ARIZONA SETS RED LINE – DO YOU HAVE THE PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP? NO! SORRY, CAN’T VOTE
Registrar of Voters: “Do you have proof of citizenship?”
Potential Voter: “Not today, didn’t know it was required.”
CLICK HERE TO READ THE LAW AND ITS PROVISIONS
And that is how the conversation will go. Illegals en masse will try to vote, cast a ballot, choose a left wing Libtard with a bleeding heart, to vote in more free everything legislation,
Arizona Passes Proof-of-Citizenship Law for Voting in Presidential Elections
Voting rights groups said the legislation signed into law by Gov. Doug Ducey, a Republican, could prevent tens of thousands of people from voting for president. THE PREVIOUS SENTENCE IS TRUE, HOWEVER THOSE WHO WILL BE PREVENTED FROM VOTING ARE ILLEGAL ALIENS, FELONS AND INELIGIBLE BECAUSE OF RESIDENCY. The pervs don’t tell you that.
Sign Up for On Politics, for Times subscribers only. A Times reader’s guide to the political news in Washington and across the nation.
Gov. Doug Ducey of Arizona has signed legislation requiring voters to prove their citizenship in order to vote in a presidential election, swiftly drawing a legal challenge from voting rights activists who argued that it could keep tens of thousands of voters from casting a ballot.
The Arizona measure, passed into law on Wednesday, also requires newly registered voters to provide a proof of address, which could have a disproportionate impact on students, older voters who no longer drive, low-income voters and Native Americans.
Legal experts said the new rules might run afoul of both federal law and recent Supreme Court decisions. On Wednesday, Mi Familia Vota, a voting rights group, filed a federal lawsuit challenging the law.
The law is one of several new voting restrictions that the Republican-led Legislature in Arizona is working to pass this year, despite multiple investigations and a partisan election review that found no evidence of widespread fraud in the state in the 2020 election.
VLAD IMPALED BY HIS OWN SWORD – TALK OF ASSASSINATION
Not even his namesake would commit such an act. Vlad the Impaler, aka Vlad Tepes, had an arsenal second to none. He watched his back, determined to be proactive, always looking over his shoulder.
This is contrary to Vlad Putin, who as the story unfolds, is facing a back stabbing threat from a known adversary, a military insider, but which one?
Assassination talk inside the Kremlin has begun. How will it occur? By gun, knife, chemicals, poison or suicide vest. At this point it is only talk, but when there is talk, there is also smoke and when there is smoke there is fire. Whoever perpetrates such a killing will be a hero to the world if he/she ends the Ukraine Invasion. 
The Ukrainian militia is holding its own against a formidable enemy. The Ruskie dead are spiraling upwards; estimates as high of 15,000 have been slabbed, that is taken out on the horizontal. Rumors are now reaching the Motherland and the Tovarish don’t like it. Questions are being asked, but answers are far and few and in between.
Zelenskyy to Fox News: Ukraine ‘will not accept any outcome’ besides ‘victory’
Zelenskyy said that giving up territory is ‘out of discussion
“What matters for us is that you and the whole world should know that we are a country at war,” Zelenskyy continued. “We were attacked. That is what matters. That is the biggest tragedy. And today, to hear those reports about something happening someplace something exploded while there is war in Ukraine – honestly it’s not professional to talk about it. They occupied our territory. They attacked us. This war going on for 8 years so whatever happens in a certain situation it’s hard for me to comment.”
“Just give us missiles, give us airplanes, you cannot give us F–18 or F-19 or whatever you have, give us old Soviet planes,” Zelenskyy said. “That’s all. Give them into my hands. Give me something to defend my county with.”
At the close of the interview, Baier asked Zelenskyy about comparisons some have made between him and Winston Churchill.
“God chooses what we can endure, and I think this was not by chance,” Zelenskyy said. “I know we will stand through this.”
HUNTER “MY SON DID NOTHING WRONG” – “WE SHOULD BE FOCUSING ON TRUMP CORRUPTION”
The media avoided the ties between Joe Biden and Hunter’s laptop
Wonders never cease. First The New York Times. Then CNN. Now The Washington Post has caught up with the Hunter Biden laptop story — only 18 months after the New York Post broke the scandal, and too late for the 2020 election.
But now, after our story was censored by Big Tech and dismissed as “Russian disinformation” by Democratic prevaricator Adam Schiff, and 51 former spooks led by former CIA Director John Brennan, apparently it’s safe to admit the laptop is real and the e-mails we published can be easily authenticated.
Of course, they all avoid the inevitable conclusion to be drawn from evidence contained on the laptop that the president’s drug-addled son Hunter abandoned at a MacBook repair shop in Delaware in April 2019: that Joe Biden, when he was vice president, was aware of, and intimately involved in, a corrupt, multimillion-dollar, international influence-peddling scheme run by Hunter, and Joe’s brother Jim Biden, in the countries for which Joe was point man in the Obama administration, such as Russia, Ukraine and China.
Hunter’s laptop is a large piece of the jigsaw puzzle that leads to such a shocking conclusion.
But despite acknowledging that the material on the laptop showed that Hunter was “trading on his father’s name to make a lot of money,” as CNN White House correspondent John Harwood put it, both The Washington Post and CNN were at pains to absolve Joe Biden of any involvement in the scheme.
“There is zero evidence that Vice President Biden, or President Biden, has done anything wrong in connection with what Hunter Biden has done,” Harwood said.
he Washington Post declared it “did not find evidence that Joe Biden personally benefited from or knew details about the transactions with [Chinese energy company] CEFC, which took place after he had left the vice presidency and before he announced his intentions to run for the White House in 2020.”
A New York Times piece earlier this month that also belatedly acknowledged that the veracity of the laptop — in the 24th paragraph — did not explicitly exonerate the president but simply rehearsed the legal defenses that Hunter could mount if he is indicted by the Delaware grand jury investigating him over alleged tax evasion, money laundering and violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act.
No doubt these august media organs who treated our story with sneering disregard for a year and a half have their reasons for jumping on board. For one thing, their original goal of removing Trump from office was achieved long ago, and Joe Biden is now so unpopular that his Praetorian Guard is melting away and reporting on his family is less hazardous to Beltway dinner-party invitations.
State-linked Chinese energy company paid $4.8 million to Hunter Biden
Hunter Biden received almost $5 million in just over a year from a Chinese energy company with ties to the Communist Party, according to documents released by Republican senators, as the investigation deepens into the business dealings of the president’s son.
The documents unveiled this week showed that, beginning in August 2017, Hunter Biden and his uncle received $4.8 million from CEFC China Energy, an oil and gas giant linked to the ruling Communist party and the People’s Liberation Army. The documents, first disclosed by the Republican senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson, have fuelled allegations that the president’s son and others in the family were seeking to profit from Joe Biden’s political connections.
MOSCOW MULE, LIKE BIDEN, SLOBBERS POOP FROM d’MOUT
“Wanted Dead or Alive” by the world at large, sans China, Vlad is one step away of being assassinated or committing suicide. Things have not gone well for the Murderer of Children. 
The Invasion of Ukraine has not gone as planned. Defense department heads are either rolling or collectively, disappeared or killed on the front. What sets this invasion apart is the ill planning and ill forecasting by, not only the Russian Generals, but by those “talking heads” at large, who failed to recognize the extent of Vlad’s commitment to invade.
Turning to Biden, we mean Branden, what has this Invalid done lately? Let us count the ways. Lied, lied and lied again.
Does he have any idea where he is going or for that matter, what is coming out of his mouth? The world wants to know what is wrong with him.
His corner handlers are mystified too. His communication director Psaki can’t keep up with the translations of his Mis-speak. Soon they will be running out of bandages to cover the wounds.
There are calls for his head to roll for giving succor to the enemy. What mattered most and what will be remembered for a long time was a single line the president of the United States said about the president of Russia: “For God’s sake, this man cannot remain in power.” Yes, Biden has divulged State Secrets. This is a treasonous offense. The question remains; is it punishable by injection, Russians are good at this, or a “lightning strike”.
TIME FOR BRANDON TO “PUT UP OR SHUT UP” THE WORLD IS SICK AND TIRED OF HIS SMELLY POOP
Biden Pooped at the G-7, had three retractions. This is nothing new, Branden has a trail of diarrhea since the day he was sworn.
We commend him for his help in electing Republicans come November. Inflation through the roof, 
Making a fool of America on the world stage Joe Biden. Branden is in Zombie mode, not knowing what he is or where he is. What confuses us is the most recent survey which shows 62% of Blacks believe.
Biden says Putin ‘cannot remain in power,’ White House clarifies: LIVE UPDATES
As (click)Russian forces continued to barrage Ukraine this weekend, President Biden hit out at Russian President Vladimir Putin on Saturday, saying he ‘cannot remain in power,’ but the White House quickly clarified that the U.S. is not seeking regime change.
Richard Engel, NBC News’ chief foreign correspondent, told Chuck Todd on Sunday’s “Meet The Press” that he doesn’t believe Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was “overly impressed” with President Biden’s comments in Poland about Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Engel told Todd that the “Russian military strategy is all over the place.” He said the strike on Lviv, a Ukrainian city 50 miles from the Polish border, was also likely meant to be a message to Biden.
“A bit of an insult to say ‘we’re going to strike right near the Polish border while you’re in Poland,” Engel said.
Biden not getting much backup in call for Putin’s ouster
Macron demurs; poll finds weak support for war leadership
President Biden’s impassioned demand that Russian President Vladimir Putin step down for starting the war in Ukraine — the climax of an emotional address in Poland over the weekend — is not getting much support from the allies Mr. Biden is trying to unify for Kyiv.
French President Emmanuel Macron and senior British and Turkish officials distanced themselves from Mr. Biden’s remark, which foreign policy analysts said could complicate the drive to end Russia’s bloody invasion by making Mr. Putin’s status an explicit aim of the war.
NY CITY PROSECUTOR CLOSES TRUMP INVESTIGATION – LIBTARDS IN A RAGE
Manhattan DA Bragg suspended Trump investigation ‘indefinitely,’ stopped pursuing charges
Top prosecutors resigned over Bragg’s decision, but still believe Trump is “guilty.”
Prosecutor who resigned from Trump investigation slams DA for putting the case on ice
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg stopped pursuing charges against former President Trump and suspended the investigation “indefinitely,” one of the top prosecutors who resigned from the office said in his resignation letter–but disagreed with the decision.
Mark Pomerantz and Carey Dunne, who had been leading the investigation under former DA Cyrus Vance, submitted their resignations last month, after Bragg began raising doubts about pursuing a case against Trump.
Prosecutor who resigned from Trump investigation slams DA for putting the case on ice
ANDREA BERNSTEIN
ANDREA BERNSTEIN, BYLINE: Hey. Great to talk to you.
SUMMERS: You, too. All right. Tell us what just happened here.
BERNSTEIN: So this is just the latest twist in a highly unusual case. You’ll remember that the former president took the Manhattan district attorney all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court twice to try to prevent him from looking at Trump’s taxes. Finally, last year, the DA got the tax documents, indicted the former president’s company and his CFO, and as we now know, was getting ready to indict the former president who has denied any wrongdoing and called the whole case politically motivated.
SUMMERS: But in January, a new DA took office, right? What has his approach been?
BERNSTEIN: So the new DA, Alvin Bragg, expressed skepticism about this new case, which had to do with fraudulent property values. And Bragg halted an ongoing grand jury investigation. This caused two top prosecutors to resign. One of them, Mark Pomerantz, who had prosecuted John Gotti, was brought in especially for this case. He submitted his – this resignation letter in which he said putting the grand jury probe on ice was a grave failure of justice and that he and his team had, quote, “no doubt” Trump was guilty of financial crimes. This is highly unusual, a highly unusual expression of passion for a prosecutor who was involved in a case that’s still technically open.
SUMMERS: So the case is technically open, but it’s not really moving forward so much right now. Is this criminal investigation really over?
BERNSTEIN: So both the Manhattan DA’s office and the New York attorney general’s office, which is also working on the criminal case, say no. The DA’s office put out a statement saying the investigation continues. A team of experienced prosecutors is working every day to follow the facts and the law. So there may yet be charges. What we do know was that a decision was made to pull back on an investigation that was very swiftly moving to an indictment as early as this spring. And former prosecutors tell me it’s not so easy to just start something up like that again.
SUMMERS: That’s a pretty strikingly sharp difference in opinion there between the former and current district attorneys in Manhattan. Do you know why that is?
BERNSTEIN: So we don’t understand all the permutations, but we do know this. The former Manhattan DA, Cyrus Vance Jr., had a reputation for extreme caution. It says something that he was ready to indict. His office had struggled for years to gather evidence. And because Trump’s team presented so many legal hurdles, the case outlasted Vance’s term in office. A number of legal experts have raised questions about why the advice of two very senior prosecutors who work for Vance would be rejected. But I’ve also spoken to current and former prosecutors who point out these are very hard cases to prosecute, and different DAs can make different calls.
SUMMERS: OK. So this is an investigation that has been going on since 2018. Andrea, what is next?
BERNSTEIN: Yeah, a long time. So even if there are never any charges against Trump the person, his company and his chief financial officer face serious felony charges in an ongoing alleged scheme to cheat taxpayers. So that in itself is unprecedented for a former and maybe would-be president. There is also a very advanced civil investigation in New York. The New York attorney general is bringing this case, and it looks at whether Trump’s company systematically engaged in fraud over property values. That case could result in significant monetary damages, maybe even shutting down some of Trump’s companies. So Trump still faces a legal reckoning in New York.
SUMMERS: That is NPR’s Andrea Bernstein. Thank you.
BERNSTEIN: Thank you so much.
Trump rails against ‘terrible’ NY prosecutors, criminal charges at rally
POLITICIZING THE FBI – BRING THOSE WHO BROKE THE LAW TO JUSTICE – DEEP STATE CARRYING WATER FOR HILLARY CAMPAIGN
Trump installed Christopher Wray as FBI director; in retrospect this was a terrible move. Wray has provided cover for those involved in the Hillary Clinton Russian Fusion conspiracy, the Impeachment of Trump, but most of all, the continuing harassment of Trump during his term. We want justice now.
Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., contends Democrats have a stake in digging for more details about the FBI breaking its own rules to probe elected officials, political candidates, religious organizations and the news media.
The FBI conducted an internal audit, a highly redacted version of which came to light earlier this month, that found 747 “compliance errors” across 353 separate cases in the category of “sensitive investigative matters.” The bureau acknowledged the 2019 audit findings were “unacceptable.”
While the FBI 
has faced increased scrutiny in recent years for alleged politicized investigations into former President Donald Trump, the problems apparently are much broader and likely go beyond the report, said Biggs, a member of the House Judiciary Committee.
“It possibly includes information about the surveillance of candidate Trump and later President Trump. But this is almost 750 compliance problems in 350 cases,” Biggs told Fox News. “The next step is to call on the committee to have a hearing on this. If I was in the majority, I would want to get to the bottom of this. I suspect this conduct goes back for multiple administrations and has been an ongoing problem affecting members of both parties.”
HUNTER BIDEN’S LAPTOP: EX-CIA OFFICER BUCK SEXTON RIPS FORMER COLLEAGUES’ REFUSAL TO APOLOGIZE
Biggs signed onto a March 21 letter with the House Judiciary Committee’s ranking member Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., to FBI Director Christopher Wray requesting an unredacted copy of the report, documents referring to or relating to the audit, an explanation of whether the FBI resolved the matters and a description of the FBI’s predicate to open investigations into politicians, religious groups and others named in the audit.
BIDEN’S HAS UNDERGONE A HYSTERECTOMY HAVING POOPED IN EUROPE
So, we have it, the President of the United States walks back his threat to remove Putin from power. Truthfully, he had it right, but his handlers went brown pants, 
rephrasing his original intent. Once again, we know who is pulling the strings here. A team of marionettes mouthing the words of pacifists, socialists, weak knee buffoons, tree huggers and draft dodgers. When it comes Branden we have seen it all. 
Ukraine is the quintessential example of Bravery; their fighters have a fighting spirit, they will not be dictated too, nor live under a Tyrant. Winning at any cost is their shibboleth. Putin, the baby killer, has no conscientious when it comes to killing opposing forces. Murdering civilians, including babies, school children and those in hospitals is his bread and butter.
White House walks back multiple Biden remarks during Europe trip on Putin, chemical weapons, troops
Biden said that Putin ‘cannot remain in power’ during a speech in Poland Saturday
Biden Says Putin “Cannot Remain in Power.” The White House Says He Didn’t Mean It.
“He was not discussing Putin’s power in Russia, or regime change.”
Biden also attacked Putin personally, calling him “a butcher” earlier on Saturday. Biden previously called Putin “a war criminal,” drawing a complaint from Russia, which summoned the US ambassador, a traditional means of registering diplomatic objections.
-
CONFUSED COMMANDER
President Biden’s Putin speech in Poland is a catastrophe
-
- Joe Biden’s call-to-arms speech in Poland was long on soaring rhetoric about the virtues of democracy but woefully short on what more the West will do to help Ukraine defeat the Russian invasion. But by the time he got to the finish, most of that was forgotten.What mattered most and what will be remembered for a long time was a single line the president of the United States said about the president of Russia: “For God’s sake, this man cannot remain in power.”
In the context of the speech and the slaughter of Ukrainian civilians, it’s impossible to understand that line as anything other than a call for regime change, a move that would dramatically raise the stakes with Russia at a time when Biden has been at pains to lower them.
BIDEN “WALK-BACK” AFTER THREATENING PUTIN
President Biden on Saturday said that Russian President Vladimir Putin “cannot remain in power,” as he declared the Russian invasion of Ukraine a “strategic failure” while pledging continued support for the embattled Ukrainian people.
“For God’s sake, this man cannot remain in power,” Biden said during a speech in front of the Royal Castle in Warsaw, Poland.
“YEAH ,REALLY”
.
BIDEN CALLS PUTIN A ‘BUTCHER’ AFTER MEETING WITH UKRAINIAN REFUGEES IN POLAND
THE WALK BACK
“The President’s point was that Putin cannot be allowed to exercise power over his neighbors or the region. He was not discussing Putin’s power in Russia, or regime change,” a White House official told Fox News Digital shortly after the speech concluded.
We have the solution to removing Putin from Power. 
(click)”I will go and Take Putin Out Tonight” Send this One Woman Army to Ukraine as Zelenskyy’s chief negotiator.
Set up a meeting with Putin, who immediately will have a fatal heart attack looking at her.
Of course this is all in jest. But we will tell you this, she certainly scares a whole lot of people on Halloween.
But for a fill-in case Waters can’t make it, we will send another seditionist. See how far she gets.
Where do these people come from? Certainly not Council Bluffs, Iowa.
President Biden on Thursday said the United States response to Russia’s potential use of chemical weapons would “trigger a response in kind,” but said the type of response would depend on “the nature of the use.”
During a press conference in Brussels, Belgium after Biden participated in an emergency NATO meeting to discuss international efforts to support Ukraine and punish Russia for its invasion, he was pressed on if the United States has collected intelligence that suggests the Kremlin is moving to deploy chemical weapons.
“We would respond,” Biden said. “We would respond if he uses it.
White House walks back multiple Biden remarks during Europe trip on Putin, chemical weapons, troops
‘In kind’ response to chemical weapons
On Thursday, Biden was asked if the U.S. would respond if Russia were to use chemical weapons as part of its invasion of Ukraine. Biden said that such a move by the Russians would “trigger a response in kind.”
After that remark, it was up to National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan to clarify. Sullivan was asked what Biden meant by “in kind.”
RUSSIA INVADES UKRAINE: LIVE UPDATES