Of course we will have to wait for what effect if any this will cause. Realize that the sanctions are on individuals not the government; that is the joke. Click here for all of the details.
From Obama’s lips,
The deal meant “Iran will not get its hands on a nuclear bomb”, he said.
He said differences with Iran remained, and the US would “remain steadfast in opposing Iran’s destabilising behaviour elsewhere” – such as its missile tests.
Visit America Conservative 2 Conservative at: http://americac2c.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network |
Visit America Conservative 2 Conservative at: http://americac2c.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network |
|
This is not a surprise to anyone, Obama and Kerry cajoled the Iran deal through knowing full well that they would violate it before the ink dried. And so it would be said, so it would be done. Obama has set Iran on a magic carpet ride, intercontinental missiles are now part of their arsenal. Nuclear research and development be propelled by a weak president; ten thousand centrifuges furiously turning out nuclear halal. No inspections, no violations!
Leading lawmakers, including supporters of President Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran, rapped the White House for (click here) delaying fresh sanctions on Tehran over its missile program, warning that the move would embolden it to further destabilize the Middle East.
The abrupt reversal by the administration came as Iranian President Hassan Rouhani publicly ordered his military to dramatically scale up the country’s missile program if the sanctions went ahead.
Obama is the “Liar in Chief”, anti American ballistic missile residing in the White House. Don’t count Israel out, soon they will act with force.
The latest updated on this deserter is appalling, a possible payment was made to the Taliban for his release. Now we have learned that this piece of human excrement will be charged with being a DESERTER and misbehaving in front of the enemy. He will be tried in a military court. To rehash the release of Bergdahl, Obama released five terrorists from Guantanamo. All have now joined their previous command killing Americans.
Bergdahl didn’t show – and ultimately was not released until May when he was traded for five Taliban leaders. Hunter’s chief of staff, Joe Kasper, told FoxNews.com the unsuccessful FBI border visit came after this operation paid an Afghan intermediary, who then ran off with the money.
Bergdahl, the army deserter whose parents were invited to the White House. How disgusting was that.
Observers wondered for months if Bergdahl would be charged with desertion after the deal brokered by the U.S. to bring him home. He was — but he was also charged with misbehavior before the enemy, a much rarer offense that carries a stiffer potential penalty in this case.
“I’ve never seen it charged,” Walter Huffman, a retired major general who served as the Army’s top lawyer, said of the misbehavior charge. “It’s not something you find in common everyday practice in the military.”
The Obama administration has been criticized both for agreeing to release five Taliban operatives from the Guantanamo Bay prison and for heralding Bergdahl’s return to the U.S. with an announcement in the White House Rose Garden. The administration stood by the way it secured his release even after the charges were announced.
Hillary Clinton the liar extraordinaire will not use the word, “Radical Islam or Islamic Extremists” because it might insight the moderate Muslims do go postal. Tell you what Ms. Clinton, not only are you a liar, a politically correct liar, a chronological liar, you are a stupid liar. Muslims by their vary nature are extremists, don’t you get it.
“I don’t want to do that because, No. 1, it doesn’t do justice to the vast numbers of Muslims in our own country and around the world who are peaceful people,” she told ABC’s “This Week.” Her memory is void of the facts; Muslims have killed over 2 million people in the two decades. Real peaceful people. They are wrecking havoc in every nation where they are a minority, not to mention Syria, Iraq and Lebanon.
On the 2016 presidential campaign trail, leading GOP candidate Donald Trump recently called out Obama on the issue.
“Radical Islamic terrorism,” Trump said at an event Friday. “We have a president that refuses to use the term. …There’s something going on with him that we don’t know about.”
How can any women vote for you when you bow down, like Obama did, to the so called moderate Muslims you are pandering too. Don’t you know that women are second class citizens. Have you forgot that all Muslims hates Jews, hates Israel and hate Christians. Read the Koran.
Have you counted the number of Christians left in the Middle East, have you checked with the Jew hating Erdogan of Turkey lately, the despot who has run most Christians out of the country, only 200,000 left out of 80,000,000. So lady Clinton, you are a nut case panderer who should be in jail by now. Hopefully the FBI will arrest you for treason, selling secrets to the enemy for political considerations, selling the United States out for donations to your husband’s foundation. You, Ms. Clinton, are pure scum. Still running for President when Chris Stevens was killed because of you. You think it is a big joke.
A fitting job for you is to clean latrines for prison inmates who have done a lot less than you, but have paid the price because they did not have the connections or money to shut people up. Ms. Clinton, you can go straight to hell.
Obama gets to the airwaves to throw more politically correct bull s…t. “This was an act of terrorism,” Obama said in his first Oval Office address since 2010, showing the magnitude of the situation. Notice how he did not mention “Islamic Terrorism.” You know why, because he is a devout Muslim, he prays to Allah; secondly he does not want to insult his brother Islamists or the Muslim Brotherhood. The United States is coming to find out what mistake they made in 2008 and 2012. We can rectify it by electing Donald Trump in 2016.
We ask America, do these people look like Americans? If you say yes, then we are in trouble, If you say know then we know what to do.
|
Obama Wants to Defeat America, Not ISIS By Daniel Greenfield November 26, 2015 , 11:00 am Last year at a NATO summit, Obama explicitly disavowed the idea of containing ISIS. “You can’t contain an organization that is running roughshod through that much territory, causing that much havoc, displacing that many people, killing that many innocents, enslaving that many women,” he said. Instead he argued, “The goal has to be to dismantle them.” Just before the Paris massacre, Obama shifted back to containment. “From the start, our goal has been first to contain them, and we have contained them,” he said. Pay no attention to what he said last year. There’s a new message now. Last year Obama was vowing to destroy ISIS. Now he had settled for containing them. And he couldn’t even manage that. ISIS has expanded into Libya and Yemen. It struck deep into the heart of Europe as one of its refugee suicide bombers appeared to have targeted the President of France and the Foreign Minister of Germany. That’s the opposite of a terrorist organization that had been successfully contained. Obama has been playing tactical word games over ISIS all along. He would “degrade and ultimately destroy” ISIS. Or perhaps dismantle the Islamic State. Or maybe just contain it. Containment is closest to the truth. Obama has no plan for defeating ISIS. Nor is he planning to get one any time soon. There will be talk of multilateral coalitions. Drone strikes will take out key figures. And then when this impressive war theater has died down, ISIS will suddenly pull off another attack. And everyone will be baffled at how the “defeated” terrorist group is still on the march. The White House version of reality says that ISIS attacked Paris because it’s losing. Obama also claimed that Putin’s growing strength in Syria is a sign of weakness. Never mind that Putin has all but succeeded in getting countries that were determined to overthrow Assad to agree to let him stay. Weakness is strength. Strength is weakness. Obama’s failed wars occupy a space of unreality that most Americans associate with Baghdad Bob bellowing that there are no American soldiers in Iraq. (There are, according to the White House, still no American ground forces in Iraq. Only American forces in firefights on the ground in Iraq.) There’s nothing new about any of this. Obama doesn’t win wars. He lies about them. The botched campaign against ISIS is a replay of the disaster in Afghanistan complete with ridiculous rules of engagement, blatant administration lies and no plan for victory. But there can’t be a plan for victory because when Obama gets past the buzzwords, he begins talking about addressing root causes. And you don’t win wars by addressing root causes. That’s just a euphemism for appeasement. Addressing root causes means blaming Islamic terrorism on everything from colonialism to global warming. It doesn’t mean defeating it, but finding new ways to blame it on the West. Obama and his political allies believe that crime can’t be fought with cops and wars can’t be won with soldiers. The only answer lies in addressing the root causes which, after all the prattling about climate change and colonialism, really come down to the Marxist explanation of inequality. When reporters ask Obama how he plans to win the war, he smirks tiredly at them and launches into another condescending explanation about how the situation is far too complicated for anything as simple as bombs to work. Underneath that explanation is the belief that wars are unwinnable. Obama knows that Americans won’t accept “war just doesn’t work” as an answer to Islamic terrorism. So he demonstrates to them that wars don’t work by fighting wars that are meant to fail. In Afghanistan, he bled American soldiers as hard as possible with vicious rules of engagement that favored the Taliban to destroy support for a war that most of the country had formerly backed. By blowing the war, Obama was not only sabotaging the specific implementation of a policy he opposed, but the general idea behind it. His failed wars are meant to teach Americans that war doesn’t work. image: https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/wp-content/uploads/useful_banner_manager_banners/222- The unspoken idea that informs his strategy is that American power is the root cause of the problems in the region. Destroying ISIS would solve nothing. Containing American power is the real answer. Obama does not have a strategy for defeating ISIS. He has a strategy for defeating America. Whatever rhetoric he tosses out, his actual strategy is to respond to public pressure by doing the least he can possibly do. He will carry out drone strikes, not because they’re effective, but because they inflict the fewest casualties on the enemy. He may try to contain the enemy, not because he cares about ISIS, but because he wants to prevent Americans from “overreacting” and demanding harsher measures against the Islamic State. Instead of fighting to win wars, he seeks to deescalate them. If public pressure forces him to go beyond drones, he will authorize the fewest air strikes possible. If he is forced to send in ground troops, he will see to it that they have the least protection and the greatest vulnerability to ISIS attacks. Just like in Afghanistan. Obama would like ISIS to go away. Not because they engage in the ethnic cleansing, mass murder and mass rape of non-Muslims, but because they wake the sleeping giant of the United States. And so his idea of war is fighting an informational conflict against Americans. When Muslim terrorists commit an atrocity so horrifying that public pressure forces him to respond, he lies to Americans. Each time his Baghdad Bob act is shattered by another Islamic terrorist attack, he piles on even more lies. Any strategy that Obama offers against ISIS will consist of more of the same lies and word games. His apologists will now debate the meaning of “containment” and whether he succeeded in defining it so narrowly on his own terms that he can claim to have accomplished it. But it really doesn’t matter what his meaning of “containment” or “is” is. Failure by any other name smells just as terrible. Obama responded to ISIS by denying it’s a threat. Once that stopped being a viable strategy, he began to stall for time. And he’s still stalling for time, not to beat ISIS, but to wait until ISIS falls out of the headlines. That has been his approach to all his scandals from ObamaCare to the IRS to the VA. Lie like crazy and wait for people to forget about it and turn their attention to something else. This is a containment strategy, but not for ISIS. It’s a containment strategy for America. Obama isn’t trying to bottle up ISIS except as a means of bottling up America. He doesn’t see the Caliph of the Islamic State as the real threat, but the average American who watches the latest beheading on the news and wonders why his government doesn’t do something about it. To the left it isn’t the Caliph of ISIS who starts the wars we ought to worry about, but Joe in Tennessee, Bill in California or Pete in Minnesota. That is why Obama sounds bored when talking about beating ISIS, but heats up when the conversation turns to fighting Republicans. It’s why Hillary Clinton named Republicans, not ISIS, as her enemy. The left is not interested in making war on ISIS. It is too busy making war on America. Read more at https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/54745/obama-wants-to-defeat-america-not-isis-opinion/#KwAhFlc3zpsec4cF.99 |
|
| Tony Passaro 843-520-6110 [email protected] Bel Air Tea Party Patriots Alliance of Americands Patriots Campaign For Liberty American for Prosperity Maryland Fair Tax |
|
(click Mike for the video)Mike Huckabee tells it like it is. You have to listen to this. Obama compares Syrians to Christians seeking religious freedom, but Huckabee compares them to Jihadists in disguise waiting for the signal to detonate their suicide bomb in America.
Obama has now thrown down the gauntlet, telling states that they must succumb to his plan of refugee resettlement.
The Obama administration warned states over the Syrian refugee crisis Wednesday, telling them in a letter they do not have legal authority to refuse the refugees, and states that do not comply may be subject to enforcement action.
The letter, from the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), told state resettlement officials that they may not deny benefits and services to refugees based on their country of origin or religion.
“Accordingly, states may not categorically deny ORR-funded benefits and services to Syrian refugees,” the letter, dated Wednesday, says. “Any state with such a policy would not be in compliance with the State Plan requirements, applicable statutes, and their own assurances, and could be subject to enforcement action, including suspension and termination.”
The letter went on to say that the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination based on race and national origin in all programs that receive federal financial assistance.
