All posts by thenewbostonteaparty

HILLARY CLINTON FROTHS WITH daMOUT

Hillary Clinton said in an interview over the weekend that Mark Zuckerberg’s embrace of misinformation on his Facebook platform was “authoritarian.”

Clinton also told The Atlantic that there’s a good reason to believe Zuckerberg’s Facebook is “not just going to reelect Trump, but intend[s] to reelect Trump.”

The magazine reported interviewing Clinton at an event Saturday at the Sundance Film Festival hosted by its owner.

Clinton was quoted as being horrified and alarmed by what she views as Zuckerberg’s unwillingness to battle the spread of disinformation and propaganda on Facebook.

BUTTIGIEG SAYS FACEBOOK’S ZUCKERBERG HAS TOO MUCH POWER

Hillary Clinton called Mark Zuckerman "authoritarian” in views on misinformation.

Hillary Clinton called Mark Zuckerman “authoritarian” in views on misinformation. (Reuters)

The former secretary of state pointed to a slowed-down video of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that went viral, according to the magazine. The video made it appear Pelosi was slurring her words and was designed to make it appear she was cognitively impaired.

“Google took it off YouTube … so I contacted Facebook,” Clinton told the Atlantic. “I said, ‘Why are you guys keeping this up? This is blatantly false. Your competitors have taken it down.’ And their response was, ‘We think our users can make up their own minds.’”

The Atlantic then reported asking Clinton whether she saw as Trumpian Zuckerberg’s reasoning that Facebook users can decide for themselves what to believe.

Clinton said in response, “It’s Trumpian. It’s authoritarian.”

PELOSI SLAMS ‘SHAMEFUL’ FACEBOOK, ACCUSES TECH GIANT OF MISLEADING USERS

A Facebook spokesman told Fox News on Sunday it had no comment on Clinton’s remarks. The spokesman pointed to an October speech at Georgetown University in which Zuckerberg spoke about the importance of protecting free expression.

In her interview with the Atlantic, Clinton said allusions to Zuckerberg as a world leader were fitting.

“I feel like you’re negotiating with a foreign power sometimes,” she said of her conversations with Facebook top executives. “He’s immensely powerful,” she told me. “This is a global company that has huge influence in ways that we’re only beginning to understand.”

About 2020, Clinton was quoted as saying Facebook is “not just going to reelect Trump, but intend[s] to reelect Trump.”

That unnerves her, the magazine reported.

GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Zuckerberg has been “somehow persuaded,” she told the magazine, “that it’s to his and Facebook’s advantage not to cross Trump. That’s what I believe. And it just gives me a pit in my stomach.”

SO LET IT BE WRITTEN SO LET IT BE DONE

Super Bowl Weekend is at hand. Super Tuesday and Super Wednesday are at hand. The impeachment process has gone up in flames. The Democrat orchestrated hoax has fallen on deaf ears. Mueller report down in flames, Kavanaugh take-out down in flames and now the Impeachment of the Greatest President of the past two hundred years has gone up in flames.

Three great places to be starting Sunday, the Super Bowl, the House Chamber on Tuesday and the Senate on Wednesday.

The Super Bowl pits Kansas City against San Francisco on Sunday in the great city of Miami. Tuesday, President Trump enters the lions den, but this time he is embraced by Christians and on Wednesday, the Senate votes to not “CHARGE THE PRESIDENT WITH HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS.”

SO LET IT BE WRITTEN SO LET IT BE DONE

THE PSEUDO PALESTINIANS NEVER MISS AN OPPORTUNITY TO ESTABLISH A PALESTINIAN STATE

Trump Middle East plan: Palestinians reject ‘conspiracy’

  • 29 January 2020

Related Topics

Media captionWhy Trump’s Middle East plan is so divisive

Palestinians have dismissed US President Donald Trump’s new Middle East peace plan as a “conspiracy”.

It envisages a Palestinian state and recognition of Israeli sovereignty over settlements in the occupied West Bank.

Mr Trump said Jerusalem would remain Israel’s “undivided” capital, but the Palestinian capital would “include areas of East Jerusalem”.

Reacting to Tuesday’s announcement, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said Jerusalem was “not for sale”.

“All our rights are not for sale and are not for bargain,” he added.

Media captionPalestinian President Mahmoud Abbas says the “conspiracy deal won’t pass”

Palestinians took to the streets on Wednesday as part of a “day of rage” called by political factions.

The Palestinian health ministry said three people were injured by live fire in clashes between protesters and Israeli security forces near Ramallah in the northern West Bank. They are in a stable condition.

Several people were also injured by rubber-coated bullets during a protest in the village of Abu Dis, in the eastern suburbs of Jerusalem, and one person was hit by a rubber bullet near Arroub camp in the southern West Bank, according to the Palestinian Wafa news agency.ADVERTISEMENT

Ads by Teads

Meanwhile, Israeli Tourism Minister Yariv Levin said a cabinet vote on whether to apply Israeli sovereignty to most Jewish settlements in the West Bank, the strategic Jordan Valley and the northern Dead Sea had been delayed for several days for technical and procedural reasons.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had said the vote would take place on Sunday.

More than 600,000 Jews live in about 140 settlements built since Israel’s 1967 occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The settlements are considered illegal under international law, although Israel disputes this.

The Jordan Valley is a fertile strip of land running along the border with Jordan that makes up almost 30% of the West Bank. Palestinians say the valley would form an integral part of the land that they want for a future state.

Media captionWhy the ancient city of Jerusalem is so important

Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said the Trump administration had simply “copied and pasted” the steps that Mr Netanyahu wanted to see implemented.

“It’s about annexation, it’s about apartheid,” he said. “Moving to the de jure annexation of settlements is something that was given the green light yesterday.”

Mr Trump’s blueprint for solving one of the world’s longest-running conflicts was drafted under the stewardship of his son-in-law, Jared Kushner.

What did Mr Abbas say?

Speaking on Tuesday, he said it was “impossible for any Palestinian, Arab, Muslim or Christian child to accept” a Palestinian state without Jerusalem as its capital.

Media captionPresident Trump: “No Palestinians or Israelis will be uprooted from their homes”

“We say a thousand times, no, no, no,” he said. “We rejected this deal from the start and our stance was correct.”

The militant Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip, also rejected the deal which it said aimed “to liquidate the Palestinian national project”.

And Mr Netanyahu?

The Israeli prime minister described Mr Trump’s plan as the “deal of the century”.

Media captionNetanyahu: Trump’s peace plan is “the deal of the century”

Israel “will not miss this opportunity”, Mr Netanyahu said.

“May God bless us all with security, prosperity and peace!” he added.

In an interview with Fox News on Wednesday, Mr Netanyahu said that over time the Palestinians would “see they’ll never get a better deal”.

How about international reaction?

A spokesman for United Nations Secretary General António Guterres said its positions had been defined by relevant Security Council and General Assembly resolutions.

“The United Nations remains committed to supporting Palestinians and Israelis to resolve the conflict on the basis of United Nations resolutions, international law and bilateral agreements and realising the vision of two states – Israel and Palestine – living side by side in peace and security within recognized borders, on the basis of the pre-1967 lines,” he added.

Palestinian protesters wave the national flag and a portrait of president Mahmud Abbas during a demonstration in the West Bank city of Ramallah on January 28, 2020
Image captionPalestinian protesters carried pictures of Mahmoud Abbas through the streets of Ramallah on Tuesday

Saudi Arabia and Egypt welcomed President Trump’s efforts and called on Israel and the Palestinians to resume negotiations.

Jordan said the only path to peace was to establish an independent Palestinian state, based on pre-1967 boundaries, while Turkey’s foreign ministry dismissed Mr Trump’s proposals as an “annexation plan” aimed, it said, at killing a two-state solution and stealing Palestinian land for money.

British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab urged the Palestinians to give the plans “genuine and fair consideration and explore whether they might prove a first step on the road back to negotiations”.

What are Trump’s key proposals?

  • The US will recognise Israeli sovereignty over swathes of the West Bank, including Jewish settlements and much of the Jordan river valley
  • The move will “more than double the Palestinian territory and provide a Palestinian capital in eastern Jerusalem”, where Mr Trump says the US will open an embassy. The Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) said the plan would give Palestinians control over 15% of what it called “historic Palestine”
  • Jerusalem “will remain Israel’s undivided capital”. The Palestinians insist East Jerusalem be the capital of their future state
  • “No Palestinians or Israelis will be uprooted from their homes” – suggesting that existing Jewish settlements in the Israeli-occupied West Bank will remain
  • Israel will work with Jordan to ensure the status quo governing the key holy site in Jerusalem known to Jews as the Temple Mount and al-Haram al-Sharif to Muslims is preserved. Jordan runs the religious trust that administers the site
  • Territory allocated to Palestinians in Mr Trump’s map “will remain open and undeveloped for a period of four years”. During that time, Palestinians can study the deal, negotiate with Israel, and “achieve the criteria for statehood”
Map showing Donald Trump's plan for a State of Palestine

Mr Trump also indicated that the West Bank would not be cut in half under the plan.

“We will also work to create a contiguous territory within the future Palestinian state, for when the conditions for statehood are met, including the firm rejection of terrorism,” he said.

Grey line

Israeli and Palestinian media react

By BBC Monitoring

Palestinian media unequivocally condemned the plan. “No Palestinian will either accept it or agree to engage with it,” said Palestinian Authority newspaper Al-Hayat al-Jadidah.

The Hamas-run Filastin online said: “There is no full half of the deal of century because the entire bottle is empty.”

Israeli opinion diverged along political lines with right-leaning media applauding the “historic move”. The pro-Netanyahu paper Yisrael Hayom said: “It would be a sin if we didn’t support it and immediately apply Israeli sovereignty to Israeli settlements.”

Other outlets had greater sympathy for the Palestinian cause and noted that however well Mr Netanyahu’s annexation plans played to his supporters in Israel’s upcoming general election, he would soon stand trial on charges of corruption.

“Netanyahu’s drama is inconceivable: on the day he gets a green light to realise his wet dream, to annex as he wishes… a harsh indictment is filed,” said one commentator in the liberal newspaper Haaretz. “He will not escape his fate.”

Grey line

What’s the background?

Media captionIs Palestinian-Israel peace plan out of reach?

The Palestinians broke off contacts with the Trump administration in December 2017, after Mr Trump recognised Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and move the US embassy to the city from Tel Aviv.

Since then, the US has ended both bilateral aid for Palestinians and contributions for the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA).

In November, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the US had abandoned its four-decades-old position that Jewish settlements in the West Bank were inconsistent with international law.

What are the issues at stake?

Of all the conflicts in the Middle East, that between Israel and the Palestinians has been the most intractable. Although the two sides signed a peace accord in 1993, more than a quarter of a century on they are arguably as far apart as ever.

Jerusalem: Both Israel and the Palestinians hold competing claims to the city. Israel, which occupied the formerly Jordanian-held eastern part in 1967, regards the whole of Jerusalem as its capital. The Palestinians insist on East Jerusalem – home to about 350,000 of their community – as their future capital

Palestinian statehood: The Palestinians want an independent state of their own, comprising the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem. Israeli prime ministers have publicly accepted the notion of a Palestinian state alongside Israel – but not what form it should take. Benjamin Netanyahu has said any Palestinian state should be demilitarised with the powers to govern itself but not to threaten Israel.

Recognition: Israel insists that any peace deal must include Palestinian recognition of it as the “nation-state of the Jewish people”, arguing that without this Palestinians will continue to press their own national claims to the land, causing the conflict to endure. The Palestinians say what Israel calls itself is its own business, but to recognise it as the Jewish state will discriminate against Israel’s Arab population of Palestinian origin, who are Muslims, Christians and Druze.

Borders: Both sides have fundamentally different ideas as to where the boundaries of a potential Palestinian state should be. The Palestinians insist on borders based on ceasefire lines which separated Israel and East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza between 1949 and 1967. Israel says those lines are militarily indefensible and were never intended to be permanent. It has not said where borders should be, other than making clear its own eastern border should be along the Jordan River.

Settlements: Since 1967, Israel has built about 140 settlements in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem, as well as 121 outposts – settlements built without the government’s authorisation. Settlements are considered illegal by most of the international community, though Israel disputes this. Palestinians say all settlements must be removed for a Palestinian state to be viable. Mr Netanyahu has vowed not only to never to uproot any settlements but to bring them under Israeli sovereignty.

Refugees: The UN says its agencies support about 5.5 million Palestinian refugees in the Middle East (the Palestinian Authority says there are up to 6 million), including the descendants of people who fled or were expelled by Jewish forces from what became Israel in the 1948-49 war. Palestinians insist on their right to return to their former homes, but Israel says they are not entitled to, noting that such a move would overwhelm it demographically and lead to its end as a Jewish state.

JEWS THROWN TO THE LIONS – OBAMA’S WEAK TRY TO REWRITE HISTORY

JANUARY 2, 2017 THENEWBOSTONTEAPARTY

At one time the Christians were berated as fools – believers of a foreign God bent on secret rituals. Paganism still ruled the land of Caesar. Anti-Christian policies in the Roman Empire occurred intermittently over a period of over two centuries until the year 313AD when the Roman Emperors Constantine the Great and Licinius jointly promulgated the Edict of Milan which legalised the Christian religion. The persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire was carried out by the state and also by local authorities on a sporadic, ad hoc basis, often at the whims of local communities. Starting in 250, empire-wide persecution took place by decree of the emperor Decius. The edict was in force for eighteen months, during which time some Christians were killed while others betrayed their faith to escape execution.

The Torches of Nero, by Henryk Siemiradzki. According to Tacitus, Nero used Christians as human torches.

But what goes around usually comes around. The Christians of yesterday are the Jews of today. They have been ostracized for millennia for their faith. At last count there were only 12 million who believed in Judaism. However, small their lot they continue to be blamed for the world’s problems. Let it be said that the Holy Bible is well documented. It records biblical history in minute detail, spelling out who occupied the Holy Land from time immemorial till 70 A.D. when the Romans sacked Jerusalem and ran the remaining Jews out of the country.

Image result for ancient israel map

However, there were always Jews living there surreptitiously. And History records Judah and Israel as the map shows. Click here for more maps of ancient Israel. It is very important to mention that when the Ottoman Turks controlled the Levant (Palestine – in actuality Israel and Judah) there was never a cry by the Muslim population for statehood. It wasn’t until the Jews pressed for their right did the pseudo Palestinians demand blood.THE QUR’AN SAYS THAT ALLAH GAVE THE LAND OF ISRAEL TO THE JEWS
AND WILL RESTORE THEM TO IT AT THE END OF DAYS

THE QUR’AN SAYS:

“To Moses We [Allah] gave nine clear signs. Ask the Israelites how he [Moses] first appeared amongst them. Pharoah said to him: ‘Moses, I can see that you are bewitched.’ ‘You know full well,’ he [Moses] replied, ‘that none but the Lord of the heavens and the earth has revealed these visible signs. Pharoah, you are doomed.’”

“Pharoah sought to scare them [the Israelites] out of the land [of Israel]: but We [Allah] drowned him [Pharoah] together with all who were with him. Then We [Allah] said to the Israelites: ‘Dwell in this land [the Land of Israel]. When the promise of the hereafter [End of Days] comes to be fulfilled, We [Allah] shall assemble you [the Israelites] all together [in the Land of Israel].”

“We [Allah] have revealed the Qur’an with the truth, and with the truth it has come down. We have sent you [Muhammed] forth only to proclaim good news and to give warning.”

[Qur’an, “Night Journey,” chapter 17:100-104]

I trace the origin of today’s war against the west to the post World War I period, 1918-1921. This was a time when new sovereign nations were emerging in Europe and the winds of freedom and hope were sweeping across a Middle East that had been suppressed for centuries by the recently defunct Ottoman Turkish Empire.

In those heady years, many Arabs and Muslims reverently hoped that new and modern sovereign Arab nations would develop alongside a Jewish State existing in the ancestral homeland promised to the Jews by the almighty in a Torah that was, and is, considered to be divine by Muslims and Christians as well as by Jews.

In fact, like the Christian New Testament, the Koran, the holy book of Islam, recognizes Israel as a Jewish State in the following passages:

…. “the words of Moses to his people. He said: “Remember, my people, the favors, which Allah has bestowed upon you…. Enter, my people, the holy land which Allah has assigned for you.” (Sura V) …. “When the promise of the hereafter cometh to pass (at Judgment Day) we shall bring you as a crowd gathered out of various nations.” (Sura XVII: 104)

CLICK HERE for more information on the 1919 peace agreement. 

When the British took over the land of Israel, suddenly the dream of a homeland for the Jews became a real possibility as opposed to a fervent hope.

By this time, there were between 85,000 to 100,000 Jews living in the Land of Israel, of a total population of 600,000. (See History of the Jews by Paul Johnson, p. 430.) Most of the Arabs living in the land had migrated there only in the previous thirty years attracted by the jobs created by the Jews who were building and farming. (Note that when Jews began to immigrate to Palestine in large numbers in 1882, fewer than 250,000 Arabs lived there.

To capture the essence of the conflict the Jews don’t have use hyperbole to validate their point. The facts going back five thousand years are well documented and support the Israeli position. This does not sit well with the Arabs who in most case fail to accept history.

Bluntly stated the Jewsish Democrats who got succered in backing Obama for the past eight years, they no who they are, must be defeated in their reelection bids.

If these Jews were Catholic, there is no doubt they would be asking the Priest for absolution, for they COMMITTED A MORTAL SIN AGAINST ISRAEL AND GOD.

PENCIL NECK

Noun[edit]

pencil-neck (plural pencil-necks)

  1. (informal) A person with a very thin neck.
  2. (idiomaticUSderogatory) An insubstantial person; a weakling.


pencil neck – Urban Dictionary

Someone who either: 1. Has a neck as thin as a pencil. Is used as an insult on anyone though. 2. Is a pussy. You know, lack’s bravery, courage and shit.

www.washingtonpost.com › politics › 2019/03/29
Trump and GOP target ‘pencil-neck’ Adam Schiff as their post …

Mar 29, 2019 – Moments after taking the stage at a Michigan campaign rally Thursday night, Trump mocked the California lawmaker as “little pencilneck Adam … CLICK HERE FOR THE GUTS

Presidents are held to a higher standard; when it comes to representing the honorable position of Commander in Chief Americans expect them to represent the country in a formal manner. However, President Trump has gone outside the box. This is no fault of his own. From day one he has been attacked, lambasted, berated, insulted and called an idiot.

With an onslaught of criticisms and debasements it is only appropriate you fight back, fight back hard and fight back harder. For the Democrats to go the low road of impeachment is an act of weakness, a cowardly act, one that is based on the moral turpitude of the accuser. In this case all Democrats deserve to be called out, for they are the enemy.

The perpetrators of this impeachment hoax are Adam “Pencil Neck” Schiff, Nancy “Crazy” Pelosi and Jerry “Fat” Nadler. Of course, we as Americans, find it unacceptable for the President to leap to the low road. But in this instance, PAINTING LABELS ON THE OPPOSITION IS NECESSARY. They must be outed for what they are. Tags are the best way to do this and Americans are, in this special case, find it acceptable.

A FLAMING LIBERAL MAKES THE CASE FOR TRUMP

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-defense-hunter-biden-john-bolton-senate

Harvard Law School Professor Alan Dershowitz, delivering a spirited constitutional defense of President Trump at his Senate impeachment trial Monday night, flatly turned toward House impeachment managers and declared they had picked “dangerous” and “wrong” charges against the president — noting that neither “abuse of power” nor “obstruction of Congress” was remotely close to an impeachable offense as the framers had intended.

In a dramatic primetime moment, the liberal constitutional law scholar reiterated that although he voted for Hillary Clinton, he could not find constitutional justification for the impeachment of a president for non-criminal conduct, or conduct that was not at least “akin” to defined criminal conduct.

Harvard Law School Professor Alan Dershowitz, delivering a spirited constitutional defense of President Trump at his Senate impeachment trial Monday night, flatly turned toward House impeachment managers and declared they had picked “dangerous” and “wrong” charges against the president — noting that neither “abuse of power” nor “obstruction of Congress” was remotely close to an impeachable offense as the framers had intended. In a dramatic primetime moment, the liberal constitutional law scholar reiterated that although he voted for Hillary Clinton, he could not find constitutional justification for the impeachment of a president for non-criminal conduct, or conduct that was not at least “akin” to defined criminal conduct. “I’m sorry, House managers, you just picked the wrong criteria. You picked the most dangerous possible criteria to serve as a precedent for how we supervise and oversee future presidents,” Dershowitz told the House Democrats, including head House impeachment manager Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif.

“I’m sorry, House managers, you just picked the wrong criteria. You picked the most dangerous possible criteria to serve as a precedent for how we supervise and oversee future presidents,” Dershowitz told the House Democrats, including head House impeachment manager Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif.

STATE OF THE UNION

To put it bluntly, the “STATE OF THE UNION” is divided. You think it was bad prior to the Civil War, today we have the devise politics in the past two hundred years.. Radical leftists, revolutionary types, political operatives, perpetrators of fake news, ANTIFA, lying politicians and outright Marxist apparatchiks, are out to stir up trouble. Their objective is to destroy the country. They care little or nothing about the Constitution. To them outright anarchy is the solution. Only then will they be able to prevail over the populace and that is with a gun made by the capitalists they are seeking to destroy.

On February 4th 2020, President Trump will walk into the House of Representatives to not only a Standing Ovation, but one given only to Kings and Queens. Expect upwards of five hundred billion worldwide to tune in. Sitting next to Vice President Pence will be the Speaker of the House. This will be a real spectacle not seen in modern times. To see President Trump, the conqueror, come face to face with the conquered.

Expect a multitude of STANDING ROOM OVATIONS FROM THE REPUBLICAN SIDE, but we can bet not one of the Democrat ACCUSERS will stand and cheer during the STATE of the UNION.

When Donald J. Trump walked into the White House in 2016, he was determined to drain the swamp. This was a threat to those whose lives depended on feasting off its goodies. We don’t have to tell you, but Hunter Biden is the quintessential example of the embedded criminals that have sucked this country dry. Trump has told Europe to pay up, to pay their fair share, he has eliminated threats with dispatch, but most of all Trump is respected by the world.

HATE ON THE LEFT
THE ENEMY

We don’t have to mention the economy, which, as you know, is steaming a head with abandon. But keep in mind the latest polling that predicts a tight race come November. There is no sure thing in politics. Ask Hillary about that. As we go down the road to November, expect turmoil, hostility from the Democrat Rats.

One thing to be aware of, we will have those on the other side to say that if Trump repeats, “the election was stolen.” We admonish them, they are third country rabble rouser – pseudo dictatorial types who have a problem with a free election when the results has their team is on the short end of the stick. This is what transpired in 2016. Hillary was stomped by Trump.

We advise those who are determined to undermine the coming election. You have nine months to prove that you are eligible to vote. You have nine months to procure the proper identification proving who you are which makes you eligible to vote. Don’t tell us that you did know that proof of citizenship was mandatory; don’t tell us you never had a picture I.D.; don’t tell us you don’t have the $5 to get a State or Federal issued photo I.D. Don’t tell us you can’t find your birth certificate or forget where you were born. Don’t tell us that you were born in the States but your parents never notified the department of vital statistics. Don’t tell us you are eighty years old and never voted, never had a driver’s license, never applied for a birth certificate, but now you want to vote. Why? Where is your Social Security Card we may ask.?

The 2016 Democratic Party platform, which is revised by party members every four years, states, “We will continue to fight against discriminatory voter identification laws, which disproportionately burden young voters, diverse communities, people of color, low-income families, people with disabilities, the elderly, and women.”

THE ONLY REASON DEMOCRATS ARE AGAINST VOTER I.D. LAWS IS THAT THEY WANT TO CHEAT.

REVOLUTION IS THE SOLUTION”

The “E Pluribus Unum” is in direct conflict with “Diversity Is Strength” — a civil struggle that will determine the fate of the country. One should not underestimate the depth of this civil divide.
Steve Schatz
6 years ago

THE BLACK DEATH – YEAR OF THE RAT – BLACK SWAN EVENT

During the Black Death pandemic in the middle of the fourteenth century upwards of two hundred million people may have succumbed to the virus.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Black Death is thought to have originated in the dry plains of Central Asia or East Asia, where it traveled along the Silk Road, reaching Crimea by 1343. From there, it was most likely carried by fleas living on the black rats that traveled on all merchant ships, spreading throughout the Mediterranean Basin and Europe.

The Black Death is estimated to have killed 30% to 60% of Europe’s population. In total, the plague may have reduced the world population from an estimated 475 million to 350–375 million in the 14th century. It took 200 years for the world population to recover to its previous level. The plague recurred as outbreaks in Europe until the 19th century.

The plague originated in Wuhan China, a city of 11 million people. Effectively the city has been on lock down. Those confirmed cases around the world, mostly resulted in a visit to Wuhan. It remains to be seen what effect this will have on the world economies. As it is, China’s economy is in a precarious situation. A one or two percent decrease in GDP would have a grave effect on those who are put out of work.

So far over 2000 cases have been reported with over 100 deaths. Statistics say that more than 11,000 have been affected

Source: The Centre for Health Protection of the Department of Health of Hong KongCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
Credit: Map by Daniel Wood/NPR. Research by Susie Cummings and Ayda Pourasad/NPR.

JOHN PODESTA

Remember that despicable dude, John Podesta? On the night of Hillary “lock her up” Clinton’s devastating stomping by Donald J. Trump, this lackey told to Clinton’s followers to go home and get some sleep and come back in the morning. Tap on to watch the frenzied Trump derangement syndrome crown.

At the same time the Trump campaign was celebrating the greatest upset in political history and Podesta (this guy is no doubt effd up in the head). Imagine saying the Russians helped him when in fact the Steele Dossier commissioned by a two bit slut with Russian help was a non issue to him.

Secondly, Obama was licking Putin’s ass for eight years, pulling our missiles back from Poland, telling the Baltics that they had to stand on their own two feet – and you have this POS saying Russia’s Putin helped Trump. Podesta’s narrative is another example of a lying progressive with a hair across his ass sprouting diarrhea laced invective from their big mouths.

JOHN PODESTA: Well, look, I think the Russians clearly intervened in the election, and I think that the– now we know that the CIA, the director of national intelligence, the FBI, all agree that the Russians intervened to help Trump. They have noted this week.

And, NBC first revealed that Vladimir Putin was personally involved with that. So I think that people went to the polls, they cast their votes, Hillary Clinton got 2.9 million more votes than Donald Trump, but Donald Trump is claiming the electoral college victory, and tomorrow the electors will get to vote.

TODD: You didn’t answer the question. Do you believe this was a free and fair election?

PODESTA: Well, I think it was distorted by Russian intervention, let’s put it that way… A foreign adversary directly intervened in our democratic institution, and tried to tilt the election to Donald Trump. I think that if you look back and see what happened over the past few weeks, you’ll see the way that votes broke. I was highly critical of the way the FBI director managed the situation with respect to the Russian engagement vs. Hillary Clinton’s emails. I think that all had an effect on the election.

READ BELOW – THE RAW FACTS – A WORD FOR PODESTA, SHOVE THESE UP WHERE THE SUN DON’T SHINE

“Wow, Report Just Out! Google manipulated from 2.6 million to 16 million votes for Hillary Clinton in 2016 Election!” Trump tweeted. “This was put out by a Clinton supporter, not a Trump Supporter! Google should be sued. My victory was even bigger than thought!”

Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump

Wow, Report Just Out! Google manipulated from 2.6 million to 16 million votes for Hillary Clinton in 2016 Election! This was put out by a Clinton supporter, not a Trump Supporter! Google should be sued. My victory was even bigger than thought! @JudicialWatch171K10:52 AM – Aug 19, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy114K people are talking about this

CLICK HER TO READ THE STORY FROM THE DAILY WIRE

Image result for the daily wire

TWENTIETH CENTURY GOLD RUSH ON THE HORIZON

The start of the 49er gold rush was caused by accident- it was totally unexpected. It happened when James W. Marshall stumbled upon some gold nuggets in the waterwheel at Sutter’s mill in the year of 1848. Word soon got out that there was gold in ” them thar hills.” The gold rush had started.

1850 Woman and Men in California Gold Rush.jpg

Today, the economies of the world are fed not by gold but by the ubiquitous paper of reserve banks. As in the Weimar Republic the day of reckoning is one day closer to a catastrophic disaster.

Gold Past $10,000 Gold in 2019 finally burst through the $1,350 ceiling that had been established during the crash of 2013. Gold’s current price of $1,550 may be materially higher than where it has traded over the past six years, and it has returned most gold miners to profitability, but it is nothing compared to where the price of gold is headed. For the benefit of new readers and to jog the memories of long-time followers, let us work through the admittedly circuitous but conceptually simple reasoning behind the reason why the dollar price of gold is heading well above $10,000 per ounce. The first step is to dispense with the quantity theory of money that underlies modern economics. This theory stretches back to the sixteenth century but was given its modern theoretical framework by Irving Fisher, who penned the famous equation that lies at the heart of monetarism: M • V = P • T, where M is the total amount of money in circulation on average, V the average frequency with which a unit of money is spent (its “velocity”), P the price level, and T the number of transactions, or volume of trade. “In short,” wrote Fisher, the quantity theory asserts that (provided velocity of circulation and volume of trade are unchanged) if we increase the number of dollars, whether by renaming coins, or by debasing coins, or by increasing coinage, or by any other means, prices will be increased in the same proportion. It is the number, and not the weight, that is essential. This fact needs great emphasis.* A cursory analysis of Fisher’s equation reveals it to be a tautology: the quantity of money transactions equals the quantity of sales in monetary terms, which is true by definition and thus makes the equation utterly useless.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL READ – INFORMATION IS KNOWLEDGE – ACTING ON KNOWLEDGE IS PROTECTION FROM DISASTER

Myrmikan Research January 14, 2020 Daniel Oliver Myrmikan Capital, LLC doliver@myrmikan.com (646) 797-3134

Fire ants 01.jpg