RBG, doesn’t stand for REDBLUEGREEN, it stands for Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Yeah, you read about her breaking a few ribs, this isn’t the first time, but it stands to reason that she is reaching the end of the line. What keeps her going is the progressive expansion of “rights” not implied in the Constitution. Beating cancer twice and recovering is a sign of her resolve, however time takes its toll and her time to retire has come. This will give President Trump the once in a life time opportunity to appoint one more Justice to the Supreme Court – 3 in all.

The 14th Amendment is a RED LINE and we hope that once and for all the Court ceases the opportunity to adjudicate it.

by TED HILTON   The San Diego Union-Tribune

“All persons born and naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” (The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.)

Related: Birthright citizenship: Bedrock principle is good for America

President Trump is correct to challenge birthright citizenship. As we commemorate 150 years since the 14th Amendment’s passage in 1868, it is long overdue for our nation to conform to the true intent of the “subject to the jurisdiction clause” which confers United States citizenship.

It is unknown to most Americans that prior to the adoption of the 14th Amendment, United States Attorneys General Caleb Cushing in 1856, and Jeremiah Black in 1859, both wrote that “the doctrine of perpetual allegiance,” or citizenship determined by the soil, is inadmissible in the United States. They concluded, at the time of the Revolution our nation’s founders rejected regal government and feudal law.

Rep. John Bingham and Sen. Jacob Howard, the chief authors of the 14h Amendment’s “subject to the jurisdiction clause,” stated it grants citizenship for a birth to a parent who is under complete jurisdiction, who owes allegiance to our nation. They stated the clause does not apply to someone who is subject in some degree to the political or civil jurisdiction.

Five years after the amendment’s passage on Dec. 1, 1873, President Ulysses S. Grant proclaimed in his State of the Union address, “The United States… had led the way in the overthrow of the feudal doctrine of perpetual allegiance.”

President Trump is upholding President Grant’s and the nation’s original understanding that the 14th Amendment ended birthright citizenship.

In 1898, the Wong Kim Ark decision granted citizen births to Chinese parents who, under the Emperor of China, were prohibited from becoming citizens of other countries. The Ark decision concluded, “…the words ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ in the Fourteenth Amendment must be presumed to have been intended by Congress …, to mean the same as the words in the case of The Exchange.” This case precedence confirms inadmissible aliens are not subject to complete jurisdiction.

United States Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall, the principal founder of our constitutional law system, authored The Exchange decision in 1812. Chief Justice Marshall wrote of the distinction between civil and territorial jurisdiction; persons residing with the nation’s “consent” are under civil jurisdiction. Justice Marshall clarified, “But if the property of an alien, be forcibly… carried within the territory, no consent is implied, and consequently there is no ground for jurisdiction.” The case confirms jurisdiction over things and persons is the same.

Wong Kim Ark cited defining precedence from The Exchange, “…the whole civilized world concurred that a foreigner is not understood as intending to subject himself to a jurisdiction absent his document proving the nation’s consent.” The justices understood an alien under territorial jurisdiction, without this document, is subject to “arrest and detention.”

Compliant with that legal precedent, Wong Kim Ark decided, “Chinese persons … are entitled to the protection of, and owe allegiance to, the United States so long as they are permitted by the United States to reside here …” In the 2012 Congressional Research Service report to Congress, Margaret Mikyung Lee omitted this crucially significant section, imprecisely writing, “The holding does not make a distinction between illegal and legal presence …”

Clearly, the justices conditioned granting citizenship to children whose parents were residing lawfully with permission, signifying doubt this ruling would be granted to aliens without legal presence.

Six Wong Kim Ark justices wrongfully declared the congressional debates that govern the accurate meaning of “subject to the jurisdiction,” were inadmissible. Opposing that misjudgment, Chief Justice Fuller and Justice Harlan, a renowned civil rights activist, dissented from this ruling. They concurred with the government’s case, to grant citizenship to children of parents ineligible to become citizens defies the Constitution’s evident meaning of jurisdiction.

President Trump’s administration can also initiate a court challenge concerning citizen births of “birth tourists” and inadmissible aliens, which can ultimately be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. There is confidence a majority of the justices will comply with the 14th’s original intent, and the conclusive jurisdiction decisions of John Marshall, the most revered Supreme Court Justice in American history.

Congress must follow the relevant words of former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, “A refusal to consider reliable evidence of original intent in the Constitution is no more excusable than a judge’s refusal to consider legislative intent.”

All Wong Kim Ark justices concurred a citizen is born to a parent who is, or is eligible to become, a U.S. citizen. This is how Congress can legislatively define citizenship by amending the Immigration and Nationality Act to follow the correct intent of the Fourteenth Amendment’s authors.

When Congress adheres to this intelligent, common-sense intent, the United States of America will at last, no longer practice feudal law and no longer silence the Founding Fathers.

Hilton, a San Diego resident, advocates for entitlement and immigration reforms.

Copyright © 2018, The San Diego Union-Tribune



Imagine this,  HRC, a lying dirt bag who got her ass handed to her on November 8, 2016, still can’t get over the pounding she received. And so, what does she do, she shoots diarrhea from the mouth hoping it will stick. Fat chance! The latest; She rejected the idea that Democrats should be “civil” with Republicans in the age of Donald Trump, embracing a more confrontational and aggressive political approach.

You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about,” Clinton said.

Is she calling for a civil war? It seems like it, doesn’t it.

Imagine this putrid con artist, a product of the Saul Alinsky school of confrontation and personal take down and a sore loser to boot, threatening physical violence. A dastardly woman who had no guts to address her constituents on election eve because she was dead drunk with pants gone yellow.

During the heat of the campaign, way back in September 2016, Donald Trump said that he would not necessarily accept the results of the presidential election in the event that Hillary Clinton defeated him, reversing his statement four days earlier that he would “absolutely” respect them.

Come full circle, Hillary “jail the bird” Clinton runs with “da mout.”

CLINTON: There are lots of questions about its legitimacy, and we don’t have a method for contesting that in our system. That is why I have long advocated for an independent commission to get to the bottom of what happened.

Look, this is the first time we have ever been attacked by a foreign adversary, and then they suffer no real consequences. 


Today was a great day for America. The Senate confirmed a highly, maybe most qualified Justice to the Supreme Court, Judge Kavanaugh. The Democrats will never forget the head crushing defeat they incurred today.

The Republicans stood together to the very end. Great Job goes to Senator Mitch McConnell.

What brought us to this point was the very fact that America could not be duped by Hillary Clinton and the rest of her clan. Now the job to TAKE AMERICA BACK will turn to the Supreme Court. First on our list is the 14th Amendment. See below for details. Congratulations to the Republicans for a job well done. But please don’t turn your back for an instant as the Democrats have knife in hand and will stab you when you are not looking.


Two years after the Civil War, the Reconstruction Acts of 1867 divided the South into five military districts, where new state governments, based on universal manhood suffrage, were to be established. Thus began the period known as Radical Reconstruction, which saw the 14th Amendment, which had been passed by Congress in 1866, ratified in July 1868. The amendment resolved pre-Civil War questions of African American citizenship by stating that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States…are citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside.” The amendment then reaffirmed the privileges and rights of all citizens, and granted all these citizens the “equal protection of the laws.”


the jurisdiction thereof.”

Overwhelming evidence against the interpretation of “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” or “not subject to any foreign power” as reaffirming the common law doctrine of citizenship by birth to aliens can be found following the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. In 1867 George Helm Yeaman, United States Minister to Denmark, in his well received treatise on allegiance and citizenship, which was presented to Secretary of State William H. Seward, said: “But the idea of a double allegiance and citizenship united in the same person, and having reference to two separate, independent, and sovereign nations or governments, is simply an impossibility.”

In the year 1873 the United States Attorney General ruled the word “jurisdiction” under the Fourteenth Amendment to mean, which Justice Gray would recognize in Elk v.Wilkins years later:

The word “jurisdiction” must be understood to mean absolute and complete jurisdiction, such as the United States had over its citizens before the adoption of this amendment… Aliens, among whom are persons born here and naturalized abroad, dwelling or being in this country, are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States only to a limited extent. Political and military rights and duties do not pertain to them. (14 Op. Atty-Gen. 300.)

House Report No. 784, dated June 22, 1874, stated, “The United States have not recognized a double allegiance. By our law a citizen is bound to be ‘true and faithful’ alone to our government.” There is no way in the world anyone can claim “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” affirms the feudal common law doctrine of birth citizenship to aliens because such doctrine by operation creates a “double allegiance” between separate nations.

If there is one inescapable truth to the text and debates, it is this: When Congress decided to require potential citizens to first be subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States they by default excluded all citizens of other nations temporarily residing in the U.S. who had no intention of becoming citizens themselves or, disqualified of doing so under naturalization laws. This was no oversight because it was too simple to declare the common law rule of jus soli if indeed that was truly the desired goal by these very competent lawyers (both Howard and Trumbull were lawyers).

Aaron Sargent, a Representative from California during the Naturalization Act of 1870 debates said the Fourteenth Amendment’s citizenship clause was not a de-facto right for aliens to obtain citizenship. No one came forward to dispute this conclusion.

Perhaps because he was absolutely correct.



We don’t take this responsibility lightly, but thoroughly identify, investigate, interrogate and interview various intellectuals to get their take on who should deserve such an honor as our choice for Person of the year. With that being said, we were blind sided yesterday by Senator Susan Collins.

For it has been a very long time where she did what was right for America. Thank you Susan for telling it like it is. (click here)Her lengthy speech, which will be played over and over again and go down as one of the best in American history.

Senator Collins did what was right for America. So without further ado, we choose Senator Collins as the New Boston Tea Party Person of the year. Susan Collins official Senate photo.jpg



Feinstein, DaNang BlumenthalFord, Clinton they aforementioned are all liars, their stench follows them wherever they go. Today the FBI investigation will wrap up and a vote on the soon to be Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh will to take place. What has transpired is a Democrat inspired witch hunt. Witnesses lied as did the accuser. There is no supporting corroborating evidence to back up the “lying Ford.” Her delusion is the result of a pipe dream, a self inflicted psychosis which inflicts those of the Democrat persuasion. To them what is not real is real; another words their dreams become reality. Remember, a lie said often enough become the truth to the liar. They are a victim of their own device.

We want Dorothy Rabinowitz to weigh in on this. Rabinowitz wrote exposés of the dubious sexual abuse charges filed against the operators of day care centers and other individuals, notably that of a family named Amirault in Malden, Massachusetts.  The prosecution of the Amiraults was nothing more than a Democrat witch hunt. Please Dorothy, step up on this one; America needs you once again. 



“I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president,” Ginsburg told The New York Times in a July 2016 interview in her Supreme Court chambers. “For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.” Ginsburg doubled down on those comments in a subsequent interview with CNN, calling Trump a “faker,” and adding: “”He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego.”


Chuck Schumer, in his own words, Brett Kavanaugh has “No presumption of innocence.”

According to Schumer, the constitution doesn’t apply to Supreme Court Justice Nominees who have a track record of adhering to the Constitution.


UPDATE: Judge Kavanaugh is to be the next Supreme Court Justice. Last night President Trump, in an eloquent presentation, nominated the Judge to replace the retiring Kennedy. What better nomination can you get than Judge Kavanaugh. A man of integrity, judicial common sense and a record to boot. Congratulations to both the President and the Judge. Of course the Democrats will babble with the mouth, but in the end they will choke on their own words.


President Trump’s nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to replace retiring Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy has set the stage for a bruising confirmation battle, as Senate Democrats and liberal groups vowed to resist what could be a dramatic and long-lasting rightward shift on the Supreme Court.

Within seconds of Trump’s announcement in the White House Monday night, the far-left political action committee Democracy for America called Kavanaugh, 53, a “reactionary ideologue” whose confirmation would “directly lead to the deaths of countless women with the dismantling of abortion rights.”

Kavanaugh, who is Catholic and formerly served as a law clerk for Kennedy, has long said he would broadly respect legal precedent, including Roe v. Wade. In his time in the Bush White House and his twelve-year stint on the influential D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, Kavanaugh has variously alarmed both pro-life and pro-choice advocates.


Top Senate Democrats, who have long said they would not seriously consider any of the candidates Trump was considering, also vowed to fight Kavanaugh, citing what they called an anti-abortion record.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., called for killing the nomination.

“If we can successfully block this nomination, it could lead to a more independent, moderate selection that both parties could support,” Schumer said.


Tonight the Democrats will squirm like little salamanders in the mud. VD day is at hand; ” Victory over the Democrats”- their ideology of legislating from the bench will suffer a near fatal blow; a day where the conservative legacy will be cemented on the Supreme Court; a day honoring our Founding Fathers by interpreting their tome as it should be. But before we rejoice we must wait a few months, say by the end of September when the latest nominee is confirmed. It is now Bader-Ginsburg’s turn to crash and burn. A very sweet scenario to look forward to.



Monday will be a day of infamy! President Trump will be the prime focus when he announces the new Supreme Court pick. Three are in the running, but there is a high probability that a woman (Judge Amy Coney Barrett) will be the one. Nothing would be better than having another woman joining the liberal triumvirate – a conservative one for a change. How about that in “your face” Crying Chuck?

As you recall Schumer’s old time pal, Harry “the pugilist” Reid, was the one who rolled out the “nuclear option.”

Sen. Harry Reid, remarks on Senate floor, Nov. 21, 2013

After years of threats and retreats by both parties, the Democratic Senate majority on Nov. 21, 2013, enacted a controversial rule change called the “nuclear option.”

The change eliminated the filibuster — a blockage of floor action, typically by the chamber’s minority party — for executive branch nominations as well as judicial appointments short of the Supreme Court. Under the new rule, the Senate only needs a 51-vote majority instead of a 60-vote supermajority to end a filibuster and move to a final vote on a nomination.

Schumer, in mid-2007, even suggested that because Democrats were “hoodwinked” by the confirmation testimony of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, no more nominees should be confirmed for the balance of George W. Bush’s term, even though he had 18 months left. The point was that it was the end of a presidency:

“For the rest of this President’s term and if there is another Republican elected with the same selection criteria let me say this: We should reverse the presumption of confirmation. The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts; or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito. Given the track record of this President and the experience of obfuscation at the hearings, with respect to the Supreme Court, at least: I will recommend to my colleagues that we should not confirm a Supreme Court nominee EXCEPT in extraordinary circumstances.”

Bottom line: it’s pretty clear the debate in 2016 revolved around nominations made in a presidential election year. Democrats are simply spinning a false narrative.


DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA IS AT STAKE – Once a beacon to the world we have been overrun by criminals in and out of the government. The violence is beginning to pick up, agitated by the Alt-Left. Obama and Clinton have fanned the flames, hoping to get critical mass. Their goal is to precipitate another Kent State. However, with Trump in charge this will not happen. Civil War though is not a remote possibility but in the realm of possibilities. As the Palestinians push babies to the front lines, the Alt-Left is pushing their agenda via the college campus. Gathering of youth is easy because of their minds are easily molded into whatever is the soup d’jour.  We should never be fooled by their tactics, they are the same ones used by Chavez, Castro and Lenin.

“Antifa” or the Alt-left is an umbrella term for a loose collection of groups, networks and individuals. Since it is composed of autonomous groups, and thus has no formal organization or membership, it is impossible to know how many groups are active. Antifa groups either form loose support networks, such as NYC Antifa, or operate independently. We have seen their tactics and know that the their objective is to bring down the government by force if necessary.


To put today’s situation in perspective we focus your attention to “what difference does it make“. These are words spoken by an animal – a carnivore by the name of “Lock her Up” Clinton. She is still walking with the mouth. A killer of men, a killer of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others, yet she leaches the puss type venom from her ugly puss. This is a travesty of justice; we know that the Deep State is still protecting her. That is why Rosenstein and Wray must go. A clean sweep of those in charge, including Mueller need to be fired. Almost 18 months and $50 million dollars and what? They found nothing. But the collusion was between the Democrats, led by Clinton who conned America into thinking that Trump was in Russia’s pocket. Truth be told, it was the Clinton DNC who falsified evidence and bribed shady characters into faking documents in a vain attempt to bring down the President of the United States. It is time for this prostitute lynch pin head of a crime syndicate to face the music and the RICO law.

de Blasio of NY is now demanding the end of ICE, the Immigration and Custom Enforcement agency charged with protecting our borders.  His lackey representative Kirsten Gillibrand is pressing for legislation to rationalize the agency. All smoke but no fire; all b.s. political window dressing. Jail the mayor for incitement, subterfuge and sedition.

Mayor Bill de Blasio says he supports fellow Democratic politicians and protesters who are calling for the abolition of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, known as ICE.  “Every country needs reasonable law enforcement on their borders. ICE is not reasonable law enforcement. ICE is broken, it’s divisive and it should be abolished,” the mayor tweeted Friday. These two are criminals in their own right. Their posture ostensibly encourages illegals to storm our borders.

Moving on the Supreme Court we take pride in the most recent divisive decision allowing Trump’s executive order which prevented individuals from 5 countries to destroy America. We must mention that they are mostly Muslim. But listen to the criminal Keith Ellison as he tripped over his tongue. This is the same Ellison who breaks bread with Nation of Islam brother Louis Farrakhan. “The president lawfully exercised that discretion based on his findings – following a worldwide, multi-agency review – that entry of the covered aliens would be detrimental to the national interest,” Chief Justice John Roberts.


Keith Ellison was put forward as the new head honcho of the DNC by none other than top Jew Charles Schumer. Who ever would believe that a pro Israel liberal progressive, remember he voted against the Iran deal, would support an anti-Semite. Well he did! But there was blowback – in the end it didn’t happen. However, new information has surfaced that ties Ellison to Farrakhan and Iran’s mullah in chief, Hassan Rouhani.

Ellison turns out to be a liar when addressing his everlasting love for anti-Semites like himself.  He previously disavowed hi anti-Semite ways during the heated DNC contest. When it came out that he met with Farrakhan and Rouhani, he did what all liberals do when accused, he called it a smear campaign. But it happened. He was an invited guest of Rouhani’s to a dinner after addressing the United Nations in 2013. Also at the dinner was Muslim brother Andre Carson of Indiana.

When asked to comment about these meetings, Mr. Schumer, Ellison and Carson had no comment. Why do Jewish members of congress keep their mouth shut when their colleagues continue to sow hatred? Time for Schumer and others in the Jewish community who supported Ellison answer why?

Another earthquake shattering moment was the announced retirement of Justice Kennedy. His retirement provides Trump with an opportunity to appoint a judicial conservative, in the same cloth as that of Antonin Scalia, to the Supreme Court.Having this opportunity gives us succor because the court has so much  influence in the way we live, sustaining our culture and the enforcement of our laws for years to come.

Right-Wing Portland Rally Declared Riot Amid Clashes With Antifa Protesters

Police canceled the Patriot Prayer’s rally permit as violence broke out in Portland’s downtown.

A rally in Oregon sponsored by the right-wing group Patriot Prayer turned violent on Saturday as demonstrators clashed with anti-fascist protesters, who showed up in opposition to the event.

The Portland Police Department said that four people were taken to the hospital as a result of clashes at the gathering. One person suffered a serious, but non-life-threatening injury, while three others suffered non-serious injuries, the police said.

Four people were arrested in connection with criminal investigations that began before the Saturday protest, police added.

Amid the fighting, police declared that the so-called “Freedom and Courage” rally had turned into a riot and revoked the Patriot Prayer’s permit to hold the event at the Terry Schrunk Plaza, a federal park, in downtown Portland.

Trump: Search For New Supreme Court Justice Will Begin ‘Immediately’

So, in a nutshell it was a great week for the Constitution


However, don’t lose sight of the fact that the ANTIFA guys are radical killers of democracy. They don’t believe in debate, but believe in confrontation. They are trying to provoke violence. Keep in mind that the altercation they are looking for will require all of us to confront them one way or another.  “May a Piece Be With You.”