FROM THE LYING LIPS OF THE FORMER EX-PRESIDENT:
Trump tweeted a 2005 video in which Obama, then a senator, made a statement against illegal immigration, accompanied by the comment “I agree with President Obama 100%”.
WHY IS THIS GUY STILL ON FOX?
Juan Williams blasted President Donald Trump and some of his Republican acolytes while discussing the Central American migrant caravan Tuesday on The Five.
Williams said that Trump is using fiery rhetoric against the caravan members and making purportedly unverified claims — including there being potential terrorists therein — because he is “absent a message for the midterms.”
“ABSENT A MESSAGE“, Wrong, Williams is a laughing stock to the other journalists that usually sit on the panel. He has nothing upstairs but a vacuum.
Jesse Watters said that he has seen reports showing a large percentage of the caravan is made up of younger, working-age males who are “economic refugees” and not explicitly fleeing “violence” as mainstream media pundits have claimed.
The Five
✔@TheFive
.@JesseBWatters comments on the migrant caravan moving toward the U.S. southern border:
“When they get [here] they’re going to wire [funds back] to El Salvador,” he said, adding that instead of marching toward the U.S., they should “march against their own corrupt governments — that would solve a lot of problems.”
Williams blasted Watters’ remarks, saying that Trump “doesn’t have proof” for many of his claims about the migrants.
MD Sen. Cardin Says US ‘Should Try to Help’ Migrant Caravan, GOP Opponent Blasts Comments
The guy is a low weight on the Totem pole of journalists. In fact he is NOTHING but a shill for the Democrats.
WHO DO YOU TRUST IN THE WHITE HOUSE? VOTE TRUMP ON NOVEMBER 6, VOTE FOR AMERICA
An American who is making America Great Again
A socialist who wants to make America Venezuela again
WE ARE TURNING THE TIDE – MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST FROM FOX NEWS.
CRIMINAL ELEMENT -THE GANG RAPE OF AMERICAN BY SANCTUARY CITY DEMOCRATS AS THEY FULLY SUPPORT ILLEGALS, MURDERERS AND RAPISTS – FUTURE DEMOCRAT VOTERS
Criminal pro gang Democrats go to bed with MS-13 gangs.
PELOSI AND SCHUMER DEMOCRATS WANT TO RAPE AMERICA by condoning violence. We can shoot them at the ballot box on November 6, 2018, at the ballot box. Chicago, St. Louis, Baltimore, New York, Los Angeles, all crime invested cities taken over by the criminal illegal element from Latin America. Murderers, rapers, killers, drug pushers, gang bangers, they all have one thing in common, they are supported by Democrats. 
And that is not all these Democrat slime candidates up for reelection and those who collude with them are in violation of the law by not only condoning their action, but by supporting sanctuary cities. The cost to taxpayers is in the billions; we don’t even know how much it really cost, but if they were tossed out of our country, our bet is $100,000,000,000. One more Supreme Court Justice and the 14th Amendment will be history for these criminals and their anchor babies.
Since 1975, emigration from Honduras has accelerated as economic migrants and political refugees sought a better life elsewhere. A majority of expatriate Hondurans live in the United States. A 2012 US State Department estimate suggested that between 800,000 and one million Hondurans lived in the United States at that time, nearly 15% of the Honduran population. The large uncertainty about numbers is because numerous Hondurans criminals having broke into our country and live in the United States without a visa. In the 2010 census in the United States, 617,392 residents identified as Hondurans, up from 217,569 in 2000.
Take the worst of the worst criminal socialist commies who want free health care, free food, free education (Governor Cuomo for one) free housing and voting for all, no matter if you are a citizen or not, they must be stopped in their tracks.
Thousand of criminals from Honduras are on their way to trespass our borders. Trump is expected to bring in the army. And we sincerely hope that, as the Patriots did back in 1773) shoot when they see the whites of their eyes. This is the only way to teach a lesson; others will then be forewarned that the next drop of blood will be theirs.
Trump must set an example; open borders are not United States borders. Our borders are closed to illegal aliens and the crime they bring to America.
CLICK HERE FOR FRIENDS OF PELOSI AND SCHUMER
PREVIOUS INFO ON THE 14TH AMENDMENT:
Two years after the Civil War, the Reconstruction Acts of 1867 divided the South into five military districts, where new state governments, based on universal manhood suffrage, were to be established. Thus began the period known as Radical Reconstruction, which saw the 14th Amendment, which had been passed by Congress in 1866, ratified in July 1868. The amendment resolved pre-Civil War questions of African American citizenship by stating that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States…are citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside.” The amendment then reaffirmed the privileges and rights of all citizens, and granted all these citizens the “equal protection of the laws.”
AN UN-GOING CRIME IS BEING COMMITTED – THE SUPREME COURT MUST ONCE AGAIN MUST STEP IN AND ADJUDICATE
Overwhelming evidence against the interpretation of “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” or “not subject to any foreign power” as reaffirming the common law doctrine of citizenship by birth to aliens can be found following the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. In 1867 George Helm Yeaman, United States Minister to Denmark, in his well received treatise on allegiance and citizenship, which was presented to Secretary of State William H. Seward, said: “But the idea of a double allegiance and citizenship united in the same person, and having reference to two separate, independent, and sovereign nations or governments, is simply an impossibility.”
In the year 1873 the United States Attorney General ruled the word “jurisdiction” under the Fourteenth Amendment to mean, which Justice Gray would recognize in Elk v.Wilkins years later:
The word “jurisdiction” must be understood to mean absolute and complete jurisdiction, such as the United States had over its citizens before the adoption of this amendment… Aliens, among whom are persons born here and naturalized abroad, dwelling or being in this country, are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States only to a limited extent. Political and military rights and duties do not pertain to them. (14 Op. Atty-Gen. 300.)
House Report No. 784, dated June 22, 1874, stated, “The United States have not recognized a double allegiance. By our law a citizen is bound to be ‘true and faithful’ alone to our government.” There is no way in the world anyone can claim “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” affirms the feudal common law doctrine of birth citizenship to aliens because such doctrine by operation creates a “double allegiance” between separate nations.
If there is one inescapable truth to the text and debates, it is this: When Congress decided to require potential citizens to first be subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States they by default excluded all citizens of other nations temporarily residing in the U.S. who had no intention of becoming citizens themselves or, disqualified of doing so under naturalization laws. This was no oversight because it was too simple to declare the common law rule of jus soli if indeed that was truly the desired goal by these very competent lawyers (both Howard and Trumbull were lawyers).
Aaron Sargent, a Representative from California during the Naturalization Act of 1870 debates said the Fourteenth Amendment’s citizenship clause was not a de-facto right for aliens to obtain citizenship. No one came forward to dispute this conclusion.
Perhaps because he was absolutely correct.
LOCK THEM UP – LOCK THEM UP
IT IS US AGAINST THEM – JAIL THE BIRD
“Us” is all of us who believe in the Constitution, liberty, freedom of the press and limited government; them is the Republican/Democrat collusion machine with a “maintain bureaucratic agenda.” The point being that Republicans controlled Congress for eight years and did nothing but salute President Obama, giving him everything he wished for.
Yes there were some critics, however Boehner and McConnell rubber stamped the Obama agenda. Keep in mind that everyone Congressman and Senator has a stake in Big Government, for they continue to suck it dry enabling the parasite to live a life of leisure.
As corrupt as government is, we now find it to be a criminal enterprise. The Clinton-Lynch-Comey triad is a case in point. The world knows that Hillary Clinton broke one law after another, lying to interrogators throughout the investigation, which by the way cost the American taxpayer over $100 million. Cheryl Mills, her assistant at State was allowed to sit in on interviews by the FBI, claiming she was Clinton’s attorney. Wrong! At the time she was a government employee and there was no “attorney-client privilege. In the movie “Gotti”, Gotti’s attorney was not allowed to represent him because he was also a witness. In Clinton’s case the same case can be made.
The free pass given to Hillary, the Liar, Clinton, destroyer of evidence and killer to boot, has created a ground swell of criticism by career FBI agents. The decision to let Hillary Clinton off the hook for mishandling classified information has roiled the (click here and read the Fox News report- this will irate you to no end) FBI and Department of Justice, with one person closely involved in the year-long probe telling FoxNews.com that career agents and attorneys on the case unanimously believed the Democratic presidential nominee should have been charged. “They believe the decision not to prosecute came from The White House.”
Add in the IRS-Lois Lerner-Koskinen cabal to the mix and no outside observer will ever believe that the government is fair and square. For instance, Obama bad mouthed Justice Alito during the State of the Union. But the most egregious outrage is that of Justice Bader-Ginsburg who went off on Donald Trump. For political attacks by the President and to top it off having a Supreme Court justice weighing in on politics are subjects that in the past have been off kept personal. But not the case here.
And as we have seen, two debates have cemented our opinion and that of the nation, that the press is biased, commentators are biased and moderators are pro-Hillary. The second debate has provided prima facie evidence of such. Click here for the Raddatz review and analysis.
ELIZABETH WARREN CONSUMER FRAUDSTER SCALPED BY DNA TEST
The Native American on the left had a DNA test last week; the result came in yesterday. His DNA indicated that he is .18% White European. Therefore, he can flaunt White Privilege, just as Elizabeth Warren manifests her Native American minority privilege. But the irony here is that Warren was instrumental in setting up the Consumer Fraud Protection Bureau (CFPB). The agency was originally proposed in 2007 by the Harvard Law School professor.
Even more embarrassing, a comprehensive study by geneticists estimated that the average European-American has 0.18% Native American DNA, which may be higher than Warren.
Warren’s gamble of desperately trying to prove her Native American ancestry appears to have backfired as she was widely mocked online.
But in the words of many of those who headed westward through Indian Territory, Elizabeth Warren was a true pioneer. For the uninitiated, the definition of a pioneer is one who was the victim of an Indian’s arrow that met its target, the back of a fleeing Caucasian. Elizabeth Warren was hit bull’s eye today.
James Woods was quick to brand her as “Señorita Warren”:
James Woods
✔@RealJamesWoods
“To make up for the dearth of Native American DNA, Bustamante used samples from Mexico, Peru, and Colombia to stand in for Native American.” #SeñoritaWarren https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2018/10/15/warren-addresses-native-american-issue/YEUaGzsefB0gPBe2AbmSVO/story.html …
James Woods
✔@RealJamesWoods
The bad news for #Pocahontas: she’s gotta swap the headdress for a sombrero. #SeñoritaWarren
Jim Messina, the campaign manager for President Obama’s 2012 campaign, was left confused by Warren’s move:
CLICK HERE FOR MORE ON THE FRAUD PERPETRATED BY ELIZABETH WARREN
If you look closely at our logo you notice the fake Indians throwing boxes of tea into Boston harbor. DNA testing was not available back then, but if it was, there would be no doubt that these Caucasians dressed up as Indians would have had Indian blood. Thanks to Elizabeth Warren all of us are Indians now. Come to think of it isn’t it time for a hand of Indian Poker?
THIS HAS GOT TO STOP – BUILD THE WALL
Tens of thousand Hondurans are massing for a million man march through Latin America heading toward the United States. This is intolerable. Among them are rapists, criminals, killers and parole violators; many have tried before but been repelled. They have destroyed their country and are hell bent on destroying ours. They’re not coming here because they fear death, they are coming for their economic well being. They will tear down our country like their brethren have torn down theirs. Honduras is one of the poorest countries in the world.
The conquistadors conquered Honduras early on in the fifth century. It was Christopher Columbus and later on his brother Bartholomew who pilfered the Mayan. It was Herman Cortes who finished the job forcing the Maya capitulated. During colonization the majority of Honduras’ indigenous population was killed or died of disease resulting in a more homogenous indigenous population compared to other colonies.
The World Bank categorizes Honduras as a low middle-income nation. The nation’s per capita income sits at around 600 US dollars making it one of the lowest in North America.
In 2010, 50% of the population were still living below the poverty line. By 2016 more than 66% was living below the poverty line. Estimates put unemployment at about 27.9%, which is more than 1.2 million Hondurans.
The proportion of the population below the age of 15 in 2010 was 36.8%, 58.9% were between 15 and 65 years old, and 4.3% were 65 years old or older.
Since 1975, emigration from Honduras has accelerated as economic migrants and political refugees sought a better life elsewhere. A majority of expatriate Hondurans live in the United States. A 2012 US State Department estimate suggested that between 800,000 and one million Hondurans lived in the United States at that time, nearly 15% of the Honduran population. The large uncertainty about numbers is because numerous Hondurans criminals having broke into our country and live in the United States without a visa. In the 2010 census in the United States, 617,392 residents identified as Hondurans, up from 217,569 in 2000.
THE GUILTY PLEAD THE FIFTH – THE INNOCENT TELL THE TRUTH
In a Washington Post opinion piece, former Obama-era State Department official Jonathan Winer acknowledged he had regular contact with ex-British spy Christopher Steele, the author of the controversial anti-Trump dossier.
Winer said that Steele alerted him in the summer of 2016 about “disturbing information regarding possible ties between Donald Trump, his campaign and senior Russian officials.” The two met in Washington in September 2016 to discuss what is now known as the “dossier.”
After he reviewed the documents, Winer said, he shared a summary with Victoria Nuland, the former assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs.
In February, Nuland confirmed to CBS News’ “Face the Nation” that the Steele dossier came to the attention of the State Department in July 2016.
“He [Steele] passed two to four pages of short points of what he was finding, and our immediate reaction to that was, ‘This is not in our purview,'” Nuland said. “‘This needs to go to the FBI, if there is any concern here that one candidate or the election as a whole might be influenced by the Russian Federation. That’s something for the FBI to investigate.'”
Nuland went further, saying that “our reaction when we saw this [was] … we can’t evaluate this. And frankly, if every member of the campaign who the Russians tried to approach and tried to influence had gone to the FBI as well in real time, we might not be in the mess we’re in today.”
Another person caught up in the dossier handoff is David J. Kramer, a former State Department official and associate of the late Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. In November 2016, he traveled to Surrey, England, to meet with and be briefed by Steele on the dossier. According to British court records reviewed by Fox, Steele told the British court that an arrangement was made so that Fusion GPS’s Simpson would provide hard copies of the dossier to McCain via Kramer.
In January 2017 the late Senator’s office posted to their website: “Late last year, I received sensitive information that has since been made public. Upon examination of the contents, and unable to make a judgment about their accuracy, I delivered the information to the Director of the FBI. That has been the extent of my contact with the FBI or any other government agency regarding this issue.”
Earlier this year, in an interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier, former FBI Director James Comey seemed vague about the dossier, when he learned about it as well as its political origins.
“Sometime in the fall (2016), I don’t remember exactly when,” Comey said, “I remember they briefed me on it, explained that it came from a reliable source I remember being given a copy of it I don’t know if it was September (sic) October some period in that time.”
Other information about Russian hacking was also provided to the FBI in 2016 by lawyer Michael Sussmann, whose firm, Perkins Coie, commissioned Simpson’s firm for the dossier. The FBI’s former general counsel, James Baker, recently confirmed that revelation during a closed-door deposition on Capitol Hill, say sources close to the congressional investigation.
A spokesman for Sussmann said in a recent statement: “Prior to joining Perkins Coie, Michael Sussmann served as a cybercrime prosecutor in the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice during both Republican and Democratic administrations. As a result, Sussmann is regularly retained by clients with complex cybersecurity matters.
“When Sussmann met with Mr. Baker on behalf of a client, it was not connected to the firm’s representation of the Hillary Clinton Campaign, the DNC or any Political Law Group client.”
Senate Oversight Committee Chairman Ron Johnson, R-Wis., sent a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray on Friday requesting all documents about Sussmann’s contact with the FBI, as well as the memos that document allegations Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein considered secretly taping the president. Rosenstein and the House Judiciary panel failed to agree on terms for his Capitol Hill appearance this week.
Fox News asked Sussmann’s spokesperson for additional comment in light of the Senate letter, but there was no immediate response.
DEMOCRATS WANT TO COUNT YOU OUT
Trump stumping for Hawley in bid to unseat McCaskill
Republican Senate candidate Josh Hawley delighted by the president’s endorsement in Missouri.
Josh Hawley, the Missouri Republican looking to unseat U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill in November, slammed the Democratic incumbent for opposing the 2020 U.S. Census question inquiring about citizenship status, saying McCaskill wants to give more power to California.
“Sen. McCaskill would love to give more representation to California. That’s what will happen,” Hawley, the state attorney general, said in an interview with the Washington Times.
He asserted that McCaskill’s aversion to the census question shows she’s beholden to the Democratic Party rather than her constituents in the Show Me State.
“Places like California and New York that have greater numbers of illegal immigrants, they are going to end up with more representation, and we’ll lose seats. She is fine with that, though,” he added. “That just strikes people in Missouri as craziness. They just don’t understand it. I don’t understand it.””Places like California and New York that have greater numbers of illegal immigrants, they are going to end up with more representation, and we’ll lose seats. She is fine with that, though.”
CENSUS RESPONDENTS MAY BE ASKED CITIZENSHIP STATUS IN 2020 SURVEY
The move to quiz U.S. residents on their citizenship status is a controversial one, dividing Washington along partisan lines. The Supreme Court will ultimately decide whether the question will appear on the census.
The citizenship question is controversial because House seats are apportioned by population, which includes everyone counted by the census. But critics say it would reduce the response rates by illegal immigrants who fear their information could be used to deport them. McCaskill herself criticized the proposal, calling it “blatantly political” and demanding a Senate panel hearing on the issue.
Republicans, meanwhile, said the citizen question is important to get a clear picture of the U.S. makeup.
The issue fits well into Hawley’s campaign to unseat McCaskill in a red state. He portrayed the Democrat as a pawn of the Democratic Party rather than the independent senator she often claims to be.
The Republican criticized McCaskill’s “no” vote on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation, saying the vote proves she’s following her party’s “extreme agenda.”
“Block conservative judges, throw open our borders, raise taxes on the middle class. That is their agenda,” he told the Washington Times. “They are hungry for power, and they will do just about anything to get it.
“That, versus the agenda that this state voted for in 2016, which is to rebuild this country. It is a stark choice and that choice is on the ballot,” he added.
The race between Hawley and McCaskill is in a dead heat, with the latest poll showing the Republican leading by 1 point.
McCaskill’s campaign didn’t respond to Fox News’ request for a comment.