Tag Archives: Iran

QUESTION: WHY IS OBAMA SO UPSET THAT NETANYAHU IS ADDRESSING CONGRESS?

The Prime Minister of Israel will be addressing Congress tomorrow. The prospect of his appearance has greatly upset the anointed one to such a degree that he has sent out his pit bull libtards to attack the Prime Minister. The question arises. What is Obama afraid of?

In a nutshell expected Netanyahu to reveal more details of Iran’s nuclear capability that Secretary of State and President Obama are willing to admit. Not that Iran is moving toward the capability of manufacturing a nuclear weapon in the next ten years, but they are today on the verge of developing a nuclear bomb. Netanyahu will propose the one and only option available to Israel at this point in time.

THEY KNOW -CHARLIE CHAN, JOE FRIDAY, SHERLOCK HOLMES, DICK TRACY AND BATMAN

Any of the above super sleuths, the Johnny gum shoes of crime solving, can bring to fore the intent of the Iranian nuclear ambitions. Negotiations with the pacifist administration of Obama have been going on for  what seems like eternity with no end in sight. Picking up on the North Korean paradim Supreme leader Khomeni is stalling for time as his scientists spin the centrifuges which generate the the nuclear cocktails necessary for the construction of a nuclear device. Close to entering the nuclear club Iran has resorted to black mail; no sanctions or we will continue to move forward by arming ISIS.

What is apparent to our cadre of crime solvers is that the Mullahs have pulled the wool over the eyes of our negotiators. Iran will no longer allow inspections at their facilities. The primal word to acknowledge is “INSPECTOR”; they inspect. But if they can’t get into facilities there is little to inspect.

Israel and the United States, say the Iranians, were responsible for the Sustinet virus making its way into the centrifuge facility. It played havoc with their computers, spinning them out of control. Only then did we know what was going on behind closed doors.

Put March 3rd on your calendar, the day Netenyahu addresses Congress.

DO DEMOCRATS HAVE THE GUTS TO CUT BAIT – OBAMA HAS MUSLIM BLOOD RUNNING THROUGH HIS VEINS

For eight long years, well it feels like eight, the Democrats have thrown in with a “threat to America.” In 2016 Americans can make a change for the better, but in between there will be two years of war. Obama is taking his last breath and in doing so will do everything in his power to destroy what he hasn’t so far. The question then will be, are there any Democrats willing to break rank? If none, then law abiding patriotic Americans of all stripes will take matters into there own hands.

Not long ago Americans gave Obama a chance and that chance turned into the mother of all mistakes. a devastation to the United States; proof being the turn in 2010 and 2014 take over by the Republicans of Congress.  Obama has not recognized the changing circumstances, he has not acknowledged the checks and balances written into the Constitution, the one to stop “ONE MAN DICTORIAL RULE.”

Ruthless as Obama has been so far expect more alarming executive orgers in the coming days. Iran for instance will be on everyone’s radar screen. Thus far, Obama and Kerry have been towing the Iranian line. Why? We can only guess but the writing is on the wall – Obama has Muslim Blood running through his veins. All eyes will be on the speech Prime Minister of Israel will give when addressing both houses of Congress. Not that they don’t know what is going on – the speech is not for them, but for the American people to hear. They will understand that stopping Iran now will prevent a nuclear war tomorrow.

Obama so far has done all he can to get Iran’s nuclear program into high gear because he knows if any sanctions were instituted the main ingredients will have been procured before hand. The Sunni street, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the Emirates are not shouting “Allahu Akbar” at the top of their lungs cheering Iran on, for they know Iran will soon target them. A Shiite-Sunni armageddon is possible. So the bottom line is this, the Democrats that don’t show up on March 3rd are in the pockets of Obama and the Mullahs.  We will know then who are enemy is.

TERRORIST – WITH KENYAN TIES AND A MUSLIM UPBRINGING – OCCUPING THE WHITE HOUSE

For many, the year 2008 started off with a pending disaster, the banking crisis, the real estate implosion and the stock market crash; they set in motion six years of turbulent times. However, one of the less talked about moments was the genesis of home grown terrorists. Not only the Jihadist miscreants who frequent the Masjids, they have been on our radar screen since the 1993 bombing of the trade center, but what was to come was far worse and many light years away from anyone’s prediction. America elected a Muslim sympathizer, a closet terrorist, to the Presidency of the United States.

A careful analysis of Obama’s step by step destructive edicts, regulations and executive actions revealed the destructive course he set upon. After being elevated to the thrown his game plan kicked in.  Millions of Muslims were allowed into this country under the guise of political retribution in their home countries just because they belonged to a different tribe. Of course this was pure poppycock.

As of late POTUS gave a helping hand, a free pass,  to the 5 million illegal aliens who invaded our southern border – many of them are fellow Jihadists. Its a good thing the Texas Judge put a halt to their free lunch for now.  Next up he through Poland under the bus by not honoring our commitment to build a missile defense system that was to protect Europe from the Russian bear.  He didn’t stop there more passivity was to come; such as Ukraine. Kiss them goodbye.

His stump speech in Egypt was not a pandering to the Muslims it was an American apology for what he called past deeds – another example of his terrorist posture. A sell out to appeasement.  Then who cannot forget his love affair with the Muslim Brotherhoods terrorist Morsi.  Soon after the overthrow of Morsi by General al-Sisi, Obama cut off aid to our friends in Egypt. This was tantamount to treason. We all remember the failure of Carter to honor the commitments to Iran, Obama went one step further, he has upped Carter’s game.

And last but not least is Obama’s lobbying for the Iranian bomb; a mistake that will be very costly when Israel drops the mushroom bomb on the Ayatollah. Then what?

BARACK OBAMA TAKING ORDERS FROM JIMMY CARTER

Jimmy Carter is responsible for the pullout from Iran; it was he who ignited the Iranian revolution back in 1978. Failure to back Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, America’s friend in the Middle East, Carter pulled up stakes which allowed the self exiled  Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini to seize power. Prior to Khomeini’s return, mass protests erupted, many deaths resulted, shocking the country and damaged any attempt at reconciliation between the Shah and the opposition. Khomeini immediately declared that “4,000 innocent protesters were massacred by Zionists“, and gave him a pretext to reject any further compromise with the government.Add in the taking of American hostages under the watch of Jimmy Carter allowed the Iranian Mullah power grab to cement the theocratic rule by the Supreme Ruler.  Additionally, the American embassy was seized and 52 hostages taken which united the country. Not until Ronald Reagan rode into office did Khomeini take heed. After 444 days the hostages were released. From then on Iran became a soviet type state in the hands of the Revolutionary Guards.

Today we Barack Hussein Obama bowing to, subservient to, supporting, guiding, patronizing, cheering for and most of all lobbying for the Iranian theocracy. For the past two years the Iranians have played the North Korean card; negotiate in bad faith while developing the nuclear weapons you swear on Allah not to develop. Obama is another Jimmy Carter by allowing the Iranians to enter the nuclear club.

Israel will not allow this to happen  negotiations fail this is obvious; even if there is a deal only to save face. Iran will continue to centrifuge its way into the nuclear age.  Don’t expect Israel to sit idly by while all this happens. Expect an Israel missile to take out Iranians capability by leveling the Arak heavy water plant and the Fordow underground uranium enrichment facility. In essence the blame will lie with Obama for increasing the possibility of a nuclear confrontation.

A flashback to Jimmy Carter and the election of his friend in Venezuela, Hugo Chavez. By now everyone knows that the election which brought Chavez to a third term was a bygone conclusion – the fix was in.  Jimmy Carter saw to it; with a warped mind bent on the destruction of capitalism Carter sanctioned the massive fraud.  Did any freedom loving American believe that Chavez would cede power?

The Carter Center, founded by former U.S. president Jimmy Carter in 1982, is a non-profit human rights organization with a self-described emphasis on “seeking to prevent and resolve conflicts, enhance freedom and democracy, and improve health” around the world. Founder and former President Jimmy Carter recently stated “As a matter of fact, of the 92 elections that we’ve monitored, I would say the election process in Venezuela is the best in the world.” Hector Vanolli, director of the Carter Center in Venezuela, says that the automization (is this a word?) of every step of the process, from pre-election voter registration, to election day voting, to post ballot tallying, along with its auditability, is what sets the Venezuelan electoral system apart from other countries.

As reported by independent media before the election;  polls diverge widely, with some predicting a victory for Mr. Chávez and others showing a race that is too close to call, there is wide agreement that Mr. Chávez is vulnerable as never before. Handicapping the election is complicated by the angst felt by many Venezuelans that a vote for the opposition could bring retaliation. Adding to that anxiety, the government recently introduced a new electronic voting system that many Venezuelans fear might be used by the government to track those who vote against the president. Electoral officials and opposition leaders defend the integrity of the system, but there is significant distrust, and a big part of Mr. Capriles’s campaign has been to reassure voters that their votes will remain secret.hugoobama

When the Venezuelan tyrant Hugo Chavez passed away back in March, one notably unctuous commemorative tribute came from former U.S. President Jimmy Carter. “Although we have not agreed with all of the methods followed by his government, we have never doubted Hugo Chavez’s commitment to improving the lives of millions of his fellow countrymen,” the statement,carried on the website of the Carter Center, intoned. Carter then praised the “positive legacies” of a man famous for embracing genocidal dictators like Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe, before ending with a vague plea to Chavez’s successors to forge a “new consensus” in taking the country forward.

“Venezuela probably has the most excellent voting system that I have ever known,” Carter began, referring to the electronic voting machines that require voters to select their favored candidate on a touch screen, before collecting a paper receipt which is then deposited in a ballot box. Well, yes, we can all agree that technology is great. But it’s what you do with it that matters.

CARACAS— April 2013.  Ruling party candidate Nicolas Maduro narrowly won Venezuela’s presidential election on Sunday, the electoral authority said, allowing him to continue the socialist policies of the late Hugo Chavez.

The National Electoral Council said Maduro won 50.7 per cent of the votes, compared to 49.1 per cent for his young rival, Miranda state Governor Henrique Capriles. It said more than 99 percent of the votes had been counted and that the result was “irreversible.”

Chavez, who ruled for 14 years, anointed Maduro as his political heir in his last speech to the country before succumbing to cancer on March 5.

That gave his former vice-president and foreign minister a huge advantage but Capriles narrowed the gap in the final days of the campaign and the result was much closer than many had expected.

Then there was this gem: “So far as I know, Maduro did get 1.5 percent more votes than his opponent, [Henrique] Capriles,” Carter told Oppenheimer, “and that has been substantiated by the recount of paper ballots.” And finally, the clincher: “Asked… whether Venezuela’s election process was clean, Carter asserted that ‘the voting part’ of it was ‘free and fair.’”

Actually, it was anything but. On election day, opposition monitors recorded around 6,000 violations, including red-shirted Chavista activists shepherding voters into polling booths, threats both physical and verbal against voters deemed to have opposition loyalties, and, most ludicrously, several polling stations in which Maduro’s vote was astronomically higher than that achieved by Chavez in the previous, October 2012, election, which the ruling United Socialist Party won by a comfortable margin of 11 points.

Contrary to Carter’s claim, there was never a comprehensive matching of the ballot papers to the votes registered electronically. There was, earlier this month, a cursory, partial recount whose sole purpose was to validate the original announcement of a Maduro victory.

“the Venezuelan government did not allow independent international election observers for the elections. It only allowed electoral tourists from friendly regional groups who arrived shortly before the voting.”

There are those who will say that however outrageous Carter’s views are, they don’t really matter. In fact, they do. Much of the Carter Center’s work involves international election monitoring, since, as the Center itself says, “more governments than ever recognize democratic elections as essential to establishing their legitimate authority.”What’s therefore shocking in the Venezuelan context is that Carter, whose organization didn’t monitor the April election, has now issued Maduro with a clean bill of health.

As a result, the chavistas now have even less incentive to admit observers to monitor the forthcoming municipal elections, currently scheduled for December. Given the likelihood that the opposition will attempt to turn this next contest into a referendum on Maduro’s rule, we can confidently expect a repeat of the violations of this past April. And we can be just as confident that Jimmy Carter will emerge, once the dust has settled, to assure us that the ballot was “fair,” “legitimate,” “free” and all the other words that give succor to those autocrats who decide what the result of an election will be before they hold one.