This is becoming “old hat”, with the technologies and forensics we have today, something does not sit right. First off, the crime scene was compromised from day one. Local police entered the scene and in doing so, tainted evidence which could have solved the crime. Days later they realized the error and called in the FBI. But now, they will not release forensic evidence gathered on day one to the FBI. What are they hiding?

The FBI has the tools available, some may have been AI generated to find the perpetrator. They asked for those in the inner circle for finger prints, just in case the local goon squad missed them. We know the camera was disabled, that tells us that the person repsonsible for this hideous abudction was familiar with the property. The FBI was able to resurrected the video footage of the Perp. However, he had what appeared to be a space suit.

Finally, they realized that a possible kidnapping took place, maybe. Was it her son, Cameron Gutherie who dropped her off at 9.45 P.M. at the house on January 31, or was this really a murder scene?. Blood droplets found all over the place. From the facts, which are few in between, how could this happen to an 84 year old women. Someone new her. Their motive was money. Believe us, Nancy Gutherie is not alive, too much time has lapsed since her abduction.

But then we now find out, she did’t go to church, she typically went to her friends house. When she didn’t show up, those in attendence became concerned. The friends met once a week after Covid. They watched the church service on live stream. Did she take a UBER? Did a friend pick her up. Perhaps a relative or a husband picked her up in previous get-togethers. Blood stains reveal the possibility that she fought for her life. Then the abduction happened. But someone does know the truth.

Gloves found, but are they there to throw the investigators off track. A Fedex driver was questioned, then released. Did he have anthing to do with the crime. Ransom demands came and went. No sign of life was given.

We bring you to the past abduction of the Lindberg baby. This turned out to be the crime of the century. In the end an innocent man named Bruno Hauptman was executed, but was he guilty? A must read!

On March 1, 1932, the 20-month-old son of aviator Charles Lindbergh was kidnapped from his New Jersey home, a “Crime of the Century” that ended with the child found dead two months later. Bruno Richard Hauptmann was convicted and executed for the murder, which led to stricter federal kidnapping laws. 

Key Details of the Lindbergh Kidnapping:

• The Abduction: On March 1, 1932, at ~9:00 PM, Charles Lindbergh Jr. was taken from his second-story nursery in East Amwell, NJ, while his parents were home.
• The Scene: A homemade ladder was found outside, along with muddy footprints and a ransom note demanding $$.
• The Result: Despite paying the ransom, the child was never returned alive. His body was discovered on May 12, 1932, in woods near the home, with cause of death determined as a fatal skull fracture.
• The Suspect: German immigrant Bruno Richard Hauptmann, a carpenter, was arrested in 1934 after a portion of the ransom money was traced to him.
• The Trial & Impact: Hauptmann was convicted of murder and executed in 1936. The case led to the Federal Kidnapping Act (“Lindbergh Law”). 

While Hauptmann proclaimed his innocence until his execution, the case remains one of the most famous and debated American criminal investigations of the 20th century.