(click) JFK T0 911 – Everything Is A Rich Man’s Trick! Must See Chilling Documentary (rumble.com)
TRUMP– THE MAN WHO BROKE THE CLUB’S HOLD ON AMERICA
TRUMP– THE MAN WHO BROKE THE CLUB’S HOLD ON AMERICA


Mexican drug cartels have conducted more than 9,000 drone flights into U.S. airspace in the last year to surveil American law enforcement and security operations in the southern border region, a senior Homeland Security official told Judicial Watch this week. The drones are observing federal, state, county, and city agencies near the Mexican border, including the U.S. Border Patrol, Texas Department of Public Safety, Texas National Guard, county sheriffs and local police. The Border Patrol, which operates under Customs and Border Protection (CBP), has captured about a dozen of the drones, and accessed the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles’ (UAVs) guidance and memory systems to gain intelligence information, according to a high-level official at the agency.
Judicial Watch learned about the Mexican cartel drone incursions during a recent visit to the southern border and specifically while interviewing federal officials at the CBP Rio Grande Valley sector in Texas. Judicial Watch is further investigating the matter and has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with CBP, the 60,000-member agency charged with keeping terrorists and their weapons out of the U.S., for all records regarding the use of drones by criminal organizations operating along the U.S.-Mexico border for the purpose of surveilling U.S. law enforcement officials or otherwise facilitating illegal activity. The federal public-record request includes, but is not limited to, all information depicting the known or estimated number of instances of the use of such technology, as well as all reports, intelligence assessments, analyses, or similar records related to their use.
Federal officials on the ground tell Judicial Watch that the cartels use the UAV surveillance flights to facilitate human smuggling and drug trafficking. Specifically, they help identify gaps in border coverage and assist the cartels in overwhelming certain areas to create a diversion for moving sensitive or high value loads through alternate border locations. The data analyzed from the confiscated drones has also provided U.S. authorities with other law-enforcement sensitive information that cannot be made public, government sources said, adding that drug cartels started using the devices a few years ago. Brandon Judd, the president of the union representing the nation’s 20,000 Border Patrol agents, told Judicial Watch the drones are also used to smuggle small amounts of drugs into the U.S. “They are dropping fentanyl,” Judd said this week. “They fly into certain locations, drop them to the ground and fentanyl is taken off of them and they take back off into Mexico.” The drones are not military grade, Judd confirmed, but rather “run of the mill” that can be purchased anywhere.
Reports of Mexican cartels using UAVs to enhance their illicit operations began surfacing within the last few years. In fact, three years ago agents in the El Paso sector around 750 miles from the Rio Grande Valley revealed in a news report that they had witnessed what they believed to be the first use of a drone by a Mexican cartel to act as a “look-out.” In the story CBP officials from the El Paso sector are quoted saying that agents “discovered a new tactic in counter surveillance,” referring to the UAV. An agent monitoring the border with an infrared camera discovered the drone traveling north into the U.S. from Mexico, the article states. Last year Mexico’s largest newspaper reported that some of the country’s most notorious cartels, including Jalisco Nueva Generación, used drones with explosives to attack police in the western part of the country. Back in 2018, an academic study found that cartels use drones to look for Border Patrol agents and inform drug smugglers of their positions. The research focused on the complex security landscape of military drones for border security and non-state actors with sharply diverging motives to develop their own drone surveillance capacities.
Exclusive: ‘Migrant president’ Biden stirs Mexican angst over boom time for gangs
By Dave Graham
6 MIN READ

MEXICO CITY (Reuters) – Mexico’s government is worried the new U.S. administration’s asylum policies are stoking illegal immigration and creating business for organized crime, according to officials and internal assessments seen by Reuters.
Migrants are pictured after a protest at the Mexico-U.S. San Ysidro port of entry to ask U.S. President Joe Biden to allow them to apply for asylum, in Tijuana, Mexico March 2, 2021. Picture taken March 2, 2021. REUTERS/Jorge Duenes
“They see him as the migrant president, and so many feel they’re going to reach the United States,” Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador said of Biden the morning after a virtual meeting with his U.S. counterpart on March 1.
“We need to work together to regulate the flow, because this business can’t be tackled from one day to the next.”
Previously unreported details in the internal assessments, based on testimonies and intelligence gathering, state that gangs are diversifying methods of smuggling and winning clients as they eye U.S. measures that will “incentivize migration.”
Apprehensions on the U.S.-Mexico border in February hit levels unseen since mid-2019, and were the highest for that month in 15 years, data reported by Reuters showed.
Among U.S. steps Mexico worries are encouraging migration are improved support for victims of gangs and violence, streamlining of the legalization process, and suspension of Trump-era accords that deported people to Central America.
Recent Mexican policies are also encouraging migration, according to one assessment. It saw potential fillips in measures such as offering COVID-19 vaccines to migrants, as well as better protections for undocumented children.
One Mexican official familiar with migration developments, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said organized crime began changing its modus operandi “from the day Biden took office” and now exhibited “unprecedented” levels of sophistication.
That includes briefing clients on the latest immigration rules, using technology to outfox authorities, and disguising smuggling operations as travel agencies, assessments showed.
Slideshow ( 3 images )
“Migrants have become a commodity,” the official said, arguing they were now as valuable as drugs for the gangs. “But if a packet of drugs is lost in the sea, it’s gone. If migrants are lost, it’s human beings we’re talking about.”
Mexico’s security ministry, foreign ministry and national migration institute did not reply to requests for comment for this story. The White House and the Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Higher concentrations of migrants in border areas have encouraged gangs to recruit some as drug mules, and kidnap others for money, said Cesar Peniche, attorney general of Chihuahua, the state with the longest stretch of U.S. frontier.
Both Mexican and U.S. policy should be more clear-cut so as not to spur illegal immigration, he told Reuters.
Mexico has praised Biden for offering a pathway to citizenship to millions of U.S. residents of Mexican origin, and for rolling back Trump-era policies that sent U.S. asylum seekers back into Mexico to await their court hearings.
SOCIAL MEDIA
To avoid detection, migrants now often travel in small groups instead of caravans, and increasingly follow more dangerous, less well-trodden routes, the Mexican official said.
Communicating via social media such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram and YouTube, smugglers update migrants on impending checkpoints, when freight trains they can jump on pass, where to stay and how to navigate immigration laws, the official added.
To ease their passage, smugglers advise Central American clients to register complaints with authorities saying they have been victims of extortion or, for young men, that they have faced death threats from street gangs, the assessments show.
And, as in previous years, migrants are being told to bring along children to make it easier to apply for asylum.
Mexican intelligence shows smugglers’ transit costs vary widely. One assessment said an unaccompanied Central American minor could secure passage to the U.S. border for about $3,250. By contrast, for African travelers, the rate was $20,000. Asians must also pay more.
One evaluation set out concerns there could be a significant influx in migrants from outside the region – the Caribbean, Asia, Africa and the Middle East – as coronavirus-led border restrictions begin easing.
Even as Mexicans hail Biden’s cancellation of work on Trump’s border wall, some officials say it is time Mexico returns to an idea the government raised in 2019: improving the infrastructure along its own southern border with Guatemala.
“Mexico spends more on every new wave of migrants than that would cost,” said another official. “We have to do it.”
Reporting by Dave Graham; Additional reporting by Sofia Menchu in Guatemala City and Alexandra Alper in Washington; Editing by Rosalba O’Brien
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
https://nypost.com/2022/04/15/fox-news-makes-peter-doocy-sound-like-stupid-son-of-a-bitch-jen-psaki/
The toll is now front and center:
We have seen this show before, but never to the degree that the Biden administration has failed on all fronts. In fact, world leaders wonder if Joe Biden is “all there.”
Dementia Joe’s last act, that is if he can last past November, will be the IMPEACHMENT of a FRAUD.
Biden, 79, had just finished delivering a nearly 40-minute speech at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University in Greensboro when he turned toward stage right with his paw outstretched in a handshake position.
There was no one else on stage and no one from the applauding crowd approached the president to exchange the pleasantry, according to footage of the event.
The Democrat did press some flesh at the start of the speech, shaking hands with Malcolm Hawkins, the electrical engineering student who introduced him.
His remarks were aimed at pressuring Congress to increase funding for semiconductors production as proposed in the Bipartisan Innovation Act.
Some political adversaries reacted to the ungraceful exit, including Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who tweeted an eye-roll emoji alongside footage of the air handshake.
President Biden turned after his speech with his hand stretched out, but no one was there.@freebeacon/TwitterThis was not the first time Sleepy Joe extended his hand to a Ghost. SEE BELOW
Biden, 79, had just finished delivering a nearly 40-minute speech at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University in Greensboro when he turned toward stage right with his paw outstretched in a handshake position.
US President Joe Biden fumbled with his microphone at the beginning of a high-stakes video call with Vladimir Putin, awkwardly waving to his Russian counterpart during the silence.
“Greetings, Mr President,” Putin said in Russian, only to be met with silence on the other end of the line.
After a few seconds, Biden leans forward and presses a button, appearing to turn his mic on.
“There you go,” he said, suddenly audible, chuckling and waving to Putin.
BUT DON’T FORGET OBAMA’S OPEN MIKE AFFAIR


From KitcoKitco Commentaries | Opinions, Ideas and Markets Talk
Featuring views and opinions written by market professionals, not staff journalists.

The U.S. dollar also strengthened with the dollar index breaking above 100 after factoring in today’s gain of 0.39% which took the index to 100.315.








But the latest is that USPS employees have called out the violence in Santa Monica California; they refuse to deliver mail there. How about the police and the firemen doing the same. Burn baby burn.
Not all but many politicians get into the game for financial reasons. One purview of what they had when they entered office and how much they had a decade later. One has to wonder how their net rose to unassailable heights. This calls our attention to the Clinton Crime Family. By the way their Crime family was no different than other Crime Families. They either put a gun to their victims heads or threatened them until they were paid off. Clinton’s were experts at this.
However this era of angry polarization, crime and violence ends, it will be left to historians to decipher how America got so far off track. Instead of building on our unprecedented prosperity and role as the world’s ultimate superpower, we declared war — cultural, political and social — on each other. Even our nation’s Founders are not spared.
The reasons will be better understood in hindsight, but it’s hard to believe the 2016 presidential campaign won’t be seen as an inflection point. Our move toward disunion didn’t begin then, but it certainly gained steam and vitriol during and after the election of Donald Trump.
Two recent developments illustrate how that campaign remains a radioactive hot spot. With both developments centering on Hillary Clinton, they underscore her role and the depths of her venality.
Just when you think you’ve seen the worst of her, proof emerges that she was even more duplicitous than we knew.
The first evidence came in a little-noticed decision from the Federal Election Commission. It ruled on a complaint from the Coolidge Reagan Foundation that Clinton and the Democratic National Committee violated federal law by hiding how they funded the odious Christopher Steele dossier, perhaps the most destructive disinformation document in United States history.
The FEC agreed with the complaint and ruled that Clinton and the DNC, which she effectively controlled, hid their payments to Steele as merely “legal fees,” without mentioning him or his work. In fact, the money was funneled through a law firm, Perkins Coie, which then hired the smear merchants at FusionGPS, who hired Steele, a former British spook.
The layers and false claim about legal fees were intended to put distance between Clinton and Steele because knowledge of the truth would have destroyed her campaign. Although her lawyers and the DNC argued they did nothing wrong, they agreed not to contest the findings and quietly paid fines totaling $113,000.
If this effective admission on funding the dirtiest dirty trick in presidential politics is news to you, don’t blame yourself. Much of the media ignored or downplayed the finding and Clinton’s fine, saying the issue was just one of “misreporting” or “mislabeling” the Steele payments.
That’s because the truth would make them look guilty, too. To report on the election commission’s significance would force the Dems’ propaganda arm to acknowledge its own culpability.
By treating the Steele dossier as if it were holy writ, or at least credible, the media furthered Clinton’s campaign to paint Trump as a Russian stooge.
Of course, the FBI was also complicit, using the dossier as a crutch to justify its unjustifiable spying on a presidential campaign. A remaining question is, under Jim Comey’s leadership, was the FBI the dumbest ever or the most venal?

Probably both but whatever the answer, J. Edgar Hoover finally can rest in peace.
The second recent development involves a new court filing by special counsel John Durham in the case of Michael Sussmann, a Clinton lawyer and campaign operative who is charged with lying to the FBI in 2016. His alleged role expands the deception annals by showing Clinton’s team wasn’t relying only on Steele’s farrago of lies, lies and more lies.
Perhaps doubtful that Steele, even with his FBI friends and media contacts, could make up for her unpopularity, Clinton financed a bookend to his dossier with another fabrication.
This second scam had Sussmann, a tech executive and the same smear merchants try to sell the FBI on a concocted story about a Trump computer secretly communicating with a Russian bank.
Durham calls the effort a “joint venture” of the conspirators, a phrase that gives a sense of the plot and the players. There wasn’t a scintilla of truth to back up the computer nonsense, and even though the FBI saw through the tissue-thin claim, many in the media naturally fell for it.
They managed to find in this particular lie a confirming detail of the larger lie Steele was spinning — that Trump was a toady of Vladimir Putin and was colluding with him to steal the election.
The case is a criminal one because Durham accuses Sussmann of lying by saying he was not representing any clients as he tried to spin a top agency official on the computer connection. In fact, Sussmann was representing the Clinton campaign, which he billed for the meeting, and the tech executive, identified as Rodney Joffe.
Although Sussmann pleaded not guilty, Durham released a text message in which Sussmann explicitly tells the FBI he is not representing any clients.
His trial, scheduled for next month, has the potential to be a breakthrough in Durham’s long-running effort to reveal voluminous wrongdoing by Clinton and the federal government against the Trump campaign.
Based on his court filings, the prosecutor appears to be planning to link Sussmann’s efforts to the dossier, in part because of the role his firm, Perkins Coie, played in both scams. Also, Durham said Sussmann met with Steele and FusionGPS in Perkins Coie offices and raised the possibility that Steele could testify.
Even before a verdict, the case moves the responsibility closer to where it ultimately belongs–in Clinton’s lap. Whether Durham will ever be able to show her fingerprints on any criminal conduct is the great unknown, but in one sense, it’s also beside the point.
We already know with 100 percent certainty that she is guilty of igniting the false accusations of Russian collusion that continue to shape our culture and politics. Although Trump was hardly a model president, the widespread claim by her party and the media that he was an illegitimate president wasn’t just dirty politics. It was a nuclear attack on the spirit that has always held our nation together, however tenuously.

Clinton lost the election and Robert Mueller’s special counsel probe came up empty, yet the collusion narrative lives on among major elements of the political left. To judge from the tumultuous years since, many of those who subscribe to her lie are using it as a license to try to destroy America.
Tragically, they are having a good deal of success.
Reader Steve Lounsberry, fearing that violence in New York is too entrenched to be reversed with halfway measures, offers what he admits is a “draconian” solution. He writes: “If you possess an illegal gun —
5 years in prison. Use an illegal gun in commission a crime — 10 years. Shoot someone in commission of a crime — 20 years. Kill someone in commission of a crime — life without parole.”
He says “sentences should be mandatory with no plea bargaining” and adds: “I bet victims and family members would like the idea.”
Perhaps you forgot about Hillary’s commodity scam. Cattle futures was her venture. Running a measly $1000 bucks to $100 large in a matter of a few months. Only pros play the commodity game because amateurs lose 99% of the time. This is a game not for the faint of heart, but for those who have the muster to play it. How did Hillary’s scam work?
Hillary Rodham Clinton engaged in a series of trades regarding cattle futures contracts. Her initial $1,000 investment had generated nearly $100,000 when she stopped trading after ten months. This is similar to Hunter Biden not knowing anything about the oil-gas industry. He hit a well the first time. Pumped Ukraine for all it was worth. It was suspected by commentators that the profits were in fact allocations to her of profits from unrelated large block trades managed by her investment advisor James Blair, outside counsel to Tyson Foods, Arkansas’ largest employer, in an attempt to gain influence with her husband Bill Clinton, then Governor of Arkansas.
That wasn’t the first of political shakedowns nor the last. Many of Hillary’s victims ended up DOA. How did that happen? Tell you the truth we would like to know. Hillary Clinton is one of the most corrupt and devious individuals who has not spent a day in the Iron Bar. Don’t forget her comment, “you mean with a cloth.” That was in reaction to her had hard drives being BleachBit. Just think for a moment, she destroyed 33,000 emails. You don’t do that unless you are guilty.
The donations to the William J. Clinton Foundation include amounts of $10 million to $25 million from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and real estate mogul Stephen Bing, a personal friend of Clinton’s.
The Clintons came under intense pressure during Hillary Clinton’s campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination to release the names of donors to both the foundation and to the Clinton presidential library in Arkansas.

By David Maraniss and Susan Schmidt
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, June 2, 1996; Page A01
One month after Massey’s testimony, when Hillary Clinton was interviewed again by lawyers for the RTC, she modified her story. She said it was not Massey but Vincent Foster, another Rose partner, who went to her originally to discuss how they could sign up Madison despite McDougal’s past billing troubles. Foster had been the billing partner in earlier work Rose had done for McDougal’s first financial institution, Madison Bank & Trust. Foster committed suicide in 1993, actually Ate a Gun, according to official reports.
By the time she was asked questions about her legal relationship with McDougal, he was a notorious figure. He brought the Clintons into the Whitewater land deal, which raised the first questions about conflicts of interest and cozy relationships in Arkansas. His savings and loan had long since gone under, costing the government as much as $60 million, another symbol of the expensive savings and loan scandal that infuriated taxpayers across the nation. He had been indicted and acquitted for his various land deals, and would later be indicted again, and convicted. He had become an embarrassment to the first lady. According to her versions, her relationship with McDougal was indirect and almost incidental.
It is an undisputed fact that Hillary Clinton became the billing partner for Rose Law Firm in its representation of James McDougal and Madison Guaranty on April 23, 1985, the day she visited McDougal at his office and arranged for him to pay the firm the $2,000-a-month retainer. Rose billing records show she began charging hours to the account that day. But what did she do for Madison? Did she in any way take advantage of her position as a powerful lawyer and wife of the governor? That issue arises in questions about the first telephone call she made on behalf of McDougal to a state agency.
SIXTY HOURS
From the time of the original Whitewater stories in 1992 until her Rose Law Firm billing records were discovered in the White House residence last January, little was known about what legal work Hillary Clinton did for Madison Guaranty beyond the question involving preferred stock and the state securities commission. She characterized her representation overall as “very limited” and essentially supervisory. Associates or other attorneys, she said, attended to the details.
The billing records showed that she put in about 60 hours of work on the Madison account over a 15-month period. She billed Madison more than $6,000 at the firm’s top rate of $120 an hour. The first lady and her lawyers calculated her time on Madison as averaging about an hour a week and said that proved her contention that it was minimal. On the other hand, an hour a week on a project might be minimal for a low-level associate, but not necessarily for a partner.
Whitewater investigators in Congress and in the independent counsel’s office regard the billing records differently. They have used them as a field map in exploring the ancient ground of Castle Grande. Did Hillary Clinton see the records back in 1992 when questions were first raised about her legal work? If she did, why did she not release them to the public then – before they were missing – or at least summarize them in discussions with the press? Has she truly been committed to full disclosure? What role did she play, if any, in their disappearance and rediscovery?
The Clintons had not, as she had claimed, taken “every document” they had and “laid them all out” when questions first arose about Whitewater. Five days after the Rehm interview, the White House issued a clarification which said the first lady “mistakenly suggested that the New York Times was provided access to all of the Whitewater-related documents in the possession of the 1992 campaign.” According to the statement, Hillary Clinton “believed that the campaign had turned over all the documents in its possession” but had since learned that some records were withheld.
From the beginning of the Whitewater controversy, Hillary Clinton has maintained a public posture seemingly at odds with her actions. She was reluctant to release records during the 1992 campaign. She fought David Gergen’s recommendation to turn over all the records in 1993. She led White House opposition to the appointment of a special counsel in early 1994.
Oh that laptop, keeps on talking, not gibberish mind you, but a real life story that would make Agatha Christies proud. Sometimes you find a gold nugget when panning for gold; surprise, look what I found. So an old geezer operating an electronic fixit shop was shocked when he found out that the laptop he was assigned to fix, was none other than Hunter Bidens, the “Thee Hunter Biden.” The coke addict Hunter Biden, the Cheater Hunter Biden, the Criminal Hunter Biden, the Donkey carrying messages from Mr. Big Hunter Biden. This Hunter Biden was racking up millions of Frequent Flier Miles while doing duty for his Criminal Liar Father. Both lining their pockets to the Detriment of the United States of America.
THE FIND
The Post reported that the email was found in a cache of data extracted from the external hard drive of a laptop computer that appeared to belong to Hunter Biden, which was dropped off at a Delaware repair shop by an unidentified person in 2019 and never collected. The Post reported that the owner of the repair shop had made a copy of the hard drive before it was seized by the FBI, and that it was later provided to the Post by Donald Trump‘s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani. The day after its initial report, the Post reported on another email relating to a business venture Hunter Biden pursued with a Chinese company in May 2017, in which his father was mentioned by a prospective business partner as a potential equity holder, though Biden wrote in another email that his father was emphatically not interested in the deal. The Post and other conservative media outlets reported extensively on the laptop and other contents of the hard drive.
On October 14, 2020, weeks before the 2020 United States presidential election, the New York Post published an article about an April 2015 email regarding an alleged meeting between then-Vice President Joe Biden and Burisma advisor Vadym Pozharskyi. The email, from Pozharskyi to Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, who served on the board of Burisma, thanked Hunter Biden for inviting him for an opportunity to meet his father in Washington, D.C.. The Post claimed that the email provided evidence that Joe Biden was untruthful when he claimed that he had “never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings”, and that the email provided evidence in support of the Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory regarding the firing of Ukrainian Prosecutor General, Viktor Shokin. The Biden campaign denied Joe Biden had any meeting with Pozharskyi, and said that if they had ever met, it would have been a brief encounter.
UPDATE: “LOCK HIM UP” – “LOCK UP JOE BIDEN” – “LOCK UP THE WHOLE CROOKED FAMILY” – THEY WERE RUNNING A CRIME SYNDICATE – LA COSA NOSTRA
The same day the $5 million was received, the report adds, Hudson West III began sending “frequent payments” to Owasco (the Hunter Biden firm), with the payments continuing for more than a year, through Sept. 25, 2018. “These payments, which were described as consulting fees,” the report adds, reached $4,790,375.25 in just over a year.”
Let’s see here, Joe Biden is proud of his son Hunter; a shakedown artist, a cocaine addict who was thrown out of the military. Well then, as they say, the fruit doesn’t fall to far from the tree. Joe schooled him on the ART of the STEAL.
Deep state press was an arm of the Democrat Party by ignoring and suppressing the Biden Crime Family. Additionally, they are now suppressing the Swalwell affair (where is the dress) in which he exchanged honey sex for National Intelligence. Swalwell is subject to bribery, he must go.
Time for War Patriots; We call you to arms.

(click)https://www.foxnews.com/media/glenn-greenwald-hunter-biden-media-historic-crime
The FCC should Revoke the licenses of these criminals who have committed the gravest crime in American History.

The buzz around Hunter Biden’s financial activities is not going away. Since 2018, investigations have been going on into a missing laptop, foreign business dealings and whether or not he could be a security threat.
The New York Post set things off back in October of 2020 with a front page titled “Biden Secret E-mails.”
The Post said they had emails proving Hunter Biden’s potentially illegal business dealings while his father was the vice president. The reporting also brought up the possibility of Joe Biden’s potential engagement in corruption.
The rebuke of the report was swift. More than 50 former senior intelligence officials signed a letter calling the emails “Russian disinformation.”
In 2020, the New York Times published a story with the headline “Trump Had One Last Story To Sell. The Wall Street Journal Wouldn’t Buy It.”
A headline from CNN read, “The anatomy of the New York Post’s dubious Hunter Biden story” and the Washington Post had an opinion piece titled, “The truth behind the Hunter Biden non-scandal.”
The New York Post story got the cold shoulder from mainstream media but the article was heavily censored online as well. Some social media sites tried to erase the story altogether.
Facebook limited the article’s visibility in users’ news feeds and Twitter outright blocked the story hours after it was released.
The site didn’t stop there and even suspended the New York Post’s account demanding that the newspaper delete the article.
The social media sites say they banned the story because they feared it was Russian disinformation but others say it was a cover-up for Joe Biden and his family before the 2020 election.
Hunter Biden’s past dealings with Chinese nationals – including some flagged for “potential financial criminal activity” – are outlined in a Senate committee report reviewed by Fox News.
The details come as Biden – the 50-year-old son of President-elect Joe Biden – on Wednesday acknowledged that he has been under a grand jury investigation through the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Delaware since 2018 over his “tax affairs.”
Biden’s father was not a target of the investigation, a source told Fox News.
It was unclear whether any of the specific transactions detailed in the Senate panel’s report were among those being investigated by the U.S. attorney. But the transactions offer a glimpse into Hunter Biden’s alleged activities prior to the launch of the grand jury investigation in 2018.
Martha Stuart, Leonna Helmsley, Alphonse Capone were all tagged for either either fraud or lying to the FEDS. Alphonse (aka Scarface) was canned for underreporting his income; Helmsley too. Stuart was jailed for lying. This brings us to Hunter( the shakedown artist) Biden.
This cocaine addict son of the ex-VP has had a target on his back since the Ukraine “you either fire him now because I’m leaving in a few hours” video of his dementia father threatening the Ukrainian President.
But Hunter is now
CLICK HERE FOR LEARN MORE ABOUT THE CRIMINAL SHAKE DOWN ARTIST – HANNITY WEIGHS IN. (CLICK HERE)
Hunter Biden, the 49-year-old son of former Vice President Joe Biden, has been dodging discovery requests in connection with a paternity case in Arkansas, and is “the subject of more than one criminal investigation involving fraud, money laundering and a counterfeiting scheme,” a private investigation firm claimed this week in a bizarre court filing.

In addition, the Florida-based D&A Investigations told Fox News that its investigators have found that the intelligence community whistleblower at the center of the Democrats’ impeachment effort against President Trump accompanied Joe Biden when he traveled to Ukraine in early 2016 and, by his own admission, pressured the country’s government to fire its top prosecutor by threatening to withhold $1 billion in U.S. aid.
The whistleblower’s attorney, Mark Zaid, did not respond to Fox News’ request for comment on D&A’s claims, which Fox News has not independently verified. Zaid has previously acknowledged that the whistleblower had “contact” with presidential candidates of both parties, amid reports that he had a “professional working relationship” with one of the Democratic presidential contenders.
The latest news
The Hunter Biden Affair. V.P. Joe Biden put the gun – shotgun – to the head of Ukraine’s higher-ups to fire the prosecutor who was investigating the natural gas company that employed Hunter Biden. There are no two ways about it, V.P. Biden got the prosecutor fired. By the way Biden was on the payroll to the tune of $80,000 plus per month. And what did he do? Nada, nothing. This was political corruption at the highest level.
Hunter Biden, drug user, discharged from Navy on February 18, 2014 for failing a drug test that showed cocaine in his urine. In July, 2014, he went to a clinic in Tijuana that provided a treatment using ibogaine, a psychoactive alkaloid derived from the roots of a West African shrub, which is illegal in America.
Rudolph Giuliani, Trump’s personal lawyer, has also aggressively promoted what he has called the “alleged Ukraine conspiracy” in interviews and on social media. Giuliani told me that, in the fall of 2018, he spoke to Viktor Shokin, Ukraine’s former prosecutor general. Shokin told him that Vice-President Biden had him fired in 2016 because he was investigating Burisma and the company’s payments to Hunter and Archer. Giuliani said that, in January, 2019, he met with Yurii Lutsenko, Ukraine’s current prosecutor general, in New York, and Lutsenko confirmed Shokin’s version of events.
In the current controversy, The Washington Post first reported Wednesday that a whistleblower complaint that has spurred a showdown between the intelligence community and Congress involved a “promise” made by Trump to a foreign leader, now believed to be Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. In response on Thursday, Trump tweeted a two-part defense in which he claimed that because he knows calls with foreign leaders are closely monitored, no one should be “dumb enough to believe that I would say something inappropriate with a foreign leader while on such a potentially ‘heavily populated’ call.”
46 THOUGHTS ON “HUNTER BIDEN TARGET OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION – LYING JOE BIDEN COVER-UP – WAKE UP AMERICA ABOUT THE DEMOCRAT CORRUPTION OF SELLING OUT AMERICA”
My Nephew is a Victim says Auntie
What a efnn Joke