THE MEXICAN INVASION IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT

Will Mexico Get Half of Its Territory Back?

Enrique Krauze, New York Times, April 6, 2017

Enrique Krauze

Anti-American Mexican nationalist Enrique Krauze (Credit Image: © Servicio Universal NoticiasNewscom via ZUMA Press)

The United States invasion of Mexico in 1846 inflicted a painful wound that, in the 170 years that followed, turned into a scar. Donald Trump has torn it open again.

Among the many lies that he has constructed, none is more ridiculous than his attempt to contradict history by presenting the United States as a victim of Mexico, a country that supposedly steals jobs, imposes onerous treaties and sends its “bad hombres” across the border.

To confront this fake history, some Mexicans are proposing to remind Mr. Trump exactly what country was the first victim of American imperialism. They are calling for a lawsuit that would aim to nullify the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (signed on Feb. 2, 1848), in which Mexico — invaded by American soldiers, its capital occupied, its ports and customs stations seized — was forced to accept the American annexation of Texas and concede more than half the rest of Mexican territory, now including most of the states of Arizona, New Mexico and California.

This effort is being led by Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas, the elder statesman of the Mexican left. Mr. Cárdenas is convinced that the Mexican government — especially given the need to confront Mr. Trump’s aggression — has a solid legal case. In his opinion, the 1848 treaty violates essential international legal norms and a case can be brought before the International Court of Justice, proposing reparations and indemnification. And even if one admits the legal validity of much of the treaty, there are a number of crucial articles — such as those dealing with citizenship, property and the security of 100,000 Mexicans who remained on what became American territory — that have been ignored from the beginning.

{snip}

If the present Peña Nieto government does not adopt Mr. Cárdenas’s project, an opposition candidate (of either the populist left or the nationalist right) could legitimately assume it as a banner for the presidential elections of July 2018. Such a new president could make that lawsuit a reality.

{snip}

Mr. Cárdenas’s initiative may have little chance of succeeding legally, but its public impact could be considerable at a time when Mexico is being attacked unjustly by President Trump.

The United States owes Mexico and itself an honest reconsideration of its first imperial war, not only in its schools and universities but also in its museums and books. Hollywood and Broadway, which have always played an important role in shaping the American historical consciousness, should take up the issue.

Films, documentaries and memorable TV series have helped to modify the memory of two original sins, slavery and racism against African-Americans, and, with somewhat lesser attention perhaps, the racist slaughter and repression of the American Indians. A third sin should be added to these: the aggression against Mexico and the plundering of its territory.

{snip}

For us Mexicans, this is the chance for a kind of reconquest. Surely not the physical reconquest of the territories that once were ours. Nor an indemnification that should have been much greater than the feeble amount of $15 million that the American government paid, in installments, for the stolen land. We need a reconquest of the memory of that war so prodigal in atrocities inspired by racial prejudices and greed for territorial gain.

But the best and most just reparation would be American immigration reform that could open the road to citizenship for the descendants of those Mexicans who suffered the unjust loss of half their territory.

IT’S NOW OR NEVER – BLACKS MUST SPEAK OUT – YOU CAN’T SAY WE DIDN’T WARN YOU

The Latino/Hispanic invasion continues without a word from major Black organisations. Where is the leadership, where is the Black Caucus, where is the NAACP? The influx of illegals from Latin America during the past three decades has marginalized the Black community. No longer are they a force to be reckoned with in the Democrat party, their power succeeded to the Latino/Hispanic cabal. All of this was done under the cover of racism. The Black leaders never realized or even if they did, none spoke out against this invasion. They were taken for granted that equal rights meant for all, even those with no gripe. According to latest estimates, there are 35,000,000 Hispanics residing in the USA, this includes Mexican, Cubans, Puerto Ricans and those from other countries; this is almost equivalent to 36,000,000 Blacks or those who are African American. The Blacks are now on the threshold of being marginalized.

Blacks have been clamoring for their rights ever since the founding, but the major thrust began after the Civil Rights bill of 1960 became law, this was subsequent to the Civil Rights Act of 1957 but preceded the 1964 and 1965 Acts. Since then Blacks have made great strides, however monies that were initially intended for them were side tracked to the Hispanic community. Bilingual education became paramount. Instead of the focus helping Black children in their childhood years funds became diverted. But now a new element has swallowed up more funds initially intended for Blacks. We are talking about bringing in refugees from foreign lands with a history of being anti-Christian and anti-Semitic. However, to ascertain the full impact one must look at the cost. And that cost to integrate these foreigners will run into the trillions.

 

(click)Preferences for such people are entirely legal. The federal government’s definition of “Hispanic” for both the census and affirmative action guidelines is, “a person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or South American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race. Since preferences apply “regardless of race,” a person qualifies for affirmative action even if every one of his Latin American ancestors was a white slave owner. And slavery was much more brutal in Latin America than in British North America.

In the first two decades of affirmative action (the 1960s and 1970s) its rationale was to redress the effects of slavery and post-slavery anti-black discrimination. During this period, “black” and “minority” were used interchangeably, and arguments about affirmative action were about whether past anti-black discrimination justified present discrimination preferences

At the beginning of the 1960s, when white Americans tried to come to terms with the legacy of slavery, unelected government bureaucrats included Hispanics in the same “minority” category as blacks. Neither the public nor Congress discussed or even noticed this bizarre categorization because Hispanics were then such a small percentage of the population. Minority status, in turn, resulted in relabeling Hispanics as deserving non-whites and generating a myth that Hispanics had suffered the same type of discrimination as Blacks.

So where do we stand today. A reminder that Blacks deserve their due, the Hispanics do not. Blacks fought valiantly in the Civil War, WWI, WWII, Korea and Viet Nam. Not to say that natural born Hispanics did not, but they were not discriminated against, they were not prevented to vote, they were not enslaved.

Click here for “National Council of la Raza” Effectively this socialist organization’s philosophy is simple, “take from the rich give to the poor, demand placement for Latinos in jobs in the name of diversity when a more qualified person (white in most cases) has the better credentials and last but not least, fight for the right of illegal aliens to not only stay in the United States, but to give them free everything.

Click here for Jorge Ramos quipping that there is no invasion of the United States.

“There is no invasion. No one is invading the United States,” Mr. Ramos said. “Mexicans are not invading the United States. The undocumented population has remained stable at about 11 million for the last decade. So those are the positive things. The negative is that this is the ‘Trump effect.’ This is created because of the policies of fear, and xenophobia and cruelty.”

The Univision star sent a different message on Fox News just one day earlier. Mr. Ramos told told Tucker Carlson on March 8 that America, for all intents and purposes, belongs to anyone who crosses the border — legally or illegally.

So we call for the BLACK LEADERS to break away from the past PARADIGM and look to the future where your voice will be heard; if you don’t do it now, you will never have a voice again. Please shout as loud as you can, your future is at stake. Your community has gone in reverse, progress is at the very least a standstill.  The marauding bands of Hispanic/Latino leaders have usurped your hard work and no pun intended, “BLACKENED YOUR LEGACY.”

WATCHING THE CRIMINALS HEADING SOUTH ACROSS THE RIO GRANDE

dhsbadge

HOMELAND SECURITY

HOMELAND SECURITY

Close at hand is the REVOLUTION we all have been waiting for; Donald Trump’s victory in five states this past Tuesday all but sealed the deal. This has caused a fury among many of the illegals. They are getting their affairs in order, preparing for the day. Bank accounts are being drained, real estate  being sold and the Ford 150 Pickup being filled with gas, waiting to cross the border into Mexico. A one way trip mind you.

They have come to the land of plenty, illegally, exporting their culture to America – some good and some bad, but America is a land of laws, Mexico is not, corruption and gangs rule the roost. What seems cruel to our liberal progressive is only fair to those who work day in and day out to support these criminal illegals; they broke the law by breaking into our country.

Mexico has a gang culture; the Bandito is a father figure.  “To separate families” says the progressive is inhumane, but that doesn’t have to be so. Those who sons and daughters here, anchor babies if you will,  have the option of taking their families with them. Slight chance of that though.

It is time that these criminal illegals must accept the card they were dealt. Why, one may ask, bring a human into a world of decay, suffering, filth, dirt, corruption, death in the country you were born? To ask an innocent child to live and suffer the consequences of a parents mistake is akin to murder. But to ask others to solve their lot in life by paying for it is most egregious and down right wrong. For the leaders of a corrupt country to tolerate such conditions is the same as condoning them. They too are guilty of sin.

Adios AmigosIMG_4021

BIAS IN THE MEDIA

A liberal CNN reporter (talking head) says Donald Trump is anti Hispanic/Latino. That is the furthest thing from the truth. Trump is not at war with the Hispanic community. He said that the illegals should wait in line like everybody else. What is wrong with that? Then you get others defending Ramos, the reporter by saying America is exceptional, that they should let the illegals stay here. Pardon us, as we recall those immigrants from abroad came to the United States through the legal means, many via Ellis Island, not over a river or fence.

The CNN racist who condones illegals, criminals and drug runners thinks its right to break in to a country and then dictate the terms of their stay. When you have anarchists like this there is no other alternative than to give them all a swift boot. Our bet is that more than 50% of the legal Hispanic/Latino community agrees with Trump. Secondly it is important that all previous immigrants became Americans by assimilating to our culture not the other way around. Most vicious and malicious criminal gangs such as MS-13 out of El Salvador and the 18th street gang are Hispanic; they reek havoc in city after city in the United States. Trump will send them packing the first day in office. You bet he will. Their drug culture and violence has permeated every country in Latin America, the time has come to put a stop to it. Donald Trump will.muchasgraciasamigo

OBAMA’S KISS OF DEATH TO WHITE AMERICA

President Obama and his self hating liberal friends want no other than to give the Kiss of Death to White America. He is following the examples of  Zimbabwe, formerly Rhodesia and South Africa. Two apartheid nations guilty of enslaving the local majority population. Like a King, the master of the kingdom, the white rulers were seen as worse than slave owners. After the whites were displaced from power it did not take long for both countries to fall into the abyss. Today they resemble nothing of their former self sinking into oblivion on the spear of Black Power; mind you that this shibboleth only has one connotation, the people are the subjects to the rulers who hold the power mostly at the point of a gun.

On to America, one by one they coming marching in; from Mexico through the Rio Grande, on planes from Europe, China and Latin America, from the Muslim levant, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Nigeria, Somalia, Iran and Syria. Illegals make it  here and are provided with the accoutrements of desire for free. What was a luxury in their home country is common place here. For instance, the best health care, schooling, housing (heat in the winter, indoor toilets and other amenities) and “O” did we mention and Obama phone becomes the gift to the border invader. This is the plan all along, saturate the country with millions while the liberal throngs of do-gooders embrace a new cause  where they can bring progressive energy to the plight of the downtrodden at the same time accumulating more to their cause.

By not holding people responsible for their own lives the progressive machine has unleashed a segment of the population against those in power – angry white men who make the rules, control the money and punish the little guy. And as day turns into night the liberal diatribe become vitriolic causing more moochers to join their cause. “Don’t tread on me” are now words coming from the leach.  Community activists, think “la Raza” raise hell at every chance they get.

The Mexican flag flew over a crowd of pro-amnesty marchers in New York. Marches like this across the U.S. have been supported by the “La Raza” movement. (Reuters/Seth Wenig)

Behind the respectable front of the National Council of La Raza lies the real agenda of the La Raza movement, the agenda that led to those thousands of illegal immigrants in the streets of American cities, waving Mexican flags, brazenly defying our laws, and demanding concessions.

With all of that being said a counter to the illegal masses is no where to be found because this will involve picking a fight which will lead to violence. And that is the crux of the matter. Illegals, especially the illegal Hispanic/Latino, are more apt to commit crimes than American citizens.In 2007, Latinos accounted for 40% of all sentenced federal offenders—more than triple their share (13%) of the total U.S. adult population. As the above chart fully illustrates almost 75% of the crimes committed by Hispanics are committed by illegal Hispanics. In other words they bring their culture to our shores. Look no further south than the drug lords that control many Mexican cities. And that is a big problem for us here in America.

Soon, central cities will be in the control of the Mexican and Latino gangs of Latin America. That is Obama’s plan all along. Proof is in the pudding. There is no call for controlling the hood which is the same mirrors the non existing plan for controlling our borders. With all of that being said, we are not adverse to Hispanic or Latinos, but emphasize that to emigrate to America and be accepted they must come to America by legal means and culturally assimilate; to the vast majority they have done that, but to condone those who come by the Rio Grande is not helping their cause.  Because of that we are facing insurmountable problems in the days and years ahead. that’s for sure as the third world awaits us on the home front.

Last but not least we would be remiss not to mention the demands of the Muslim community; a mosque on every corner, Sharia law takes precedent over the Constitution and State laws. Special prayer rooms for the faithful.  An example of not assimilating was put to the test in France where the Burqa was forbidden in public. Will we follow their example? Stupid question.