyond doubt that all persons, white or black . . . should be citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside.”
American Indians were not made citizens until 1924. Lo those 56 years after the ratification of the 14th Amendment, Indians were not American citizens, despite the considered opinion of Judge Napolitano.
Of course it’s easy for legal experts to miss the welter of rulings on Indian citizenship inasmuch as they obtained citizenship in a law perplexingly titled: “THE INDIAN CITIZENSHIP ACT OF 1924.”
{snip}
The only reason the 14th Amendment doesn’t just come out and say “black people” is that–despite our Constitution being the product of vicious racists, who were dedicated to promoting white privilege and keeping down the black man (Hat tip: Ta-Nehisi Coates)–the Constitution never, ever mentions race.
{snip}
On one hand, we have noted legal expert Bill O’Reilly haranguing Donald Trump: “YOU WANT ME TO QUOTE YOU THE AMENDMENT??? IF YOU’RE BORN HERE YOU’RE AN AMERICAN. PERIOD! PERIOD!” (No, Bill–there’s no period. More like: “comma,” to parents born “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States “and of the state wherein they reside.”)
But on the other hand, we have Justice John Marshall Harlan II, who despite not being a Fox News legal expert, was no slouch. He wrote in the 1967 case, Afroyim v. Rusk, that the sponsors of the 14th Amendment feared that:
“Unless citizenship were defined, freedmen might, under the reasoning of the Dred Scott decision, be excluded by the courts from the scope of the amendment. It was agreed that, since the ‘courts have stumbled on the subject,’ it would be prudent to remove the ‘doubt thrown over’ it. The clause would essentially overrule Dred Scott and place beyond question the freedmen’s right of citizenship because of birth.”
It is true that in a divided 1898 case, U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, the Supreme Court granted citizenship to the children born to legal immigrants, with certain exceptions, such as for diplomats. But that decision was so obviously wrong, even the Yale Law Journal ridiculed it.
The majority opinion relied on feudal law regarding citizenship in a monarchy, rather than the Roman law pertaining to a republic–the illogic of which should be immediately apparent to American history buffs, who will recall an incident in our nation’s history known as “the American Revolution.”
Citizenship in a monarchy was all about geography–as it is in countries bristling with lords and vassals, which should not be confused with this country. Thus, under the majority’s logic in Wong Kim Ark, children born to American parents traveling in England would not be American citizens, but British subjects.
As ridiculous as it was to grant citizenship to the children born to legal immigrants under the 14th Amendment (which was about what again? That’s right: slaves freed by the Civil War), that’s a whole order of business different from allowing illegal aliens to sneak across the border, drop a baby and say, Ha-ha! You didn’t catch me! My kid’s a citizen–while Americans curse impotently under their breath.
As the Supreme Court said in Elk: “[N]o one can become a citizen of a nation without its consent.”
The anchor baby scam was invented 30 years ago by a liberal zealot, Justice William Brennan, who slipped a footnote into a 1982 Supreme Court opinion announcing that the kids born to illegals on U.S. soil are citizens. Fox News is treating Brennan’s crayon scratchings on the Constitution as part of our precious national inheritance.
Judge Richard Posner of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals is America’s most-cited federal judge–and, by the way, no friend to conservatives. In 2003, he wrote a concurrence simply in order to demand that Congress pass a law to stop “awarding citizenship to everyone born in the United States.”
The purpose of the 14th Amendment, he said, was “to grant citizenship to the recently freed slaves,” adding that “Congress would not be flouting the Constitution” if it passed a law “to put an end to the nonsense.”
{snip}
Our history and our Constitution are being perverted for the sole purpose of dumping immigrants on the country to take American jobs. So far, only Donald Trump is defending black history on the issue of the 14th Amendment. Fox News is using black people as a false flag to keep cheap Third World labor flowing.
(CLICK HERE) Original Article
(CLICK HERE) FOR THE 14TH AMENDMENT
Apparently our dumb politicians, judges included (Brennan) don’t understand the meaning of “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” A foreign national is still subject to the laws of his own country, period. “Get that liberal”
“WHO IS CALLING”
Mossad warns Iranian citizens to distance themselves from IRGC affiliates
The Israeli spy agency told residents that if an IRGC affiliate “suddenly receives a phone call or message on their personal phone,” they should move away from them immediately.
XTRA XTRA READ ALL ABOUT IT “BIG WIN AT THE SUPREME COURT
The Supreme Court on Friday delivered a major victory in President Donald Trump‘s quest to block lower courts from issuing universal injunctions that had upended many of his administration’s executive orders and actions.
Justices ruled 6-3 to allow the lower courts to issue injunctions only in limited instances, though the ruling leaves open the question of how the ruling will apply to the birthright citizenship order at the heart of the case.
The Supreme Court agreed this year to take up a trio of consolidated cases involving so-called universal injunctions handed down by federal district judges in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state. Judges in those districts had blocked Trump’s ban on birthright citizenship from taking force nationwide – which the Trump administration argued in their appeal to the Supreme Court was overly broad.
“The applications do not raise – and thus we do not address – the question whether the Executive Order violates the Citizenship Clause or Nationality Act,” Justice Amy Coney Barrett said, writing for the majority. “The issue before us is one of remedy: whether, under the Judiciary Act of 1789, federal courts have equitable authority to issue universal injunctions.”
“A universal injunction can be justified only as an exercise of equitable authority, yet Congress has granted federal courts no such power,” she added.
OF COURSE THE THREE WOKE JUSTICES VOTED NO. THIS WAS EXPECTED FROM THE PERVS. THEY LEGISLATE FROM THE BENCH, THE CONSTITUTION IS NOTHING TO THEM BUT A PIECE OF PAPER.
SCOTUS BLOCKS LOWER COURTS ON UNIVERSAL INJUNCTIONS
The Supreme Court granted a partial stay Friday of President Donald Trump‘s request to block lower courts from issuing universal injunctions, handing a partial victory to the administration as it looks to execute many of its top priorities via executive order and action.
Justices ruled 6-3 to allow the lower courts to issue injunctions in certain cases, though the ruling leaves open the question of how the ruling will apply to the birthright citizenship order in question.
“The applications do not raise — and thus we do not address — the question whether the Executive Order violates the Citizenship Clause or Nationality Act,” Justice Amy Coney Barrett said, writing for the majority. “The issue before us is one of remedy: whether, under the Judiciary Act of 1789, federal courts have equitable authority to issue universal injunctions.”
“A universal injunction can be justified only as an exercise of equitable authority, yet Congress has granted federal courts no such power,” she added.
Rather, the justices considered whether lower courts should have the authority to issue nationwide injunctions at all, or whether doing so exceeds their authority, as argued by U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer.
Lawyers for the Trump administration asked the high court to review the case earlier this year, arguing that the three lower courts, each of which blocked Trump’s birthright citizenship order from taking force nationwide, acted beyond the scope of their authority.
U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer stressed this point during oral arguments earlier this month, telling justices that universal injunctions “require judges to make rushed, high-stakes, low-information decisions.”
“They operate asymmetrically, forcing the government to win everywhere,” he said, and “invert,” in the Trump administration’s view, the ordinary hierarchical hierarchy of appellate review.
The Supreme Court decision will have sweeping implications, both in the near- and longer-term, with knock-down effects on the more than 300 federal lawsuits that have challenged White House actions since Trump’s second presidency began on Jan. 20, 2025.
U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi praised the high court’s ruling on social media Friday.
“Today, the Supreme Court instructed district courts to STOP the endless barrage of nationwide injunctions against President Trump,” she said, adding that the ruling “would not have been possible without tireless work from our excellent lawyers” at the Justice Department and U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer.
ALLAH WON’T LET US ACCEPT DEFEAT
The ayatollah Khamenei tries to save face by acknowledging the very fact that the eight or nine BOPs had no affect on Iran’s nuclear program. This is the same POS who says, “death to Israel and the United States” who has now been bloodied by #47 beyond repair. The Donald said straight out, we will do it again and again if you restart the path toward a nuclear weapon. In other words, the Western World and even the Arab States are calling this turd a real al’ahmaq. The time is now for the Iranian people to take back their freedoms by REVOLUTION, the only SOLUTION to his autocracy.
Iran sacrificed everything over its hatred for Israel, expert says
INSS researcher Beni Sabti argues that Iran is ramping up arrests and executions to paint a picture of damage control after successful Israeli infiltrations.
Iran arrests at least 700 Jews for alleged ties to Israel – report
Six additional people have been executed on suspicion of collaborating with Mossad, Israel’s public broadcaster KAN News noted.
Iran has arrested at least 700 people since Operation Rising Lion began due to alleged ties with Israel, the Iranian exiled women’s organization Association Femme Azadi reported on Thursday night.
“Reports confirm the arrest of rabbis and religious leaders in Tehran and Shiraz, accused, without evidence, of ties to Israel,” the organization wrote on its social media.
Ayatollah Khamenei says Iran dealt US ‘severe slap’, claims victory over Israel
Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Thursday claimed victory over Israel and said that his country had “dealt a severe slap to the face of America” during his first televised speech since a ceasefire between Iran and Israel was declared following their 12-day war.
Iran‘s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Thursday that the US had “gained nothing” from its attacks during the Islamic republic’s 12-day war with Israel that saw nuclear sites hit.
In a video broadcast on Iranian state television, Khamenei said the US “engaged in the war directly, convinced that its refusal to intervene would lead to the complete destruction of the Zionist regime”.
“It has gained nothing from this war,” Khamenei said of Washington, adding that “the Islamic republic won, and in retaliation dealt a severe slap to the face of America”.
“Should any aggression occur, the enemy will definitely pay a heavy price,” he said.
We certainly paid a heavy price, no Americans were killed, but Iran’s nuclear program turned into an outright disaster.
BOOM TIMES ARE THE FUTURE -WHERE IS THE CHICKEN LITTLE?
The smoke filled rooms are alive with the Bilderbergs, talking, scheming, planning the next phase of world domination. This is NATO at work. We have seen the world excalate to outright chaos in the past two decades. Borders were crossed with impunity, countries went bankrupt, clandestine murders took place and rogue countries defied the consensus.
The spotlight was on him as Trump took center stage, receiving the the accolades from his comrades with dignity. He was the guy in the room that mattered. And why was this? Because Trump had the CHUTZPAH to take care of Iran in such a way that they were more than shocked, but amazed and awed at the powerful message it sent to the rest of the world. “Don’t “F..k” with us.
‘Complete obliteration’: Israel, Iran and US agree on Trump’s Iran strikes
Iran sacrificed everything over its hatred for Israel, expert says
INSS researcher Beni Sabti argues that Iran is ramping up arrests and executions to paint a picture of damage control after successful Israeli infiltrations.
ByWALLA!JUNE 26, 2025 10:21Updated: JUNE 26, 2025 11:17
Iran is ramping up executions and arrests of suspected Israeli collaborators to restore the image of internal control, an Iran researcher at the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), Beni Sabti, told 103FM on Thursday.
As for Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s disappearance, Sabti is convinced that he is alive and well.
According to Sabti, “There have been several executions in recent days – three yesterday and one the day before. They say they are finding more drone hideouts and drone factories. We don’t know what is real and what is not.”
“In Iran, they must feign action, exposure, and discovery. In real time, they were not successful, but now, suddenly, a lot of spies are being discovered,” he added.
Regarding the regime’s strong grip on the country, Sabti said, “You won’t believe it. They’re holding concerts in the middle of the street. The regime is bringing the Tehran Philharmonic to the Grand Square, playing anti-revolutionary songs.”
Sabti also addressed developments within Iran. “No one has seen Khamenei, but he is alive and well,” he stated. “His office continues to release religious statements. We are entering a more religious month of Muharram.”
Disappearance of Khamenei
Sabti explained that Khamenei will take part in the religious ceremonies that will take place during the month: “He will appear in one of the prayers or ceremonies that will take place in the coming days. This is part of the projection of Iranian power – as soon as the leader exists, everything exists, like Sinwar in Hamas.”
Regarding the mysterious disappearance of the Iranian leader, he said: “In recent years, Iran has sacrificed everything on the altar of hatred for Israel, but these are technical delays. He will reemerge soon.”
Sabti clarified that the US could still revive the nuclear issue to some extent.
“Trump is lifting some of the sanctions and is starting to praise them again.”
Sabti: ‘The ball is in the Americans’ hands’
According to him, it is the United States that will determine the future of Iran’s nuclear program.
“They are paving the way again for delays and for renewed pressure. The ball is in the Americans’ hands. Either they are making a lot of mistakes, or this is once again a hidden plan. I don’t think they will be allowed to restore the nuclear program.”
“It has now been discovered that they hid centrifuges in a deeper part of Natanz, which is where we bombed,” Sabti claimed. “There is another part that was known to everyone at the IAEA, Israel, where they hid the advanced centrifuges.”
Sabti explained the Iranians’ method and how they hide and disperse their capabilities: “The Iranians work with a method of dispersion and concealment and disperse their capabilities in all sorts of places. We bombed Fordow, and suddenly it turns out that it is less important.”
Will Iranians revolt?
Regarding a possible uprising within Iran during Operation Rising Lion, he explained, “There was no chance that in 12 days people would revolt. They are being bombed, and it is impossible to hold demonstrations and protests under bombs. Small groups in the first days supported and slandered Khamenei. It was physically difficult to revolt, and there was also no drive, no engine that starts. It would have taken at least another month.”
“Sometimes, things come later – the rage accumulates and reveals the weakness of the regime. Going against the destroyed basis of the regime’s internal security would be something that would really fuel the protest, to see the regime naked. Maybe another month or two. Something in the Iranian public is off. That’s the thing about the trigger,” he said.
Iranians didn’t lose their dissent for the regime; it was just put on hold.
“It’s not that the Iranians forgot about their rage, their anger about electricity, water, or food. It simply didn’t reach the point of murder or a trigger,” he added.
“The Iranians will not forget their dire situation. This regime’s philharmonic orchestra display, maybe 20 people, went. It gives me the impression that Iranians know who is good and who is bad in this story. The public is still a public without weapons and without organization. We did what we could – regime change is their responsibility.”
