JAIL THE BIRD – GAVE STATE SECRETS TO RUSSIA IN RETURN FOR DONATIONS

The Clinton Foundation was awash with Russian rubles that came pouring in non stop subsequent to Hillary Clinton bartering away our defense secrets for donations to the Clinton Foundation. This is treason. Why hasn’t the Bird been Jailed?

From the Wall Street Journal

Hillary Clinton touts her tenure as secretary of state as a time of hardheaded realism and “commercial diplomacy” that advanced American national and commercial interests. But her handling of a major technology transfer initiative at the heart of Washington’s effort to “reset” relations with Russia raises serious questions about her record. Far from enhancing American national interests, Mrs. Clinton’s efforts in this area may have substantially undermined U.S. national security.

Consider Skolkovo, an “innovation city” of 30,000 people on the outskirts of Moscow, billed as Russia’s version of Silicon Valley—and a core piece of Mrs. Clinton’s quarterbacking of the Russian reset.

Following his 2009 visit to Moscow, President Obama announced the creation of the U.S.-Russia Bilateral Presidential Commission. Mrs. Clinton as secretary of state directed the American side, and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov represented the Russians. The stated goal at the time: “identifying areas of cooperation and pursuing joint projects and actions that strengthen strategic stability, international security, economic well-being, and the development of ties between the Russian and American people.”

The Kremlin committed $5 billion over three years to fund Skolkovo. Mrs. Clinton’s State Department worked aggressively to attract U.S. investment partners and helped the Russian State Investment Fund, Rusnano, identify American tech companies worthy of Russian investment. Rusnano, which a scientific adviser to President Vladimir Putin called “Putin’s child,” was created in 2007 and relies entirely on Russian state funding.

What could possibly go wrong?

RELATED ARTICLES

Hillary’s Strange Security Adviser
The Clinton Business Model . . .
Putin and Those Democratic Emails
Soon, dozens of U.S. tech firms, including top Clinton Foundation donors like Google, Intel and Cisco, made major financial contributions to Skolkovo, with Cisco committing a cool $1 billion. In May 2010, the State Department facilitated a Moscow visit by 22 of the biggest names in U.S. venture capital—and weeks later the first memorandums of understanding were signed by Skolkovo and American companies.
By 2012 the vice president of the Skolkovo Foundation, Conor Lenihan—who had previously partnered with the Clinton Foundation—recorded that Skolkovo had assembled 28 Russian, American and European “Key Partners.” Of the 28 “partners,” 17, or 60%, have made financial commitments to the Clinton Foundation, totaling tens of millions of dollars, or sponsored speeches by Bill Clinton.

Russians tied to Skolkovo also flowed funds to the Clinton Foundation. Andrey Vavilov, the chairman of SuperOx, which is part of Skolkovo’s nuclear-research cluster, donated between $10,000 and $25,000 (donations are reported in ranges, not exact amounts) to the Clinton’s family charity. Skolkovo Foundation chief and billionaire Putin confidant Viktor Vekselberg also gave to the Clinton Foundation through his company, Renova Group.

Amid all the sloshing of Russia rubles and American dollars, however, the state-of-the-art technological research coming out of Skolkovo raised alarms among U.S. military experts and federal law-enforcement officials. Research conducted in 2012 on Skolkovo by the U.S. Army Foreign Military Studies Program at Fort Leavenworth declared that the purpose of Skolkovo was to serve as a “vehicle for world-wide technology transfer to Russia in the areas of information technology, biomedicine, energy, satellite and space technology, and nuclear technology.”

Moreover, the report said: “the Skolkovo Foundation has, in fact, been involved in defense-related activities since December 2011, when it approved the first weapons-related project—the development of a hypersonic cruise missile engine. . . . Not all of the center’s efforts are civilian in nature.”

Technology can have multiple uses—civilian and military. But in 2014 the Boston Business Journal ran an op-ed placed by the FBI, and noted that the agency had sent warnings to technology and other companies approached by Russian venture-capital firms. The op-ed—under the byline of Lucia Ziobro, an assistant special agent at the FBI’s Boston office—said that “The FBI believes the true motives of the Russian partners, who are often funded by their government, is to gain access to classified, sensitive, and emerging technology from the companies.”

Ms. Ziobro also wrote that “The [Skolkovo] foundation may be a means for the Russian government to access our nation’s sensitive or classified research development facilities and dual-use technologies with military and commercial application.”

To anyone who was paying attention, the FBI’s warnings should have come as little surprise. A State Department cable sent to then-Secretary Clinton (and obtained via WikiLeaks) mentioned possible “dual use and export control concerns” related to research and development technology ventures with Moscow. And in its own promotional literature Skolkovo heralded the success of its development of the Atlant hybrid airship.

“Particularly noteworthy is Atlant’s ability to deliver military cargoes,” boasts the Made in Skolkovo publication: “The introduction of this unique vehicle is fully consistent with the concept of creating a mobile army and opens up new possibilities for mobile use of the means of radar surveillance, air and missile defense, and delivery of airborne troops.”

Even if it could be proven that these tens of millions of dollars in Clinton Foundation donations by Skolkovo’s key partners played no role in the Clinton State Department’s missing or ignoring obvious red flags about the Russian enterprise, the perception would still be problematic. (Neither the Clinton campaign nor the Clinton Foundation responded to requests for comment.) What is known is that the State Department recruited and facilitated the commitment of billions of American dollars in the creation of a Russian “Silicon Valley” whose technological innovations include Russian hypersonic cruise-missile engines, radar surveillance equipment, and vehicles capable of delivering airborne Russian troops.

A Russian reset, indeed.

Mr. Schweizer is president of the Government Accountability Institute and the author of “ Clinton Cash.” A larger report on the subject of this article is available at Cronyism.com.

 

 

 

What is more egregious is the Clinton response to Chris Wallace’s interview. She said that the FBI chief honcho gave her a clean bill of health. Lies keep pouring out of her mouth, verbal diarrhea from a killer. None other than the Washington Post to her to task. When they were through Hillary Clinton was eviscerated like a skinned catlies

CNN)The Washington Post’s Fact Checkers awarded Hillary Clinton four “Pinocchios” — their worst rating — after the former Secretary of State defended her use of a private email server in an interview Sunday by claiming the FBI director said she had been “truthful” about the subject.

In the interview on Fox News Sunday, Clinton had defended her use of a private email server, saying “[FBI Director James Comey] said my answers were truthful, and what I’ve said is consistent with what I have told the American people, that there were decisions discussed and made to classify retroactively certain of the emails.”
But the Fact Checkers at the Washington Post weren’t buying it.
“Clinton is cherry-picking statements by Comey to preserve her narrative about the unusual setup of a private email server. This allows her to skate past the more disturbing findings of the FBI investigation,” they wrote.
Parsing Clinton’s public statements and comparing them to Comey’s congressional testimony, the Post’s Fact Checkers determined that while Clinton’s answers to the FBI during its investigation may have been truthful, that description couldn’t reasonably be extended to everything she’s said in public — parts of which apparently contradict Comey’s description of the server.
As the Post’s Fact Checkers explained, “As we have seen repeatedly in Clinton’s explanations of the email controversy, she relies on excessively technical and legalistic answers to explain her actions. While Comey did say there was no evidence she lied to the FBI, that is not the same as saying she told the truth to the American public — which was the point of [Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace’s] question. Comey has repeatedly not taken a stand on her public statements.”
The Post continued, “Although Comey did say many emails were retroactively classified, he also said that there were some emails that were already classified that should not have been sent on an unclassified, private server. That’s the uncomfortable truth that Clinton has trouble admitting.”
Clinton campaign spokesperson Brian Fallon responded to the Washington Post’s verdict on Monday in an interview on MSNBC.
“I think that the question she got yesterday was sort of suggesting that she had misrepresented things to the American people over the last several months,” Fallon said,
“And what she attempted to indicate in her response was that Director Comey was very clear when he was asked in the hearing before Congress last month about the nature of the answers that she gave in her interview to the Justice Department. And Director Comey’s response was quite clear, that he had no reason to believe anything that she ever said to the Justice Department was at all untruthful, and what she was indicating in that interview to Chris Wallace was what she said to those Justice Department interviewers was entirely consistent with what she has said to the public for the last several months, and the many questions we’ve answered on this issue.”

(click)Washington Post hits Clinton with four ‘Pinnochios’ on emails

THE LADY IS GOING DOWN – ORANGE JUMPSUIT ON ORDER

It has now been revealed that the “Liar Clinton” has sent 104 classified emails from her personal server. Clinton’s ­authorship of dozens of emails now considered classified could complicate her efforts to argue that she never put government secrets at risk. And this female dog is running for president. Give us a break. Image result for jumpsuit orange for jailliesCHAPPAQUA

A warning for those in charge, if Clinton is not brought to justice to face the full weight of the law, mass riots will be in the offing.

Americans are sick and tired of political gamesmanship.  Highly connected individuals who get away with murder and treason and then given a free pass risk precipitating a Revolutionary War. Do not ever think that this can’t happen.

YOUR ARE GOING TO DICTATE TO US! WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?

How many times have you been stopped by a policement, given a ticket for traveling five miles an hour over the limit, perhaps they grabbed you for plowing through a stop sign, a rolling stop at that; did they ticket you for not wearing a seatbelt? And that orange light which turned red at the last instant cost you $200. Yeah, you know what we are talking about, you break the law and the law comes down on you like a lead balloon. But this does not happen to the teflon  MOUTH OF POLITICS, Hillary Clinton, she is too Big to Jail.

What she did was provide assistance to the enemy, her server was tapped like a keg of beer, yet she says she did nothing wrong and won’t apologize. The FBI and State Department are knee deep in the investigation, worming through the evidence, 100’s of investigators seeking the truth, or are they? Americans have had enough of the trash talking lady Clinton, enough crap has come out of her mouth to fill a barnyard. Hundreds of emails were labeled secret, top secret and for your eyes only, Special Access Program or (SAP). They ended up on her closet server, the one she installed to bypass security. Remember Clinton wondered if it could be wiped clean, like with a cloth.

The State Department is culling these emails releasing them at a snails pace. However, they will not release 22 classified Top Secret and seven as SAP, these are more than top secret, only a dozen people are allowed access to them, yet they ended up on Clinton’s ignominious server. Bluntly this is a violation of the oath Clinton signed when taking office, but it is more, Clinton has consistently lied about why it appeared on her server. We no why. Clinton instructed her surrogate, Huma Abedin to cut and paste these from a secure server, how she got her hands on this only God knows, wiping the title classification and any other culpable data from it before it was copied and pasted on the Chappaqua server. CHAPPAQUA

Clinton, the Democratic presidential front-runner, insists she never sent or received emails on her personal server that were marked classified at the time. We will tell you this, if this liar received classified information, even if it was not classified as such, but did not know it or understand how secret it was, she is not qualified to be the President of the United States; she is an incompetent antagonist unworthy and incapable to protect America.

The best place for Lady Clinton, one that will keep her mouth shut for good and protect the security and future of the United States is in solitary confinement.lies

TOO BIG TO JAIL

Hillary Clinton is involved in the biggest cover-up in a generation. The State Department she once headed is in cahoots with her by not coming clean regarding Top Secret emails she received. These were emails sent to her private server that were classified Top Secret from the beginning. These emails were originated by the CIA.  Clinton has obfuscated the process from the start, but now it is the State Department which is protecting her.

The findings have been transmitted to the State Department, which continues to challenge the intelligence community’s conclusions about the classification of all the emails. But the department has no authority to change the classification since it did not originate the information.

On Nov. 6, Politico reported that the intelligence community was retreating from the “top secret” classification, a development that could have helped Clinton’s presidential campaign deflect allegations about mishandling classified material. Fox News can confirm it is true the handling of one email has changed since it was drafted and sent, but this change has no bearing on the “top secret” nature of the emails when first received on Clinton’s server. And this is what matters to the FBI probe.

Hillary Clinton is a criminal, but the State Department is protecting her; America wants to know why and who is behind it.Click for Options

THE IRS IS NUMBER ONE ONE ON AMERICA’S MOST WANTED LIST

Run by a government out of control with employees doing Obama’s dirty work by lying to Congress; this has energized an American populace against this Terrorist Organization. Targeting Tea Party groups leading up to the 2012 election by preventing them from soliciting funds for political purposes; this stymied advertising which could have prevented Obama’s 2nd term.

Lois Lerner, kept her mouth shut by invoking the 5th Amendment in testimony before Congress. IRS honcho Koskinen then told Congress that they would investigate, but did no such thing. Suddenly we are informed that 32,000 of Lerner’s emails have been located on back-up tapes. “We were lied to.”  We now wait to find out what incriminating evidence is in those tapes, but will not be surprised if Obama directed the cover-up and the targeting of Tea Party groups.

Lois Lerner, Obama’s IRS water carrying Tea Party vigilante, is receiving a pension of $100,000+.  Lerner is very depressed because she can’t find a job. You have got to be kidding. We have one for her. Time for the ankle bracelets.  We have seen a recent job posting at an all women’s prison, “Help wanted: no experience necessary; attention to detail cleaning latrines in a government institution; low pay but plenty of job security.”