TRUMP “THEY WERE DANCING IN THE STREETS”

Trump Tweets Infowars Link of Dancing Muslims from 9/11; Liberals Go Into Meltdown

Written by Paul Joseph Watson
November 27, 2015 at 6:24 am| URL: http://wp.me/p3c1Bb-e9v

Major butt-hurt after Republican frontrunner links to article about Muslims celebrating 9/11

261115tweet2

Liberals went into meltdown Wednesday night after Donald Trump tweetedan Infowars link to a story about how Muslims in New Jersey allegedly celebrated the 9/11 attacks.

After days of the mainstream media accusing Trump of lying about the assertion that he saw news reports about Middle Easterners celebrating the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center, the Republican presidential frontrunner cited a Washington Post story from September 18 which appeared to at least partially prove the claim.

But that didn’t satisfy the “fact checkers,” who continue to insist that Trump is being disingenuous. Fast forward to Wednesday night, when Trump tweeted out a link to an article posted on Infowars in which the writer, who drove through New Jersey on 9/11, asserts that she, “Witnessed people in traditional Muslim garb dancing, jumping, shouting and celebrating like their team had won the Super Bowl, just as Trump said.”

Other people who were in New Jersey and New York on the day of the attacks also tweetedout their eyewitness reports of Muslims celebrating 9/11 under the hashtag #TrumpIsRight.

The mere spectacle of Trump tweeting a link to Infowars caused a sudden outbreak of cry-baby butt-hurt on behalf of liberals the likes of which the Internet has never seen.

Gawker devoted an entire article to the egregious act with the headline Trump Tweeted an InfoWars.com Link and the Election Is Still 348 Days Away.

After we began trending, Twitter exploded with leftist rage at ‘The Donald’ daring to link to Infowars, with one cry-baby describing us as, “a site by paranoid idiots for paranoid idiots.”

Most of the attacks on Infowars also failed to recognize the fact that the article wasn’t even an Infowars story, it was a re-post of a BizPacReview piece by Carmine Sabia.

MORE evidence that New Jersey Muslims in fact, were dancing and celebrating on 9/11/01

MORE evidence that New Jersey Muslims in fact, were dancing and cel…

by BareNakedIslam

BareNakedIslam | November 27, 2015 at 9:00 pm URL: http://wp.me/p276zM-1jvV

The sharia-compliant media cover-up can’t cover up what many people in New York and New Jersey saw with their own eyes on 9/11. Don’t forget, there were no i-Phones back then and most of the cell phones did not have video cameras built in as they do now.

This is a copy of a Navy Vet Log from a DJ Lewis on Sept. 11, 2001″ “People Here Dancing on Rooftops – UNREAL!”

lewis-1

FRENCH INQUISITION! IT IS ABOUT TIME

The Spanish Inquisition in 1492 The Inquisition was originally intended in large part to ensure the orthodoxy of those who converted from Judaism and Islam. This regulation of the faith of the newly converted was intensified after the royal decrees issued in 1492 and 1501 ordering Jews and Muslims to convert or leave Spain. Alhambra Decree, which ordered the expulsion, was issued in January 1492. Historic accounts of the numbers of Jews who left Spain have varied enormously. Historians of the period give extremely high figures: Juan de Mariana speaks of 800,000 people, and Don Isaac Abravanel of 300,000. Modern estimates, based on careful examination of official documents and population estimates of communities, are much lower: Henry Kamen estimates that, of a population of approximately 80,000 Jews, about one half or 40,000 chose emigration. The Jews of the kingdom of Castile emigrated mainly to Portugal (whence they were expelled in 1497) and to North Africa. However, according to Henry Kamen, the Jews of the kingdom of Aragon, went “to adjacent Christian lands, mainly to Italy”, rather than to Muslim lands as is often assumed. The Sefardim or Anusim descendants of Spanish Jews gradually migrated throughout Europe and North Africa, where they established communities in many cities. They also went to New Spain, the Ottoman Empire and North America (the American Southwest), Central and South America.

The Inquisition not only hunted for Protestants and for false converts from Judaism among the conversos, but also searched for false or relapsed converts among the Moriscos, forced converts from Islam. The Moriscos were mostly concentrated in the recently conquered kingdom of Granada, in Aragon, and in Valencia. Officially, all Muslims in the Crown of Castile had been forcibly converted to Christianity in 1502. Muslims in the Crown of Aragon were obliged to convert by Charles I‘s decree of 1526, as most had been forcibly baptized during the Revolt of the Brotherhoods (1519–1523) and these baptisms were declared to be valid.

Many Moriscos were suspected of practising Islam in secret, and the jealousy with which they guarded the privacy of their domestic life prevented the verification of this suspicion.[30] Initially they were not severely persecuted by the Inquisition, but experienced a policy of evangelization without torture,[31] a policy not followed with those conversos who were suspected of being crypto-Jews. There were various reasons for this. Most importantly, in the kingdoms of Valencia and Aragon a large number of the Moriscos were under the jurisdiction of the nobility, and persecution would have been viewed as a frontal assault on the economic interests of this powerful social class.[32] Still, fears ran high among the population that the Moriscos were traitorous, especially in Granada. The coast was regularly raided byBarbary pirates backed by Spain’s enemy the Ottoman Empire, and the Moriscos were suspected of aiding them.

In 1609, King Philip III, upon the advice of his financial adviser the Duke of Lerma and Archbishop of Valencia Juan de Ribera, decreed the Expulsion of the Moriscos. Hundreds of thousands of Moriscos were expelled, some of them probably sincere Christians. This was further fueled by the religious intolerance of Archbishop Ribera who quoted the Old Testament texts ordering the enemies of God to be slain without mercy and setting forth the duties of kings to extirpate them.[35] The edict required: ‘The Moriscos to depart, under the pain of death and confiscation, without trial or sentence… to take with them no money, bullion, jewels or bills of exchange…. just what they could carry.’[36] So successful was the enterprise, in the space of months, Spain was emptied of its Moriscos

France today:

The country’s radical secularism clashes with many Muslims’ desire to publicly display their faith

With news that the chief suspects in the massacre on Wednesday at the offices of the French satirical newspaperCharlie Hebdo are French citizens, a new mystery emerges: how could the land of liberty, equality and fraternity have produced men hell-bent on destroying all three? While the attack may evoke comparisons to earlier tragedies in New York, London, or Madrid, France’s relationship with its Muslim citizens is particular — and particularly fraught. What sets France on a particular collision course with Islamic practices is the country’s radical brand of secularism — and this ideology’s impact on French Muslim life.

With more than 5 million Muslims, France may have Western Europe’s largest Muslim community, but its relationship with Islam has been tenser than, say, Britain’s or Germany’s. An older generation of French Muslims has been alienated by memories of the Algerian War in the 1950s, when local groups battled for independence from more than a century of French rule, with its heavy-handed disdain for local customs. Their children and grandchildren frequently feel excluded from mainstream society because of their Arabic names or the color of their skin.

With news that the chief suspects in the massacre on Wednesday at the offices of the French satirical newspaperCharlie Hebdo are French citizens, a new mystery emerges: how could the land of liberty, equality and fraternity have produced men hell-bent on destroying all three? While the attack may evoke comparisons to earlier tragedies in New York, London, or Madrid, France’s relationship with its Muslim citizens is particular — and particularly fraught. What sets France on a particular collision course with Islamic practices is the country’s radical brand of secularism — and this ideology’s impact on French Muslim life.

With more than 5 million Muslims, France may have Western Europe’s largest Muslim community, but its relationship with Islam has been tenser than, say, Britain’s or Germany’s. An older generation of French Muslims has been alienated by memories of the Algerian War in the 1950s, when local groups battled for independence from more than a century of French rule, with its heavy-handed disdain for local customs. Their children and grandchildren frequently feel excluded from mainstream society because of their Arabic names or the color of their skin.

EUROPE IS FINISHED!

Reporting from BudapestJihad Central

Victor Orban said, “We are not a frontier county. We intend to control our borders. Greece, Italy, Spain, are the frontier countries. It is their responsibility to block, and not facilitate, an illegal invasion!”

European colonization, not refugee resettlement

Started by Robert M

by Tom Tancredo

URL: http://wp.me/p2oBxg-2ls

Islam in Europe

Islam in Europe

Why are the more than one million Muslim refugees so anxious to get to northern Europe and not, say, Saudi Arabia or Egypt? Why are we obligated to help them get to Amsterdam, Oslo and London? And why in the world is the United States government planning to take 66,000 Syrian refugees?

Yes, Europe is faced with a massive refugee crisis when a million homeless people surge northward in search of food, shelter and safety. But why are they choosing Germany, Belgium, Sweden and Britain and not neighboring Muslim countries?

And why does the United States have any obligation whatsoever to absorb any more refugees and asylum seekers than the over 100,000 we already accept each year from Central America, Asia and Africa?

This human wave surging across Europe is a byproduct of the interminable civil war in Syria, ISIS massacres of whole cities in Iraq – and the terrorist mayhem across North Africa unleashed by Obama’s incredibly stupid “Arab Spring.” We can understand why people are fleeing the chaos. But why must Muslim refugees be accommodated with shelter, food, and jobs in Europe instead of in Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey?

Turkey is a symptom of the larger problem. Turkey has refugee camps, but the Turkish government encourages and helps the refugees’ movement to seaports where they can arrange to be smuggled across the Aegean Sea to Greece, Italy or elsewhere.

Why don’t the refugees want to stay close to home so they can return when the violence stops?

Is this simply a flight to the perceived safety and welfare state generosity offered by European nations? Or is something else going on here? Why is it not politically correct to ask that question?

This week the head of the UN refugee agency said there is an immediate need for shelter and aid for 200,000 refugees fleeing northward, and he called on the European Union to require each member nation to take a mandated number of refugees.

The Prime Minister of Hungary, Victor Orban, has a different answer, an answer that is shocking to liberal sensitivities. The Hungarian leader believes the number will reach one million by year’s end and that Europe can only halt the flood by saying no. The Hungarian leader made this blunt statement on Thursday:

“We have to make it clear that we can’t allow everyone in, because if we allow everyone in, Europe is finished.”

Remember, it was Hungary that started the dominoes falling to end the Cold War in 1988-89 by allowing the free flow of refugees fleeing Poland, East Germany and other communist hell holes.

The Hungarian leader has put his finger on the real issue here—the ongoing and accelerating colonization of Europe by Muslims.

I believe that it does not matter whether or not this is the conscious goal of a majority of the refugees now flooding Europe, most of whom are undoubtedly concerned with finding food and shelter tomorrow and not the sweep of history. Nonetheless, colonization will be the inevitable outcome of the limitless accommodation to Muslim populations.

In 2014, the United States took in over 69,000 refugees and over 40,000 asylees, mostly from Central America, not the Middle East. But the State Department and the Obama White House have proposed to bring 66,000 Syrian refugees to the U.S. in the 2015-2016 fiscal year.

Folks, the war-torn city of Aleppo, Syria, is less than 50 miles from Turkey, but it is over 500 miles from Amsterdam and over 5,000 miles from Amarillo and Anaheim. Why do Syrian refugees prefer to find “resettlement” so far from their Muslim homeland?

The answer seems to be that a million Muslim refugees are being told — by their own leaders and mullahs, by the UN, by the media, and by the United States government, that they can resume their lives as devout Muslims and practice Sharia Law in their new homes in Europe and the United States.

This raises profound national security questions for Europe and the U.S. quite apart from the economic and cultural impact of millions of low-income migrants added to an already over-burdened welfare system.

Does anyone doubt that ISIS and al-Qaeda are hard at work helping dedicated jihadists find a home in that flow of humanity? The FBI has admitted in congressional testimony that is has no capacity for vetting the thousands of refugees now arriving from the Middle East.

Even if only two percent of the Syrian and Iraqi refugees are ISIS sympathizers, that number is a major threat. Moreover, we know from many polls that the percentage of jihadist sympathizers in the Muslim population is frighteningly high.

The United States should follow Hungary and just say no. We do not need another 66,000 Muslim migrants added to the over one million Muslims residing here now.

The real victims of the ISIS violence in the Middle East are the Christians. Why is it that the only concern for Christian refugees comes from private religious groups operating without any government assistance? If we are going to take Syrian refugees, why are not Christian refugees given priority?

Beneath the “humanitarian crisis” lies a looming national security crisis that may make the 9-11 attacks look like a walk in the park.

‘Refugees’ Abusing Police, Throwing Food and Water Away onto Train Tracks

hungary-640x480

The question no one is asking is why all these people, all of a sudden?

Did millions of Muslims across the Middle East and Africa get a text message that said, go now?

This is clearly orchestrated, and as I previously reported, ISIS warned Europe of an invasion of “migrants.”

This, too, is an act of war. How many jihadists are among the hordes?

YouTube video has emerged showing the Muslim migrants overwhelming Europe rejecting food packages and bottled water, throwing them onto the train tracks. Although the children appeared eager to take the food, the adults would not allow it, in some cases throwing it back at police.

Now there’s a harbinger of things to come.

migrats throw food

David Cameron agreed to allow many more refugees into Britain following an outcry on social media over a photograph of a dead migrant child.

What the media doesn’t tell you is that the Syrian boy drowned because his Father wanted new teeth. 

The family of drowned toddler Aylan Kurdi were given free housing in Turkey, while the father’s story is full of holes.And yet the photo of the child washed up on a beach has become iconic of the massive Muslim invasion of Europe. The media’s cynical exploitation of mirrors the al Dura hoax.

CNN says of the photo of the toddler: “It took a tragic photo of a drowned toddler on a Turkish beach to make the refugee torrent pouring into Europe a problem for Americatoo.”

Referring to the photograph of the dead child, he said: “I genuinely think and believe that Chancellor Merkel, compounding the pull factors this week, is more likely to make us see more of those kind of photographs. It is a very dangerous thing, I think, that she has done.

The fact is, if they Europeans cave, millions more will come — and food won’t be the only thing they’ll be throwing at police.

Editor’s Note: Video has been removed by YouTube. 

Laura J Alcorn

Let’s
 Invite More to our social network.
 

Send these post to your email groups and friends. Like us on
 Facebook 

 

 

Visit America Conservative 2 Conservative at: http://americac2c.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

 

AMERICA’S NUMBER ONE ENEMY – PRESIDENT OBAMA

Ever since President Obama entered the White House the United States has gone down hill. America’s guilt trip, the lame stream media are to blame. What sets the Obama presidency apart from all of the other Presidents is a simple notion, Obama is out to destroy America. That is correct; everything he has done before and after acquiring the throne has been to debase our culture, country and standing in the world.

Case in point number one was his belonging to the Church of Reverend Wright. Obama has taken this with him from day one. And who can forget the Reverend Wright “God Damn America”  video. To be honest here Wright makes a point, we did  not so glorious a past regarding the treatment of individual groups -Indians, slaves, Japanese – but we confronted these challenges  and change has occurred. However, Reverend Wright continues to blame White Americans for the problems in his community when in fact he should be blaming them. Add in the Reverend’s church which continues to lash out at the Jews and Israel. Again these are all lies that continue to spread falsehoods that people of ignorance believe resulting in anti-Semitic diatribe.

Moving forward from day one we began to see his strategy. First off was the kowtow to Russia’s Putin by not implementing the Bush plan of building a defensive missile systems in Poland and the Czech Republic. This new posture emboldened Russia and Iran. They saw Obama as weak; facts on the ground have not only proved this, but have put America at risk of nuclear war. Once again, ongoing talks with Iran concerning their quest to build a nuclear weapon have gone nowhere. However, Obama warns Congress that to penalize Iran with more sanctions if talks fail will only irritate the Islamists who by their very nature will not only build a bomb, but try to use it against Israel. That is their plan all along. We don’t have to interpret what Obama is doing, we can see it with our very own eyes.

Immigration is one more avenue utilized by Obama to subvert the Constitution. Deferring the expulsion of 5 million invaders into this country is an impeachable offense. Many of them are from countries at war with the United States. Islamic Suicide bombers presenting themselves as Latinos. That is not all, Obama has given hundreds of thousands more from the Middle East permanent residency cards. Don’t take our word for it, take Obama’s word, he calls the Fort Hood killing of 13 of our finest, “workplace-violence.” In what might be termed the audacity of nope, the government has declined to call this al Qaeda–inspired mass murder an act of terrorism because to do so would be “unfair to the victims.” The official reasoning is that it would jeopardize the case because, as stated in a Pentagon memo, “defense counsel will argue that Major Hasan cannot receive a fair trial because a branch of government has indirectly declared that Major Hasan is a terrorist—that he is criminally culpable.”

Let’s add to the recent Paris attacks the Obama line was not Islamic-terrorism, but plain old terrorism. The president himself, before the United Nations, revealed his own appeasement of Islamic terrorists and hoodlums when he declared in September 2012:“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”  The first comments came from Josh Earnest, the White House spokesman, who refused to even call the massacre an act of terrorism, but made sure to add the now typical non-sequitor  which now routinely follows Islamic terrorist attacks,  that “Islam is a religion of peace” and therefore no one should associate this with the “extremists” in Paris with Islam.

How many more examples do we need, how many more deaths will be the result of these Islamist terrorist, how many more politically correct defenders of Islam will continue to be seduced by Islams who tout brotherhood?  Within hours Of the Paris shooting Obama gave the militant Jihadists being held at Guantanamo the key; off they went to join their fellow Islamic terrorists in a welcome home party. If anyone does not believe we are in a war with Islam, they soon will when these same Jihadists come back to America with a missile on their back crying Allahu Akbar.