MESSAGE TO POTUS – “HAVE A NICE TRIP, SEE YOU NEXT FALL”

He ain’t no Smoken Joe, we will tell you that. However, it does appear that POTUS is smoking something because he is always on a trip – LSD? The latest flop appeared two days ago. Man, this guy love to bite the dust.

 

Previous encounters with the tarmac below.

The only thing this guy is beating are his knees. 

President Biden once took a swipe at Donald Trump over how his predecessor walked down a ramp at West Point — ironic in light of his own stair stumble on Friday.

“Look at how he steps and look at how I step,” Biden said in September 2020, referring to the former president gingerly walking down what he later called a “slippery” ramp after delivering a commencement speech.

“Watch how I run up ramps and he stumbles down ramps. OK? Come on.”

https://nypost.com/2021/03/19/biden-once-mocked-trump-over-slippery-ramp-descent/

A DRUNKEN LOUT – PELOSI’S HUBBY ARRESTED FOR DWI

Paul Pelosi was picked up for DWI, that is after he cracked up.

The California Highway Patrol said Pelosi was driving a 2021 Porsche that was hit by a 2014 Jeep as Pelosi’s car tried to cross a state road in Napa County, ABC10 reported. No one was hurt in the accident. Pelosi was booked into jail at 4:13 a.m. the following morning and released on a $5,000 bond a few hours later.

Paul Pelosi DUI arrest: Napa County DA’s office refuses to release body cam footage during investigation

0:00 / 1:44

BeyondWords

The Napa County District Attorney’s Office decided it will not release any dash or body camera footage from Paul Pelosi’s DUI arrest right now because it could “jeopardize” the ongoing investigation, according to the California Highway Patrol (CHP).

“The Public Records Unit (PRU) has determined the Department possesses records responsive to your request,” CHP told Fox News Digital in a letter in a response to a California Public Records Act request last week.

Paul Pelosi, husband of U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, arrives for a reception at the White House on May 16, 2022.

Paul Pelosi, husband of U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, arrives for a reception at the White House on May 16, 2022. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

“However, the Napa County District Attorney’s Office has advised the release of records would jeopardize an ongoing investigation. As such, records are being withheld pursuant to Government Code section 6254 (f).”

IF HE WAS A REPUBLICAN, THE RECORDS WOULD BE RELEASED. THERE ARE TWO SETS OF LAWS IN THIS COUNTRY, ONE FOR THE DEMOCRATS AND THE ACTUAL LAW FOR THE REPUBLICANS

BIDEN’S LIFE IS A BEACH – OUR LIFE IS A BITCH – BIDEN HAS THUMBED HIS NOSE AT AMERICA

Over the weekend Branden took a stroll along the Delaware seashore. We are surprised that a shark didn’t befriend him; after all, aren’t attorneys known as “sharks.” Thought that would be a nice gesture for a cousin to show some brotherly love. Don’t you think?

The real world is beckoning for Branden to do something, anything, but time has took its toll on him. Like free radicals running inside his mind, oxygenating his cerebellum, filling his brain, what is left of it, with plaque. We should not despair though, because this train wreck in the best thing that happened to the Republican party. Come November we will pick up the pieces – do what we have to do to take back our Country from the FREE RADICALS that have insulted it, turning our once beautiful America into a haven for the illegal, the gangbanger, the murder, the drug pusher, all in the name of Guess What, Democracy, Freedom, Liberty.A migrant caravan on the way to the US border in Tapachula, Mexico on June 6, 2022.

As you have seen, their values are not our values, their culture is not our culture, their morals are not our morals. Come January 2023 the take back will occur; we will hear scowls, see riots, see cities go up in flames, but all of that will be to no avail as the Police will be energized to enforce the law, not stand down and watch criminals violate it with impunity.

Back to Biden, STUPID JOE DOESN’T KNOW THE STREET. He is on the verge of finding out how America feels about him. Thumbs down from all quarters. $10 a Gallon Joe has two diseases, one  untreatable, the other treatable.  Socialism, the worst disease known to man and the second disease, Inflation, only treatable by Republicans and they could give a flying “f” to save Joe.

OPINION

Leftist groups are taking cues from Biden and helping migrant caravans

“Do not come.”

Vice President Kamala Harris’s message to illegal immigrants doesn’t seem to be getting through. A big new caravan set out Monday from the southern Mexican border town of Tapachula, with hopes of attracting as many as 15,000.

And why wouldn’t they come? Weak borders invite illegal immigration. In April, more than half of the 200,000 people Border Patrol “encountered” on the Mexican border were let go into the United States, either immediately or after brief detention. All told, the Biden-Harris administration has released more than 1 million illegal border-crossers into the United States, few if any of whom will ever be made to leave.

With odds like that of getting past the border, of course there will be more caravans.
These caravans are not entirely spontaneous. This latest version seems to have been organized by Centro de Dignificación Humana, a Mexican leftist group that has been involved in several illegal-immigrant caravans over the past couple years. Other leftist groups have masterminded earlier caravans.

But these aren’t efforts that require a lot of money. Migrants in Central America or bottled up by authorities in southern Mexico are looking for options to head north, and if they don’t have something already arranged, tagging along with a caravan is worth a try. They don’t have to pay smugglers, and there’s safety in numbers from criminal predators. The large groups can also help overwhelm Mexican law enforcement and paramilitary units trying to block the roads north.

 

HI YO SILVER – THE FED HAS TESTED POSITIVE FOR INFLATION DISEASE – DID YOU BUY GOLD?

The Fed is Trapped

May Research Letter – Too Soon

The Fed’s main policy tool for fighting inflation is to hike interest rates. This reduces the demand side of the economy by tightening credit conditions and causing financial asset prices to decline which crimps investor savings and consumer demand and increases unemployment. But raising interest rates does not stimulate commodity supplies, the core inflationary problem today. In fact, raising interest rates could have the opposite effect because it makes the cost of capital for investment in new commodity production higher.

After years of money printing and interest rate suppression, policy makers have created a historic speculative environment in financial assets. But now, the inflation genie is out of the bottle, and to restore its credibility, the Fed has no choice but to burst the bubble. At the same time, it is powerless to stop commodity inflation. To illustrate just how trapped the Fed is, it has never ended a hiking cycle with the Fed Funds Rate below CPI. But the implied terminal rate in the Fed Funds Futures market is now just 2.9% in early 2023 while CPI is still at 8.3%. If the efficient market hypothesis holds, which it rarely does, CPI must drop precipitously over the next three quarters. Such is highly unlikely based on our commodity supply analysis shown above. There is a much bigger risk based on our work that inflation stays elevated, and the Fed ends up having to hike more and for longer than is currently priced in, as in all past tightening cycles. Alternatively, there is the risk that the stock market correction continues under the existing planned increases and the Fed panics and ends its hiking cycle for the first time with real rates still in negative territory. In all cases, the market seems to be in state of delusion today with the average participant still buying the dip in overvalued tech, crypto, and fixed income assets, hoping for a return to those manias, while underestimating the risk of continued high inflation in valuable, scarce, tangible resources.

Crescat Capital

 Monthly Research Letter

Too Soon to Buy the Dip, Unless It’s Commodities

The valuation of the Wilshire 5000 US Total Stock Market Index reached a historic high of 207% of GDP in 2021 in the wake of the Covid-19 stimulus and record corporate earnings. We are now entering what in Crescat’s analysis is an inflationary recession. The index is off 15% from its all-time highs but still trading at 187% of GDP. During comparable stagflations of the early 1970s and 1980s, the associated equity bear markets did not end until the total stock market capitalization traded down to an average of 35% of GDP. Even if nominal GDP were to grow a full 20% over the next two years, not out of reason in today’s historically high inflationary environment, there is the potential for a further 78% decline in stock prices from current levels to settle at the low multiples of the last stagflationary era. While the market could bottom at higher multiples this time around, we must acknowledge the downside risk if we are indeed in just the early stages of new stagflationary regime.

INFLATION BOMB COMING – BIDEN TEAM RUNNING SCARED IN NOVEMBER – HEADING INTO A TRAIN WRECK

DEMOCRATS DIAGNOSED WITH INFLATION DISEASE


President Joe Biden’s administration is considering a drawdown of tariffs on Chinese goods in an effort to combat record-high inflation in the U.S.

Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo confirmed the potential move on Sunday, saying Biden has personally asked her team to look into the issue. Inflation in the U.S. hit a 40-year high in March and is expected to escalate in the coming months.

List of rail accidents (1900–1909) - Wikiwand

List of rail accidents (1900–1909 …

wikiwand.com

Some of the tariffs, imposed by former President Donald Trump, affect household goods that could be purchased more cheaply from China. Raimondo previously praised some of Trump’s tariffs on China as “very effective.”

MEDIA, ECONOMIC EXPERTS REACT TO APRIL INFLATION NUMBERS: ‘NOT A LOT OF COMFORT’

Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo speaks during a press briefing in the briefing room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, July 22, 2021. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo speaks during a press briefing in the briefing room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, July 22, 2021. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik) (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

The potential move comes as the Biden White House searches frantically for inflation remedies. Biden released a 3-point plan to combat inflation last week, but even members of his own party criticized it as lackluster.

MONKEY POX – WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

Smallpox/Monkeypox The New York times has an article today (6/3/22) implying that monkey pox is a disease so far infecting men who have sex with other men in the USA. They looked at 17 cases and all but one had sex with other men. 3 were immuocompromised. 14 traveled to other countries.

It also said the stockpiles of the old vaccine are decades old and may have lost potency, AND that it. (ACAM2000) may cause heart perimyocarditis 6 CASES PER 1000 DOSES! Quote: “The U.S. emergency stockpile holds 100 million doses of the older smallpox vaccine called ACAM2000. But the vaccine contains live vaccinia virus, and causes about six cases of myopericarditis — inflammation of the heart muscle — for every 1,000 people who receive it.”

“In Switzerland, the World Health Organization maintains about 2.4 million doses of the vaccine used to eradicate smallpox, and it has stockpiled another 31 million doses in five donor countries that could be released to countries in need.”

“The W.H.O. is also assessing the newer Jynneos vaccine for prequalification, a step needed for its use in many countries.” but are not scheduled to meet until October on that issue. Scientific advisers to the C.D.C. voted in November to recommend Jynneos for immunizing researchers and health care personnel who are at risk of exposure to smallpox or monkeypox.”

That vaccine is made by the Danish company Bavarian Nordic and is supposed to be safe for everyone, women, children, immune compromised… quote: “ACAM2000 cannot be used in pregnant women, infants or those who are immunocompromised — exactly the people who most need protection from the monkeypox virus. Jynneos, by contrast, has been shown to be safe in older adults, people with H.I.V. or AIDS and those who have received bone marrow transplants and are therefore immunocompromised.”

Supposedly the USA only has about a million doses of it so far but has ordered more. The article says the antivirals for the disease have been tested only on animals and the USA has some on hand. We have 1.7 million doses of tecovirimat (TPOX) on hand and ordered 7.5 million dollars worth more before the outbreak began. Here’s the link to NYT article.: NYTimes: 21 Americans Infected With Monkeypox, C.D.C. Reports 21 Americans Infected With Monkeypox, C.D.C. Reports https://nyti.ms/3MgVJ6n JYNNEOS SMALLPOX VACCINE INSERT and cardiac AESIs https://www.fda.gov/media/131078/download Cardiac AESI (Adverse Event of Special Interest aka AESI) in Jynneos drug insert: 1.3% in Jynneos recipients (that would be about 4 out of every 300 ppl) versus .2% in saline placebo group. (Which would be 1 out of every 500)

They compared the previously vaxxed with the old smallpox who got Jynneos to the ppl who only got Jynneos. (Shouldn’t they of used a saline placebo for that one too? ). 2.1% of the previously vaxxed had cardiac AESI. Which would be 21 out of every 1000 recipients). Sidenote: I think making the percentages into whole numbers of ppl per 100s makes more sense than percentages of reactions to lay people. Its easier to understand if you say x number of people, instead of 2.1 ppl per hundred. Because there is no such thing as a 1/10ths person.

Rounding up or down is not accurate when you consider populations of millions. Before I thought of this I normally would use averages and 2.1% would be 2 people out of a hundred. But when you get up to a thousand people you lose 1 persons adverse event. So when you vax 100,000 you would lose 100 AESI. Ect. Back to safety study report from Insert.. It mentions most Cardiac AESI had elevated troponin levels. When your troponin levels are high you are at higher risk of heart attack. To me it appears the new “safe” smallpox vaccine actually causes heart issues at a much higher rate than the saline control group. And more than the 6/1000 the NYT said the old vaccine caused. IMO anyone with previous smallpox shot definitely should be told their risk is 21 out of 1000 of having heart issues. That is a far cry SAFE. The same goes for the 4 out of every 300 cardiac AESI in the not previously vaccinated for smallpox. JYNNEOS VACCINE INSERT

https://www.fda.gov/media/131078/download

21 Americans Infected With Monkeypox, C.D.C. Reports

SAVAGES ARE RAMPING UP THEIR CALL FOR GUN CONTROL

Miscreants have gone on a rampage, but the signs were there indicating that these cold blooded murders were intent on committing mass killings. The Democrats are now, once again, pushing for gun control laws to stop US (law abiding citizens – Constitutionalists – Americans- from protecting our families and loved ones.

But one thing is crystal clear. LAW ABIDING GUN OWNERS, those who the Left smear with a vengeance are the target. For them, any gun, is fair game. To them, the 2nd Amendment is only a bunch of words. They will do any thing in their power to take away our God Given Right to defend ourselves from the Lunatics who now hold sway in Congress.

They are not after gun control, they are after people control. You see, anyone who disagrees with a Democrat is a threat to their hold on power. Once the citizenry is without arms, the Gestapo (Democrat Tyrants) will rationalize those who previously owned fire-arms.

Wait and see, they will go down the FBI list, one by one, then they will target those on it, from A to Z. This is what Stalin did, this is what Mao did, this is what Pol Pot did, this is what Hitler did, this is what Castro did. Don’t think it will be any different here; it won’t. Affectively, the Democrats are a killing machine. If its not abortion, it is the bullet.  

 

 

REVOLUTION IS THE SOLUTION

As you see below, recent killings were committed by deranged individual who were previously know to police. The purchase of deadly weapons by them should have been prohibited, should have been nipped in the bud. A one day due diligence would have stopped them in their tracks. Police would be notified, facebook, youtube, tiktok and other social media sites would have revealed that they had agendas. 

The latest account from authorities indicates the shooter trapped the 21 victims with him inside two adjoining classrooms for more than an hour as officers gathered in the hallway, despite repeated 911 calls from students asking for help. The killing at the Elementary School in Uvalde was carried out by a local 18-year-old student, Salvador Ramos, who was shot and killed by law enforcement.

The killer featured photos and stories of automatic firearms—as well as selfies strongly resembling the mugshot of the killer shared by the Texas Department of Public Safety. Several of Ramos’ former friends said he often posted images of guns and videos of himself screaming at his mother, with whom he appeared to have a fraught relationship.

Of the weapons posted, one appeared to be a Daniel Defense AR-15 with a high-capacity magazine. A TikTok account with the same handle and profile picture as the Instagram, also disappeared in the minutes following the Texas governor’s press conference, featured only a clip of a mobile game and the line “Kids be scared IRL.” Both accounts used the bio line TheBiggestOpp.

A gunman who killed five people and injured two others in a series of shootings in Denver is believed to have targeted the victims based on previous personal and business dealings and was investigated by police twice in the last two years.

Denver police said that Lyndon James McLeod, 47, who was also killed in the deadly rampage on Monday night, knew most of the victims and was “on the radar of law enforcement”.

Matt Clark, the commander of Denver police’s major crimes division, said: “Based on what we know, it does appear that the offender was targeting specific people in this case. The victims were known to the offender.”

Denver’s police chief, Paul Pazen, said McLeod had been investigated in 2020 and early 2021 but that charges had not been filed against him. These investigations “will be part of this ongoing investigation into this violent crime spree”, he said.

SUSSMANN FIX WAS IN FROM DAY ONE

We had a very hard time digesting the result in the Sussmann trial. John Durham did a fine job, but the Judge was on the take; a long time Democrat he did not allow evidence which would implicate “lock her up”.  Additionally, the jury consisted of donors to the Biden and Clinton campaigns. How in the life of anyone would they actually believe that the jury would convict one of their own?

But this is not over by a long shot. Durham is working behind the scenes. Others are on the hit list, they soon will be indicted.  However, Durham is after the Big Kahuna. To interview her is paramount. Let her lie out of this one and BINGO; they will have “lock her up.”  She can join the other criminals who preceded her.

Sussmann prosecutors also take aim at Clinton, FBI and the news mediaPublic Relations - The Washington Post

Testimony shows how the FBI worried about being “played” in the wake of the 2016 probe of Hillary Clinton’s emails.

Special counsel John Durham was appointed by Trump administration Attorney General William P. Barr to probe whether the federal agents who investigated the 2016 Trump campaign committed wrongdoing. (Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP)
Listen
9 min
Comment
Gift Article

The trial of well-connected lawyer Michael Sussmann centers on whether he lied to the FBI while sharing potentially damaging allegations about Donald Trump at a key moment in the 2016 presidential campaign.

But the first week of testimony showed the prosecution’s hopes for a conviction rest largely on a much broader set of assertions: that the FBI, the Hillary Clinton campaign and the press collided in ultimately harmful ways, leading to the public airing of unsubstantiated allegations shortly before Election Day.

Sussmann’s trial is the first courtroom test of the investigative work done by special counsel John Durham, appointed by Trump administration Attorney General William P. Barr to probe whether the federal agents who investigated the 2016 Trump campaign committed wrongdoing. Somewhat surprisingly, in this prosecution and another scheduled for trial this fall, Durham’s team contends not that FBI officials committed crimes but were the victims of others’ lies.

Sussmann, a cybersecurity lawyer who has represented Democrats and technology firms, has denied breaking the law. His defense team argues that what prosecutors suggest was a duplicitous conspiracy to smear Trump was in truth people acting independently, and with good intentions, to raise alarms about what they saw as suspect behavior.

Michael Sussman’s federal trial: What to know

Suspicions were already running high in political and government circles in September 2016 when Sussmann arranged a meeting with the FBI’s top lawyer, James Baker, to share important computer data and analysis suggesting a secret communications back channel between the Trump Organization and Russia-based Alfa-Bank.

When the two men sat down in a conference room on the 7th floor of the J. Edgar Hoover building, the FBI was wary of being played by political operatives. Two months earlier, then-FBI Director James B. Comey had ended the investigation into Clinton’s use of private email for sensitive government issues, holding a highly unusual news conference to publicly criticize her conduct.

Still furious over that issue, the Clinton campaign had refused to meet with FBI agents to discuss security amid an ongoing Russian hacking and leaking campaign. And both the Clinton campaign and the FBI suspected people in the Trump campaign might be conspiring with Russia to interfere with the election.

In testimony that stretched over three days last week, Baker insisted Sussmann told him he had brought the computer data not on behalf of any client or company. Baker said if he had known, as the prosecution charges, that Sussmann was acting on behalf of the Clinton campaign and a technology executive, he would have handled the information differently — and might not have even agreed to the meeting.

Key trial witness recounts meeting and ordeal that followed

Baker is the sole direct witness to the conversation, and Sussmann’s lawyers have repeatedly challenged his credibility on this point, noting that in one earlier interview, Baker said Sussmann was representing cybersecurity clients; in another, he seemed to say he didn’t remember that part of the talk. Prosecutors introduced billing records from Sussmann’s law firm listing the time he spent on the issue as work on behalf of the Clinton campaign.

Baker told the jury that while his earlier statements may be inconsistent, he is “100 percent confident” of his memory that Sussmann claimed to be acting on his own.

He testified Sussmann also told him a major newspaper — he later learned it was the New York Times — was preparing to write about the allegations. That worried Baker: He knew a news story would likely cause any suspicious communications to stop, and so he wanted the FBI to be able to investigate before an article appeared. Prosecutors say it was Sussmann himself who had provided the information to the Times.

“It would have concerned me, whether there was an effort to play the FBI and drag us into the ongoing political campaign and make us a pawn in the campaign in some fashion,” Baker said. “It would have alarmed me, this nexus with the press and whether there was some effort to engineer a situation where the FBI would be investigating this material and that the press — even though it couldn’t determine the reliability of that material and couldn’t report on it — could report the FBI was investigating it.”

Ultimately, the FBI investigated the computer data and decided it was nothing suspicious.

Sussmann trial tests credibility of 2016 figures

Baker’s account underpins the core assertion of the prosecution case — that Sussmann lied about the client he was representing to try to spark both an FBI investigation and a news story about an issue that would hurt Trump’s election chances.

Left unsaid was another reason Baker might have reacted differently if he had known Sussmann was acting on Clinton’s behalf: Of all of Comey’s senior advisers who worked on the Clinton email case, Baker was arguably the most critical of how she and her staff had communicated on sensitive topics, according to those who worked with him at the time, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.

If Baker had known Sussmann’s information came from a Clinton campaign opposition-research effort, he might have had a much more negative reaction. It’s unclear whether Sussmann was aware at the time of Baker’s views about the Clinton email case.

The Sussmann trial is being closely watched by lawyers, government officials, and political operatives for potential fallout. On the witness stand, Baker bemoaned the “maelstrom” of false accusations against him from Trump and other supporters since his meeting with Sussmann.

The case has even drawn the attention of the world’s richest person, Elon Musk, who tweeted repeatedly about it this past week — a particularly awkward situation for Baker since Musk is attempting to purchase Twitter, where Baker now works as a lawyer.

“Bet most people still don’t know that a Clinton campaign lawyer, using campaign funds, created an elaborate hoax about Trump and Russia. Makes you wonder what else is fake,” Musk tweeted Friday, after Baker finished testifying.

‘Elon Musk’s Crash Course’: Three key arguments from the Tesla documentary

Baker told the jury that a few days after the Sussmann meeting he spoke to the Times reporter working on the story, Eric Lichtblau, and asked that the story not publish until the FBI could investigate further.

Baker said it is unusual but not unheard of for a government agency to make such a request.

The newspaper told Baker that they needed more time to investigate — which, he testified, bought the FBI more time to do the same.

Lichtblau, a prizewinning reporter who has since left the paper, is expected to be called as a defense witness as early as this coming week. There are unresolved questions about what he would talk about if he testifies. Lichtblau has agreed to discuss his conversations with Sussmann and Joffe, but lawyers for the reporter say he should not have to answer questions on other topics. U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper signaled last week that he may hold a hearing on the subject before Lichtblau takes the stand.

The prosecution contends that what Sussmann and the Clinton campaign were really after was a kind of “October surprise” — a damaging revelation against Trump shortly before voting began. At times, the prosecution team has suggested that reporters can be patsies in that strategy.

“I’m sure you know that reporters often publish things that aren’t true?” Assistant Special Counsel Andrew DeFilippis asked former Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook.

Mook appeared taken aback, and disputed the idea that the Clinton campaign thought the Alfa-Bank allegation was any kind of “silver bullet” against Trump. Mook said he was not told about anyone taking the Alfa-Bank allegations to the FBI, nor did he authorize anyone to do so.

The campaign did decide — and Clinton herself agreed — to give the allegations to a reporter, he said. Slate published a story about the allegations on Oct. 31, 2016.

Prosecutors say Sussmann used connections to share dirt with FBI

Mook told jurors the Clinton campaign simply “did not trust” the FBI. “Two or three of the most damaging days of the campaign were caused by James Comey, not Donald Trump,” he said, referring to how the FBI had handled the email case.

Mook added that Alfa-Bank was just one of many stories at the time about possible connections between Russia and Trump.

If news stories about Alfa-Bank weren’t that important to Mook, they seemed important to everyone else.

In February 2017 — after Trump took office — Sussmann was still trying to persuade the U.S. government to pursue the Alfa-Bank issue, and still trying to invoke the Times to make that happen, according to another witness.

Mark Chadason, a former CIA officer, said he met with Sussmann and helped set up a meeting between the lawyer and agency officials to discuss the Alfa-Bank claims and a related allegation.

In an email at the time, Chadason wrote that Sussmann said his client wanted the information to go to a senior CIA official, adding that “if there is no interest, he would most likely go to New York Times.”

5571 Comments

Stay informed with your free trial to The Washington Post.

24/7 coverage from 1000+ journalists. Subscriber-exclusive events. Unmatched political and international news.

Get 4 weeks freeYou can cancel anytime

"Where Revolution is the Solution" Taking back the Empire