SENATOR MURPHY OFFERS CONDOLENCES TO THE SOLEIMANI FAMILY

Ax you know the Democrats have been on a social media surge. They hate it when Trump kills our mortal enemies. Take Senator Chris Murphy from CT, an avowed socialist, a lying double talking forked tongue pansy.

Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., criticized  President Trump‘s order that led to the death of Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani Thursday, appearing to contradict his own rhetoric following the Iran-backed militia assault on the U.S. embassy in Baghdad earlier this week.

“Soleimani was an enemy of the United States. That’s not a question. The question is this – as reports suggest, did America just assassinate, without any congressional authorization, the second most powerful person in Iran, knowingly setting off a potential massive regional war?” Murphy tweeted.

WASHINGTON POST BLASTED FOR REFERRING TO QASSIM SOLEIMANI AS IRAN’S ‘MOST REVERED MILITARY LEADER’

Appearing on CNN Friday, Murphy claimed that the actions taken by the Trump administration “seem disproportionate to the threat” posed by Soleimani, and expressed his fear that Americans, including top political and military figures, are now more in danger because of the escalation.

However, the Democratic senator struck a different tone on Tuesday following the violence at the embassy.

“The attack on our embassy in Baghdad is horrifying but predictable,” Murphy tweeted. “Trump has rendered America impotent in the Middle East. No one fears us, no one listens to us. America has been reduced to huddling in safe rooms, hoping the bad guys will go away. What a disgrace.”

He was even confronted about the inconsistent rhetoric by CNN’s Jake Tapper.

“What do you say to critics who say, ‘Look, before the attack, you said the president is insufficiently projecting American strength. And then he carries out this strike and you fault him for that?'” Tapper asked.

“Well, our policy in the Middle East has been an embarrassment. It has made us weak,” Murphy responded. “The fact that none of our allies can trust us, that the president changes his mind every day on how many troops we’re going to have in Syria, that he welches on promises that America has made to countries in the region and throughout the world. All of our policy in the Middle East has made us weaker. That doesn’t justify the assassination of the leader of a foreign country that ultimately makes us less safe.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

He continued, “I may counsel my kids to stand up to bullies, that doesn’t mean I’m suggesting that they kill the people that are threatening them. In this case, it may be — it is likely that the assassination of Qassem Soleimani ultimately will lead to war with Iran. It will make the United States less safe. So I, of course, think that the president has taken grave missteps in the region, but this is likely an overcorrection for lots of mistakes that mounted over the time that he’s been in office.”

Fox News’ Frank Miles contributed to this report. 

Put in perspective. The Democrat President Clinton failed to take out Osama bin-Laden prior to the 911 devastating attack on America.

The Washington Post

“The World Trade Center came down because Bill Clinton didn’t kill Osama bin Laden when he had the chance to kill him.”

—Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), remarks in the GOP debate, Feb. 13, 2016

“The responsibility of 9/11 falls on the fact that al Qaeda was allowed to grow and prosper and the decision was not made to take out their leader when the chance existed to do so. Not once but four times according to the 9/11 report. President Clinton has acknowledged that as a regret.”

—Rubio, remarks on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Feb. 14

Hindsight is always 20/20. Rubio made his comments during the GOP debate after Donald Trump asserted that George W. Bush was responsible for the 9/11 attacks because they happened on his watch. Not so, responded Rubio, pinning the blame on Bush’s predecessor, Bill Clinton. Expanding on his remarks a day later, Rubio said that the 9/11 Commission report identified four times when Clinton could have killed bin Laden.

The reasons varied why a particular attack did not go forward — fear of civilian casualties, uncertainty in the intelligence, diplomatic fallout, bureaucratic inertia. During Clinton’s presidency, al-Qaeda attacked U.S. targets overseas, not in the homeland. Media attention was fleeting. When the CIA suddenly withdrew its support for one operation, the commission wrote: “It was the duty of [George] Tenet and the CIA leadership to balance the risks of inaction against jeopardizing the lives of their operatives and agents. And they had reason to worry about failure: millions of dollars down the drain; a shoot-out that could be seen as an assassination; and, if there were repercussions in Pakistan, perhaps a coup.”

It is worth recalling that when the first operation was discussed — in May 1998 — bin Laden actually had not even been indicted yet. That did not happen until a month later. (It was a sealed indictment and not made public until November, 1998.) Clinton initially only approved a plan to capture bin Laden, and even when he amended that to allowing bin Laden’s death, his intentions were not broadly understood by the CIA.

Three of the rejected operations involved intelligence on bin Laden’s location and might have led to his death; a fourth was only intended to capture him and bring him to the United States for trial. In at least one instance, intelligence later indicates bin Laden had already left the targeted location. In a fifth case, Clinton did order a strike against targets — but bin Laden apparently was missed by a few hours.AD

We will leave it to readers to decide whether that means there were “four times” when Clinton could have killed bin Laden, as Rubio asserted. There were certainly opportunities that were missed — but whether they would have been successful or resulted in unintended consequences is impossible to say.

1. May 1998: Tarnak Farms raid plan rejected

The CIA planned hard on an effort to capture bin Laden and to bring him to the United States for a trial. But at the last minute the CIA senior management lost its nerve and apparently never brought the plan to Clinton for a decision.

From the 9/11 Commission report:A compound of about 80 concrete or mud-brick buildings surrounded by a 10-foot wall, Tarnak Farms was located in an isolated desert area on the outskirts of the Kandahar airport. CIA officers were able to map the entire site, identifying the houses that belonged to Bin Laden’s wives and the one where Bin Laden himself was most likely to sleep. Working with the tribals, they drew up plans for the raid. They ran two complete rehearsals in the United States during the fall of 1997. By early 1998, planners at the Counterterrorist Center were ready to come back to the White House to seek formal approval…One group of tribals would subdue the guards, enter Tarnak Farms stealthily, grab Bin Laden, take him to a desert site outside Kandahar, and turn him over to a second group. This second group of tribals would take him to a desert landing zone …From there, a CIA plane would take him to New York, an Arab capital, or wherever he was to be arraigned. Briefing papers prepared by the Counterterrorist Center acknowledged that hitches might develop. People might be killed, and Bin Laden’s supporters might retaliate, perhaps taking U.S. citizens in Kandahar hostage.But the briefing papers also noted that there was risk in not acting. “Sooner or later,” they said, “Bin Laden will attack U.S. interests, perhaps using WMD [weapons of mass destruction].” The CIA planners conducted their third complete rehearsal in March…The plan had now been modified so that the tribals would keep Bin Laden in a hiding place for up to a month before turning him over to the United States-thereby increasing the chances of keeping the U.S. hand out of sight. …On May 18, CIA’s managers reviewed a draft Memorandum of Notification (MON), a legal document authorizing the capture operation. A 1986 presidential finding had authorized worldwide covert action against terrorism and probably provided adequate authority. But mindful of the old “rogue elephant” charge, senior CIA managers may have wanted something on paper to show that they were not acting on their own….Discussion of this memorandum brought to the surface an unease about paramilitary covert action that had become ingrained, at least among some CIA senior managers. Despite misgivings, the CIA leadership cleared the draft memorandum and sent it on to the National Security Council.From May 20 to 24, the CIA ran a final, graded rehearsal of the operation, spread over three time zones, even bringing in personnel from the region. The FBI also participated. The rehearsal went well. The Counterterrorist Center planned to brief cabinet-level principals and their deputies the following week, giving June 23 as the date for the raid, with Bin Laden to be brought out of Afghanistan no later than July 23.On May 20, Director Tenet discussed the high risk of the operation with Berger and his deputies, warning that people might be killed, including Bin Laden. Success was to be defined as the exfiltration of Bin Laden out of Afghanistan. A meeting of principals was scheduled for May 29 to decide whether the operation should go ahead. But the principals did not meet…The plan was never presented to the White House for a decision.Working-level CIA officers were disappointed….No capture plan before 9/11 ever again attained the same level of detail and preparation. The tribals’ reported readiness to act diminished. And Bin Laden’s security precautions and defenses became more elaborate and formidable.

2. August, 1998: A campaign for continued air strikes is shelved after al-Qaeda attacks two U.S. embassies in Africa

After the embassy attacks, Clinton ordered air strikes against al-Qaeda targets, which were deemed ineffectual. Officials discussed but do not reach agreement on a campaign of follow-on air strikes.AD

From the 9/11 Commission report:The day after the embassy bombings, Tenet brought to a principals meeting intelligence that terrorist leaders were expected to gather at a camp near Khowst, Afghanistan, to plan future attacks. According to Berger, Tenet said that several hundred would attend, including Bin Laden. The CIA described the area as effectively a military cantonment, away from civilian population centers and overwhelmingly populated by jihadists….The principals quickly reached a consensus on attacking the gathering. The strike’s purpose was to kill Bin Laden and his chief lieutenants.Berger put in place a tightly compartmented process designed to keep all planning secret. On August 11, General Zinni received orders to prepare detailed plans for strikes against the sites in Afghanistan. The Pentagon briefed President Clinton about these plans on August 12 and 14.Though the principals hoped that the missiles would hit Bin Laden, NSC staff recommended the strike whether or not there was firm evidence that the commanders were at the facilities….Later on August 20, Navy vessels in the Arabian Sea fired their cruise missiles. Though most of them hit their intended targets, neither Bin Laden nor any other terrorist leader was killed. Berger told us that an after-action review by Director Tenet concluded that the strikes had killed 20-30 people in the camps but probably missed Bin Laden by a few hours….During the last week of August 1998, officials began considering possible follow-on strikes. President Clinton was inclined to launch further strikes sooner rather than later. On August 27, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Walter Slocombe advised Secretary Cohen that the available targets were not promising. The experience of the previous week, he wrote, “has only confirmed the importance of defining a clearly articulated rationale for military action” that was effective as well as justified. But Slocombe worried that simply striking some of these available targets did not add up to an effective strategy. [Eventually the discussion became mired in the bureaucracy and went nowhere.]

3. August 1998: covert operations limited to a ‘capture operation,’ not kill

As will be shown, Clinton vacillated over signing a memo that would authorize the killing of bin Laden. He first authorized only a capture, then agreed to allow bin Laden’s killing, only to weaken the language later. CIA officials were under the impression they did not have permission to kill the al-Qaeda leader.

From the 9/11 Commission report:President Clinton signed a Memorandum of Notification authorizing the CIA to let its tribal assets use force to capture Bin Laden and his associates. CIA officers told the tribals that the plan to capture Bin Laden, which had been “turned off” three months earlier, was back on. The memorandum also authorized the CIA to attack Bin Laden in other ways. Also, an executive order froze financial holdings that could be linked to Bin Laden.

4. December 1998: Missile strike against Kandahar is rejected; memo to ‘kill’ bin Laden misunderstood

Officials had intelligence on bin Laden’s whereabouts, but decided not to allow a missile strike because of fears of civilian casualties. Later intelligence indicates bin Laden had already left that location.

(The day before the Sept. 11 attacks, Clinton told businessmen in Australia that he had decided against launching a strike in Kandahar out of concern for civilian casualties: ”I nearly got him. And I could have killed him, but I would have to destroy a little town called Kandahar in Afghanistan and kill 300 innocent women and children, and then I would have been no better than him. And so I didn’t do it.”)AD

From the 9/11 Commission report:On December 20, intelligence indicated Bin Laden would be spending the night at the Haji Habash house, part of the governor’s residence in Kandahar. … An urgent teleconference of principals was arranged.The principals considered a cruise missile strike to try to kill Bin Laden. One issue they discussed was the potential collateral damage — the number of innocent bystanders who would be killed or wounded. General [Anthony] Zinni predicted a number well over 200 and was concerned about damage to a nearby mosque. The senior intelligence officer on the Joint Staff apparently made a different calculation, estimating half as much collateral damage and not predicting damage to the mosque. By the end of the meeting, the principals decided against recommending to the President that he order a strike…..later intelligence appeared to show that Bin Laden had left his quarters before the strike would have occurred.On December 21, the day after principals decided not to launch the cruise missile strike against Kandahar, the CIA’s leaders urged strengthening the language to allow the tribals to be paid whether Bin Laden was captured or killed. …The new memorandum would allow the killing of Bin Laden if the CIA and the tribals judged that capture was not feasible (a judgment it already seemed clear they had reached). The Justice Department lawyer who worked on the draft told us that what was envisioned was a group of tribals assaulting a location, leading to a shoot-out. Bin Laden and others would be captured if possible, but probably would be killed. The administration’s position was that under the law of armed conflict, killing a person who posed an imminent threat to the United States would be an act of self-defense, not an assassination. On Christmas Eve 1998, Berger sent a final draft to President Clinton, with an explanatory memo. The President approved the document.Because the White House considered this operation highly sensitive, only a tiny number of people knew about this Memorandum of Notification.…A message from Tenet to CIA field agents directed them to communicate to the tribals the instructions authorized by the President: the United States preferred that Bin Laden and his lieutenants be captured, but if a successful capture operation was not feasible, the tribals were permitted to kill them. The instructions added that the tribals must avoid killing others unnecessarily and must not kill or abuse Bin Laden or his lieutenants if they surrendered. Finally, the tribals would not be paid if this set of requirements was not met….Policymakers in the Clinton administration, including the President and his national security advisor, told us that the President’s intent regarding covert action against Bin Laden was clear: he wanted him dead. This intent was never well communicated or understood within the CIA. Tenet told the Commission that except in one specific case, the CIA was authorized to kill Bin Laden only in the context of a capture operation. CIA senior managers, operators, and lawyers confirmed this understanding. “We always talked about how much easier it would have been to kill him,” a former chief of the Bin Laden unit said.

5. Early 1999: Decision not to deploy the AC-130 gunship option

From the 9/11 Commission report:After the decision — in which fear of collateral damage was an important factor — not to use cruise missiles against Kandahar in December 1998, Shelton and officers in the Pentagon developed plans for using an AC-130 gunship instead of cruise missile strikes. Designed specifically for the special forces, the version of the AC-130 known as “Spooky” can fly in fast or from high altitude, undetected by radar; guided to its zone by extraordinarily complex electronics, it is capable of rapidly firing precision-guided 25, 40, and 105 mm projectiles. Because this system could target more precisely than a salvo of cruise missiles, it had a much lower risk of causing collateral damage. After giving [White House official Richard] Clarke a briefing and being encouraged to proceed, Shelton formally directed Zinni and General Peter Schoomaker, who headed the Special Operations Command, to develop plans for an AC-130 mission against Bin Laden’s headquarters and infrastructure in Afghanistan. The Joint Staff prepared a decision paper for deployment of the Special Operations aircraft.Though Berger and Clarke continued to indicate interest in this option, the AC-130s were never deployed. Clarke wrote at the time that Zinni opposed their use, and John Maher, the Joint Staff’s deputy director of operations, agreed that this was Zinni’s position. Zinni himself does not recall blocking the option. He told us that he understood the Special Operations Command had never thought the intelligence good enough to justify actually moving AC-130s into position. Schoomaker says, on the contrary, that he thought the AC-130 option feasible.

6. February-March 1999: A decision not to strike bin Laden’s desert camp

Another potential target — bin Laden’s desert camp — slips by because of diplomatic considerations.

From the 9/11 Commission report:Early in 1999, the CIA received reporting that Bin Laden was spending much of his time at one of several camps in the Afghan desert south of Kandahar. At the beginning of February, Bin Laden was reportedly located in the vicinity of the Sheikh Ali camp, a desert hunting camp being used by visitors from a Gulf state. Public sources have stated that these visitors were from the United Arab Emirates.Reporting from the CIA’s assets provided a detailed description of the hunting camp, including its size, location, resources, and security, as well as of Bin Laden’s smaller, adjacent camp. Because this was not in an urban area, missiles launched against it would have less risk of causing collateral damage. On February 8, the military began to ready itself for a possible strike.The next day, national technical intelligence confirmed the location and description of the larger camp and showed the nearby presence of an official aircraft of the United Arab Emirates. But the location of Bin Laden’s quarters could not be pinned down so precisely. The CIA did its best to answer a host of questions about the larger camp and its residents and about Bin Laden’s daily schedule and routines to support military contingency planning. According to reporting from the tribals, Bin Laden regularly went from his adjacent camp to the larger camp where he visited the Emiratis; the tribals expected him to be at the hunting camp for such a visit at least until midmorning on February 11. …No strike was launched. By February 12 Bin Laden had apparently moved on, and the immediate strike plans became moot. According to CIA and Defense officials, policymakers were concerned about the danger that a strike would kill an Emirati prince or other senior officials who might be with Bin Laden or close by. … The lead CIA official in the field, Gary Schroen, felt that the intelligence reporting in this case was very reliable; the Bin Laden unit chief, “Mike,” agreed. Schroen believes today that this was a lost opportunity to kill Bin Laden before 9/11.

7. February 1999: The decision to again amend the covert action authorization, canceling the ‘kill’ authorization of December and reinstating the ‘capture’ language

From the 9/11 Commission report:In February 1999, another draft Memorandum of Notification went to President Clinton. It asked him to allow the CIA to give exactly the same guidance to the Northern Alliance as had just been given to the tribals: they could kill Bin Laden if a successful capture operation was not feasible. On this occasion, however, President Clinton crossed out key language he had approved in December and inserted more ambiguous language. No one we interviewed could shed light on why the President did this. President Clinton told the Commission that he had no recollection of why he rewrote the language.Later in 1999, when legal authority was needed for enlisting still other collaborators and for covering a wider set of contingencies, the lawyers returned to the language used in August 1998, which authorized force only in the context of a capture operation. Given the closely held character of the document approved in December 1998, and the subsequent return to the earlier language, it is possible to understand how the former White House officials and the CIA officials might disagree as to whether the CIA was ever authorized by the President to kill Bin Laden.

8. May 1999: The decision not to do the missile strike on Kandahar

Another opportunity presents itself, and top officials again do not pull the trigger, to the intense frustration of lower-level officials.

From the 9/11 commission report:It was in Kandahar that perhaps the last, and most likely the best, opportunity arose for targeting Bin Laden with cruise missiles before 9/11. In May 1999, CIA assets in Afghanistan reported on Bin Laden’s location in and around Kandahar over the course of five days and nights. The reporting was very detailed and came from several sources.If this intelligence was not “actionable,” working-level officials said at the time and today, it was hard for them to imagine how any intelligence on Bin Laden in Afghanistan would meet the standard. Communications were good, and the cruise missiles were ready. “This was in our strike zone,” a senior military officer said. “It was a fat pitch, a home run.” He expected the missiles to fly. When the decision came back that they should stand down, not shoot, the officer said, “we all just slumped.” He told us he knew of no one at the Pentagon or the CIA who thought it was a bad gamble. Bin Laden “should have been a dead man” that night, he said.Working-level CIA officials agreed. While there was a conflicting intelligence report about Bin Laden’s whereabouts, the experts discounted it. At the time, CIA working-level officials were told by their managers that the strikes were not ordered because the military doubted the intelligence and worried about collateral damage. Replying to a frustrated colleague in the field, the Bin Laden unit chief wrote: “having a chance to get [Bin Laden] three times in 36 hours and foregoing the chance each time has made me a bit angry…. [T]he DCI finds himself alone at the table, with the other princip[als] basically saying ‘we’ll go along with your decision Mr. Director,’ and implicitly saying that the Agency will hang alone if the attack doesn’t get Bin Laden.”But the military officer quoted earlier recalled that the Pentagon had been willing to act. He told us that Clarke informed him and others that Tenet assessed the chance of the intelligence being accurate as 50-50. This officer believed that Tenet’s assessment was the key to the decision.Tenet told us he does not remember any details about this episode, except that the intelligence came from a single uncorroborated source and that there was a risk of collateral damage. …Berger remembered only that in all such cases, the call had been Tenet’s. Berger felt sure that Tenet was eager to get Bin Laden. In his view, Tenet did his job responsibly. “George would call and say, ‘We just don’t have it,’” Berger said.The decision not to strike in May 1999 may now seem hard to understand. In fairness, we note two points: First, in December 1998, the principals’ wariness about ordering a strike appears to have been vindicated: Bin Laden left his room unexpectedly, and if a strike had been ordered he would not have been hit. Second, the administration, and the CIA in particular, was in the midst of intense scrutiny and criticism in May 1999 because faulty intelligence had just led the United States to mistakenly bomb the Chinese embassy in Belgrade during the NATO war against Serbia. This episode may have made officials more cautious than might otherwise have been the case.

9. November-December 2000: The decision not to strike against bin Laden after the al-Qaeda attack on the USS Cole

As the nation is gripped by the post-election struggle between Bush and Al Gore, Clinton administration officials hesitate about retaliating against bin Laden for the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen. Bin Laden was fully prepared for retaliation, but it never came. Eventually, a response gets lost in the transition from the Clinton to Bush administration.

From the 9/11 Commission report:Back in Afghanistan, [after the attack on the USS Cole], Bin Laden anticipated U.S. military retaliation. He ordered the evacuation of al Qaeda’s Kandahar airport compound and fled- first to the desert area near Kabul, then to Khowst and Jalalabad, and eventually back to Kandahar. In Kandahar, he rotated between five to six residences, spending one night at each residence. In addition, he sent his senior advisor, Mohammed Atef, to a different part of Kandahar and his deputy, Ayman al Zawahiri, to Kabul so that all three could not be killed in one attack.In mid-November, as the evidence of al Qaeda involvement mounted, Berger asked General Shelton to reevaluate military plans to act quickly against Bin Laden. General [Hugh] Shelton tasked General Tommy Franks, the new commander of CENTCOM, to look again at the options. Shelton wanted to demonstrate that the military was imaginative and knowledgeable enough to move on an array of options, and to show the complexity of the operations. He briefed Berger on the “Infinite Resolve” strike options developed since 1998, which the Joint Staff and CENTCOM had refined during the summer into a list of 13 possibilities or combinations. CENTCOM added a new “phased campaign” concept for wider-ranging strikes, including attacks against the Taliban. For the first time, these strikes envisioned an air campaign against Afghanistan of indefinite duration.….On November 25, Berger and Clarke wrote President Clinton that although the FBI and CIA investigations had not reached a formal conclusion, they believed the investigations would soon conclude that the attack had been carried out by a large cell whose senior members belonged to al Qaeda. Most of those involved had trained in Bin Laden-operated camps in Afghanistan, Berger continued. So far, Bin Laden had not been tied personally to the attack and nobody had heard him directly order it, but two intelligence reports suggested that he was involved. …Nearly a month later, on December 21, the CIA made another presentation to the Small Group of principals on the investigative team’s findings. The CIA’s briefing slides said that their “preliminary judgment” was that Bin Laden’s al Qaeda group “supported the attack” on the Cole, based on strong circumstantial evidence tying key perpetrators of the attack to al Qaeda. The CIA listed the key suspects, including Nashiri. In addition, the CIA detailed the timeline of the operation, from the mid-1999 preparations, to the failed attack on the USS The Sullivans on January 3, 2000, through a meeting held by the operatives the day before the attack.This, President Clinton and Berger told us, was not the conclusion they needed in order to go to war or deliver an ultimatum to the Taliban threatening war. The election and change of power was not the issue, President Clinton added. There was enough time. If the agencies had given him a definitive answer, he said, he would have sought a UN Security Council ultimatum and given the Taliban one, two, or three days before taking further action against both al Qaeda and the Taliban. But he did not think it would be responsible for a president to launch an invasion of another country just based on a “preliminary judgment.”[No attack was launched and one angry official] rhetorically asked of Defense officials: “Does al-Qaeda have to attack the Pentagon to get their attention?”

211 thoughts on “SENATOR MURPHY OFFERS CONDOLENCES TO THE SOLEIMANI FAMILY”

  1. Whoa! This blog looks exactly like my old one! It’s on a completely different subject but it
    has pretty much the same layout and design. Superb choice of colors!

  2. Your review is incredibly interesting. If you want to
    experiment with slot deposit pulsa, I might suggest
    taking part in in reliable agen slot online personal blogs.

    As you can attain big gains and get particular profits.
    If you want that can be played out, you may directly just click here here.
    The hyperlink may be a job site that may be frequently
    used between Indonesia member.

  3. Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is a really well written article.
    I will make sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your useful information. Thanks
    for the post. I will certainly comeback.

  4. An impressive share! I have just forwarded this onto a colleague who was conducting a little research on this.

    And he in fact ordered me dinner simply because I discovered
    it for him… lol. So allow me to reword this…. Thank
    YOU for the meal!! But yeah, thanx for spending time to discuss this matter here on your blog.

  5. My partner and I absolutely love your blog and find nearly all
    of your post’s to be what precisely I’m looking for. Do you offer guest
    writers to write content in your case? I wouldn’t mind
    creating a post or elaborating on a lot of the subjects you
    write concerning here. Again, awesome site!

  6. You could definitely see your enthusiasm within the work you write.
    The world hopes for more passionate writers such as
    you who are not afraid to mention how they believe.
    At all times follow your heart.

  7. Wonderful blog! I found it while surfing around on Yahoo News.
    Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News? I’ve
    been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Many thanks

  8. I loved as much as you’ll receive carried out right here.
    The sketch is attractive, your authored subject
    matter stylish. nonetheless, you command get
    got an shakiness over that you wish be delivering the following.
    unwell unquestionably come more formerly again as exactly
    the same nearly very often inside case you shield this increase.

  9. Hello There. I discovered your weblog the use of msn. That is a really neatly written article.
    I will be sure to bookmark it and return to learn extra of your useful information. Thanks for the post.
    I will definitely comeback.

  10. My brother suggested I might like this web site. He was entirely right.

    This post actually made my day. You cann’t imagine just how much time I had spent for this information! Thanks!

  11. Aw, this was an incredibly good post. Spending some time and actual effort to create a superb article… but what can I
    say… I hesitate a lot and never seem to get anything done.

  12. Way cool! Some extremely valid points! I appreciate
    you penning this post and also the rest of the site is extremely
    good.

  13. You really make it seem so easy along with your presentation but I to find
    this matter to be really something that I think I’d by no means
    understand. It sort of feels too complex and extremely broad for me.
    I’m looking forward on your next submit, I will attempt to get the dangle of it!

  14. I’m really loving the theme/design of your blog. Do you ever run into any internet browser compatibility problems?
    A few of my blog audience have complained about my website not operating
    correctly in Explorer but looks great in Safari. Do you have
    any ideas to help fix this problem?

  15. I was curious if you ever considered changing the layout of your blog?
    Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.
    But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better.
    Youve got an awful lot of text for only having 1 or two images.
    Maybe you could space it out better?

  16. I got this website from my buddy who informed me regarding this web site and at the moment this
    time I am visiting this site and reading very informative articles at this time.

    Feel free to surf to my web blog; gameaduayam.com

  17. You could certainly see your expertise within the work
    you write. The arena hopes for even more passionate writers such as you who
    are not afraid to mention how they believe.
    All the time go after your heart.

  18. After looking at a number of the articles on your site, I really like your technique of writing a blog.
    I saved as a favorite it to my bookmark website list and will be checking back in the near future.
    Take a look at my website too and tell me your opinion.

  19. Having read this I thought it was extremely enlightening. I appreciate you
    taking the time and energy to put this information together.
    I once again find myself spending a lot of time both reading and posting comments.
    But so what, it was still worthwhile!

  20. Pretty section of content. I just stumbled upon your website and in accession capital to assert that I get actually enjoyed account your
    blog posts. Any way I will be subscribing to your augment and even I achievement
    you access consistently rapidly.

  21. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as
    though you relied on the video to make your point. You clearly know what youre talking about, why throw away your intelligence on just posting videos to your site when you could
    be giving us something informative to read?

  22. Hey there I am so happy I found your web site, I
    really found you by mistake, while I was browsing on Yahoo for something else, Anyways I am here now
    and would just like to say thanks for a incredible post and a all round exciting blog (I also
    love the theme/design), I don’t have time to go through it all at the minute but I have bookmarked it and also included your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read much more,
    Please do keep up the awesome b.

  23. Excellent post. I was checking continuously this blog and I’m impressed!
    Extremely helpful info specially the last part 🙂
    I care for such info much. I was seeking this particular info for a very long time.
    Thank you and best of luck.

  24. Having read this I thought it was rather informative.
    I appreciate you taking the time and effort to put
    this short article together. I once again find myself personally
    spending a lot of time both reading and leaving comments.
    But so what, it was still worth it!

  25. Hello there, I discovered your blog by way of Google while searching
    for a comparable matter, your site got here up, it appears to be like great.
    I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
    Hi there, just changed into alert to your blog via Google, and
    found that it is truly informative. I’m gonna watch out for brussels.
    I’ll appreciate if you proceed this in future.
    A lot of people might be benefited out of your writing.
    Cheers!

  26. Wow that was odd. I just wrote an incredibly long comment
    but after I clicked submit my comment didn’t show up. Grrrr…

    well I’m not writing all that over again. Anyway, just wanted to say wonderful blog!

  27. Hello, this weekend is nice designed for me,
    because this occasion i am reading this impressive educational paragraph here
    at my house.

  28. You’ve made some decent points there. I looked on the internet to find
    out more about the issue and found most individuals will go along with
    your views on this web site.

  29. Greetings from Ohio! I’m bored at work so I decided
    to browse your website on my iphone during lunch break.
    I enjoy the knowledge you provide here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home.

    I’m amazed at how fast your blog loaded on my cell phone ..
    I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyways, fantastic blog!

  30. I’m not that much of a online reader to be honest but your sites really nice, keep it up!
    I’ll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back in the future.
    Cheers

  31. It’s truly very complicated in this full of activity life to listen news
    on Television, therefore I simply use the web for that purpose, and take the most recent news.

  32. Howdy! This blog post couldn’t be written much better!

    Reading through this post reminds me of my previous roommate!
    He always kept preaching about this. I am going to forward this information to him.

    Fairly certain he’ll have a very good read. Many thanks for sharing!

  33. Wonderful beat ! I would like to apprentice whilst you amend your website, how can i subscribe for a
    weblog web site? The account aided me a acceptable deal. I were a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided shiny transparent concept

  34. Attractive section of content. I just stumbled upon your
    web site and in accession capital to assert that I get
    in fact enjoyed account your blog posts.
    Any way I’ll be subscribing to your feeds and even I achievement you
    access consistently quickly.

  35. I’m gone to inform my little brother, that he should also pay a quick visit this webpage
    on regular basis to take updated from newest gossip.

  36. You’re so interesting! I don’t believe I’ve read something like that
    before. So good to discover somebody with some unique thoughts on this issue.
    Seriously.. thank you for starting this up. This site is
    one thing that is required on the internet, someone
    with some originality!

  37. Thanks for every other fantastic article. The place else may just anyone get that kind of information in such
    an ideal way of writing? I’ve a presentation subsequent week, and I’m at
    the search for such info.

  38. Your review is extremely interesting. If you require to experience slot
    pulsa online, I might suggest participating in regarding efficient situs
    slot deposit pulsa niche sites. As possible attain big profits each of the incentives and get certain payouts.
    If you require to experience, you are able to instantly just click
    here under. The link is actually a video position web site that is certainly
    frequently used between Indonesian players.

  39. I absolutely love your blog and find nearly all of your post’s
    to be precisely what I’m looking for. Do you offer guest writers to write content for yourself?

    I wouldn’t mind creating a post or elaborating on many of the subjects you write with regards to here.
    Again, awesome site!

  40. Hello there, I discovered your web site via Google whilst looking for a comparable topic, your web site got here up, it appears good.
    I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
    Hi there, just become alert to your blog via Google, and found that
    it’s really informative. I’m gonna be careful for brussels.
    I will appreciate for those who continue this in future.
    Many folks can be benefited from your writing.
    Cheers!

  41. A person essentially help to make critically posts I would state.
    This is the very first time I frequented your web page and to this point?
    I surprised with the research you made to create this actual put
    up amazing. Fantastic process!

  42. Hello there! I could have sworn I’ve been to this site before but after browsing through some of the posts I
    realized it’s new to me. Nonetheless, I’m certainly pleased I found it and I’ll be
    book-marking it and checking back frequently!

  43. Heya i am for the first time here. I came across this board
    and I find It truly useful & it helped me out a lot. I hope
    to give something back and help others like you aided me.

  44. Great blog you have got here.. It’s hard to find excellent writing like yours these
    days. I seriously appreciate individuals like you!
    Take care!!

  45. I love what you guys are usually up too. Such clever work and
    reporting! Keep up the very good works guys I’ve included
    you guys to my personal blogroll.

  46. Hi to every one, the contents present at this web site are
    in fact awesome for people experience, well, keep up the nice work fellows.

  47. That is a good tip particularly to those fresh to the blogosphere.
    Brief but very accurate info… Thank you for sharing this one.
    A must read post!

  48. What’s Taking place i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve found It positively helpful and it
    has aided me out loads. I hope to contribute & aid different users like its helped me.
    Great job.

  49. I blog frequently and I genuinely appreciate your content.

    This great article has really peaked my interest. I will book mark your site and keep checking for
    new information about once per week. I opted in for your
    RSS feed as well.

  50. Does your blog have a contact page? I’m having trouble locating it
    but, I’d like to shoot you an email. I’ve got some creative ideas for your blog you might
    be interested in hearing. Either way, great blog and I look forward to seeing it develop over time.

  51. Hmm it looks like your blog ate my first comment (it was extremely long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I wrote and
    say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I as well am an aspiring blog
    blogger but I’m still new to everything. Do you have any tips and hints
    for rookie blog writers? I’d genuinely appreciate it.

  52. I was suggested this web site by my cousin. I am not sure whether this post is written by him as
    no one else know such detailed about my problem.
    You’re wonderful! Thanks!

  53. Today, I went to the beach with my kids. I found a sea
    shell and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.”
    She placed the shell to her ear and screamed. There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear.
    She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is entirely off topic but I had to tell someone!

  54. hey there and thank you for your information – I have definitely picked up something
    new from right here. I did however expertise some technical issues using this web
    site, since I experienced to reload the site a lot of times previous to I
    could get it to load correctly. I had been wondering if your web host is OK?
    Not that I’m complaining, but sluggish loading instances times will sometimes affect your placement in google and can damage your high-quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords.
    Well I’m adding this RSS to my e-mail and can look out for much
    more of your respective interesting content. Ensure that you update this again very soon.

  55. Oh my goodness! Awesome article dude! Thanks, However I am going through troubles with your
    RSS. I don’t know why I can’t subscribe to it.
    Is there anybody else having the same RSS issues?
    Anybody who knows the solution can you kindly respond? Thanks!!

  56. What’s up Dear, are you actually visiting this site regularly, if so after that you will absolutely obtain pleasant experience.

  57. I enjoy what you guys tend to be up too. This type of
    clever work and reporting! Keep up the terrific works
    guys I’ve you guys to my personal blogroll.

  58. It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d most certainly donate to this excellent blog!
    I suppose for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS feed to
    my Google account. I look forward to new updates and will talk about this site with my
    Facebook group. Chat soon!

  59. Unquestionably believe that which you said.

    Your favorite justification seemed to be on the
    internet the easiest thing to be aware of.
    I say to you, I certainly get irked while people think about worries that they just do not know about.
    You managed to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the whole
    thing without having side-effects , people can take a signal.

    Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

  60. Hello there! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a team of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a
    community in the same niche. Your blog provided us valuable information to work on. You have done a outstanding job!

  61. Today, I went to the beach front with my kids.

    I found a sea shell and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She placed
    the shell to her ear and screamed. There was a hermit crab inside and
    it pinched her ear. She never wants to go back!
    LoL I know this is entirely off topic but I had
    to tell someone!

  62. With havin so much content and articles do you ever run into any problems of
    plagorism or copyright infringement? My website has a lot of exclusive
    content I’ve either created myself or outsourced but it appears a lot of
    it is popping it up all over the internet without my agreement.

    Do you know any solutions to help protect against content from being ripped off?
    I’d really appreciate it.

  63. I have been browsing online more than 3 hours today, yet
    I never found any interesting article like yours. It’s pretty worth enough
    for me. In my view, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content as you did, the internet will be
    a lot more useful than ever before.

  64. Greetings from California! I’m bored to tears at work so I decided
    to browse your website on my iphone during lunch break.

    I enjoy the information you present here and can’t wait
    to take a look when I get home. I’m amazed at how fast your blog loaded on my mobile ..
    I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyways, fantastic site!

  65. Hey there! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any problems with hackers?
    My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing months of hard work due to no back up.
    Do you have any solutions to stop hackers?

  66. Hi this is somewhat of off topic but I was wondering
    if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with
    HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding knowledge so I wanted to get guidance from someone with experience.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!

  67. A motivating discussion is worth comment. There’s no doubt
    that that you need to publish more on this topic, it might not be a taboo subject but usually people do not discuss such issues.
    To the next! Cheers!!

  68. wonderful issues altogether, you simply received a
    brand new reader. What may you suggest in regards to your put up that you just made some days in the past?
    Any certain?

  69. I’ve been surfing online more than 3 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours.

    It’s pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all webmasters
    and bloggers made good content as you did, the net will be a lot more
    useful than ever before.

  70. Do you mind if I quote a couple of your posts as long as
    I provide credit and sources back to your website? My blog site is in the very same niche as
    yours and my users would certainly benefit from some of the information you provide here.
    Please let me know if this okay with you. Regards!

  71. That is really fascinating, You’re a very skilled blogger.
    I have joined your feed and look forward to looking for extra of your wonderful post.
    Also, I’ve shared your site in my social networks

  72. Hey there would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re working
    with? I’m going to start my own blog soon but I’m having a difficult time choosing between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal.
    The reason I ask is because your layout seems different then most
    blogs and I’m looking for something completely unique.
    P.S Apologies for getting off-topic but I had to ask!

  73. The research is extremely interesting. If you want to
    experience slot pulsa, I recommend participating in regarding
    dependable slot pulsa online niche sites. As possible obtain big wins
    and acquire promised affiliate payouts. If you want that can be played, you’re able to upright click
    the link right here. The web link is mostly a posture web page this is often used between Indonesian the gamers.

  74. Interesting blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere?

    A design like yours with a few simple adjustements would really make my blog jump out.

    Please let me know where you got your design.
    With thanks

  75. After exploring a number of the articles on your website, I truly like your technique of writing a blog.
    I book marked it to my bookmark website list and will be checking back in the
    near future. Take a look at my web site too and let me know your opinion.

  76. Today, I went to the beach with my kids. I found a sea shell
    and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She put the shell to her
    ear and screamed. There was a hermit crab inside and it
    pinched her ear. She never wants to go back!
    LoL I know this is entirely off topic but I had to tell someone!

  77. My developer is trying to convince me to move to .net from PHP.
    I have always disliked the idea because of the costs.

    But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using Movable-type on a
    number of websites for about a year and am concerned about switching to
    another platform. I have heard good things about blogengine.net.
    Is there a way I can transfer all my wordpress posts into it?
    Any kind of help would be greatly appreciated!

  78. First off I would like to say great blog! I had a quick question that I’d like
    to ask if you don’t mind. I was interested to
    know how you center yourself and clear your head prior
    to writing. I have had a difficult time clearing my mind in getting
    my ideas out there. I truly do enjoy writing but it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes
    tend to be wasted just trying to figure out how to begin. Any recommendations or tips?
    Kudos!

  79. Your research is extremely interesting. If you would like to experiment
    with agen slot online, I suggest participating in on reputable slot deposit pulsa
    sites. Since you can achieve big wins and obtain assured profits.

    When you need to try out, you are able to instantly take a peek through the following.
    The web link can be described as posture web-site that may be commonly
    used among Indonesia the gamers.

  80. My spouse and I absolutely love your blog and find almost all of your post’s to be
    exactly I’m looking for. Do you offer guest writers to write content to suit your needs?
    I wouldn’t mind creating a post or elaborating on most of the
    subjects you write concerning here. Again, awesome web site!

  81. Hey! Someone in my Myspace group shared this site with us so I came to give it a look.
    I’m definitely enjoying the information. I’m
    book-marking and will be tweeting this to my followers!
    Outstanding blog and fantastic style and design.

  82. Today, I went to the beachfront with my children. I found a sea shell and gave it
    to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She put the shell to her ear and screamed.
    There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear.
    She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is completely off topic but I had to tell someone!

  83. Everyone loves what you guys tend to be up too.
    This sort of clever work and reporting! Keep up the great works
    guys I’ve included you guys to our blogroll.

  84. The review is exceedingly interesting. If you want to experience slot online, I recommend participating in regarding respected slot pulsa websites.
    Because you can gain big advantages and acquire
    given the assurance pay-out odds. If you would like to learn, you are able to right
    away have a look through underneath. The web link is mostly a slot machine game
    internet site this is often used between Indonesia the members.

  85. Wonderful goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous
    to and you are just too excellent. I actually like what you’ve acquired here, really like what you are stating and the way in which you say it.
    You make it entertaining and you still take care of to keep it wise.
    I can not wait to read much more from you. This is really
    a tremendous website.

  86. Hi, I think your site might be having browser compatibility issues.
    When I look at your website in Opera, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer,
    it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up!
    Other then that, wonderful blog!

  87. Hey would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re
    working with? I’m planning to start my own blog soon but I’m having a hard time deciding between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal.
    The reason I ask is because your design and style seems different then most blogs and
    I’m looking for something completely unique.
    P.S Apologies for getting off-topic but I had to ask!

  88. Hi, I think your site might be having browser compatibility issues.
    When I look at your blog site in Chrome, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer,
    it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up!
    Other then that, awesome blog!

  89. Howdy! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist with SEO?

    I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m
    not seeing very good gains. If you know of any please share.

    Appreciate it!

  90. I’m not sure where you are getting your info, but great
    topic. I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more.
    Thanks for magnificent info I was looking for this information for my mission.

  91. I like the valuable info you provide in your articles.
    I will bookmark your blog and take a look at again here frequently.
    I am fairly certain I’ll be informed many new stuff proper here!
    Good luck for the next!

  92. 545742 1586It is actually a cool and valuable piece of details. Im glad which you shared this helpful info with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thanks for sharing. 889855

Comments are closed.