CONFIRMED – A GREAT DAY FOR AMERICA

Today was a great day for America. The Senate confirmed a highly, maybe most qualified Justice to the Supreme Court, Judge Kavanaugh. The Democrats will never forget the head crushing defeat they incurred today.

The Republicans stood together to the very end. Great Job goes to Senator Mitch McConnell.

What brought us to this point was the very fact that America could not be duped by Hillary Clinton and the rest of her clan. Now the job to TAKE AMERICA BACK will turn to the Supreme Court. First on our list is the 14th Amendment. See below for details. Congratulations to the Republicans for a job well done. But please don’t turn your back for an instant as the Democrats have knife in hand and will stab you when you are not looking.

14TH AMENDMENT

Two years after the Civil War, the Reconstruction Acts of 1867 divided the South into five military districts, where new state governments, based on universal manhood suffrage, were to be established. Thus began the period known as Radical Reconstruction, which saw the 14th Amendment, which had been passed by Congress in 1866, ratified in July 1868. The amendment resolved pre-Civil War questions of African American citizenship by stating that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States…are citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside.” The amendment then reaffirmed the privileges and rights of all citizens, and granted all these citizens the “equal protection of the laws.”

AN UN-GOING CRIME IS BEING COMMITTED – THE SUPREME COURT MUST ONCE AGAIN MUST STEP IN AND ADJUDICATE

the jurisdiction thereof.”

Overwhelming evidence against the interpretation of “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” or “not subject to any foreign power” as reaffirming the common law doctrine of citizenship by birth to aliens can be found following the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. In 1867 George Helm Yeaman, United States Minister to Denmark, in his well received treatise on allegiance and citizenship, which was presented to Secretary of State William H. Seward, said: “But the idea of a double allegiance and citizenship united in the same person, and having reference to two separate, independent, and sovereign nations or governments, is simply an impossibility.”

In the year 1873 the United States Attorney General ruled the word “jurisdiction” under the Fourteenth Amendment to mean, which Justice Gray would recognize in Elk v.Wilkins years later:

The word “jurisdiction” must be understood to mean absolute and complete jurisdiction, such as the United States had over its citizens before the adoption of this amendment… Aliens, among whom are persons born here and naturalized abroad, dwelling or being in this country, are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States only to a limited extent. Political and military rights and duties do not pertain to them. (14 Op. Atty-Gen. 300.)

House Report No. 784, dated June 22, 1874, stated, “The United States have not recognized a double allegiance. By our law a citizen is bound to be ‘true and faithful’ alone to our government.” There is no way in the world anyone can claim “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” affirms the feudal common law doctrine of birth citizenship to aliens because such doctrine by operation creates a “double allegiance” between separate nations.

If there is one inescapable truth to the text and debates, it is this: When Congress decided to require potential citizens to first be subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States they by default excluded all citizens of other nations temporarily residing in the U.S. who had no intention of becoming citizens themselves or, disqualified of doing so under naturalization laws. This was no oversight because it was too simple to declare the common law rule of jus soli if indeed that was truly the desired goal by these very competent lawyers (both Howard and Trumbull were lawyers).

Aaron Sargent, a Representative from California during the Naturalization Act of 1870 debates said the Fourteenth Amendment’s citizenship clause was not a de-facto right for aliens to obtain citizenship. No one came forward to dispute this conclusion.

Perhaps because he was absolutely correct.

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS BLOG

THE TALE OF TWO GUTTERSNIPES

We call them GUTTERSNIPES, a defining term used to define Democrats, yes all of them fit into this category. Those are the  ones who have demanded Judge Kavanaugh step down. This is outrageous! The Judge will be confirmed but not before making those who chose salacious and false allegations are forced to eat their own words. Senator Feinstein, a worthless POS, who is in the throws of a vicious campaign that has the making of her taking a knee from a more progressive opponent.

So what has Feinstein done to deserve the GUTTERSNIPE moniker? She, held on to a letter during Judge Kavanaugh’s hearings purporting to indicate the Judge’s moral turpitude. This letter was not introduced as evidence nor was a hint of it to exist. Feinstein (important read – 25 minutes)question the Judge, but never asked him about his previous behaviors going back to his teenage years.

Now two things we can ascertain from Feinstein’s grandstand play here. First off, she is incompetent for not bringing forth the information she had in hand. If it was available to the committee, they could have questioned Kavanaugh, but more important they would have requested that the accuser come forward and address these allegations. This did not happen because Feinstein wanted to delay the vote as long as possible. If Kavanaugh was to withdraw another nominee would have been chosen for the position. However the delay to confirmation would have been days not weeks. Secondly, because Feinstein is in the fight of her life she wanted to burnish her progressive reputation with the voters.

Senator Grassley has done a fine job thus far, but any more delays are unnecessary. He needs to stress that they adhere to strict terms and rules he sets forth. Information regarding the so called drinking party has been gushing in as if it were high tide. None of this was a confirmation of Ford’s hallucinogenic memory. Others who were supposedly at this party have come forward to counter the person who says she was almost raped.

“One week ago, Dr. Christine Ford claimed she was assaulted at a house party attended by four others. Since then, all four of these individuals have provided statements to the Senate Judiciary Committee denying any knowledge of the incident or even having attended such a party.”

Again, the Bottom Line here can be summed up that Ford is a lying Guttersnipemade of the same cloth as Feinstein. We relish the hearing on Thursday where both of them will be seen as what they are, worse than the POS that litters the sidewalks of Feinstein’s hometown of San Francisco, better know today as San Franshitsco. 

This is not the  end of the story. Senator Feinstein is in violation of Senate and Committee rules for holding evidence that may or may not have incriminated a Supreme Court nominee. If a Republican did this and the nominee were confirmed only to find out later that such evidence existed the Senator would have been forced to resign. And the Supreme Court Justice would have resigned as well if the allegations proved to be true. So the  time has come for the Senate to GRILL FEINSTEIN on why this evidence was not brought forward when it came to her attention. At least she should be censured; impeachment hearings are not out of the question.