Top Republicans in the Senate are also alleging that Democratic leaders are hoping to hide the fact that Tlaib is just one of many new Democratic politicians in Congress who harbor deeply anti-Israel views.
Tlaib, responding to a post by Vermont Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday, suggested that Senate Republicans were more loyal to Israel than the U.S., amid a report that GOP leaders were planning to introduce a bill that would punish companies that participate in the so-called “Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions” (BDS) global movement against Israel. BDS proponents seek to pressure Israel through economic and other means — often, until Israel ceases to exist in its current form.
“They forgot what country they represent,” Tlaib, a Palestinian-American who made history last week by becoming one of the first two Muslim women to ever serve in Congress, wrote.
They have been licking their chops since November, now that they rule the house these ruthless scum from the inner cities have foamed at the mouth like the rabid dogs they are.
Case in point is the Muslim Tlaib from Michigan who calls Trump a bully and a mother fkr. But let us take a closer look at this Koran loving Jihadist who is a member of the Socialist party.
Those who hide beyond the proverbial burka are an existential threat to the United States of America. This name calling goat lover has 13 siblings. Questions arise though, did her parents enter the United States illegally? If so, she and her siblings are one more reason for the WALL.
Moving on to New York we find a socialist by the name of Ocasio has exposed positions of the late Lenin and Marx. For her socialism is the only way; taxing the rich at 70% or more is one of her more aggressive policies. She is for open borders and a weak military.
So there you have two of the most vocal members of the House who don’t hide their positions, but throw them in your face. By the way, both believe that Israel should not exist. We have news for them, you ain’t going anywhere, Republicans rule the Senate. Wake up, shut up and learn up.
Obama’s full quote at the time: “We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States, undetected, undocumented, unchecked and circumventing the line of people who are waiting patiently, diligently and lawfully to become immigrants in this country.”
“We all agree on the need to better secure the border and to punish employers who choose to hire illegal immigrants,” Obama added. “We are a generous and welcoming people, here in the United States, but those who enter the country illegally, and those who employ them, disrespect the rule of law and they are showing disregard for those who are following the law.”
In his post, Trump also provided a partial quote from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, emphasizing her support for the Secure Fence Act of 2006. That legislation passed by an overwhelming 80-19 majority, and was backed by Obama, as well.
“I voted, when I was a Senator, to build a barrier to try to prevent illegal immigrants from coming in…” Hillary Clinton, 2015,” Trump wrote.
At a campaign stop in November 2015, Clinton told a crowd: “I voted numerous times when I was a senator to spend money to build a barrier to try to prevent illegal immigrants from coming in. And I do think you have to control your borders.”
Trump continued: “The only reason they do not want to build a Wall is that Walls Work! 99% of our illegal Border crossings will end, crime in our Country will go way down and we will save billions of dollars a year! A properly planned and constructed Wall will pay for itself many times a year!”
Gustavo Perez Arriaga, 32, a Mexican national, has been accused of killing Singh around 1 a.m. Dec. 26. He was arrested two days after the murder as he prepared to flee to Mexico, officials said.
The case has rekindled a debate over California’s sanctuary law that limits cooperation with federal immigration authorities. President Trump seized on the case to call for tougher border security amid a fight with congressional Democrats over funding for a border wall, which has forced a partial government shutdown.
That’s bad news for the Democrat Party, which is hellbent on opposing the president’s efforts to fix our broken immigration system, especially the border wall he needs in order to get illegal immigration under control.
China’s megalomaniac leader Xi Jinping is on the brink of a fight; he believes in Chinese hegemony the world over. His modus operandi begins by starting a small skirmish and then draw in the adversary which in turn will escalate into something bigger, maybe a fission type of fight.
Beijing has criticised the 2016 international court’s stinging rejection of its territorial claims in the South China Sea, with Communist party-controlled newspapers warning of a military escalation in response to what they denounced as a US ploy to thwart China’s rise.
So far his actions are minor probes, but in due time expect more than a dry run, a major provocation will cause an encounter drawing in more powerful forces. The coming fight will test U.S. resolve on Taiwan. But expect warfare in the Pacific too. Lately China has buzzed on purpose a U.S Destroyer part of the Pacific fleet, coming close to a collision.
In a written statement emailed to Navy Times, Pacific Fleet officials say that a Luyang-class destroyer closed on the Decatur around 8:30 a.m. local time Sunday October 2, 2018 in “an unsafe and unprofessional” manner near Gaven Reef, making a series of “increasingly aggressive maneuvers” that were accompanied by warnings for the Decatur to leave the area.
The Chinese vessel came within 45 yards of the Decatur’s bow before the American warship veered off to prevent a collision, officials said.
China though is deploying loans the world over. For instance they have their hands in a multitude of Latin American countries lending them scarce funds with tough restrictions. This is causing some strife among the borrowers.
For the five-year period between 2015 and 2019, China’s President Xi Jinping set ambitious goals for exchange with the Latin American and Caribbean region (LAC): $500 billion in trade and $250 billion in direct investment. The pledge was made in January 2015 at the first ministerial meeting of the Forum of China and the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, which was held in Beijing. Although it remains to be seen if this degree of integration can be achieved, the investment target is certainly plausible, as China is likely to emerge in the next few years as the world’s largest supplier of capital.
However, some Latin American countries are fighting back. A few decades ago Russia owned Egypt, but were given the boot by Anwar el-Sadat.
CAIRO: President Anwar el‐Sadat’s expulsion Russian military advisers from Egypt is probably the most severe defeat the Soviet Union has suf fered since it began to buy friends and influence nations in the non‐Communist Third World. happened because the Soviets could no longer camouflage the basic ambivalence of their policy— their posture as Egypt’s stanchest advocate against Israel and their simultaneous quest for more salu brious relations with the United States.
Why Sadat packed off the Russians
The Russians also stumbled because they never really understood the Egyptian—or the Arab—mind, at once so beguiling and so maddening. Arabs can be bribed, but never bought; they can be bullied, but never bound; they can be fervent, but not always faithful. The Russians thought they had squeezed Sadat into a narrow corner of obeisance where he would be obliged to do their bidding until they were ready to replace him with someone more to their taste. How sadly they misjudged him, and how astonished they must have been when they woke up that morning in mid‐July to receive his order to pack their bags.
Over the past decade, China has become a leading lender and builder of infrastructure projects in the developing world. With extraordinarily high savings and a declining investment rate at home, China has reached out to invest in a diverse array of infrastructure projects from West Africa to the Amazon. One of the major drivers of the infrastructure investment is the Belt and Road initiative (BRI). Launched in 2013 by President Xi Jinping as One Belt One Road (OBOR), the initiative has increased in funding (aiming at US$1 trillion) and expanded in scope, now including projects in over 70 nations. This investment abroad constitutes an ambitious foreign policy, and one with deep geopolitical implications.
Thanks to Beijing’s loans, Chinese corporations are building dams and hydroelectric power plants in the Amazon and Patagonia. They are laying thousands of kilometers in rail tracks to reduce freight transportation costs and connect populations in Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. China’s development banks are even financing a state-of-the-art nuclear energy plant in Argentina. In what has become the most ambitious civil engineering project in recent decades (although one plagued with challenges and uncertainties), a Hong Kong-based billionaire has been granted the authority to build a canal through Nicaragua, connecting the Pacific and Atlantic oceans to compete against the Panama Canal.
Due to the novelty of the ventures, investing in infrastructure in LAC poses an important learning opportunity for Chinese firms, which have not responded adequately to local culture and regulations. We find that most projects in LAC have faced local backlash because of environmental concerns about pollution and harm to residents and livelihoods. For example, there have been concerns about the environmental impact of Sinopec’s oil refineries in Moín, Costa Rica (the National Secretary of the Environment objected to the first evaluation for serious omissions) and in the Yasuní National Park, Ecuador (800,000 people signed a petition before the national government to stop the works.) The beginning of the construction of the Condor Cliff and La Barrancosa hydroelectric dams in Santa Cruz, Argentina, without an environmental impact assessment, led to the Argentine Supreme Court ordering the suspension of the projects. In some cases, local courts intervened, with negative effects on the viability of the projects and the economic standing of the firms.
Bottom line here, if China moves too fast for the locals, expects the NATIVES to get restless. Once this happens all hell would break loose. Then the World would see if China has the cajones to enforce their agreements.
Expect the Pacific waters to heat up. Question occurs though, on who will blink first, Xi or Trump.
FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
In a highly aggressive editorial on Thursday, Chinese state media taunted the U.S. with nuclear weapons, threatened U.S. aircraft carriers, and called for preparations to invade Taiwan. The editorial reflects growing Chinese nationalist fury in the face of Trump administration pressure.
In a highly aggressive editorial on Thursday, Chinese state media taunted the U.S. with nuclear weapons, threatened U.S. aircraft carriers, and called for preparations to invade Taiwan. The editorial reflects growing Chinese nationalist fury in the face of Trump administration pressure.
Offered up by the Global Times newspaper, a mouthpiece for the hard nationalists, the editorial didn’t pull any punches. To consider what it means for the U.S., let’s consider each element in turn. First up, the nuclear taunt: The year 2019 marks the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China. We look forward to seeing the public debut of Chinese deterrence’s trump card, the Dongfeng-41 intercontinental ballistic missile.AD MAGA list: 205 ‘historic results’ help Trump make case for 2020 re-electionWatch Full Screen to Skip Ads
This is a not-so-subtle signal that the Dongfeng-41 will be shown in public at a military parade later this year. But note the “trump card” language. A personal rebuke of President Trump, it’s a sign of Beijing’s growing frustration that the president won’t accept an easy deal to end the current U.S.-China trade war. But back to the nuclear weapon issue. While the Dongfeng-41 is an impressive nuclear intercontinental ballistic missile platform, it will not fundamentally alter the nuclear balance of power against the U.S. Instead, the mobile system is designed to strengthen China’s ability to threaten the U.S. up the escalation curve. In tandem with other capabilities in cyberspace, in space, and with conventional long-range missiles, China is showing it intends to pose a growing threat across the spectrum of warfare. The U.S. must pursue and posture greater capability to deter China.
Next up is the Global Times’ aircraft carrier threat. China should carry out more maritime combat exercises with live ammunition, especially training to strike aircraft carriers. There is no need to worry that doing so would make Washington unhappy. Making them concerned is the whole point of the exercise.
This is not terribly surprising. China has a powerful conventional ballistic missile capability across short, medium, and long ranges. It is also developing hypersonic missiles of the kind recently mastered by Russia. The import of these threats is in restricting where and how the U.S. Navy can operate aircraft carriers. But what’s most interesting here is the specific Chinese focus on “making [Washington]” upset.” This reflects a Chinese nudge into the ongoing U.S. debate over whether it would ever attempt to destroy a U.S. aircraft carrier in battle. Some believe that China would not do so in fear of meeting a massive U.S. response. I’m less sure about that.
That leaves us with the threat to Taiwan. To promote peaceful reunification, the People’s Liberation Army should also carry out more preparations to respond to a military crisis across the Taiwan Straits, formulate various plans such as a military blockade around the island, destroying military facilities there and preventing external military interventions, which can be disclosed to the outside world appropriately when necessary.
Note the absurd Orwellian-language here: “[T]o promote peaceful reunification,” carry out attack preparations. It sums up the nature of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s regime. Still, Xi views the subjugation of Taiwan to Chinese rule as of paramount importance to his legacy. And the Chinese president is certainly making increased references to what he says is Taiwan’s inevitable return to Beijing. Yet, in the context of next year’s 70th anniversary of China’s captureof Hainan Island from the nationalists, and Taiwan’s upcoming 2020 general election, China’s military threats to Taiwan must take on more attention.
Ultimately, this editorial is another warning for the U.S. — a warning that challenging China’s island imperialism and its feudal economic strategy is only going to become more complicated. And while growing allied support for U.S. actions in the Indo-Pacific are positive, in the end, China will only be deterred by America. We must seek a more constructive relationship and resist China’s defining challenge.
Ms. Payton started writing for The Federalist in April 2015. The site said she quickly became a “rising star” who was regularly featured on Fox News Channel and Fox Business Channel.
“From the moment we started talking I realized she was a potential star,” Ben Domenech, the publisher of The Federalist, said in an essay on Saturday. “She was raw, yes, but that could be honed. She was eager to learn, to write, and to go places — not because of ambition, but because she wanted to change the world.”
Pelosi, a rusty relic from the old school holds a dead woman’s hand. She has outlived her stay and will go down like a swatted fly. No win for this anti-American zealot. The Senate, forget it Nancy they will never accede to your wishes. Therefore, 2019 will become not a watershed but a tumultuous year where the Democrats will have hearing after hearing. Count on nothing happening for the next 12 months, but Trump vitriolic invective.
What we will see though is President Trump exercising his authority to the full extent of the law. Build that wall. One prediction we make is this; RBG, better known as Supreme Court justice Ginsberg will not survive another 12 months. This radical legislates from the bench based on her progressive affiliation; the Constitution means nothing to her. Check the same box for Sotomayor and Kagan.
So the Democrats will have hearing after hearing, accomplishing nothing in the mean time. Their middle of the road constituency will call them out; mass demonstrations will occur across the land. National Guards will be employed, civil disobedience will be common place. Attempts will be made to impeach Trump, a waste of time.
Black Swans are everywhere you look. China, Mid East, Europe, Mexico and the United States. China is a CROOK, the Mid East is one bomb away from a nuclear strike, Europe is being destroyed by a ruthless religion bent on world hegemony whose followers will stop at nothing to subjugate Christianity and Judaism to waste bin of history, Mexico is on the verge of unleashing millions of illegals across the border and here in the good old USA we are faced with liars, scam artists and ruthless cheats in charge of the House.
So in the scheme of things we see a world in chaos. Latino/Hispanic killers are everywhere; Trump is doing his best to prevent these serial rapists, murders and gangs from entering our country. On the other hand the likes of Pelosi love to see Americans raped, pillaged, beaten and murdered. Her love for the United States is no more, her love for United States citizens is no more. Pelosi and the sanctuary city aficionados are on attempting to euthanize the God loving honorable people of the our country.
Make no mistake about it, we are in a fight of our lives. Not only a fight of our lives, but a fight for our lives. Believe us when we say it, we are not against Hispanics/Latinos or their culture; we are against illegals violating our sovereignty. This must stop.
Click here to learn more about the Conquistador mindset. This information will educate each and everyone of you about the Spanish killers who stopped at nothing to pillage Latin America. By the way in so doing, they murdered, raped and violated the indigenous populations. And the irony today is that many of the leaders of Latin American countries preach to us today about morality.
The Madoff Ponzi scheme fleeced thousands of investors out of $17 billion. Small change though when it comes to professional criminals. Madoff was small potatoes, only 4800 suckers involved; $13 billion or 75% has been clawed back.
Yes as alluded to in our title we are talking about the elite captains of industry here, those who were responsible for multi billion dollar scams reaching back decades; and yet none have ever seen the inside of a jail cell. How come? They were too big to jail. Oh we must mention, most not all were Democrats.
For instance another example is the implosion of Wachovia Corporation; a once honorable bank that collapsed like a cheap suit during the financial crisis of 2008. They fell on a knife of their own making by taking over World Savings. Shareholders lost $150 billion. Their savior Wells Fargo scooped them up for pennies on the dollar.
A quick glance around the graveyard for other skeletons that stand out finds a tombstone with the name of General Motors, now carrying the nom de guerre, Government Motors. Stockholders of yesteryear can tell you about the company crashing to junk. Billions lost, then the Uncle bailed them out of bankruptcy. No arrests though; guess it was the stupidity of management that caused the hit and run. Forgot to mention, this was a union bailout-most are of the Democrat persuasion.
MF Global was only a blur on the radar screen, but they pulled another scam, mingling customer money with house cash; however, there was no house cash – it burned up a long time ago. And who was the architect of this mini scam? None other than the Democrat paisano named Jon Corzine. Remember him? Corzine denied this, but coughed up $5 million to get off the hook. His bio was a liberal path to success, once the governor of New Jersey, before that he was a Wall Street man, scamming the little guy at Goldman Sachs. MF Global went down faster than the Hindenburg. One of the 12 largest bankruptcies in U.S. history.
This leads us to General Electric, the once iconic company admired by all, including the press, Wall Street and politicians; and run by ruthless captains of industry. Today GE is teetering on the brink of bankruptcy. Share price implosion has wiped out at last count $600,000,000,000; that is 600 billion. The one thing that that got our attention is the decades of growth consistency quarter by quarter, year by year. This was awesome, but as we find out, the chefs were in the kitchen cooking the books. Financial maneuvering taking place on all of the Viking back burners.
However, there is no consolation for long term shareholders – they are taking it on the chin. But no one is being held responsible for this cavalcade of calamities. We wonder why the GE auditors(KMPG) have not been charged; after all they blessed the books throughout the years. Were they in collusion with management?
But last but not least are the previous heads of GE, Jack Welch and Jeffrey Immelt. Why are they untouchable? Are they responsible for committing financial crimes of gigantic proportions? If not, we now know that the “too big to fail, too big to jail” doesn’t apply to the little guy. They always pay the price.
‘Twas the night before Christmas, when all through the house Not a creature was stirring, not even a mouse; The stockings were hung by the chimney with care, In hopes that St. Nicholas soon would be there; The children were nestled all snug in their beds, While visions of sugar-plums danced in their heads; And mamma in her ’kerchief, and I in my cap, Had just settled our brains for a long winter’s nap, When out on the lawn there arose such a clatter, I sprang from the bed to see what was the matter. Away to the window I flew like a flash, Tore open the shutters and threw up the sash. The moon on the breast of the new-fallen snow Gave the lustre of mid-day to objects below, When, what to my wondering eyes should appear, But a miniature sleigh, and eight tiny reindeer, With a little old driver, so lively and quick, I knew in a moment it must be St. Nick. More rapid than eagles his coursers they came, And he whistled, and shouted, and called them by name; “Now, Dasher! now, Dancer! now, Prancer and Vixen! On, Comet! on, Cupid! on, Donder and Blitzen! To the top of the porch! to the top of the wall! Now dash away! dash away! dash away all!” As dry leaves that before the wild hurricane fly, When they meet with an obstacle, mount to the sky; So up to the house-top the coursers they flew, With the sleigh full of Toys, and St. Nicholas too. And then, in a twinkling, I heard on the roof The prancing and pawing of each little hoof. As I drew in my head, and was turning around, Down the chimney St. Nicholas came with a bound. He was dressed all in fur, from his head to his foot, And his clothes were all tarnished with ashes and soot; A bundle of Toys he had flung on his back, And he looked like a peddler just opening his pack. His eyes — how they twinkled! his dimples how merry! His cheeks were like roses, his nose like a cherry! His droll little mouth was drawn up like a bow And the beard of his chin was as white as the snow; The stump of a pipe he held tight in his teeth, And the smoke it encircled his head like a wreath; He had a broad face and a little round belly, That shook when he laughed, like a bowlful of jelly. He was chubby and plump, a right jolly old elf, And I laughed when I saw him, in spite of myself; A wink of his eye and a twist of his head, Soon gave me to know I had nothing to dread; He spoke not a word, but went straight to his work, And filled all the stockings; then turned with a jerk, And laying his finger aside of his nose, And giving a nod, up the chimney he rose; He sprang to his sleigh, to his team gave a whistle, And away they all flew like the down of a thistle, But I heard him exclaim, ere he drove out of sight, “Happy Christmas to all, and to all a good-night.”
"Where Revolution is the Solution" Taking back the Empire
/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-mco.s3.amazonaws.com/public/TKFFT2TA7VA3NH4BJHSOPFHNUY.jpg)
