Tag Archives: Mexico

CARAVAN – ILLEGALS – THE CONSTITUTION STATES – MICHAEL OBERNDORF WEIGHS IN

Warning! Agent Provocateurs Ahead!

As those who don’t depend on the Ministry of Leftist Propaganda, aka, the “mainstream” media, are aware, a growing army of foreign invaders is moving north through Mexico toward our southern border. The leftist Mexican government, with its plethora of draconian immigration laws, is not only doing nothing to stop them, it is actively supporting, aiding, and abetting them. This is a blatant, albeit slightly indirect, attack upon us, going way beyond its policy of aiding and abetting its own citizens in entering the US illegally. In response, President Trump needs to immediately rescind the recently negotiated trade agreement and consider imposing severe economic sanctions.

In addition, and more importantly, Article lV, Section lV, of the Constitution states,

The United States shall guarantee to every State in the Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion…

Thus, as Commander-in-Chief, sending troops to the border is not just an option, it is a requirement of the Constitution. Repeat: it is a requirement of the Constitution.

Unfortunately, this is not as simple as it sounds. Given that the invading army appears to be organized and paid for by our Enemies Domestic, and that it is clearly timed to coincide with the upcoming midterm elections – another Democrat “October Surprise” – it needs to be looked at from more than just a military/law enforcement point of view. There has been a lot of speculation by all sorts of “pundits” and “experts” as to why this is happening, what is the hoped-for outcome, who will benefit, etc, etc. However, I have yet to hear what, in my never humble opinion, is a highly likely conclusion of this dangerous, and probably tragic farce.

The Setup: Thousands of poor, ignorant, unskilled and unemployed people, along with a large portion of criminals and foreign terrorists mass on the Mexican side of the border. Note that these are the dregs and jetsam of their society; they are definitely, in the eyes of their various governments, expendable. On the American side, troops and law enforcement agents, arraigned against the invaders.

The Trigger: Snipers and gunmen, acting as agent provocateurs open fire on the troops across the border, and, less obviously, on the “migrants”, causing the troops to return fire.

The Result: Hundreds of invaders, and American soldiers and law enforcement agents killed and wounded. The Democrats and the Ministry of Leftist Propaganda, in a preplanned effort to turn voters away from Republicans, go berserk, calling it a premeditated massacre of innocent immigrants on the orders of President Trump and his racist, immigrant-hating supporters, and the Nazi military.

Sound far-fetched, folks?  Wait and see. Watch and learn. Time for President Trump to seriously think outside the box.

OBAMA SPEAKS WITH FORKED TONGUE

FROM THE LYING LIPS OF THE FORMER EX-PRESIDENT:

Trump tweeted a 2005 video in which Obama, then a senator, made a statement against illegal immigration, accompanied by the comment “I agree with President Obama 100%”.

“We are a generous and welcoming people here in the United States,” Obama says in the 31-second clip. “But those who enter the country illegally and those who employ them disrespect the rule of law and they are showing disregard for those who are following the law.

We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked, and circumventing the line of people who are waiting patiently, diligently and lawfully to become immigrants into this country.”

CLICK HERE FOR THE LIAR IN CHIEF OBAMA

THE “KILLAS” MEXICO-COLUMBIA-VENEZUELA-BRAZIL – STREETS FILLED WITH BLOOD

They live by the gun and die by the gun. The allowing of ruthless individuals from South American countries to illegally enter our country is an insult to the every day American who goes about his/her business in a peaceful manner. The only way to stop the “killas” from entering the USA is a strong wall at our southern border. “So let it be written, so let it be done.” 

CLICK HERE FOR THE  RECENT WSJ ARTICLE

Latin America has suffered more than 2,500,000 murders since the start of this century and is facing an acute public security crisis that demands urgent and innovative solutions, a new report warns. Latin America suffers 33% of the world’s homicides despite having only 8% of its population. One-quarter of all global homicides are concentrated in four countries – Brazil, Colombia, Mexico and Venezuela.

Nearly one in every four murders around the world takes place in just four countries: Brazil, Venezuela, Mexico and Colombia. Last year, a record 63,808 people were murdered in Brazil. Mexico also set a record at 31,174, with murders so far this year up another 20%.

The 2016 tally in China, according to the U.N.: 8,634. For the entire European Union: 5,351. The United States: 17,250.

In recent years, growing numbers of families from Central America, including women and children, have fled to the U.S. because of horrific violence. Gangs such as MS-13 and Barrio 18 enforce a reign of terror, dictating even where people can go to school or get medical care. El Salvador’s murder rate of 83 per 100,000 people in 2016—the world’s highest—was nearly 17 times that of the U.S.

ACAPULCO, Mexico—It was the beginning of just another day in one of the world’s most murderous places.

Cristian Sabino was sitting on a plastic chair by this beach resort’s central market when a gunman walked up and shot him five times. As the 22-year-old dropped to the ground, the assailant fired a final bullet to the head and walked away. Six more people would be killed that day in Acapulco, including a cabdriver who was hacked to pieces. Death is so much part of the landscape that once police cordoned off the area around Mr. Sabino’s body, some patrons at a nearby rotisserie chicken restaurant stayed to finish their meals.

Acapulco’s days as a tourist resort with a touch of Hollywood glamour seem long ago. In a city of 800,000, 953 people were violently killed last year, more than in Italy, Spain, Switzerland, Portugal and the Netherlands put together.

The only thriving businesses around here are funeral homes,” says Laura Caballero, the head of a shopkeeper association. She closed her eight shops along the city’s main beachfront avenue three years ago due to monthly extortion demands that reached $800 per store. She says several fellow shopkeepers who refused to pay were killed.

It’s not just Mexico. There is a murder crisis across much of Latin America and the Caribbean, which today is the world’s most violent region. Every day, more than 400 people are murdered there, a yearly tally of about 145,000 dead.

Between 2000 and 2017, roughly 2.5 million people were murdered in Latin America and the Caribbean, as if Chicago were wiped out. That compares with about 900,000 killed in the armed conflicts of Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan combined, according to U.N. figures and estimates by groups like Iraq Body Count. During that same period, all the world’s terrorist attacks killed 243,000 people, according to the University of Maryland’s Global Terrorism Database.

“Large swaths of Brazil, Colombia, El Salvador, Honduras, Mexico and Venezuela are experiencing a war in all but name,” says Robert Muggah, head of the Igarapé Institute.

In Acapulco, what once saw sleek yachts cruise into their dockside births, now sees dead bodies float up on shore, but no tourists are walking by. But don’t let any of this fool you. The cause of all this anarchy is due to criminal minded politicians who have failed to harness in the “killa machine.”

WE NEED A WALL MORE THAN EVER”. BUILD THAT WALL PRESIDENT TRUMP, WE WANT WHAT HAPPENS IN LATIN AMERICA TO STAY THERE. CHICAGO, BALTIMORE AND SAINT LOUIS ARE ENOUGH.

EVADING THE POLICE HAS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES – MOST ARE DOA

Time and time again it’s the same old story. HEADLINE: “chased by border patrol agents 5 illegals killed in crash.” How many times has this occurred during the past two years? Twenty, thirty, forty! And the liberals blame the cops for the chase. We would expect nothing else from the Nancy Pelosi-Chuck Schumer crowd. 

Two Chicanos fleeing the ICE agents when vehicle overturns.

Six illegals (undocumented to the lib crowd) killed when overloaded SUV flips with 14 aboard crashes when fleeing the border patrol in Texas.

Parents killed when fleeing ICE agents in California’s central valley.

CRIMINALS ATTACKING THE BORDER WILL BE MET WITH FORCE

Criminals shall be warned that testing our will has consequences; Trump must exercise the power he has and protect the citizens of the United States with Brut Force. Be it cutting them down on the ground or to take to the air it must be said and done. Either way this show of force is necessary, not for intimidation, but for our right to keep out the the trash coming to our the Homeland.

Trump says the military will secure the southern border until wall can be built!

We don’t have laws, we have catch-and-release,” he said. “You catch and then you immediately release and people come back years later for a court case, except they virtually never come back.”

Trump did not offer specifics, but the move appears to be at least partly motivated by a caravan of over 1,000 Central American migrants heading toward the U.S. border. Buzzfeed, which first reported on the caravan, said that Mexican officials had not yet attempted to stop the flow.

Reports of the caravan angered Trump, who has sent out a number of tweets threatening to end the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and to cut foreign aid to countries such as Honduras, from where many of the migrants originate.

Brandon Judd, President of the National Border Patrol Council, said on Fox News Radio’s “The Todd Starnes Show” that it gives Border Patrol “certainty of apprehension.”

“The criminal smugglers, this is a multibillion dollar industry. They smuggle humans, they smuggle drugs,” he said. “This criminal enterprise, if we arrest the majority of people that cross the border illegally, we put a dent into their criminal enterprise, and if you put a dent into their criminal enterprise, then you can possibly stop them.”

ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION – DEMOCRATS ARE PLAYING A DANGEROUS GAME – HUGE WIN FOR TRUMP

Americans at large are a very empathetic lot. Most have given their all, building this country. They fought in foreign wars protecting others from tyranny, braved ice cold winters and burning summers in defense of liberty, volunteered their time and money when no else would, but most of all they gave their hearts in making a world a better place. But some Americans, you know who they are, Democrats, don’t give a hoot about our sacrifices. To them the White Man is a devil, responsible for what ails the world. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Their ultimate objective is to denigrate and decimate all the hard work that has gone before. Case in point, the Democrats find it repulsive to protect our borders from illegal aliens; they want open borders allowing more criminals into the country. They fail to take responsibility for the murders and crime perpetrated by illegals. Sanctuary cities are harbors for the illegal criminal element.

Democrats are adamant against the WALL. You may ask why? Simply stated the Liberal-Progressive mind will not be happy until the country is minority based.  White racists are the progressives enemy. However, the important point here is that the 11 million illegal aliens here have anchored 30 million babies, all are United States citizens. Letting the Democrats have their way will ensure that another twenty million will team up with those already here. The bottom line here is simple; the Supreme Court must rule on the anchor baby syndrome regarding the 14th Amendment. SEE BELOW.

These numbers are serious because in 30 years or less the White man will be at the beck and call of the minority who will then be the majority. Increases in crime, murder and social demands will no doubt make America Venezuela.  As noted before, in 20 years, 70% of the people will be living in 15 states with 30 Senators and 30% of the people will be living in states with 70 Senators. The Demoperverts don’t like these statistics. And they will do everything in their power to stop the White majority in those 35 states to stymie their efforts to totally control the country.  Will a Civil War erupt? That is the question.

But today, the Supreme Court gave a thumbs up to President Trump in a TRAVEL BAN  WINSupreme Court OKs major Trump policy after months of courtroom fights

 

Handing the White House a huge judicial victory, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of President Trump’s travel ban affecting residents of six majority-Muslim countries.

14TH AMENDMENT

Two years after the Civil War, the Reconstruction Acts of 1867 divided the South into five military districts, where new state governments, based on universal manhood suffrage, were to be established. Thus began the period known as Radical Reconstruction, which saw the 14th Amendment, which had been passed by Congress in 1866, ratified in July 1868. The amendment resolved pre-Civil War questions of African American citizenship by stating that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States…are citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside.” The amendment then reaffirmed the privileges and rights of all citizens, and granted all these citizens the “equal protection of the laws.”

AN UN-GOING CRIME IS BEING COMMITTED – THE SUPREME COURT MUST ONCE AGAIN MUST STEP IN AND ADJUDICATE

the jurisdiction thereof.”

Overwhelming evidence against the interpretation of “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” or “not subject to any foreign power” as reaffirming the common law doctrine of citizenship by birth to aliens can be found following the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. In 1867 George Helm Yeaman, United States Minister to Denmark, in his well received treatise on allegiance and citizenship, which was presented to Secretary of State William H. Seward, said: “But the idea of a double allegiance and citizenship united in the same person, and having reference to two separate, independent, and sovereign nations or governments, is simply an impossibility.”

In the year 1873 the United States Attorney General ruled the word “jurisdiction” under the Fourteenth Amendment to mean, which Justice Gray would recognize in Elk v.Wilkins years later:

The word “jurisdiction” must be understood to mean absolute and complete jurisdiction, such as the United States had over its citizens before the adoption of this amendment… Aliens, among whom are persons born here and naturalized abroad, dwelling or being in this country, are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States only to a limited extent. Political and military rights and duties do not pertain to them. (14 Op. Atty-Gen. 300.)

House Report No. 784, dated June 22, 1874, stated, “The United States have not recognized a double allegiance. By our law a citizen is bound to be ‘true and faithful’ alone to our government.” There is no way in the world anyone can claim “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” affirms the feudal common law doctrine of birth citizenship to aliens because such doctrine by operation creates a “double allegiance” between separate nations.

If there is one inescapable truth to the text and debates, it is this: When Congress decided to require potential citizens to first be subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States they by default excluded all citizens of other nations temporarily residing in the U.S. who had no intention of becoming citizens themselves or, disqualified of doing so under naturalization laws. This was no oversight because it was too simple to declare the common law rule of jus soli if indeed that was truly the desired goal by these very competent lawyers (both Howard and Trumbull were lawyers).

Aaron Sargent, a Representative from California during the Naturalization Act of 1870 debates said the Fourteenth Amendment’s citizenship clause was not a de-facto right for aliens to obtain citizenship. No one came forward to dispute this conclusion.

Perhaps because he was absolutely correct.

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS BLOG

EL ASESINO Y VIOLADOR ES SER METER A LA MUERTE – JUSTICE IS METERED OUT IN TEXAS

Let’s hear it for justice as “the Mexican murderer and rapist was put to death.” I will be Back for Justice,” he wrote. “You can count on that!” Contrary to what his note said, it is highly unlikely that he will speak from the grave. Ramirez was put to death by lethal injection.

Decades ago this animal raped and murdered his cousin Mayra Laguna. The Supreme Court rejected his appeals. The inmate’s case received international attention in part due to the objections of the Mexican government, which said that Texas violating international law by killing a man who was not told of his right to assistance from his home country.

“Words can’t begin to describe the relief it feels to know that there is true peace after so much pain and sorrow,” her sister Roxana Jones said in a statement put out by prison officials.

Opposition to the execution reached all the way to the Mexican presidency, with Enrique Peña Nieto posting on Twitter late Wednesday that he condemned it as a violation of the international court ruling.

“Now! I will not and cannot apologize for someone elses crime, but,

Liberals will come out and protest no matter what the crime; justice to them is to free the guilty and jail those who disagree with them. They are afflicted with an incurable disease that has spread over society during the past three decades. Expect them to protest to their hearts desire. Their offshoot, ANTIFA, or shall we define it as their armed affiliate who will continue on their quest to total anarchy.

THE MEXICAN INVASION IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT

Will Mexico Get Half of Its Territory Back?

Enrique Krauze, New York Times, April 6, 2017

Enrique Krauze

Anti-American Mexican nationalist Enrique Krauze (Credit Image: © Servicio Universal NoticiasNewscom via ZUMA Press)

The United States invasion of Mexico in 1846 inflicted a painful wound that, in the 170 years that followed, turned into a scar. Donald Trump has torn it open again.

Among the many lies that he has constructed, none is more ridiculous than his attempt to contradict history by presenting the United States as a victim of Mexico, a country that supposedly steals jobs, imposes onerous treaties and sends its “bad hombres” across the border.

To confront this fake history, some Mexicans are proposing to remind Mr. Trump exactly what country was the first victim of American imperialism. They are calling for a lawsuit that would aim to nullify the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (signed on Feb. 2, 1848), in which Mexico — invaded by American soldiers, its capital occupied, its ports and customs stations seized — was forced to accept the American annexation of Texas and concede more than half the rest of Mexican territory, now including most of the states of Arizona, New Mexico and California.

This effort is being led by Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas, the elder statesman of the Mexican left. Mr. Cárdenas is convinced that the Mexican government — especially given the need to confront Mr. Trump’s aggression — has a solid legal case. In his opinion, the 1848 treaty violates essential international legal norms and a case can be brought before the International Court of Justice, proposing reparations and indemnification. And even if one admits the legal validity of much of the treaty, there are a number of crucial articles — such as those dealing with citizenship, property and the security of 100,000 Mexicans who remained on what became American territory — that have been ignored from the beginning.

{snip}

If the present Peña Nieto government does not adopt Mr. Cárdenas’s project, an opposition candidate (of either the populist left or the nationalist right) could legitimately assume it as a banner for the presidential elections of July 2018. Such a new president could make that lawsuit a reality.

{snip}

Mr. Cárdenas’s initiative may have little chance of succeeding legally, but its public impact could be considerable at a time when Mexico is being attacked unjustly by President Trump.

The United States owes Mexico and itself an honest reconsideration of its first imperial war, not only in its schools and universities but also in its museums and books. Hollywood and Broadway, which have always played an important role in shaping the American historical consciousness, should take up the issue.

Films, documentaries and memorable TV series have helped to modify the memory of two original sins, slavery and racism against African-Americans, and, with somewhat lesser attention perhaps, the racist slaughter and repression of the American Indians. A third sin should be added to these: the aggression against Mexico and the plundering of its territory.

{snip}

For us Mexicans, this is the chance for a kind of reconquest. Surely not the physical reconquest of the territories that once were ours. Nor an indemnification that should have been much greater than the feeble amount of $15 million that the American government paid, in installments, for the stolen land. We need a reconquest of the memory of that war so prodigal in atrocities inspired by racial prejudices and greed for territorial gain.

But the best and most just reparation would be American immigration reform that could open the road to citizenship for the descendants of those Mexicans who suffered the unjust loss of half their territory.

MEXICO – THE CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION ON OUR SOUTHERN BORDER SPONSORED BY THE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT

First a little history: The United States has been the home of those with Mexican descent since the Battle of Gonzales. Settlers from the United States were called in to Mexico by the Mexican government to provide help needed to counter Indian raids from across the border

The Battle of Gonzales was the first military engagement of the Texas Revolution. It was fought near Gonzales, Texas, on October 2, 1835, between rebellious Texian settlers and a detachment of Mexican army soldiers. Gonzales became a rallying point for Texians opposed to General Antonio López de Santa Anna‘s policies. On October 11, the Texians unanimously elected  Stephen F. Austin their commander, despite his lack of military training. By the end of the year, the Texians had driven all Mexican troops from Texas. COME AND TAKE IT WAS THE BATTLE CRYTexas Flag Come and Take It.svgThe U.S.–Mexican War or the Invasion of Mexico, was an armed conflict between the United States of America and the United Mexican States from 1846 to 1848. It followed in the wake of the 1845 U.S. annexation of Texas, which Mexico considered part of its territory in spite of its de facto secession in the 1836 Texas Revolution.

Santa Anna defeated the Texians at the Alamo but he was defeated by the Texian Army commanded by General Sam Houston and captured at the Battle of San Jacinto and signed a treaty recognizing Texas’ independence.

The 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the war and specified its major consequence: the Mexican Cession of the territories of Alta California and Santa Fe de Nuevo México to the United States. The U.S. agreed to pay $15 million compensation for the physical damage of war. In addition, the United States assumed $3.25 million of debt owed by the Mexican government to U.S. citizens. Mexico acknowledged the loss of Texas and thereafter cited the Rio Grande as its national border with the United States. Texas became the 29th state in 1845.

In the aftermath of Texas becoming a state. First of all the Mexican governments following the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo never fully accepted the loss of Texas to the Gringo. Many words have been exchanged through the years. dhsbadge

To many Mexico is still a sewer pit, run by the drug cartels, but one must be aware that corruption is prevalent in government. Police, mayors, governors, troops all have been infiltrated by the (click for some nighttime action by the Mexican gun ship-kudos to them)Drug Cartels. Many areas of Mexico remind one of the favelas of Brazil. Slum cities operating without government oversight. Gangs rule the roost;  the law of the jungle prevails, drugs and guns are commonplace.

The time has come for these criminal illegals to accept the card they were dealt. Why, one may ask, bring a human into a world of decay, suffering, filth, dirt, corruption, death in the country you were born? To ask an innocent child to live and suffer the consequences of a parents mistake is akin to murder. But to ask others to solve their lot in life by paying for it is most egregious and down right wrong. For those illegals coming to the United States and infecting us with their diseases is akin to murder.

For the leaders of a corrupt country to tolerate such conditions is the same as condoning them. They too are guilty of sin of the highest order. The problem with Mexico is corruption which leads to the mass migration into the United States. These illegals bring with them the culture of drugs, killings, guns. Our laws have been broken, the United States has been attacked and it is up to Trump to put a stop to the infiltration of the criminal element. Mexico President condones this behavior. Time for him to face the music. The election in 2018 will bring in a new government; most likely run by the Mayor of Mexico, a Populist who will bring Mexico down like Venezuela. Anticipate a major confrontation with Mexico in 2018. 

The NAFTA agreement was hailed by both countries to be the panacea, the coronation of free trade  – one that would bring true economic benefits. It hasn’t turned out that way. Mexico exports illegal aliens (not undocumented) and our companies took advantage of little or no tariffs to pocket huge profits at the expense of laid off American workers. That sucking sound you heard was our jobs going to Mexico. 

So now it is up to Trump to right the wrong. A strong border wall is the first step; the second step is to challenge the ANCHOR BABY fiasco in the Supreme Court. This will be a fight. Until the court has two more conservatives on the bench our country is at the beck and call of illegal aliens and their perverted judges in the 9th circuit.

Click here for the story of another illegal deported by ICE.

Rights group blames Arpaio’s policy

Puente Arizona, the advocacy group, said that Garcia de Rayos was a victim of the controversial policies of former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Enforcing identity-theft laws was one of Arpaio’s most well-known tools to crack down on illegal immigration in the border state.

Puente sued Arpaio, saying the workplace raids — such as the one where Garcia de Rayos was arrested nine years ago for using a fake Social Security number — were unconstitutional and amounted to racial and ethnic profiling. It lost the case on appeal, but Arpaio disbanded the task force that conducted the raids.

the jurisdiction thereof.”

Overwhelming evidence against the interpretation of “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” or “not subject to any foreign power” as reaffirming the common law doctrine of citizenship by birth to aliens can be found following the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. In 1867 George Helm Yeaman, United States Minister to Denmark, in his well received treatise on allegiance and citizenship, which was presented to Secretary of State William H. Seward, said: “But the idea of a double allegiance and citizenship united in the same person, and having reference to two separate, independent, and sovereign nations or governments, is simply an impossibility.”

In the year 1873 the United States Attorney General ruled the word “jurisdiction” under the Fourteenth Amendment to mean, which Justice Gray would recognize in Elk v.Wilkins years later:

The word “jurisdiction” must be understood to mean absolute and complete jurisdiction, such as the United States had over its citizens before the adoption of this amendment… Aliens, among whom are persons born here and naturalized abroad, dwelling or being in this country, are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States only to a limited extent. Political and military rights and duties do not pertain to them. (14 Op. Atty-Gen. 300.)

House Report No. 784, dated June 22, 1874, stated, “The United States have not recognized a double allegiance. By our law a citizen is bound to be ‘true and faithful’ alone to our government.” There is no way in the world anyone can claim “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” affirms the feudal common law doctrine of birth citizenship to aliens because such doctrine by operation creates a “double allegiance” between separate nations.

If there is one inescapable truth to the text and debates, it is this: When Congress decided to require potential citizens to first be subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States they by default excluded all citizens of other nations temporarily residing in the U.S. who had no intention of becoming citizens themselves or, disqualified of doing so under naturalization laws. This was no oversight because it was too simple to declare the common law rule of jus soli if indeed that was truly the desired goal by these very competent lawyers (both Howard and Trumbull were lawyers).

Aaron Sargent, a Representative from California during the Naturalization Act of 1870 debates said the Fourteenth Amendment’s citizenship clause was not a de-facto right for aliens to obtain citizenship. No one came forward to dispute this conclusion.

 

DEMOCRAT REPRESENTATIVE FROM TEXAS TELLS TRUMP TO SHOVE THE BORDER WALL UP HIS ASS

President-elect Donald Trump’s pledge to build a U.S.-Mexico wall has touched off a fierce debate in the U.S. border towns that would be most affected – with local Democrats vowing to fight Trump tooth and nail if he proceeds.

“Mexico is an ally, not an enemy,” Rep. Filemon Vela, D-Texas, told FoxNews.com. “It is our second-largest trading partner, and building a wall between two countries with such important ties is a senseless and wasteful exercise.”

Vela is a colorful Trump critic. He made headlines after calling the president-elect’s illegal immigrant policies “hateful, dehumanizing, and frankly shameful.” In a public letter, he also advised Trump to “take your border wall and shove it up your ass.”