PROVACATEUR – OBAMA CAN’T LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY

So, Obama sets a Red Line.

Remember his Red Line on Syria, turned into a Pink Line, then a White Line. Listen to this POS. He says voters didn’t believe Democracy was a priority. What an idiot, they voted, you jerk. That is Democracy. Your idea of Democracy is to have it your way only. but that is autorcracy.

His comments came even as many Americans believe that President-elect Trump has been unfairly targeted in unwarranted politically motivated cases. 

Obama made the comments during a speech on Thursday during the Obama Foundation’s Democracy Forum.

The speech marked his first public remarks following the 2024 election.

Imagine the balls this guy has, spewing out one lie after another to arouse his commrades to riot.

FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, “READ THIS MESSAGE VERY CAREFULLY, YOUR VACATION IS OVER”

“REVOLUTION IS THE SOLUTION”

CRIMINAL FAMILY OF THE HIGHEST ORDER

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2Fhunter-bidens-confident-demeanor-unearthed-video-raises-questions-dads-pardon-plans&data=05%7C02%7C%7C3087c030278940c0196a08dd13330726%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638687832066487118%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=s%2FfjvtwDqXbEXgDXXXxANdNFEWELe2Rr4KGRKEd2kig%3D&reserved=0

https://nypost.com/2024/12/02/us-news/jill-biden-pushed-for-hunters-pardon-report

ROBERT HUNTER BIDEN CONTINUED

Executive Grant of Clemency
Joseph R. Biden, Jr.
President of the United States of America
To All to Whom These Presents Shall Come, Greeting: Be It Known, That This Day, I, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, Pursuant to My Powers Under Article II, Section 2, Clause 1, of the Constitution, Have
Granted Unto
ROBERT HUNTER BIDEN
A Full and Unconditional Pardon For those offenses against the United States which he has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 1, 2024, including but not limited to all offenses charged or prosecuted (including any that
have resulted in convictions) by Special Counsel David C. Weiss in Docket No. 1:23-cr-
00061-MN in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and Docket No. 2:23-CR-00599-MCS-1 in the United States District Court for the Central District of
California. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF I have hereunto signed my name and caused the Pardon to be
recorded with the Department of Justice. Done at the City of Washington this ist day of December in the year of our Lord Two Thousand and Twenty-four and of the Independence of the United States the Two Hundred and Forty-ninth

Joe Pardoned Hunter for all crimes he might be involved in starting on Jan 1, 2014.

Why did he pick that date?

Because 2014 is when the CIA/State Dept took over Ukraine. 2014 is when Hunter’s biolab company, Metabiota, began looking for coronaviruses in Ukraine.

Joe is not just covering the drug and gun possession charges. Joe is running cover for all of Hunter’s criminality in Ukraine, which is really Joe’s criminality in Ukraine.

This is not just a pardon for Hunter. This is a pardon for JOE!

Clandestine’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

#

BIDEN ALLOWED THIS TO HAPPEN – BLOOD ON HIS HANDS

Illegal migrant charged in shooting Jewish man headed to Chicago synagogue found dead in ‘apparent suicide attempt’

By 

Patrick Reilly

Published Dec. 2, 2024, 8:11 a.m. ET

The illegal migrant charged with shooting a Jewish man in a targeted attack in Chicago killed himself while in custody, according to police.

Sidi Mohamed Abdallahi, a 22-year-old from Mauritania, was found unresponsive in Cermak Health Services on Saturday.

https://nypost.com/2024/12/02/us-news/illegal-migrant-charged-in-shooting-jewish-man-headed-to-chicago-synagogue-found-dead

FROM THE GUARDIAN

Support us

the-guardian-logo - Florida Rights Restoration Coalition

The Guardian – Back to homeThe Guardian: news website of the year

Joe Biden’s pardon for son Hunter condemned as ‘bad precedent’ – US politics live

The US president has been criticized by Democrats and Republicans for pardoning his son over federal gun and tax charges

Joe Biden and son Hunter Biden stepping out of a bookstore while shopping in Nantucket, Massachusetts on 29 November.

Chris Stein (now) and Luke Jacobs (earlier)

Mon 2 Dec 2024 08.58 EST

Key events 

08.58 EST

Legal experts who spoke to Politiconoted the scope of Joe Biden’s pardon of his son Hunter, saying that it is comparable only to the pardon Gerald Ford granted to his White House predecessor, Richard Nixon.

Rather than pardoning his son of the individual offenses that he faced, as is typical, Biden pardoned him of offenses over a period of more than 10 years – likely so the incoming Trump justice department can’t levy new charges against him.

Here’s more, from Politico:

Experts on pardons said they could think of only one other person who has received a presidential pardon so sweeping in generations: Nixon, who was given a blanket pardon by Gerald Ford in 1974.

“I have never seen language like this in a pardon document that purports to pardon offenses that have not apparently even been charged, with the exception of the Nixon pardon,” said Margaret Love, who served from 1990 to 1997 as the U.S. pardon attorney, a Justice Department position devoted to assisting the president on clemency issues.

“Even the broadest Trump pardons were specific as to what was being pardoned,” Love added.

Joe Biden’s “full and unconditional pardon” of his son is deliberately vague. Donald Trump and his allies have long fixated on the president’s son, and Trump has repeatedly pledged to use his second term to investigate and prosecute members of the Biden family. Conservative commentators have engaged in parlor-game speculation that Hunter Biden could be charged with bribery, illegal lobbying or other crimes stemming from his foreign business activities and drug addiction.

So rather than merely pardoning his son for the gun crimes for which he was convicted and the tax crimes for which he pleaded guilty, the president’s pardon covers all “offenses against the United States which he has committed or may have committed or taken part in” from Jan. 1, 2014, through Dec. 1, 2024. That language mirrors the language in Ford’s pardon of Nixon, which did not merely cover the Watergate scandal but extended to “all offenses against the United States” that Nixon “has committed or may have committed” between Jan. 20, 1969, and Aug. 9, 1974 — the exact span of Nixon’s presidency.

AMERICANS “RISE UP” AGAINST TYRANNY


https://nypost.com/2024/12/01/us-news/donald-trump-vows-to-overhaul-democrat-controlled-doj-after-biden-pardons-son-hunter

The Capo dei Tuti Capi has proved that the Biden Crime Family has no limits on what it will do in the next 50 days. By Pardoning Cocaine Hunter who loves the Blow, he has cemented his legacy as the most corrupt president in history.

His department of injustice harassed “The Don” for four years. A political opponent that indicated that Biden put out a hit on Trump. He told DOJ to push the button. But the American people knew better, they didn’t swallow the bait.

Trump, has a chance to sic the dogs on Biden’s brother and other members of his crime syndicate. We sincerely hope he does just that.

DOJ DOUBLE STANDARD

Trump-hunter

Trump promises mass pardons

https://nypost.com/2024/12/01/us-news/donald-trump-vows-to-overhaul-democrat-controlled-doj-after-biden-pardons-son-hunter


PARDONED A CRIMINAL

Joe Biden pardoned his two bit punk cocaine addicted son today, despite him previously saying he would not. The reason stated is that he was unfairly prosecuted. We all know this is a big fat lie. This is outrageous.

President Biden signed a pardon for his son Hunter Sunday after the younger Biden was convicted of federal gun charges and federal tax evasion charges earlier this year, the outgoing Democrat announced.

Biden, 82, claimed he was taking the controversial action after he watched his son being “selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted.”

Trump, once in office, must throw the book at Biden and his crime family. The American public wants no less. They corrupted our government, made deals with our adversaries, flaunted the law and paid off foreign agents.

https://nypost.com/2024/12/01/us-news/joe-biden-to-pardon-son-hunter-in-shocking-reversal/

https://nypost.com/2024/12/01/us-news/donald-trump-vows-to-overhaul-democrat-controlled-doj-after-biden-pardons-son-hunter


A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY

Gold had a hiccup this week, but don’t despair, the trend is up and soon the $3000 per ounce mark will be shattered. However, don’t take your eyes off of silver where demand is outstripping supply.

Silver is utilized in solar panels, integrated circuits, power supplies, demand is robust, Uncle Sam can’t meet demand. This type of environment leads us to believe that $40 silver is in our future. Remember, there are few pure silver mines, most silver is produced as a byproduct, mostly from lead or zinc.


https://sdbullion.com/g-2024-1-ounce-silver-eagle?campaignid=21928633168&adgroupid=179217066948&adtype=pla&targetid=pla-296910256048&keyword=&network=g&device=m&gad_source=1&gbraid=0AAAAADryeg483tdCeR6T46HJ-zt8ipUaz

FIFTY DAYS AND COUNTING

The daylight is diminishing as we approach the winter solstice, but that doesn’t mean that Biden/Harris are sleeping on their laurels. In fact, these two losers are scheming on how they can turn around the bitter and we must say, the robust trouncing they took in November 5.

Biden can issue more executive orders, put in place more regulations and tap a slew of liberal judges. However, whatever he does will most likely be reversed by Trump.

The ELEPHANT in the room are the dreamers. Trump’s man, Homan, will take care of the twenty illegal scum that poached are border during his four years in office. They will be sent back to where they came from.

Our solution to solve the dreamer problem as well as the anchor baby solution is two fold. Give the dreamers citizenship but do not allow them to vote in Federal Elections. Regarding the anchor babies, a Supreme Court decision must target their illegality by denying them the right to stay in our country.

According to the Fourteenth Amendment they are not citizens. Below is a post from 2915, read it fully , and understand the true facts of #14.


Fox News Anchored in Stupidity on 14th Amendment

Ann Coulter, VDARE, August 19, 2015

By my count–so far–Fiorina, Chris Christie, Rick Perry and the entire Fox News commentariat are unfamiliar with a period of the nation’s history known as “the Civil War.” They seem to believe that the post-Civil War amendments were designed to ensure that the children of illegal aliens would be citizens, “anchor babies,” who can then bring in the whole family. (You wouldn’t want to break up families, would you?)

As FNC’s Bill O’Reilly authoritatively informed Donald Trump on Tuesday night: “The 14th Amendment says if you’re born here, you’re an American!”

I cover anchor babies in about five pages of my book, Adios, America, but apparently Bill O’Reilly and the rest of the scholars on Fox News aren’t what we call “readers.”

Still, how could anyone–even a not-very-bright person–imagine that granting citizenship to the children of illegal aliens is actually in our Constitution? I know the country was exuberant after the war, but I really don’t think our plate was so clear that Americans were consumed with passing a constitutional amendment to make illegal aliens’ kids citizens.

{snip}

“Luckily,” as FNC’s Shannon Bream put it Monday night, Fox had an “expert” to explain the details: Judge Andrew Napolitano, Fox’s senior judicial analyst.

Napolitano at least got the century right. He mentioned the Civil War–and then went on to inform Bream that the purpose of the 14th Amendment was to–I quote–“make certain that the former slaves and the native Americans would be recognized as American citizens no matter what kind of prejudice there might be against them.”

Huh. In 1884, 16 years after the 14th Amendment was ratified, John Elk, who–as you may have surmised by his name–was an Indian, had to go to the Supreme Court to argue that he was an American citizen because he was born in the United States.

He lost. In Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94, the Supreme Court ruled that the 14th Amendment did not grant Indians citizenship.

The “main object of the opening sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment,” the court explained–and not for the first or last time–“was to settle the question, upon which there had been a difference of opinion throughout the country and in this court, as to the citizenship of free negroes and to put it beyond doubt that all persons, white or black . . . should be citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside.”

American Indians were not made citizens until 1924. Lo those 56 years after the ratification of the 14th Amendment, Indians were not American citizens, despite the considered opinion of Judge Napolitano.

Of course it’s easy for legal experts to miss the welter of rulings on Indian citizenship inasmuch as they obtained citizenship in a law perplexingly titled: “THE INDIAN CITIZENSHIP ACT OF 1924.”

{snip}

The only reason the 14th Amendment doesn’t just come out and say “black people” is that–despite our Constitution being the product of vicious racists, who were dedicated to promoting white privilege and keeping down the black man (Hat tip: Ta-Nehisi Coates)–the Constitution never, ever mentions race.

{snip}

On one hand, we have noted legal expert Bill O’Reilly haranguing Donald Trump: “YOU WANT ME TO QUOTE YOU THE AMENDMENT??? IF YOU’RE BORN HERE YOU’RE AN AMERICAN. PERIOD! PERIOD!” (No, Bill–there’s no period. More like: “comma,” to parents born “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States “and of the state wherein they reside.”)

But on the other hand, we have Justice John Marshall Harlan II, who despite not being a Fox News legal expert, was no slouch. He wrote in the 1967 case, Afroyim v. Rusk, that the sponsors of the 14th Amendment feared that:

“Unless citizenship were defined, freedmen might, under the reasoning of the Dred Scott decision, be excluded by the courts from the scope of the amendment. It was agreed that, since the ‘courts have stumbled on the subject,’ it would be prudent to remove the ‘doubt thrown over’ it. The clause would essentially overrule Dred Scott and place beyond question the freedmen’s right of citizenship because of birth.”

It is true that in a divided 1898 case, U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, the Supreme Court granted citizenship to the children born to legal immigrants, with certain exceptions, such as for diplomats. But that decision was so obviously wrong, even the Yale Law Journal ridiculed it.

The majority opinion relied on feudal law regarding citizenship in a monarchy, rather than the Roman law pertaining to a republic–the illogic of which should be immediately apparent to American history buffs, who will recall an incident in our nation’s history known as “the American Revolution.”

Citizenship in a monarchy was all about geography–as it is in countries bristling with lords and vassals, which should not be confused with thiscountry. Thus, under the majority’s logic in Wong Kim Ark, children born to American parents traveling in England would not be American citizens, but British subjects.

As ridiculous as it was to grant citizenship to the children born to legal immigrants under the 14th Amendment (which was about what again? That’s right: slaves freed by the Civil War), that’s a whole order of business different from allowing illegal aliens to sneak across the border, drop a baby and say, Ha-ha! You didn’t catch me! My kid’s a citizen–while Americans curse impotently under their breath.

As the Supreme Court said in Elk: “[N]o one can become a citizen of a nation without its consent.”

The anchor baby scam was invented 30 years ago by a liberal zealot, Justice William Brennan, who slipped a footnote into a 1982 Supreme Court opinion announcing that the kids born to illegals on U.S. soil are citizens. Fox News is treating Brennan’s crayon scratchings on the Constitution as part of our precious national inheritance.

Judge Richard Posner of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals is America’s most-cited federal judge–and, by the way, no friend to conservatives. In 2003, he wrote a concurrence simply in order to demand that Congress pass a law to stop “awarding citizenship to everyone born in the United States.”

The purpose of the 14th Amendment, he said, was “to grant citizenship to the recently freed slaves,” adding that “Congress would not be flouting the Constitution” if it passed a law “to put an end to the nonsense.”

{snip}

Our history and our Constitution are being perverted for the sole purpose of dumping immigrants on the country to take American jobs. So far, only Donald Trump is defending black history on the issue of the 14th Amendment. Fox News is using black people as a false flag to keep cheap Third World labor flowing.

(CLICK HERE) Original Article

(CLICK HERE) FOR THE 14TH AMENDMENT

Apparently our dumb politicians, judges included (Brennan) don’t understand the meaning of “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” A foreign national is still subject to the laws of his own country, period. “Get that liberal”

You are paying over $2 million to support this family in the next 20 years

"Where Revolution is the Solution" Taking back the Empire