Hunter Biden sent note to China firm chairman on behalf of family, urged $10M wire transfer: email
Hunter Biden in 2017 sent ‘best wishes’ from ‘entire Biden family’ to China firm chairman, requested $10M wire
AND THE SHOW MUST ON FOR THE NEXT FOUR YEARS, WE WILL DO TO THEM WHAT THEY DID TO US
December 16, 1773
The Boston Tea Party was an American political and mercantile protest by the Sons of Liberty in Boston, Massachusetts, on December 16, 1773. Wikipedia
KILLER CUOMO, the maniac governor of NY, changed voting rules back in the summer, allowing anyone to send in an absentee ballot. Well you know what that means, Cheating, Stealing and Fraud. You would not believe it but Claudia Tenney was up by 28,000 votes before the absentee ballot fiasco started. Now she is up by 12 votes. Please tell us, if this isn’t fraud, what is?
Before absentee votes were counted, Tenney had a lead of more than 28,000 votes on election night, Syracuse.com reported. Tenney was elected to Congress in 2016 but was defeated by Brindisi in 2018.
A lying cocaine addict by the name of Hunter Biden, who learned his lessons well from none other than his C.S. lying father. A no nothing for 47 years, now with the complicity of BIG FAKE NEWS including the liberal scum who run NPR is about to RUN OUR COUNTRY DOWN.
What can we do about it? PLENTY! These dirtbags do not know what will hit them. A conspiracy of MAGA proportions has led to this result. They are guilty of the SHERMAN ANTITRUST ACT. The Fake News organizations conspired behind close doors to not report any negative news on this LYING SHAKEDOWN ARTIST.
Sherman Antitrust Act, first legislation enacted by the U.S. Congress (1890) to curb concentrations of power that interfere with trade and reduce economic competition. It was named for U.S. Sen. John Sherman of Ohio, who was an expert on the regulation of commerce.
One of the act’s main provisions outlaws all combinations that restrain trade between states or with foreign nations. This prohibition applies not only to formal cartels but also to any agreement to fix prices, limit industrial output, share markets, or exclude competition. A second key provision makes illegal all attempts to monopolize any part of trade or commerce in the United States. These two provisions, which constitute the heart of the Sherman Act, are enforceable by the U.S. Department of Justice through litigation in the federal courts. Firms found in violation of the act can be ordered dissolved by the courts, and injunctions to prohibit illegal practices can be issued. Violations are punishable by fines and imprisonment. Moreover, private parties injured by violations are permitted to sue for triple the amount of damages done them.
For more than a decade after its passage, the Sherman Act was invoked only rarely against industrial monopolies, and then not successfully, chiefly because of narrow judicial interpretations of what constitutes trade or commerce among states. Its only effective use was against trade unions, which were held by the courts to be illegal combinations. The first vigorous enforcement of the Sherman Act occurred during the administration of U.S. Pres. Theodore Roosevelt (1901–09). In 1914 Congress passed two legislative measures that provided support for the Sherman Act. One of these was the Clayton Antitrust Act, which elaborated on the general provisions of the Sherman Act and specified many illegal practices that either contributed to or resulted from monopolization. The other measure created the Federal Trade Commission, providing the government with an agency that had the power to investigate possible violations of antitrust legislation and issue orders forbidding unfair competition practices.
Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), is a United States Supreme Court decision that dramatically increased the regulatory power of the federal government. It remains as one of the most important and far-reaching cases concerning the New Deal, and it set a precedent for an expansive reading of the U.S. Constitution‘s Commerce Clause for decades to come. The goal of the legal challenge was to end the entire federal crop support program by declaring it unconstitutional.[1]
An Ohio farmer, Roscoe Filburn, was growing wheat to feed animals on his own farm. The US government had established limits on wheat production, based on the acreage owned by a farmer, to stabilize wheat prices and supplies. Filburn grew more than was permitted and so was ordered to pay a penalty. In response, he said that because his wheat was not sold, it could not be regulated as commerce, let alone “interstate” commerce (described in the Constitution as “Commerce… among the several states”). The Supreme Court disagreed: “Whether the subject of the regulation in question was ‘production’, ‘consumption’, or ‘marketing’ is, therefore, not material for purposes of deciding the question of federal power before us…. But even if appellee’s activity be local and though it may not be regarded as commerce, it may still, whatever its nature, be reached by Congress if it exerts a substantial economic effect on interstate commerce and this irrespective of whether such effect is what might at some earlier time have been defined as ‘direct’ or ‘indirect.'”[2]
The Supreme Court interpreted the Constitution’s Commerce Clause, in Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution, which permits the US Congress “to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.” The Court decided that Filburn’s wheat-growing activities reduced the amount of wheat he would buy for animal feed on the open market, which is traded nationally, is thus interstate, and is therefore within the scope of the Commerce Clause. Although Filburn’s relatively small amount of production of more wheat than he was allotted would not affect interstate commerce itself, the cumulative actions of thousands of other farmers like Filburn would become substantial. Therefore the Court decided that the federal government could regulate Filburn’s production.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/robinson-patman-act.asp
OUT OF STATE CRIMINALS are entering Georgia en masse. These POS are planning on casting votes for two of the most cancerous candidates in the history of the South. Under the Presidency of Jefferson Davis and his top notch Commander General Robert E. Lee, no Yankee would have set foot on Georgian soil. So it is up to us to take action and neutralize the threat.
This can be done in two ways. Number one is to donate to Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue. Secondly, you can vote in Georgia if you have in the past and are a legal resident. Additionally, you can activate your group, get them to call acquaintances to help with the campaigns. After all, do you want a bunch of California perverts to decide who will represent them in the Senate.
These outsiders are nothing but extremists paid for by George Soros. Close to 500 million dollars is being poured into this race from Californians and out of staters.
We can’t let this happen, they Stole Georgia from President Trump, don’t let them Steal the election of Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue. America is at stake here. Liberty and Democracy are at stake. Your life, your children’s life is at stake. Do you want them living under a dictatorship.
Warnock, the Black Preacher who is challenging kelly Loeffler said this, “
“It was the Black Muslims who challenged Black preachers and said, ‘you’re promulgating … the White man’s religion. That’s a slave religion. You’re telling people to focus on heaven, meanwhile, they’re catching hell,’” Warnock said.
The reverend said the Nation of Islam was necessary to “put a fire” under Black preachers and keep them “honest” about the message coming from their pulpits.
At the debate, Warnock didn’t deny he wants to eliminate cash bail and empty the prisons. He promoted the false narrative that police disproportionately kill Blacks more than Whites suspected of the same crimes. When Loeffler warned that Warnock would raise Georgians’ taxes to fund the Green New Deal and a government takeover of private health insurance, he didn’t deny that either.”
The Civil War of 1865 was triggered by State’s Rights. Others have said the trigger was due to the recalcitrant attitude of the South which condoned slavery. And then there were many who based it on a combination of both. Whatever the cause we can see another civil war in its embryonic stage. A Biden win will trigger the greatest clash of ideologies this country has never seen. On one side are strict Constitutionalists, on the other there are vehement and repugnant anarchists. Those backing Biden are true socialists with a radical bent toward anarchy.
As seen below, the election map of 2016 manifested the country divide. Any outside observer will immediately see that the west and east coasts consist of progressive types who by their violent nature will go on a rage, like they did in 2016, when Trump wins again.
However, if Biden wins by capturing just Texas, you can see that a great divide will be punctuated by the ruthless element that put Biden/Harris in charge. Those 33 states that did not succumb to the Faustian bargain will not take orders from Washington. There is no way shape or form that these states will be dictated to by the other 17. And so what will we have? Civil War! Don’t count it out.
Below is the 2020 map, similar to 2016, take away the cheaters (Georgia, Pennsylvania, Arizona and Michigan, add in Wisconsin too) and you have the 2016 blue print. How did Trump get 10,000,000 more votes and lose? They STOLE THE ELECTION, THAT’S HOW.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/11/20/the-republican-voters-who-say-no-way-in-hell-trump-lost
In case you haven’t heard, a hardened Killer who not only saw his victims, a religious couple from Iowa, shot, but then torched them afterwards was put to death this week. The libtard community – Kim Kardashian West – was outraged that this POS loser was about to be put down like a an animal; no electric chair, only a syringe.
As the bible says, an eye for an eye, however, to those who clamored at the top of their lungs to save his life, this guy was lucky, he should have suffered the same fate as his victims – A bullet, lighter fluid then a match.
The supreme court justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented in the decision not to delay Bernard’s killing.
After the execution, Kardashian West said Bernard was an “amazing person” and added: “This just has to change: our system is so fucked up.”
Yeah, he was an amazing person, that being said, ask the Victims Family if he was amazing. We feel for them and all of Americans should too.
Let’s see here, Joe Biden is proud of his son Hunter; a shakedown artist, a cocaine addict who was thrown out of the military. Well then, as they say, the fruit doesn’t fall to far from the tree. Joe schooled him on the ART of the STEAL.
Deep state press was an arm of the Democrat Party by ignoring and suppressing the Biden Crime Family. Additionally, they are now suppressing the Swalwell affair (where is the dress) in which he exchanged honey sex for National Intelligence. Swalwell is subject to bribery, he must go.
Time for War Patriots; We call you to arms.
(click)https://www.foxnews.com/media/glenn-greenwald-hunter-biden-media-historic-crime
The FCC should Revoke the licenses of these criminals who have committed the gravest crime in American History.
As far as we know it is not only the obligation of individual States to protect the voting process, it is their obligation under law. So to do that, based on the oath their attorney generals took, that is to uphold the Constitution, was to sue the four Battleground States for violating their election laws as laid out by their legislatures.
But the Deep State Scumbag from Pennsylvania feels that those who are aggrieved by election shenanigans have no right to sue the guilty parties. That is a typical response from a dirtbag liberal. In other words, what this Mfkr is saying is that those who have been falsely arrested can’t take full advantage of the legal process. “F” him. We look forward to his shitface when the Supreme Court issues a Rebuke and overturns the election results in these four Battleground states.
“Texas waited until now to seek an injunction to nullify Pennsylvania’s election results because all of the other political and litigation machinations of Petitioner’s preferred presidential candidate have failed,” the Pennsylvania brief, led by Attorney General Josh Shaprio, states.
“The Trump campaign began with a series of meritless litigations. When that failed, it turned to state legislatures to overturn the clear election results,” Pennsylvania continued. “Upon that failure, Texas now turns to this Court to overturn the election results of more than 10% of the country. … Texas literally seeks to decimate the electorate of the United States.”
In briefs submitted with the Supreme Court on Thursday, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin slammed the Texas lawsuit to prevent those four states from casting their electoral votes as a “meritless” effort to “decimate the electorate of the United States.”
The Texas suit gained the backing of 17 other states Wednesday when, led by Missouri, they filed a brief endorsing the Paxton’s case. Then on Thursday, Missouri and five other states filed another brief with the Supreme Court this time asking to be allowed to join Texas as litigants in the case.
MISSOURI, 16 OTHER STATES FILE BRIEF SUPPORTING TEXAS SUIT TO DELAY PRESIDENTIAL ELECTOR APPOINTMENT