Monthly Archives: August 2016

MUSINGS

17 Comments

Did you notice the subtle change in your neighborhood? Foreigners walking the streets at all hours, many of them Middle Eastern types that stand out like a sore thumbs; wearing apparel akin to bath robes or pajamas. Do you wonder what these people are thinking, why they pray five times a day, are you suspicious of them?

Why are they here in the first place? They hate what we stand for; why come to America? Are they plants, lone wolfs, suicide bombers in waiting? newhavenpeople2 Who brought them here? Are they illegal aliens? What foreign lands did they come from?

Britain and France have experienced such an influx. After decades these foreigners have not assimilated into their Western Christian Culture, this is anathema to them. Did they come for financial reasons? Why are so many on the dole?

By dressing in burqas and hijabs do they pose a threat, do they incite? It seems that the French think so. France has outlawed face covering since 2010, this includes  masks, helmets, balaclavas, niqābs, including the burqa 

To many of Westerners, dressing like this is confrontational. It sends a message that they will not assimilate into our culture. They become adversarial with their demands. Others say that this is what America is all about. Wrong! Assimilation in language, culture and dress is what brings us together. Outrageous behavior does not. Failure to transition into the mainstream will keep them looking in; outsiders they will always be.

We still wonder why the Saudis, Egyptians, Jordanians, Kuwaitis, Qatar and the Emirates have not taken them in. Do they know something we don’t?

DID HILLARY CLINTON HAVE A BRAIN SEIZURE – LIKE FDR, DOES SHE BELONG IN A WHEEL CHAIR?

126 Comments

Not long ago Hillary Clinton took a HEAD dive resulting in a blood clot on her brain. Questions remain about her health, but recently they became more intent. Click here for Hillary the BOBBLEHEAD. Did her neurologist tell her to bobble in order to alleviate some kind of brain injury?

And what about the (click here) seizure, this was no fun thing, but a serious indication that there is something wrong with her health. Americans want to know what is wrong with the most corrupt politician since Eva Peron. Questions arise when she won’g release her medical records.

PLEASE CLICK HERE to VIEW THE COMPLETE VIDEO, IT IS IMPORTANT FOR THE VOTERS TO KNOW WHO THEY ARE CASTING A VOTE FOR. It is not only apparent, but obvious that Hillary the liar Clinton has a cognitive disorder; she is psychological unfit to become President?liesCHAPPAQUAhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqbDBRWb63s

Is Hillary have LSD flashbacks? Click here to watch Hillary go down like the Benghazi operation.

hillary-clinton-staircase-2016-drudge-screenshot-600

Is Hillary Clinton getting support from DEPEND?Depend FIT-FLEX UnderwearIs she suffering from incontinence?

Where to get Depend®

Get more from your adult diapers. Find discreet Depend® products online and in stores

DESTRUCTION OF AMERICA BY THE PROGRESSIVE AXIS

4 Comments

The Liberal-Progressive agenda got its start many moons ago. With the appointment of Supreme Court Justices with the liberal bent the road to Armageddon was began to take shape. Mind you this did not happen over night, it was a slow process similar to Chinese water torture. Decisions were beginning to be decided, not based on the Constitution, but based on political expediency. What politicians could not do by legislations was done by the Judge who legislated from the bench. We have seen that in the most recent decisions by the court. A most startling example is the requirement by North Carolina that a first time voter present a photo ID’s before voting.

The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against North Carolina in this case. The State has asked for a stay of the ruling. Barely three weeks after a federal appeals court issued a blistering ruling overturning a North Carolina voter registration law that it called a deliberate attempt to suppress the black vote, Republicans across the state are fighting back. What set the liberals off was the early voting period being reduced from (Click)17 to 10 days. This they said affected people of color and restricted their participation in elections.

However, this is only one instant of a Liberal Court dictating how far a state can go in setting voting requirements. It is beyond anyone’s imagination that voters can’t produce the required photo IDs. For instance, those citizens who will be voting no long in advance what the requirements are. For a first time 18 year old voter and an elderly person who never cast a vote procuring the required identification should not be a hardship. Both potential voters had at a minimum one year to secure the proper documents. So where is the hardship?

It doesn’t end here, recent comments by two of the most flaming liberals on the Supreme Court gives pause. Bader Ginsburg and Sotomayor went rogue, beyond the pale in their comments. Once again indicating their progressive agenda. How they can be impartial in rendering a decision is highly suspect.

In Ginsberg’s own words:

“He is a faker,” she said of the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, going point by point, as if presenting a legal brief. “He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. … How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that.”
Toobin: Justice crossed a line
Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s slam of Donald Trump  The Legend in Her Own Mind is mentally incompetent to sit on the bench; a biased mind formed at birth. Biased beyond belief for a sitting Judge to manifest personal comments regarding individual politicians. What gets our goat is she wonders how Trump got away with not turning over his tax returns; the irony here is that she didn’t mention Hillary Clinton not turning over all of her emails. Nor did she mention the pass on Obama back in 2008. 
Turning to the Latino on the bench, Sotomayor, another anti white bomb thrower if there was ever on. Her biases were also embedded at birth.

The Supreme Court issued an extraordinarily disappointing 5–3 decision on Monday, June 20, 2016 in Utah v. Strieff, a Fourth Amendment case about police searches. Yet the terrible ruling came with a bright spot: In a powerful and groundbreaking dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor lambasted the majority for its heartless and illogical rejection of Fourth Amendment freedoms, invoking the Justice Department’s Ferguson report, echoing Black Lives Matter, and even citing Ta-Nehisi Coates.

Mark Joseph SternMARK JOSEPH STERN

Mark Joseph Stern is a writer forSlate. He covers the law and LGBTQ issues.

Strieff itself involves a fairly simple question of constitutional law. Typically, when police illegally stop an individual on the street without reasonable suspicion, any fruits of that stop—such as the discovery of illegal drugs—must be suppressed in court, because the stop was “unreasonable seizure” under the Fourth Amendment. Strieff gave the justices an opportunity to affirm this constitutional rule. But instead, Justice Stephen Breyer joined the court’s four conservatives to add a huge loophole to that long-established doctrine. In an opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas, the court found that if an officer illegally stops an individual then discovers an arrest warrant—even for an incredibly minor crime, like a traffic violation—the stop is legitimized, and any evidence seized can be used in court. The only restriction is when an officer engages in “flagrant police misconduct,” which the decision declines to define.

Sotomayor, who dominated oral arguments in Strieff, refused to let the majority get away with this Fourth Amendment diminution without a fight. In a stunning dissent, Sotomayor explains the startling breadth of the court’s decision. “This case allows the police to stop you on the street, demand your identification, and check it for outstanding traffic warrants—even if you are doing nothing wrong,” Sotomayor writes, in a dissent joined in part by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. “If the officer discovers a warrant for a fine you forgot to pay, courts will now excuse his illegal stop and will admit into evidence anything he happens to find by searching you after arresting you on the warrant.”

“Most striking about the Court’s opinion,” Sotomayor notes “is its insistence that the event here was ‘isolated,’ with ‘no indication that this unlawful stop was part of any systemic or recurrent police misconduct.’ ” But in truth, “nothing about this case is isolated.” Sotomayor then dives into the widespread police misconduct that has dominated headlines for several years, focusing on the Department of Justice’s Ferguson report to demonstrate that “outstanding warrants are surprisingly common.”

The Department of Justice, Sotomayor writes, “recently reported that in the town of Ferguson, Missouri, with a population of 21,000, 16,000 people had outstanding warrants against them.” That means 76 percent of Ferguson residents have, under the court’s decision, effectively surrendered their Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizure. “In the St. Louis metropolitan area,” moreover, “officers ‘routinely’ stop people—on the street, at bus stops, or even in court—for no reason other than ‘an officer’s desire to check whether the subject had a municipal arrest warrant pending.’ ”

But Sotomayor’s bravest moment arrives when she announces that, “writing only for myself, and drawing on my professional experiences, I would add that unlawful ‘stops’ have severe consequences much greater than the inconvenience suggested by the name.” (Sotomayor cites previous opinions, citations that I’ve excised for clarity.)

Sotomayor forgets to address why the high percentage of existing warrants of those who live in the Black and Latino community. She fails to address that 75% of children are born out of wedlock, that there is a family breakdown due to the liberal progressive mindset that anything goes and it is “all whitey’s fault.”

“REVOLUTION IS THE ONLY SOLUTION”

MESSAGE FROM THE NEW BLACK PANTHERS

31 Comments

New Black Panthers Call Milwaukee Riots “a War”!  By Tim Brown August 17, 2016The Constitution

Breitbart reports:

“The people against terrorism, and tyranny in their community is not a civil war. When you are speaking about civil war, you are talking about a country fighting against a country. This is oppressed people fighting against a racist, white supremacist police system. Which is meant to oppress a certain group of people. More than likely black people and poor people around the country.”

“What you see is people lashing out and fighting against the system. As it is said in the Second Amendment, you know. So this is not new. The people in this country have always defended themselves against tyranny. So I can’t liken this to a civil war. No it’s not. Is it a war? Yes, it is. It’s a war against black people because we’re the ones being murdered. We’re the ones being killed. So there’s been a war against us. But is it a civil war? I can’t say that that’s the case.”

However, instead of Omowale recognizing the real problem, he is only escalating a skin color war, not a war against tyranny

The shooting or armed suspects that took place in Milwaukee over the weekend resulted in several riots. However, the rioting is happening due to lack of knowledge and lack of justice. Even Omowale acknowledged that his knowledge was limited, but still pushed the narrative that the incident was “basically the same old, same old that is happening around the country. Black men are being murdered.”

So, there you have it from the racist Black Panthers leader. He doesn’t have enough information to determine what happened or why, but hey, everyone is after the black man. I would laugh if the man and his ideology were not so serious.

Aaron Klein, who interviewed Omowale, read to him a description of the incident from theNew York Times.

The violence erupted after an officer killed a man who the police said was armed with a semiautomatic handgun and who fled after a traffic stop.

The police said two uniformed officers stopped two people in a car at about 3:30 p.m. on Saturday. The police did not provide details on why the car was stopped.

Both occupants ran from the car. During the pursuit, Mr. Barrett said, an officer ordered the man to drop his gun and fired when he did not, striking the man in the chest and an arm. He said the gun held 23 rounds.

The gunman, described by the police as a 23-year-old Milwaukee man with a lengthy arrest record, died at the scene.

“You say the man was running. If he’s running, then most definitely he is running in the opposite direction away from the police officer,” Omowale replied. “Now could have gotten shot in the chest? Now that is possible because he could have turned in which direction he needed to go.”

“With a gun, don’t forget,” Klein reponded. “And the police did tell him to put the gun down.”

“You are only telling me the police’s version,” Omowale retorted. “See the other man is dead. He can’t give his version.”

“We have seen so many times where police officers have made statements but yet cameras have come out to catch them in their lies,” Omowale added. “So it’s gotten to the point where America does not believe when a police officer says that someone turned toward them with a gun. And again having a gun does not justify killing someone.”

“This incident just took place last night,” he concluded. “We haven’t really had a chance to sit down and discuss the issue, to organize on it. Again, I remind you I just found out about it basically at the same time the rest of America found out about it. We have Black Panthers, the People’s New Black Panthers, Huey P. Newton Gun Club, based around the country. So I imagine there will be some type of Panther presence in Milwaukee if there is not already.”

Reposted with Permission from Freedom Outpost.

THE BLACK CONUNDRUM COME NOVEMBER

6 Comments

You do have to admit that Blacks and Hispanics get the short end of the stick when it comes to public education. Yes there are exceptions but in the broad scheme of things minority school children attend, for the most part, failing schools. This is due to many causes. The majority of students in these schools are from single parent families; hence the teachers spend a great deal of time on discipline, secondly one parent families have many chores thereby neglecting their responsibility in helping the child with homework or in fact seeing that it was done in the first place. Another major cause of concern is the education of the parent, in many cases they were dropouts, so engaging their children in meaningful conversations become a dead issue.

The liberal elites designed today’s education experience, for the most part, particularly in suburbia it works fine. However, when one peers into the inner city experience he/she sees a different picture. Mayhem is everywhere. Teachers in many instances are on the defensive, fearful of what an irate student may do. This has been caused by state board’s of education and the progressive politician. Discipline is no longer the stick that it once was. For instance a teacher, in many states and localities, can’t lay a hand on a student, even to break up a fight. The cops are responsible for this. Disciplining destructive students is not any easy task. Classes are disrupted effectively limiting their classroom learning. Teachers now become baby sitters. This very rarely happens in suburbia. Who to blame for this?  We can point many fingers, but it is obvious the liberal progressive cabal put the rules in place.

As we enter prime time in November, the decision on who to vote for becomes more acute. The Black parents need to understand who they are voting for and why. This is not too difficult of a decision. Looking behind and in front of the scenes makes the choice easy. The American Federation of Teachers (AFT) has come out in favor of Hillary.  Resolution of the AFT, “Hillary Clinton is a tested leader who shares our values, is supported by AFT members, and is prepared for a tough fight in order to champion the interest of students, families and communities”

Why does the AFT support Hillary? There is a one word answer, UNIONS. Hillary Clinton is vehemently against Charter Schools because they do not fall under the rules. They are successful in their own right and challenge today’s paradigm. A reminder once again that tenure teachers who do not measure up to today’s standards cannot be fired; they end up in the minority districts teaching down the inner city youth.

Many issues are at work here; for instance the AFT supports illegal aliens. This is detrimental to legal students, especially Blacks. Extra time is necessary to bring Hispanics up to speed, money that would to into the hiring of support personnel, tutors, mentors etc, to help failing or below standard Black students is not available. In reality the Blacks are like slaves of the Education Plantation. Suffering meted out like the plantation whip.

A look at the New York Charter School System is a prime example of what can be done to what is being done. Success Academy is the quintessential example of the dichotomy between public and charter schools; one flunks the other succeeds. Charters are a threat to the TEACHER’S UNION who control the public education agenda.

The message to the Black Parents, when voting ask yourself who is best for your child, who is in the pockets of failing teachers and unruly unions. You can make a difference, cast your vote for the future not the past. Despite her public pronouncements you must look behind the scenes and only then you will see who is pulling the scenes. Don’t fall for this trap again. They take your vote for granted. Do the right thing for a change, break away from the plantation mindset. It will benefit your child in the long run.

Click here for a message from Donald Trump.

WILL HILLARY BE JOINING MARTHA STUART – PERJURY = JAIL THE BIRD

31 Comments

The Lying Clinton has been caught red handed, this time (of course we know the truth). Will she be charged with perjury?  Clinton is an abusive liar, spouting vitriol at her enemies by personal attack (Saul Alinsky’s model), but this time what she said in public, to a Congressional committee does not reconcile with what FBI Director Comey said.

House Republicans have detailed perjury allegations against Hillary Clinton, citing the apparent conflict between her 2015 congressional testimony about her email practices and the FBI’s conclusions announced in July, according to a letter to the US Attorney for the District of Columbia.

“I provided you, with all my work related emails, all that I had.  Approximately 55,000 pages. And they are being publicly released,” Clinton testified.  But FBI investigators found “several thousand work related emails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014.”

YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS ABOUT TO BE BUSTED

102 Comments

Their movin them in folks, that is the plan. Remember Andrew Cuomo, Clinton’s head of HUD, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, well he is long gone but his predecessor is about to bust the lily white neighborhoods. The plan is to require the “burbs” to provide housing for the low income families that now reside in the inner cities. Move ‘um out move ‘um in.  Yessirreebob!

Westchester County New York was embroiled in a six year lawsuit with HUD. Open your market for people with low income. In other words let the riff raff move into the plush suburbs. The Center for Individual Rights or CIR has filed an amicus brief in support of Westchester County Executive Robert Astorino and his ongoing effort to fend off an overreaching federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). HUD is attempting to silence Astorino’s opposition to its agenda of dismantling local zoning ordinances in Westchester County, a northern suburb of New York City.

Prior to Astorino’s election, the federal government and Westchester County agreed to a consent decree that ended a lawsuit against the county. Now, HUD is using that agreement to stage a test-run of a new, nationwide HUD program designed to meld together urban and suburban municipalities. The agreement required Westchester County to build 750 new affordable housing units and to publicize the benefits of mixed-income neighborhoods by funding campaigns to broaden support for them. It also required the county to submit future housing plans to HUD that must be deemed “acceptable” by HUD.

“HUD has told Westchester that any limits on the size, type, height and density of buildings are ‘restrictive practices.’ It demands that the county sue its localities over such common zoning regulations, which are not exclusionary by any stretch of the imagination. If HUD can define what constitutes exclusionary practices, then local zoning as it is known today disappears. Apartments, high rises or whatever else the federal government or a developer wants can be built on any block in America.”

CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL STORY – THE CONTENT WILL SET YOU INTO A RAGE.

Now that you have got the jist of the story we bring you the latest. Obama has demanded that inner city folk be provided housing in the burbs.

As reported by the New York Post, Obama’s Housing Secretary Julian Castro is looking to create a new program that will “reallocate funding for Section 8 housing to punish suburbs for being too white and too wealthy.”

Castro’s plan is to “super-size” the federal Section 8 housing vouchers that provide rental funding for low-income people. The increased vouchers are intended to help poor people move out from increasingly expensive urban districts to the suburban areas that are currently middle and upper middle class.

As reported by the New York Post, Obama’s Housing Secretary Julian Castro is looking to create a new program that will “reallocate funding for Section 8 housing to punish suburbs for being too white and too wealthy.”

Castro’s plan is to “super-size” the federal Section 8 housing vouchers that provide rental funding for low-income people. The increased vouchers are intended to help poor people move out from increasingly expensive urban districts to the suburban areas that are currently middle and upper middle class.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL STORY FROM BREITBART.

What to expect? Break-ins, robbery, fires, drug dealing, hit and runs, shootings, murders, stolen vehicles, muggings, loitering, public drinking, urinating in public, fornification, pit bulls replace the poodle, school lock-downs, education expenses skyrocket, quality of education suffers, police monitor the neighborhoods, teen pregnancy explodes, illegals saturate once quiet streets harassing women,  drug over-doses reach epic proportions, nightly shootings disrupt the once quiet neighborhood. children aren’t allowed to go out at night, Mosques replace churches, the call to prayer breaches the peace, women wear burqas, men walk around with traditional robes, real estate price implode and municipal budgets double. Once quiet suburbs now become the hoodburbs. Did we miss anything? We certainly did, how about the gangs? The Crips, the Bloods, the MS 13’s and more.

The violent El Salvador Mara Salvatrucha gang , better know by its nom de guerre MS-13 and the lesser know 18th Street gang.  They have infiltrated major cities committing felonies, murdering, extorting, running guns and prostitution rings, peddling drugs and smuggling.

In many cities the police do not dear tread on their turf. But what is more interesting is their sudden recruitment of illegals who are being lodged at an Arizona facility. We should be alarmed. As detailed in thearticle members of the gang cross the border and are subsequently housed in government holding pens pending their release.

Those doing the recruiting are minors, JUST CHILDREN IN MOST INSTANCES, effectively they are plants duping Obama’s  uninitiated border patrol goons.

These Latin American gangs aren’t the typical street hoods of the ’50’s, they are violent criminals. 

In the early 2000s (decade), US authorities investigated MS-13 in Charlotte, North Carolina. Eventually the work led to charges against 26 MS-13 members, including 7 trial convictions in January 2010, 18 guilty pleas, and 11 multi-year prison sentences.This included the alleged first federal death-penalty conviction for an MS-13 member, Alejandro Enrique Ramirez Umaña, aka “Wizard” (age 25).

On July 13, 2003, Brenda Paz, a 17-year-old former MS member turned informant was found stabbed on the banks of the Shenandoah River in Virginia. Paz was killed for informing the FBI about Mara Salvatrucha’s criminal activities. Two of her former friends were later convicted of the murder.

OPEN UP YOUR EYES AMERICA – CLICK HERE FOR THE 42 MINUTE YOU TUBE VIDEO. THIS IS SCARY

SCARY MOVIE AMERICA. IF HILLARY WINS EXPECT ALL HELL TO BREAK LOOSE. muchasgraciasamigo Hey Gringo, we want a piece of your action!

TRUMP’S MESSAGE TO THE LYING CLINTON

27 Comments

A message for Trump to Clinton! Yes, I will divulge my my Income Tax Return if you allow an independent commission to investigate your server, the FBI files, the State Department files, the Clinton Foundation files, the Clinton World Initiative Files, Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills and Susan Rice files and whatever files or servers they deem appropriate.

Then and only then after they complete their investigation and release the ones that will incriminate you and publish them; you know the ones you haven’t turned over but say you did, you liar, then I will release my Tax return. Until then demand all you want but it will fall on deaf ears, you Corrupt lying murderer.

Slick Willy weighed in too. The words of Representative Duffy, “For Bill Clinton to come out now and say that this is a bunch of ‘bull’, why then did he have this secret meeting with Loretta Lynch on the tarmac in Arizona to make sure he could tap down any kind of prosecution that comes from the DOJ,” Duffy said. “If he wasn’t concerned about Hillary Clinton and her scandal about the email he wouldn’t have had to have that secret meeting.”

ABOUT TIME COMEY CAME CLEAN – WHAT DID THE BIRD SAY

4 Comments

FBI Director Comey is the butt end of bad jokes, a buffoon, a YES MAN taken to the cleaners. The question is what did he say; is he going to let Hillary drive the narrative. Come clean Comey? America wants to know what he knows and didn’t say. It seems odd that there was no one else present when he interviewed the Lying Clinton on top of not taking notes on the questions asked and the answers given. She was not put under oath. This is in violation of accepted procedure. An independent investigation is warranted. The truth must come out. The lying Clinton is walking away from a ten month investigation costing millions and Comey basis everything on a meek description of carelessness or criminal intent. We know the intent was criminal. She did not turn over 25 emails that the FBI found; why not? they incriminated here and the Clinton Foundation. Why no arrest, why no RICO charge? This is hypocrisy gone wild. America will not stand for separate legal system where the likes of Clinton and Corozine get away running scams and lying under oath; pleading ignorance. 

The liberal elites running Washington have had their way long enough, but when it comes to murder, grand theft, selling state secrets, compromising America’s security someone, somewhere must be held responsible. And that person is Hillary Clinton; Jail the Bird.

 We want to know how many times Comey spoke to Attorney General Lynch before he testified to Congress. We also want to know why the decision not to prosecute the Corrupt Clinton was left to Lynch who by meeting with Slick Willie was in no position to render an independent decision. Definitely a conflict of interest. Similar to Al Scarface Capone meeting with the head of the IRS.

Americans are on the verge of revolt because of a corrupt government where their elected officials steal billions and get away with it.

GO FOR THE GOLD

246 Comments

The Olympics are in full swing, participants are reaching new heights with the expectation of bringing home the gold; if not gold silver waits in the wings. The real action is not in Rio, but in the gold pits of London and Chicago.  Gold medals are actually made of silver and gold plated with 6 grams of pure gold out of a total weight of 500 grams. The last time the medal was 100% gold was in 1912.

Effectively the medal is a counterfeit. But nothing is new here, the United States has been printing fiat money for years. However, the world is catching on with this ruse; in the not too distant future the Ponzi scheme will be over. Gold will again rule the roost, paper currency will only be worth the paper it is printed on. In case Americans have noticed the price of gold and silver has soared during the past year reminding us of a pole vaulter whose pole sprung him/her over the bar in whip like fashion to take the gold.

Throughout history gold has been the medium of exchange; the store of value. Paper money displaced gold early in the 17th century; first used in Massachusetts then by the states during the Civil War. The banking industry’s genesis was initiated early on by warehouses which issued a receipt – thus a warehouse receipt– entitling the holder to redeem the receipt for the said amount of gold as defined in the receipt. As the industry blossomed it became apparent that the holders of receipts very rarely requested the physical gold; they only transferred the receipts. Thus the warehouses evolved into lenders realizing that a call for 100 percent of the gold at any one time was not a probability.

The 18th through the 21st century became the glory days of gold. Banks became behemoths lending more gold than they had in inventory. When a run on a bank occurred, which it ultimately did, culminating in bankruptcy and ruin. As the United States entered the 20th century as the world’s big money player the world treated the dollar as if it was good as gold.

This was true up until 1971.  Not dismissing the illegal taking of individuals gold by FDR back in 1933 (see executive order 6102).  The world was on the path of becoming a dynamic and risky adventure from 1971 on; the dollar was no longer convertible to gold, the dream of El Dorado became a reality by inventing paper gold on a scale never seen before. The physical gold window had closed, the dollar pyramid scheme began.  Hence the printing of paper money on a scale never seen before. Economies were on financial cocaine, a euphoria that is still manifested by governments gone wild. More printing enabled the exalted to exert control of economies, countries and world politics. But good times don’t last forever.

Entering the 21st century has proved that the dollar panacea has a long reach, but things can changes in a quant moment. Across the globe one country after another has defaulted; Greece and Argentina head the list. Is it possible that the United States is next?  A probability that cannot be counted out. What brings us to that conclusion is the loss of faith in the United States. We are no longer control world events – Obama saw to it.

Future obligations are the tail wagging the dog and that is about to become the albatross under our neck for the next two decades. Obligations are coming due. And the question remains, who will be responsible to pay them. for sure you can’t count on today’s youth to hand over their hard earned cash.   17 Trillion and counting is a gargantua number, that is just debt, counting social security, medicate obligations and interest on the debt we are looking at a google type number closer to 100 trillion. $100,000,000,0000,0000.

Another relevant question to ask a politician of the goldbrick variety is:  Will we ever be able to pay back the money we owe?   Don’t expect a straight answer.  The next question is, Will gold provide a solution to political largesse?