Mosque attack in broad daylight, a replica of the Norwegian massacre. Yesterday. March 15, 2019, two mosques in Christchurch were attacked by an armed man; 49 people were killed. The accused perpetrator of the attack is an Australian white supremacist who intended to show “immigration and increasing population of Muslims in NZ”.
The white supremacist who live streamed himself murdering 49 people in two mosque attacks in New Zealand – the worst in the country’s history – claims he was inspired by Black conservative activist Candace Owens.
n response to her name being mentioned, Owens took to Twitter to defend herself, in two bizarre posts that blame liberals instead of Tarrant.
Brenton Tarrant, 28, was one of three men arrested by police in the devastating attack. He credited Owens for radicalizing him in a 74-page manifesto that he posted online. The manifesto was reported on by several major global news outlets, but not yet verified by police on Friday. Law enforcement officials say Tarrant opened fire inside the Masjid Al Noor mosque in Christchurch, NZ, killing 49 people and wounding dozens more.
Back drop: In November 2016, Mohammad Anwar Sahib, the Imam of the Al-Taqwa mosque in Manukau, Auckland and a religious adviser to the FIANZ, drew controversy when he made offensive remarks about Jews, Christians, and women in a series of speeches that were posted by the blogger Cameron Slater on YouTube.
There is a common underlying pattern here, like the massacre in Denmark, where Anders Breivik , who on 22 July 2011, killed eight people by detonating a van bomb amid Regjeringskvartalet in Oslo, then shot dead 69 participants of a Workers’ Youth League (AUF) summer camp on the island of Utøya. In July 2012, he was convicted of mass murder, causing a fatal explosion, and terrorism. The fuse is lit by extreme Muslim imams who blame the Jews and Christians for all of the worlds ills. This type of inflammatory jargon can be the recipe for disaster. And seen yesterday it was.
On the day of the attacks, Breivik electronically distributed a compendium of texts entitled 2083: A European Declaration of Independence, describing his militant ideology. In them, he stated his opposition to Islam and blamed feminism for a European “cultural suicide.” The text called for the deportation of all Muslims from Europe and Breivik wrote that his main motive for the attacks was to publicize his manifesto.
AOC has been in the news of late, matter of fact she is the news. We have to admit this ex-bartender come media star is a bit of a hit or to some she is a TWIT. On the face of it her actions portend those of a teenager strutting her stuff when mommy leaves the house. Perhaps the lid of LSD she did when working nights at the bar or was it coke that pushed her to the limit of insanity. Well any attempt to describe her is in vain, but up to now she has been the life of the party, gang banging her way to stardom.
This is good news for the Republicans in many respects. First of all Ocasio-Cortez is the quintessential example of what is wrong with these Janey-come-lately fruit cakes. Their ideas are good in an unreal world, but living in the real world many take issue with her crack pot ideas. That leaves a putrid taste to many of the main stream Demo’s who are not about to be swayed by a rat with a mouse voice and pea size brain.
So on to 2020 we go, full charge ahead. And lo and behold we see the Democrat path of destruction coming into view. Unions most of all think the Green agenda is a no-go for the economy and that is the start. Others, for instance, the Jewish community, is jumping ship as if it was the Titanic going down head first. With Ilan Omar, the suicide bomber from Somalia and her Jew hating Rashida Tlaib, most likely an anchor baby, have taken the Democrat party down a path of antisemitism, convincing Pelosi to water down any resolution that don’t insult the Jihadists now sitting in Congress. This does not bode well for the Dem’o rats come 2020.
The socialist regime of Maduro is on the verge of imploding. It should have collapsed by now, we don’t understand why there is still support for a killer. Guess these Latin American socialist zealots love blood and lead. The latest to be blamed for the country’s demise is none other than (click for the full article from Fox News) Little Marco Rubio. Do you believe that, Marco is being blamed for the Venezuelan blackout.
On Thursday thousands of commuters had to scramble to find a way back home as subway service stopped operating, while roads came to a standstill due to confusion over blackened stoplights. The blackout forced hospital nurses to monitor patients, including premature babies in incubators, while holding candles.
Venezuela’s disputed president Nicolas Maduro, meanwhile, blamed the blackout as an “electrical war” perpetrated by the United States without providing any proof, the latest sign of a dictator who’s losing the grip over the country.
Communications Minister Jorge Rodriguez echoed Maduro and said right-wing extremists are causing mayhem in the country at the behest of Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, a claim mocked by the senator on Twitter.
The electrical system – once the envy of Latin America – has suffered years of mismanagement that was exacerbated amid dwindling financial resources that made it difficult for the government to continue subsidize the people’s electricity bills.
“My apologies to people of Venezuela,” he wrote in a tweet. “I must have pressed the wrong thing on the ‘electronic attack’ app I downloaded from Apple. My bad.”
The irony here is that AOC, that is Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for the uninitiated, believes we should go Green. That is fine and dandy, but empirical evidence indicates that The Green Machine is nothing more than Hope and Change and you now how that worked out. Ask the good citizens of Venezuela what they think of Black-outs?
Not only those of the Jewish faith are contemplating changing parties, but Christians too are thinking about fleeing the House Gas Chamber. With the likes of the three suicide bombers and AOC hold the reigns, the picture becomes crystal clear. What we are seeing is a multiple attack on American values. The Judeo-Christian ethic is at risk.
Let us explain. The Green agenda is nothing more than the fleecing of the rich by the transfer of wealth to the lazy irresponsible do nothing, know nothing. Don’t let their words fool you. Going green and saving the planet is a worthwhile objective, however the cost of 32 trillion dollars is unsustainable. Printing presses are not up to the task, just ask those who lived through Germany’s Wiemar Republic and more recently Jimmy Carter’s Venezuela; that worked out well, didn’t it?
Pelosi is on the run from the ruthless swarm of suicide bombers. But it is too late, they have gotten to her. Like a lion eyeing their prey these Muslim Jihadists, including AOC have their nails into Pelosi’s rear end. She is their next meal. Soon the rest of the old beasts will be road kill. Hunting season has begun. Poachers have reached the House.
And what will happen if their agenda becomes real? Watch out defense industry, your honey pot will go poof. Defense workers, your out of a job. Israel, forget your 3 billion a year. Troops, you too will find the sliding rough as defense budgets will be slashed to the bone; troops pulled out of the far distant lands. Borders, they will be open to every Muslim Jihadist in the world. Africans and Latin Americans will flee their worn torn countries to come here and milk our social welfare system. Sharia laws will become common place; Christians and Jews will be targets. Can’t they see what has happened across the pond? Most importantly, you and your family will have to register with the government; new ID cards will be issued. Taxes will rise to 90% of income. And that is the start.
Our thoughts and suggestions for the next couple of years to the moderate Democrat including the Jewish members are right on. Do they want to belong to a party spearheaded by reckless anti-American Muslims, we think not. Mind you that this is the beginning, you guys (old timers) are finished. Nothing can stop the steam roller coming for your head. You will not have a say in the politics of destruction.
So what can they do? Only one choice here! SWITCH PARTIES.
We bet that this is the thinking of many Democrats. They don’t say it but in their hearts are anti-Muslim, anti-immigration, pro Constitution. Additionally, many are sick and tired of welfare programs that run on and on with no viable results. These programs have been the bread and butter of the Black Caucus, who by the way have manifested their Jew hate by voting for the resolution, elections come and go and they pimp themselves to the Black community only for their own ego, and POWER. COMPLETE FAILURES ARE THESE INCOMPETENTS. The results are proof of their ignorance.
Leading up to the 2020 election we can foresee many Democrats jumping ship before being relegated to steerage . At last count there were approximately 24 Jewish House members, plus many Christians who are friends of Israel. If they mutiny the Trump revolution will be intact and Victory for America and You will be assured.
How many times have we warned American Jews that their time of influence is about to come to an end. As recent days have testified that Islamic Jihadists have infiltrated America’s heart; we see first hand the evidence.
The House of Representatives has become a Jihadist organization; lovers of the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and Hezbollah. They are out of control, slurring Judaism, Israel and anyone who gets in their way. Its too late now, the venomous snakes have taken on the Nazi diatribe. Jews look out, they are coming for you.
Speaker Pelosi has hit a new low, bowing to the Islamic scum Jihadist that now sits in the House of Representatives. Pelosi is no better than Adolf Hitler’s assistant who lit the ovens. She copped out. Jews look out, the day has come, one you never dreamed of his here. You were nice, you welcomed these Muslims from war torn countries with open arms, now you are being pushed out of your own country; one that your forefathers defended since the Revolution. We cannot believe that those Jewish members have not stood up and contemn Pelosi and these Muslim suicide bombers. Jump Ship now. The only party that will protect you is the Republican party. Can’t you see what is happening?
The house on Thursday overwhelmingly passed a bipartisan resolution that only indirectly condemned Minnesota Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar‘s repeated ‘anti-Semitic’ and ‘pernicious’ comments — without mentioning her by name. Another cop-out by the Jew hating Democrats.
Our main thought here is simple, if you are a House member, we are talking about Democrats only of the Jewish faith and sit next to Tlaib or Omar are you going to greet them as follows: Allahu Akbar!
Sitting next to them is akin to sitting next to Adolph Hitler. When will the Democrat House members of the Jewish faith wake up before it is too late? Can’t they see that the House chambers are taking on the same hue as Hitler’s Gas chambers.
“NEVER AGAIN” – HOLLOW WORDS FROM THE JEWISH MEMBERS OF CONGRESS – THE GAS CHAMBERS ARE NEXT
By now everyone who is breathing has heard of the Venezuelan filet minion; boiled shoes and topped off with human Au Jus. A sharp knife and strong teeth are all you need to digest the treat. This is not a joke, but the true facts of Venezuelans who are starving. Over 2.6 million Venezuelans have fled the once jewel of Latin America.
What happened? Leaders with a socialist bent took over and boy did they takeover, takeover everything, from A to Z. Socialism, a once stupid idea whose time has come and gone. The worst disease known to man, there is no cure. However, the village idiot keeps on doing the same thing over and over again, hoping for a different result. “Not gonna happen”.
The United Nations is condemning violence at points on the Venezuelan border where opposition figures have been trying to bring in aid shipments, according to a statement tweeted Sunday.
(click)Opposition leader Juan Guaido has called on the international community to consider “all options” to resolve Venezuela’s crisis, a dramatic escalation in rhetoric that echoes comments from the Trump administration hinting at potential U.S. military involvement.
Back in the hey-day Venezuela was swimming in money, BLACK GOLD, as they say. Then Hugo, the CHAVISIMO came to power.
Hugo Chavez was the elected strongman of Venezuela who took office in 1999 and remained there until his death from cancer in 2013. Hugo Chavez was the son of schoolteachers, and he graduated from the Venezuelan Academy of Military Sciences in 1975. That led to a career in the military — at least until he formed his own revolutionary force within the Venezuelan army and tried to overthrow President Carlos Andres Perez in 1992. He failed and was jailed, but after two years in prison, Chavez was pardoned by President Rafael Caldera and made the transition from soldier to politician. An engaging speaker and charismatic personality, he was elected to the presidency as a leftist reformer and modern-day Simón Bolívar. (His reforms were called the “Bolivarian Revolution.”) After taking office on 2 February 1999, he instituted sweeping reforms that resulted in widely divided opinions of his presidency: supporters saw him as a populist leader and champion of the poor, while critics called him anti-business and neo-fascist. He shunned U.S. and European support and focused on South American and Third World solidarity. He was an economic and political supporter of Fidel Castro and a sharp-tongued critic of George W. Bush and U.S. policies. (He once called Bush “the devil” in a speech at the United Nations, saying the podium still smelled of sulfur from Bush’s speech the previous day.) Hugo Chavez’s presidency provided some topsy-turvy times for Venezuela: he survived a kidnapping and coup attempt in April of 2002, withstood a recall referendum in August of 2004, and battled cancer through various treatments and surgeries in his last few years. He was re-elected to another six-year term in October of 2012, but finally succumbed to cancer a few months later.
He purged the upper ranks of the state-run oil giant—the untouchable goose that laid the golden egg—and then had the company divert precious resources away from energy fields and into socialist-style manufacturing co-ops and other boondoggles.
(click)He fended off a coup attempt, blacklisted voters who tried to have him recalled, took over the TV and radio airwaves, and created a Sunday talk show, Aló Presidente, where he waxed poetic about Simón Bolívar, mocked George W. Bush, and sang and told jokes for hours on end. He became the international darling of the leftist movement, shipping subsidized fuel to Nicaragua and Cuba (the Castros, in exchange, sent doctors and teachers to Venezuela), giving away heating oil to the poor in the Bronx, signing joint ventures with Iran and Russia, financing Argentina after its default, and even hobnobbing with Hollywood’s radical set—Sean Penn, Oliver Stone, Michael Moore. And, of course, he drafted a new constitution, giving birth to the “Fifth Republic,” which allowed him (and later Maduro) to seek reelection indefinitely.
QUITO, Ecuador – Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaido is in Ecuador as part of a continent-wide campaign to intensify pressure on President Nicolas Maduro to give up power.
Guaido, who recently visited the leaders of Brazil, Paraguay and Argentina, on Saturday met Ecuadorean President Lenin Moreno in the coastal city of Salinas.
Guaido, who the U.S. and 50 other nations recognize as Venezuela’s rightful president, says he seeks a “peaceful transition” that will allow his homeland to overcome its political and humanitarian crisis.
Last weekend, Guaido coordinated a failed effort to bring aid from Colombia and Brazil into Venezuela, where security forces loyal to Maduro blocked the supplies.
Maduro described Guaido’s gambit as part of a U.S.-backed plot to overthrow him.
Moreno says he supports Guaido’s attempt to bring “democratic change” to Venezuela.
For a quick take on those of the Jewish faith who constantly affiliate themselves with the Democrats, the question arises, are they to continue to harbor themselves in the Democrat party? Has the time come where they make a serious breakout? To be part of an organization consisting of “Jew haters, anti Israel deniers and members of Hezbollah” is anathema to everything the progressive Jew has striven for during the past century.
Embattled Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) made arguably the most anti-Semitic remarks of her career on Wednesday night during a town hall event in Washington, D.C., claiming that her “Jewish colleagues” have devised a plan to silence her and that pro-Israel groups are making politicians loyal to Israel.
Back in Omar’s district, her constituents are waking up to her bigotry. A local newspaper published a letter to the editor by Omar constituent Maxine Baker, who said she regretted voting for Omar and called on her to resign:
I voted for Rep. Ilhan Omar. I am sorry I did. My hope was that now we have a large Somali population in Minnesota that it would be a good thing. To be elected to the United States Congress is such an honor and she could have done so much to promote relations between Somalis and other immigrants. But to make anti-semitic remarks about our Jewish allies is disgusting.
Omar isn’t the only one elected to Congress who hate Jews and everything they supposedly stand for but in actuality don’t – influence, money, politicians, news media, institutions, the country, etc. The other three are Israel (Jew haters – doesn’t matter where the Jew lives, they are still supporters of Israel and therefore are conspiring with Israel.)
Omar — who is a well-documented anti-Semite — was flanked by fellow far-left Democrat Reps. Rashida Tlaib (MI) and Pramila Jayapal (WA) (another Jew Hater from Washington state) during the event at a Busboys and Poets restaurant. Omar has been under intense scrutiny from forces across the political spectrum for promoting anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and using anti-Semitic tropes, which earned her condemnation from her own party. Tlaib and Jayapal are also Muslim plants who have earned their credo by playing the Jew card.
Tlaib came under fire in January when she suggested that US senators backing an anti-boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) bill hold dual loyalties.
“They forgot what country they represent,” Tlaib said in a tweet at the time. “This is the U.S. where boycotting is a right & part of our historical fight for freedom & equality.”
If signed into law, the bill would protect states that pass anti-BDS bills, including those that ban work with contractors who boycott Israel, from lawsuits. Civil libertarians have decried the state laws as impinging on speech freedoms.
In response to Hoenlein’s allegation, Denzel McCampbell, Tlaib’s communications director, told The Times of Israel that “she was talking about senators like [Marco] Rubio who were attempting to strip Americans of their right to free speech. Any other interpretation is inaccurate and unintentional.”
Rashida Tlaib, then a Democratic candidate for Michigan’s 13th Congressional district, during a rally in Dearborn, Michigan, October 26, 2018.
Hoenlein also said the Conference of Presidents was particularly worried about support for Israel on the left wing of the Democratic party.
“We are very concerned about some of the currents in the body politic, especially on the democratic left,” he said. “But we have started already to reach out to people and sectors on the Democratic left and frankly we have found them receptive.”
Twenty-seven percent of Democrats said they sympathize with Israel over the Palestinians, a Pew Research Center poll from June 2018 found. That was down from 38% support among Democrats in a similar survey from 2001.
WASHINTON (JTA) — The Republican leader in the US House of Representatives said he would take action against two Democrats who have sharply criticized Israel if the Democratic majority did not do so.
So, the question remains, are the Jews to bolt the anti-Israeli party in 2020? Many are now questioning, as noted above, their support for a party that preaches antisemitism anti-Israeli diatribe on a daily basis. Time for the AMERICAN JEW TO WAKE UP BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.
In early 2014 Brandeis University in Massachusetts announced that Ali would be given an honorary degree at the graduation commencement ceremony. In early April, the university rescinded its offer following a review of her statements that was carried out in response to protests by the Council on American–Islamic Relations (CAIR) and lobbying by Joseph E. B. Lumbard, Head of the Islamic Studies Department, other faculty members and several student groups that accused Hirsi Ali of “hate speech”. University president Frederick M. Lawrence said that “certain of her past statements” were inconsistent with the university’s “core values” because they were “Islamophobic.”] Others expressed opinions both for and against this decision.[84] The university said she was welcome to come to the campus for a dialogue in the future.
The university’s withdrawal of its invitation generated controversy and condemnation among some. But, The Economist noted at the time that Hirsi Ali’s “Wholesale condemnations of existing religions just aren’t done in American politics.” It said that “The explicit consensus in America is ecumenical and strongly pro-religious …” The university was distinguishing between an open intellectual exchange, which could occur if Hirsi Ali came to campus for a dialogue, and appearing to celebrate her with an honorary degree.]A Brandeis spokesperson said that Ali had not been invited to speak at commencement but simply to be among honorary awardees. She claimed to have been invited to speak and expressed shock at Brandeis’ action. Hirsi Ali said CAIR’s letter misrepresented her and her work, but that it has long been available on the Internet. She said that the “spirit of free expression” has been betrayed and stifled.]David Bernstein, a law professor at George Mason University, criticised the Brandeis decision as an attack on academic values of freedom of inquiry and intellectual independence. Among the commenters, Jeffrey Herf, a Brandeis alumnus and historian, published an open letter criticizing Lawrence’s decision, saying it had “done deep and long-lasting damage to a university.” Lawrence J. Haas, the former communications director and press secretary for Vice President Al Gore, published an open letter saying that Lawrence “succumbed to political correctness and interest group pressure in deciding that Islam is beyond the pale of legitimate inquiry … that such a decision is particularly appalling for a university president, for a campus is precisely the place to encourage free discussion even on controversial matters.”]
Fake hate crimes should be treated as hate crimes against the accused group.
Last month, television star Jussie Smollett was treated for scratches on his face after an alleged racist and anti-gay attack in Chicago. Different sources reported different details, but one commonly reported detail was that two suspects asked him, “Aren’t you that f***ot Empire n***er?” Then he was supposedly attacked with bleach and a rope. The suspects allegedly yelled, “This is MAGA country!”
In an age of hate hoaxes, many people took this report skeptically. The idea of people in Chicago screaming about “MAGA country” is self-discrediting. Another problem with Mr. Smollett’s story was that he was supposedly recognized on the street at two in the morning by racist right-wingers who were also familiar with the show Empire. (I didn’t know about the existence of either Empire or Mr. Smollett until the alleged attack, and I assume the same about most people who voted for Trump.) The weapon of choice was also strange for a frigid Chicago night well below bleach’s freezing temperature.
The story’s details kept changing, but Mr. Smollett’s behavior was consistently bizarre. Mr. Smollett reportedly refused to let police examine his phone. He also walked into his apartment building wearing a rope around his neck and didn’t notify police immediately. Despite his claim that “I fought the f**k back!” against two attackers, the rather effete Mr. Smollett still managed to hold on to a Subway sandwich he purchased before the alleged incident.
This reads like ludicrous fan fiction. Yet the most powerful and influential people in our society, from the Speaker of the House of Representatives to Hollywood celebrities, declared this attack not only legitimate, but of huge moral importance. What’s more, they insisted that the incident must be used to inspire political and cultural activism.
Senator Gillibrand’s statement about “condemning this behavior and every person who enables or normalizes it” was echoed by mainstream media outlets, which gave the incident huge coverage.
Entertainers exploded with fury against President Donald Trump and his supporters, who were blamed for the “attack.” “I want Trump and all MAGA lunatics to burn in Hell,” declared actor Billy Eichner. “[T]here is no question that since he [President Trump] has injected his hatred into the American bloodstream, we are less decent, less human, & less loving,” tweeted Rob Reiner. “No intolerance! No DT!”
The highlight was a secular sermon by actress Ellen Page on Stephen Colbert’s late-night show. The actress delivered an obscenity-laden condemnation of President Trump and Vice President Mike Pence, linking them to the supposed crime and urging people to “connect the dots.” The audience gave her a standing ovation, and the video has been seen over 18 million times.
“Civil-rights organizations” dutifully “connected the dots” between the supposed attack and the president from the moment the news broke. The NAACP blamed the president, saying, “The rise in hate crimes is directly linked to President Donald J. Trump’s racist and xenophobic rhetoric.” The SPLC promoted the attack, especially the supposed cry of “This is MAGA country!” GLAAD declared that “Jussie’s experience is sadly not unique in today’s America” and expressed concern about “Chicago’s Black and LGBTQ communities who may be experiencing heightened fears of violence.” One wonders who does not fear violence in Chicago.
President Trump was condemned for not expressing sufficient outrage about the attack. He “has not tweeted about the alleged attack—but has tweeted about caravans and the border wall,” wrote Samantha Allen on January 30 in “What ‘Empire’ Star Jussie Smollett’s Attack Reveals About Hate Crime in America.” On January 31, the left-wing website Think Progress reported that President Trump and Republicans were “silent…despite ‘MAGA’ comments.” The next day, the president called the alleged attack “horrible” and said “it doesn’t get worse.” President Trump has never said such a thing about the frequent attacks against his own supporters, including a case over the weekend where a man allegedly pulled a gun on a couple wearing MAGA hats.
This rhetoric has consequences. The morning after Mr. Smollett received a positive interview on Good Morning America, the Senate passed legislation making lynching a federal crime. Senator Booker specifically referenced the alleged attack on Mr. Smollett to justify the legislation. Black Republican Senator Tim Scott, who has frequently used his race to attack his own party, was among those who introduced the legislation. Thus, even if the supposed crime never happened, it has already been used as an excuse to change American law.
Mr. Smollett’s original story has collapsed. It appears that he concocted the assault with the assistance of two Nigerian brothers who knew him before this incident. After being arrested and then released, the Osundairo brothers issued a statement denying any racist or homophobic intent and even denying they are “anti-Trump.” The attack was reportedlyconcocted after Mr. Smollett became upset by the scant attention that was aroused by a racist letter sent to the Empire studio. CBS—citing two sources—is now reporting that Mr. Smollett was behind the letter as well. If true, he could be charged with a federal crime.
Those who signal-boosted the original incident are now backtracking. Senator Kamala Harris, who clearly did not have a prepared statement, seemingly panicked when confronted about the issue at a campaign stop. She laughed awkwardly and looked around for help. Cory Booker declared he would “withhold” comment until more information emerged, a notable contrast to his initial reaction. He also continued to blame right-wingers for domestic terrorism. “We know in America that bigoted and biased attacks are on the rise in a serious way,” he said, “and we actually know in this country that since 9/11, the majority of terrorist attacks on our soil have been right-wing terrorist attacks—the majority of them white supremacist attacks.” Nancy Pelosi has deleted her tweet about the “attack.” Meanwhile, Brian Stelter at CNN claimed the mainstream media had been “really careful” in reporting the alleged attack.
In the days following the incident, Mr. Smollett struck a heroic pose. He claimed he was attacked because he is an opponent of President Trump. He said he was initially reluctant to report the incident. Days ago, he said he was “devastated” by reports claiming he had staged the attacks. His lawyers say he has been further “victimized” by all the suspicion. One suspects he may have convinced himself the attack actually happened.
Donald Trump’s supporters should be happy that another media offensive against them has collapsed. “Hate crimes that have the structure of perfectly crafted narratives should be regarded with skepticism until they’re proven true,” writes Kyle Smith at National Review.
However, this advice presupposes journalists are interested in reporting facts. Something deeper is at work. The attention given to a petty crime in a city with hundreds of murders a year, the rapturous reception given to Ellen Page’s denunciation of Donald Trump and Mike Pence, and the desperate willingness of so many seemingly intelligent people to believe a ridiculous story suggest semi-religious motivations among Jussie Smollett’s true believers. Mr. Smollett’s frantic quest to be perceived as a victim of white racist violence is akin to those Christian martyrs who sought death in the arena for a new faith. The main difference is that Christian martyrs actually had to suffer.
If anti-racism is a faith, the devil figure is the hated white male, blamed for every failing, problem, and historical grievance plaguing non-whites. Socialist countries needed “wreckers” to explain why central planning didn’t work; anti-racism requires the existence of violent white racists to explain egalitarianism’s failures. If there aren’t enough real racists out there, they need to be invented. Therefore, Democrats, liberal journalists, and others who believe in the egalitarian myth probably won’t learn anything from the Jussie Smollett case. This will happen again. Many Americans desperately want to be a victim of the “oppressor” and so become a person of importance with a life that means something. This is also why wealthy suburban mothers who oppose the president are pretending they are in the French #Resistance or The Handmaid’s Tale. After the collapse of traditional Christianity, a new faith has taken power in the West.
Even those who think they are on the Right are in egalitarianism’s thrall. S. E. Cupp, one of CNN’s anti-Trump “conservative” pundits, argues that the story is “sad no matter your politics.” She faults Donald Trump supporters’ “giddiness” since the story’s predictable disintegration, the phenomenon John Derbyshire calls “Narrative Collapse.” S. E. Cupp and others argue that real hate-crime victims are the ones who have been wronged here.
Yet the people who were targeted by Jussie Smollett’s actions were white men, especially ones who supported Trump. If Mr. Smollett hadn’t been so clumsy in planning in his “attack,” innocent white men could have been arrested and blamed or simply named “suspects” and been destroyed by the media. Whites in Chicago and around the country were endangered by these lurid tales of right-wing gangs setting upon innocent blacks. This wasn’t simply a false report or a waste of resources—if the latest reports about Jussie Smollett’s actions are true, this was a deliberate attack on white people.
It needs to be treated that way. Absent radical change, there will always be motivation for hate hoaxes. There will always be those with a psychological need for the perceived meaning and significance that comes with “victim” status. The material rewards given to “victims,” whether through online fundraising or talk-show tributes, are also too strong. Thus, there need to be real consequences.
Donald Trump, Jr. has been tweeting furiously about this case. He should tell his father to do something to stop these kinds of cases. Going forward, a false report of a hate crime should be treated as a hate crime targeting the accused group. Mr. Smollett, liberal journalists, and some Democrat politicians blamed Donald Trump supporters and whites generally for an act that didn’t happen. This lie has already been used to push changes to American law, and had it gone unexamined, it would have been used to justify more funding for “diversity” programs and laws that demonize whites.
Jussie Smollett’s actions were not just a lie or a false report; they were a racist attack against our people. Worse, this blood libel was repeated by our society’s most powerful institutions. We demand more than an apology. We demand #JusticeForJussie.
Parents whose children have been brainwashed by progressive liberal union sucking school teachers should be up in arms. It is imperative that they bring a lawsuit against the union green machine that has propagandized and indoctrinated their children for the past 30 plus years. Start off by suing the local board of education and town or city they represent.
Indicate that your child be taught by a non-union teacher. You do not want them proselytized by a socialist blood sucking member of a teacher’s union; the one with a socialist agenda. Teachers must be independent of union guidance and their socialist philosophy. All sides of the issue should be analyzed, debated and decisions rendered based on the evidence, not the biases that are now presented.
It is important to note that a union teacher will never go up against the union agenda. Capitalism is no good, taxing the rich is good, spending more money on education is good (for their pockets only and bad for the taxpayer) and ramping up attacks on President Trump is good. The teachers who are clubbed to comply are no better than the ISIS suicide bomber. They must be dealt with harshly. Court is the road to justice; let this be adjudicated. The less union teachers, the less money to fill their coffers. Its always about the money.
1 out of 5 educators must take another job to make ends meet.
The truth is the educators that take another job must do so because of their own profligacy. But they forget to tell you it is because of their brand new car, new house and private school tuition for their young ones.
71%
of people think teachers are not paid enough.
These are statistics. The educators are paid enough, those are facts, when they tell you that they are underpaid that is where their amnesia sets in; because they forget the twice the benefits received by those in the private sector that are omitted.
