Inside Mayor Adams’ migrant debit card boondoggle — no-bid bank gets $50 million, border crossers up to $10,000 each

‘Squad’ member Jamaal Bowman under fire for fundraising with ‘anti-Israel’ Rashida Tlaib as he faces challenge from moderate

Greg Abbott: Texas has the constitutional right to defend itself from invasion

A student of history will tell you that the Palestinian State is in reality Jordan. The turn of the century saw many entities involved in the Middle East, Britain and France being the main characters.

The name Palestine was a new name given to the country of Israel by Roman Emperor Hadrian. It was punishment for the Israeli revolt which started in 70AD and lasted until 135AD.  The name has endured for the past 2000 years.  So the question remains, where did all of those Palestinians of today come from?

To quote Mark Twain, who visited Israel in 1880! He described what he saw in three words, “Palestine is desolate.”  The Holy Land was occupied by the Ottoman Turks in the 1800’s; they settled Turks in Palestine to farm and strip the forests for Turkish export.  From 1840 to 1920 the Turks brought in 506,000 Arabs (see  below).  In 1920 The British Mandate approved by the League of Nations in 1922 opened the floodgates to more foreigners. The British allowed 36,000 Syrians to enter the land in 1934. From 1924-1947 the British secretly brought in 440,000 Arabs from Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Lebanon and Iraq. During the Holocaust, the British smuggled in 200,000 more Arabs.

The Turks in Palestine (Turkish: Filistin’deki Türkler), also referred to as Palestinian Turks and Palestinian Turkmen (Turkish: Filistin Türkmenleri) are ethnic Turkish descendants who have had a long-established presence in the State of Palestine. With Turkish rule spanning between the years 1069-1917/22, mass Turkish migration was encouraged during the rule of Nureddin Zengi in Syria, and then when thousands of Turks participated in the battle of Jerusalem with Saladin. Turkish migration continued further during the Mamluk and Ottoman rule of Palestine as well as during the British rule. Estimates during mid 18th century had a total population of 350,000. 

Of the 1,303,000 Arabs living in Palestine in 1947, One million were illegally brought in and the other 300,000 were born to those brought in after the Zionist movement in 1882 was born.  The BIG Lie continues to this day.  One question remains to be answered; why is the western media continuing the perpetration of this falsehood?

When British rule began, says the Colonial Office, Palestine was primitive and underdeveloped. The population of 750,000, this includes Transjordan,  were disease-ridden and poor. But new methods of farming were introduced, medical services provided, roads and railways built, water supplies improved, malaria wiped out. (see above for details)

In mid 1800 the estimated pseudo Palestinian population was 200,000; in 1947 there were 1,100,000. Quite a jump. Jews were the majority during the 1st through the 4th century. The years between 1900 and 1947 the Jewish population exploded due to those leaving Europe after the war and those who fled Muslim countries.

In 1920 the British estimated that no more than 700,000 people lived in all of Palestine including Transjordan

Official reports

In 1920, the British Government’s Interim Report on the Civil Administration of Palestine stated that there were hardly 700,000 people living in Palestine:

There are now in the whole of Palestine (1920) hardly 700,000 people including Transjordan, a population much less than that of the province of Gallilee alone in the time of Christ. Of these 235,000 live in the larger towns, 465,000 in the smaller towns and villages. Four-fifths of the whole population are Moslems. A small proportion of these are Bedouin Arabs; the remainder, although they speak Arabic and are termed Arabs, are largely of mixed race. Some 77,000 of the population are Christians, in large majority belonging to the Orthodox Church, and speaking Arabic. The minority are members of the Latin or of the Uniate Greek Catholic Church, or—a small number—are Protestants. The Jewish element of the population numbers 76,000. Almost all have entered Palestine during the last 40 years. Prior to 1850 there were in the country only a handful of Jews as there were Muslims. keep in mind In the following 30 years a few hundreds came to Palestine. Most of them were animated by religious motives; they came to pray and to die in the Holy Land, and to be buried in its soil. After the persecutions in Russia forty years ago, the movement of the Jews to Palestine assumed larger proportions. Jewish agricultural colonies were founded. They developed the culture of oranges and gave importance to the Jaffa orange trade. They cultivated the vine, and manufactured and exported wine. They drained swamps. They planted eucalyptus trees. They practiced, with modern methods, all the processes of agriculture. There are at the present time 64 of these settlements, large and small, with a population of some 15,000.

By 1948, the population had risen to 1,900,000, of whom 68% were Arabs, and 32% were Jews (UNSCOP report, including Bedouin).

In Transjordan, the British government granted its independence in 1921 with Abdullah as ruler. The degree of independence that was afforded to the Arab states by colonial powers was an ongoing issue at the time, however in the case of Transjordan, the independence enjoyed was limited; with substantial influence and control reserved by British government in London. In domestic affairs the local ruler was given a considerable amount of power nonetheless; but these powers were exercised in an autocratic manner by the Hashemite family while remaining under the superintendence of the British Resident in Amman, as well as the British high commissioner in Jerusalem.^[18] Abdullah was assassinated in 1951, but his descendants continue to rule Jordan today.

Upon the departure of the British occupying forces in May 1948 and the proclamation of the State of Israel, the armies of five Arab countries entered Palestine. In the ensuing conflict—the first of the Arab-Israeli wars—Israel expanded beyond the territory contemplated by the partition plan. The West Bank, as demarcated by the Jordanian-Israeli armistice of 1949, was broadly similar to (but smaller than) one of the zones designated as an Arab state by the United Nations (UN) partition plan for Palestine in 1947 (see United Nations Resolution 181). According to that plan, Jerusalem was to have been an international zone. However, the city was instead divided into Israeli (west) and Jordanian (east) sectors. The Arab state whose creation was envisioned by the 1947 UN partition plan never came into being, and the West Bank was formally annexed by Jordan on April 24, 1950, although this annexation was recognized only by Great Britain and Pakistan.

They had their chance under Arafat, but he missed an opportunity to miss and opportunity. As history is recorded, the pseudo Palestinians failed to compromise. Never in war has the losing side dictated terms to the conqueror.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_Camp_David_Summit

This N.Y. case against Trump will not stand on its own two feet. Trump’s attorneys are hatching a plan behind closed doors to either alter the fine or get the case dismissed on the merits.

You have a rouge judge, hand picked by a ruthless prosecutor, who will find their demise in short order. The fact is, a Judge can’t be judge and jury in the United States, unless the defendant agrees to the procedure in advance. We are talking about highway robbery.

This case is one of Capital Murder. Byrd claims shots were fired at him, he returned fire killing Ms. Babbitt an Air Force Veteran. No shots were fired, but Byrd claims they were after he shot Ms. Babbitt. This was an ambush in cold blood. “Shots fired” was a False Flag.” Lies prevailed throughout the investigation; they said she smashed a window, not true, then they said she was part of a mob, not true.

Byrd has never been charged for the fatal shooting.  Her husband, Aaron Babbitt, has filed a thirty million lawsuit backed by Judicial Watch against the Federal Government. 

The above information was gathered from the EPOCH TIMES.

Illegals of the pregnant type are fleeing their home country, dropping their anchor babies  like locusts.

Hospitals have been ordered by the Biden administration to give these criminals first class treatment, no waiting in line for them. Americans in need of surgery, radiation treatments and medical care are now relegated to second class citizens; affectively they are Dalits. 

 By Michael Ruiz Fox News

Where is Charles Bronson (DEATH WISH) when we need him most?

https://youtu.be/2YPzSrb0NPI

Veterans are up in Arms because the Branden administration has decided that the Nations Backbone, the Armed Services, are no longer needed as America is beaten up by China, Russia, Iran, Iraq, Houthi Yemen, Turkey and others.  Goes to show you what Branden thinks of Our Heroes. 

President Biden is facing increased scrutiny over his administration providing health care administrative services to illegal migrants amid a worsening border crisis, potentially exacerbating long wait times for American veterans utilizing Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA) facilities.

In an interview with Fox News Digital, Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., touted his recently introduced No VA Resources for Illegal Aliens Act, which he introduced alongside Rep. Mike Bost, R-Ill., that would ban such action, one of the many problems he says are facing the country as a result of the border “disaster” taking place under Biden’s watch.

“[Biden’s] decided, OK, we’ve got to feed all these 10 million people we’ve let come across the border, we’ve got to house them, and we’ve got to give them health care,” Tuberville said. “They’ve opened up care from the doctors in these [VA] community care systems. The lines now in the VA’s are getting longer. Our funds that are supposed to go to the veterans are going to these illegal immigrants that are coming across.”

Hamas was pretty slick, after all they built the Gaza Metro connecting hospitals to houses, where they stored munitions of every kind imaginable. Their comrades in arms, UNRWA, not only looked the other way, but coordinated the effort. Of course this is denied over and over again. However, the proof is in the putting. Not only did they help Hamas in storing weapons, their employees used them to attack innocent women and children on October 7, 2023.

Opinion by BY NEVILLE TELLER • 2d

Former US president Harry S. Truman kept a slogan on his desk: “The buck stops here.”

The idea was to remind himself daily that, as the nation’s leader, he intended to take ultimate responsibility for what happened on his watch. There would be no “passing the buck,” no denying responsibility or laying the blame elsewhere.

The Motley Fool7 High Yield Savings Accounts

Ad

This principle was at one time observed pretty universally by any chief executive. Heads of organizations took it for granted that they were responsible for their actions.

Standards may have slipped somewhat in recent years, but it is still generally accepted that when organizations act reprehensibly, their leaders are ultimately responsible for their failures and must relinquish their posts.

The furor that has erupted around the United Nations Relief and Works Agency is not the first time that UNRWA has been charged with scandalous conduct, but it is undoubtedly the worst.

Israeli soldiers operate next to the UNRWA headquarters, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, in the Gaza Strip, February 8, 2024. (credit: REUTERS/DYLAN MARTINEZ)© Provided by The Jerusalem Post

Israeli soldiers operate next to the UNRWA headquarters, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, in the Gaza Strip, February 8, 2024. (credit: REUTERS/DYLAN MARTINEZ)

The organization is tarred with offenses so heinous that they almost beggar description. Yet we have heard not a peep from its commissioner-general, Philippe Lazzarini, suggesting that he is shouldering any kind of responsibility, let alone considering his position.

 Based upon what must be pretty convincing intelligence provided by Israel, at least 14 countries have stopped funding UNRWA for the time being.

Related video: IDF, says ‘Hamas leaders, wherever they are hiding, should know they are on borrowed time’ (The Economic Times)

This evening we are releasing a footage of the mass

Play Video

The Economic Times

IDF, says ‘Hamas leaders, wherever they are hiding, should know they are on borrowed time’

Unmute

0

View on Watch

Details of Israel’s intelligence dossier were disseminated in the media on January 30. They provide information indicating that incredibly, 12 UNRWA employees participated personally in the massacre of 1,200 people and the capture of some 240 hostages that took place in Israel on October 7.

The dossier lists the names and jobs of all 12 allegedly involved in Hamas’s attack and the specific allegations against them. It details how six of the UNRWA staff inside Israel on the day of the attack were tracked through their phones. Others were wiretapped and, during a series of calls, were heard discussing their involvement in the attack.

It describes 10 of the 12 as Hamas members and another as affiliated with Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ). It names a school counselor from Khan Yunis as allegedly conspiring with his son to abduct a woman from Israel and identifies an Arabic teacher employed by UNRWA as a Hamas militant commander who allegedly took part in the murderous attack on Kibbutz Be’eri.

Pandora Official E-StorePandora Disney Pixar Mike Wazowski Charm – Enamel / Sterling Silver / Man-Made Crystal / Green

Ad

A social worker in the Nuseirat refugee camp is accused of helping Hamas bring the body of a dead Israeli soldier into Gaza, and of coordinating vehicles for the terror group during the October 7 attack and handing out ammunition to its gunmen.

The New York Times, which also had access to the intelligence dossier, reported that three of those monitored by Israeli intelligence received text messages on October 7 ordering them to report to muster points, while another UNRWA employee was ordered to bring rocket-propelled grenades stored inside his home.

But the scandal runs much deeper.

According to a report in The Wall Street Journal, the dossier says that about 10% of UNRWA’s 13,000 staff in Gaza have ties to Islamist groups, including Hamas and PIJ.

On January 28, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said he was horrified by the allegations and that nine of the 12 employees identified as being involved with Hamas had been sacked. One was dead, he added, and the identities of the other two were being clarified.

While the UN investigates, so far at least 14 countries, among them the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, Italy, Canada, Finland, the Netherlands, and Japan have not responded to pleas from Lazzarini and Guterres to resume their payments to UNRWA.

A senior Israeli government official told The Wall Street Journal: “UNRWA’s problem is not just ‘a few bad apples’ involved in the October 7 massacre. The institution as a whole is a haven for Hamas’s radical ideology.”

The history of UNRWA and how Hamas’s ideology allegedly found a home there

AROUND THE time that the State of Israel came into being, over half the non-Jewish population of what was called “Palestine” at the time, some 750,000 people, left their homes – some on advice, some from fear of the forthcoming conflict, some during the fierce exchanges.

After the armistice, the UN set up a body to assist them – UNRWA.

UNRWA began its work in May 1950, seven months ahead of the establishment by the UN of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).  Ever since, Palestinian refugees have been treated differently from all the other refugees in the world. One reason is that from the start, UNRWA totally ignored a key aspect of its remit.

The 1949 UN General Assembly resolution that established UNRWA called for the alleviation of distress among Palestine refugees and stated, crucially, that: “constructive measures should be undertaken at an early date with a view to the termination of international assistance for relief.”

In other words, the new agency’s mission was intended to be temporary, as the refugees under its wing were resettled.