The progressive liberals have tried every which way but loose to prevent President Trump from running in 2024. In fact the stalwart lunatics from Colorado denied his place on the ballot, but they will have learned a strict lesson as the Supreme Court will overturn their misguided ploy.
And Jack Smith, the arrogant prosecutor, who thought he had an avenue for a quick trial, found out that he is not the only man in town.None of the prosecutor’s calls for expedience have squarely explained why he wants the case to advance with urgency rarely seen in criminal proceedings. If Trump can use the plodding pace of the courts to force delays in his criminal trials — and then retakes the White House in 2024 — he may never see the inside of a courtroom again.
That vague paean to the public interest stops well short of saying what everyone — including the high court — already knows.
“If this case doesn’t get tried before the election, and if he wins, then it will likely never be tried,” Parlatore said. “That is a reality. So you could sit there and say, ‘It needs to be done now because if it’s not done now it will never be done.’”
It has also allowed Trump to attempt to define the answer for him. A spokesperson for Trump’s campaign said the filings show Smith “flailing about in desperation.” In his own Supreme Court filing Wednesday,Trump urged the justices to refuse Smith’s entreaties for “haste,” saying Smith’s silence on the reason for his demand, backed by “the vaguest of justifications,” betrays a corrupt political motive to damage Joe Biden’s likeliest 2024 opponent. His attorneys described the lack of elaboration as “an omission that speaks volumes.”
"Where Revolution is the Solution" Taking back the Empire
