All posts by thenewbostonteaparty
POWELL’S FOLLY
Powell has it dead wrong. Yes, inflation is 8.5% and interest rates are net negative (3-8.5 = 5.5%) underwater. The unemployment rate is 3.7% because less and less people are working. For example, if a targeted group of one hundred available workers finds that 90% are employed, the unemployment rate is 10%, but if ten of the unemployed workers retire they are no longer considered to be in the work force; therefore the unemployment rate is now 0%. We have a slippery slope here. Keep in mind there will always be shortage to some degree of demand for workers with specialized skills.
Bringing a recession will not effect the unemployment rate, but will bring misery to the workforce. Pouring gasoline on the fire is not a solution, but will cause an unsurmountable problem. This is not palatable. Powell believes that cutting demand will bring inflation down. However, because of supply chain issues, which are slowly being resolved, oil price escalation due to limited supply issues brought upon us by Branden who shut down the Keystone pipeline in addition to suspending Gulf drilling.
There is only one way to resolve the INFLATION ISSUE, that is to let it run its course. Most people will cut back purchases, prices will drop until the X Y chart reaches equilibrium.
GO FOR THE GOLD
However, we add that the future scenario is precarious at best. The United States government owes thirty trillion dollars ($30,000,000,000,000,000) and counting. But overall obligations, including Social Security, Medicare and other off the book liabilities bring bring the total to one hundred thirty trillion dollars. This sham cannot go on forever. Something has to give. 
https://www.usdebtclock.org/
Please note, the interest payed by the FED increases $30,000,000,000 (thirty billion) for every 1% increase in rates. This is not funny money; somebody has to pay up. You may ask when? Right now there is no answer, but dollar apocalypse is not too far away. When this happens, the dollar price of gold will go through the roof. Currently the dollar price of dollar is sinking due to the rise in interest rates. But in most all other currencies the price of gold has gone up. 
Hawaii Six O – Gary Wagner
Federal Reserve’s inaction will lead the U.S. into a deep recession
Kitco Commentaries | Opinions, Ideas and Markets Talk
Featuring views and opinions written by market professionals, not staff journalists.
There is never been a time in history when the Federal Reserve effectively reduced inflation without moving their key interest rates to at least equal to the current level of inflation. When inflation began to rise and was at 3% or 4%. The pandemic and recession in 2020 resulted in average inflationary pressures to come in at 1.2%. By 2021 inflation began in January at 1.4% and rose to 2.6% in March 2021. If the Federal Reserve acted and begun to raise rates and not maintain that inflation was transitory, it could have had a dramatic impact. Instead, the Federal Reserve did nothing. Had they acted at this point and began to slowly raise interest rates which had been set artificially low between 0 and ¼% they would’ve had a tremendous impact just by taking interest rates to 2%.
In April 2021 inflation was running at 4.2% in the Federal Reserve continued to do nothing and keep interest rates artificially low. By May 2021 inflation had risen to 5%, 5.4% in June and still the Federal Reserve did nothing. In fact, inflation rose to 6.2% in October, 6.8% in November, and 7% in December and still the Federal Reserve did nothing and kept interest rates artificially low at 02 ¼%.
By the time the Federal Reserve initiated its first interest rate hike in March 2022 inflation was already at 8 ½%. At this point, it would require the Federal Reserve to raise rates to at least 8% to have any sustainable impact to reduce inflation.
It is clear that the signs of rising inflation that occurred in 2021 showed a clear and systemic growth by the first quarter the point at which the Federal Reserve needed to act and did not. It was his primary misjudgment that inflation was transitory that led to the inaction of the Federal Reserve until it was too late.
Now the Federal Reserve is dealing with attempting to reduce and level of inflation and interest rate that cannot be supported for any sustainable period of time. With the national debt well over 120% of GDP if interest rates were raised today from 3% to 8% it would add $1.5 trillion per year to service our national debt. Clearly, the Federal Reserve has painted itself into the corner and by a critical mistake that led them to do nothing when they could’ve had a strong and immediate impact on inflation, instead, they sat on the sidelines and watched interest rates rise out of control.
COVID HOAX UNCOVERED
Evidence of harmA short collection of key pieces of evidence showing the COVID vaccines are not “safe and effective.” Not even close. They are the most deadly vaccines we’ve ever produced.
Executive summaryHere’s a high level collection of some of the most compelling pieces of evidence I’ve seen to date. This is not an exhaustive list, but just the key pieces of data that are impossible to explain if the vaccines are safe and effective. I’ve divided the collection into sections and I’ve tried to limit each section to the most compelling data points. So don’t be disappointed if your favorite item isn’t mentioned in this article; I wanted to keep it short enough to be read.. I’ll try to keep this updated over time. It can be found in the Reference section of my Substack. The phase 3 clinical trial data1. The Pfizer trial 6 month report showed absolutely no all-cause morbidity or mortality benefit. There were no benefits at all. It was all negative. Ask your doctor why you should take a new, unproven medical intervention that is not shown to have an overall benefit. 2. The Pfizer trial 6 month report showed that more people died (and were injured) who got the drug than who got the placebo. It’s supposed to be the other way around. More importantly, none of the people in the vaccine group were judged by the drug manufacturer to have been killed by the vaccine. They do not reveal the tests they did and how they were confidently able to make that assessment. Why the secrecy here, especially in light of the study by Bhakdi and Burkhardt showing that trained medical examiner missed the causality link in 93% of the cases they looked at? 3. The Pfizer trial 6 month report showed that at best, the drug saved only 1 COVID life per 22,000 recipients. This means that at best, after vaccinating 220M Americans, we might save 10,000 lives from COVID. But the VAERS reports show an excess death toll of well over 10,000 people and that’s before applying the minimum estimated under-reporting factor of 41. So there isn’t a mortality benefit: it’s actually the reverse. Furthermore, VAERS only considers the short term deaths and is highly unlikely to report those deaths happening 5 months after the shot which appear to be the bulk of the deaths. This makes the comparison even worse. 4. The Classen paper analyzed the clinical trial data for all three US vaccines and confirmed the lack of a benefit (there was an increase in morbidity which was highly statistically significant in all three vaccines): “Based on this data it is all but a certainty that mass COVID-19 immunization is hurting the health of the population in general. Scientific principles dictate that the mass immunization with COVID-19 vaccines must be halted immediately because we face a looming vaccine induced public health catastrophe.” 5. The paper by Christine Stabell Benn entitled, “Randomised Clinical Trials of COVID-19 Vaccines: Do Adenovirus-Vector Vaccines Have Beneficial Non-Specific Effects?” confirmed that there was no mortality benefit by taking the COVID mRNA vaccines. “Based on the RCTs with the longest possible follow-up, mRNA vaccines had no effect on overall mortality despite protecting against fatal COVID-19.” See this article by Daniel Horowitz for more information. In other words, these vaccines have no death benefit. Period. Full stop. This is just like the Canadian analysis below showed. 6. Serious adverse reactions, including paralysis, were not reported to the FDA and there were other serious discrepancies in the trials. For some reason, nobody seems to be interested in exploring or explaining these very serious issues. Some are very clear cut such as the case of Maddie de Garay who was one of 1,000 kids in the clinical trial. She’s paralyzed now and has to eat with a feeding tube. The FDA and Pfizer never investigated, but reported her results as mild abdominal pain in the trial results. 7. Pfizer admitted to clinical trial fraud in federal court. Their defense was that the FDA was in on it. Official government data1. The VAERS data, which is the official adverse event reporting system used by the US government, shows that an estimated hundreds of thousands have died and millions have been injured. If these weren’t caused by the vaccine, what caused them? Why are there more adverse events reported for these vaccines than for all other vaccines in history combined? Nobody can answer that question. See this tutorial and this recent confirmation and this article on VAERS and causality. Here’s how these numbers were calculated. Here is independent confirmation of the estimates by Dr. Naomi Wolf who used different datasets. No fact checker was interested in contacting me to challenge the facts since I insist on recording the call. Also, the causality of events was confirmed by the Israeli safety studies, but nobody wants to look at those. 2. Can you spot the unsafe vaccine? People at the CDC don’t see any problem with this mortality chart: all the vaccines look perfectly safe. 3. The US Social Security Death Master File showed a 60% increase in death rate in September 2021 vs. September 2020. According to the insurance companies, it wasn’t COVID. A five month delay in death vs. vaccination was discovered in multiple countries, not just the US. Different studies found nearly identical delays. 4. US disability rose dramatically soon after the vaccines rolled out (Y axis is Z-score). A 3 sigma increase is hard to explain. 5. As of Sep 2, 2022, the vaccination rate in Israel is now just 2.4%. They used to be one of the world’s most vaccinated countries. Today, very few people in Israel are considered to be vaccinated. If the vaccines are so beneficial, why has nearly the entire country shifted from extremely pro-vax to extremely anti-vax in such a short period of time? Statements from government officials1. The Israeli Ministry of Health revealed in a confidential meeting with scientists that the reason that they never notified the people of Israel about the safety issues from the vaccines was because of budget/staffing issues. Apparently, while they had millions of dollars to promote the vaccines as safe and effective, they forgot to budget for the possibility they were wrong. Independent expert reports solicited by government officials1. The Israeli vaccine safety data showed very clearly the side-effects are serious, long-lasting, and caused by the vaccines. Secondly, it showed that the Israeli authorities and the worldwide mainstream media are covering it all up. It also showed that US officials were not interested in seeing credible COVID vaccine safety that didn’t go along with the narrative. I tried to find out why, but nobody would talk to me. Harvard Professor Martin Kulldorff, a widely respected authority on vaccines, when asked why these people wouldn’t want to see the data, replied, “I don’t know.” This is the single most damaging report in the history of the COVID vaccines. Nobody wants to talk about it. They are hoping it will die. It won’t. 2. The Canadian report prepared for the Liberal Party of Canada (Trudeau’s party) showed no benefit for infection, hospitalization, and death for those under 60. “The empirical evidence investigated in this report from PHO and PHAC does not support continuing mass vaccination programs, mandates, passports and travel bans for all age groups.” You can’t have a vaccine that doesn’t work in Canada work in other countries. The authors of the report had to hide their identities for fear of retribution. Pre-prints from highly credible sources1. The Harvard-Hopkins-UCSF study showed it is unethical to mandate vaccination for college students and anyone younger. The clearly said, “University booster mandates are unethical.” 2. The Thailand study did blood tests before vs. after the jab and determined that nearly 30% of young adults experienced cardiovascular injuries after the jab. How is that safe? And why didn’t anyone in the US ever do such a study? Do we not want to know? This was a simple as a blood test before and after the vaccine. Why did they not notify parents as soon as the study was published? 3. The study by Bhakdi and Burkhardt showing 93% of deaths after vaccination were caused by the vaccine 4. The data showing the vaccines cause prion diseases shortly after vaccination. This is impossible if the vaccines are truly safe. See the paper on ScienceOpen.com (after ResearchGate removed it). 5. Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis Requiring Hospitalization by Jessica Rose and Peter McCullough showing the myocarditis caused by the vaccine have distinct biomarkers. Papers published in peer-reviewed medical journals1. The Fraiman-Doshi paper looked at serious adverse event rates and found that the vaccines may not be as safe as has been claimed, but they cannot do a proper analysis because they are not allowed to see the data. “Full transparency of the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial data is needed to properly evaluate these questions. Unfortunately, as we approach 2 years after release of COVID-19 vaccines, participant level data remain inaccessible.” You have to wonder: if the vaccine is so safe, why are the drug companies hiding the data? 2. The Levi cardiac arrest rate elevation paper showed a troubling correlation between vaccine doses and increased cardiac events from January–May 2021. When they tried to get data after May 2021, they were refused access. This begs the question: if the vaccines are perfectly safe, what are they trying to hide? 3. There are over 1,250 papers published in the scientific peer-reviewed literature showing the vaccine cause significant adverse events. 4. The Walach paper found that the vaccines harm more people than they save. 5. This news article published in the BMJ showed that at least 10% of the deaths after vaccination were caused by the vaccine. Funny, in America we think the number is 0. They can’t both be right. Someone should investigate why we have different results. This is very important. In fact, with a deeper investigation, over 90% of the deaths thought by medical examiners not to be caused by the vaccine were shown to be caused by the vaccine. This suggests that the US isn’t looking at the deaths. Autopsy reportsThere are specialized tests required to diagnose a death from the COVID vaccine. The CDC has never told any medical examiner in the US about these tests. So the medical examiners aren’t implicating the vaccine in any of the deaths. The question is we know what the tests are, we know there is solid evidence from multiple countries that the vaccine causes death, yet we refuse to even consider the possibility that the vaccine caused the deaths. Why? Retracted papers published in peer-reviewed journalsThis paper, A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products, was retracted because the publisher didn’t like the result. So he unilaterally decided to retract the paper. This is unethical. Here’s the “withdrawn” notice. Here is the backstory as well as this censorship update. The publisher hasn’t fixed the problem in over a year despite assurances it would be quickly resolved. Here is another retracted paper that was correct: Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19? by Ron Kostoff That is basically what I found: the vaccines kill >10X more people than the number of COVID deaths that they save. The paper passed peer review and was published. The editor of the journal quit after he was over-ridden by the publisher on the retraction. The reason cited for the retraction: 1. The use of key terminology, specifically the key terms “inoculation” and “vaccination” diverges from common use and are incorrect, indicating clear evidence of bias. 2. Publicly available data from the United States Center for Disease Control (U.S. CDC) were concluded by the external reviewers to be misinterpreted to make the erroneous conclusion that the vast majority of reported deaths due to COVID-19 are actually due to other comorbidities. Such an egregious misinterpretation and misrepresentation are unacceptable. This is completely bogus for two reasons: 1. The editor could have easily normalized the terminology to eliminate any perceived “bias.” They simply ask the author to do a quick search and replace. 2. The vast majority of COVID-19 deaths were in fact due to other co-morbidities. For example, the New Mexico death records where COVID-19 was listed as the cause of death and 5 out 6 were not consistent with a COVID death. If anyone wants to challenge me on that, I have access to the death data. In Massachusetts, only 10% to 20% of the deaths listed as COVID were actually caused by COVID. Most people don’t have access to the death data, but I do. So I wonder if the journal is interested in fixing their error? Hard-to-explain anecdotesCan anyone explain how these anecdotes are possible? 1. The Died Suddenly group on Facebook was adding users at 20,000 per day making it the fastest growing group in Facebook history. They had to throttle the growth rate due to attempts by the British military to infiltrate the group to cause it to be shut down. 2. The average age of the people reported dead in the Died Suddenly group has been trending younger and younger over time. How can you explain that? The only worldwide massive intervention that goes to younger people is the COVID vaccine. 3. The embalmer data (such as The Epoch Times article and this interview). 4. Insurance company data from insurance companies worldwide: 1. Adults Aged 35–44 Died at Twice the Expected Rate Last Summer, Life Insurance Data Suggests 5. Wayne Root’s wedding: 200 guests, half vaxxed, half unvaxxed. Only the vaxxed got injured (26%) or died (7%). I surveyed my readers and the readers collectively reported very similar stats. That’s hard to explain if there isn’t a huge effect. 6. My neurologist stats: 11 years without needing to do a single VAERS report; this year, needs to file 1,000 VAERS reports. How will anyone explain that? 7. The polling results using third party polling firms (so not my followers) consistently showing more people died from the vaccine than from the virus. The mainstream media refuses to do similar surveys and most survey firms refuse to even ask the questions. 8. Ten different surveys I did 9. The fact that Paul Offit isn’t going to get the latest booster even though the CDC says he should 10. Google searches show people became interested in topics related to vaccine safety before they became popular on social media 11. When I ask data/statistics experts such as Joel Smalley and Professor Norman Fenton whether they’ve seen any credible data proving the vaccines are safe and effective, they are unable to cite a single reference. Books1. Turtles all the way down: Vaccine science and myth Slide presentations1. Vaccine Secrets: a 20 minute slide presentation from CHD 2. The CCCA presentations: 1. Stop the shots, Mitigation measures: masks, vaccines, lockdowns, social distancing, 6 foot rule, …This was a very well done study, but it is of course attacked by the pro narrative people. We’d love to have an open debate about this study, but the other side doesn’t want to talk about it in a neutral forum. A LITERATURE REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF LOCKDOWNS ON COVID-19 MORTALITY Masks don’t work at all. See this article which has plenty of references. If anything, masks are more likely to hurt you than to benefit you. There is no study at all on the 6 foot distance rule. They just made that one up. Origin of the virus investigationProfessor Jeffrey Sachs was tasked by The Lancet to lead an independent investigation into the source of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. After he determined it came from US biotechnology, all of a sudden nobody wanted to pursue the investigation any further. Questions for lawmakers1. Why can’t we have open forums where our public health officials can be challenged by experts who disagree? Is there proof that having open debate results in worse outcomes? 2. Why doesn’t anyone want to see the Israeli safety data? 3. Why isn’t anyone asking for Fauci’s unredacted emails? 4. Is there a scientific reason that the CDC is ignoring me and all the experts I work with? 5. Questions I’d love to ask Congresswoman Anna Eshoo… that she’ll never answer Questions I’d like to ask the CDC1. Why hasn’t anyone calculated the minimum VAERS under-reporting factor (URF)? 2. Did the propensity to report change in 2021 vs. previous years. What is the new number in 2021 and 2022 compared to previous years? 3. Why do John Su and Tom Shimabukuro never talk about the URF in the ACIP meetings? 4. I found thousands of adverse events that are elevated by these vaccines compared to all other vaccines combined in previous years. How many adverse events did the CDC find? 5. There was a dramatic rise in adverse events reported in the VAERS system for the COVID vaccines. How could this not be a serious safety concern? The propensity to report did not increase. If you believe the propensity to report did increase, what data do you have to support that? 6. My neurologist has been in practice for 11 years. She’s never had to report a single event to VAERS. With the COVID vaccines, she needs to make 1,000 reports. How do you explain this? 7. The NEJM pregnancy paper by Tom Shimabukuro noted that the results on safety for pregnant women was preliminary since many of the women were still pregnant. What was the final result and why wasn’t it published? 8. There was an analysis of the VAERS data by Hannah Rosenblum published in the Lancet. It never goes into explaining why there were elevated reporting rates and also the nature of the reported events are not normal background events. Couldn’t the elevated reporting rates be caused by a dangerous vaccine? Does she want to look at the Israeli safety data? If not, why not? The Israeli data directly contradicts the conclusion of the paper. Shouldn’t we figure out which conclusion is correct? 9. Why does Carol Crawford not answer my questions about an open discussion with the top vaccine misinformation spreaders to resolve our differences and reduce vaccine hesitancy? 10. Why does Martha Sharan ignore my emails and phone messages when I attempted to ask for permission to talk to the authors of the Rosenblum paper? Can’t she reply with the reason questions are not allowed? The unanswered questionsQuestions I’d love to get the answer to. These were asked, but never answered. 1. Why did the CDC never publish the follow up on the NEJM pregnancy paper by Tom Shimabukuro? 2. The CEO of Moderna was asked how the 19 nucleotide sequence from a Moderna patent got into the SARS-CoV-2 genome. That sequence is never found in a virus. How did it get in this one? The CEO said he’d look into it, but never reported the explanation. I’d love to know what it was. 3. Why hasn’t any Democratic committee chairman asked the NIH for Tony Fauci’s unredacted emails? Don’t we want to know the truth about whether there was a deliberate cover-up? If there was, shouldn’t Fauci be fired? 4. Fauci wasn’t supposed to be funding gain of function research but he was. How is he being held accountable? 5. How much is Fauci making every time someone gets a Moderna shot? He’s a public official… why is this a secret? DebatesPeople who disagree with the mainstream narrative are rewarded with censorship, permanent bans on posting on social media, demonetization of your YouTube account, revocation of your medical license, revocation of your medical certifications, loss of hospital privileges, loss of job, loss of funding, loss of friends, and a Wikipedia entry labelling you a “misinformation spreader” and/or “conspiracy theorist.” This is a problem. I am not aware of any paper published in the medical literature that shows that such tactics result in better health decisions. Should we use the same rules at the UN when nations disagree? Do you think that will result in better outcomes? The way people resolve differences is by confronting the issues and talking through them. But we are not doing this: 1. Why can’t we find anyone who will defend the CDC, FDA, and NIH on camera? 2. Dr. Byram Bridle and 2 colleagues challenged Canada’s health authorities to a debate 3. Vinay Prasad’s most important op-ed Articles about the corruption of scienceThis is objective proof of a broken system. It is indefensible. Caught on video camera. There is no reason that anyone in a position of authority on the COVID vaccines would refuse an opportunity to see the most thorough post-vaccine safety study ever done: one that shows causality of serious adverse events. Professor Grace Lee should be removed from her position by the CDC. Why isn’t she? Does anyone care? Meta-collectionsIf the above isn’t enough, there are hundreds more “hard to explain” data points. 1. List of over 1,200 papers published in peer-reviewed scientific journals 2. The safe and effective narrative is falling apart 4. How the authorities can INSTANTLY stop the spread of “COVID misinformation” Using all the available evidenceThere is an excellence article written in August 2020 by Norman Doidge entitled “Medicine’s Fundamentalists” which talks about the “all-available-evidence approach.” It should be read by every doctor in America. This is how medical science should work. The precautionary principle of medicineThe precautionary principle medicine seems to have been thrown under the bus during the pandemic. It says in the face of uncertainty, one should take reasonable measures to avoid threats that are serious and plausible. For example, the Pfizer clinical trial showed the vaccine saved only one COVID death per 22,000 injected. That means we might only save around 10,000 lives if we inject 200M Americans. So if VAERS, which is at least 41 times under reported, is showing over 12,000 deaths associated the vaccine, any reasonable person should say that killing more than 41 people to save 1 life is nonsensical… shouldn’t we put a PAUSE on this intervention until we resolve the uncertainty? In the current system, questioning the CDC or other authorities results in serious retribution as mentioned earlier. Is that really the right way to handle scientific dissent? SummaryAre the vaccines “safe and effective” as claimed? To answer this, science requires that we look all all the available data and see whether the data is more consistent with the hypothesis of “safe and effective” or “not safe and effective.” All the data that I and my colleagues have seen end up being placed in the “not” bucket. We are open to being shown we got it wrong on the hundreds of pieces of evidence we have examined, but nobody is willing to discuss the data with us to resolve the issue, not even for $1M dollars. I even went to extraordinary lengths to offer the Israeli safety data to ACIP Chair Grace Lee. Her response: she called the police on me. That pretty much tells you everything you need to know: they simply refuse to look at any data that goes against their currently held beliefs. That’s the way science works. Please share this widely.
You’re a free subscriber to Steve Kirsch’s newsletter. For the full experience, become a paid subscriber. © 2022 Steve Kirsch |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WOKE COMMENT BY BLACK GOES UNPUNISHED – FIRE THE BITCH
Just imagine a White person suggesting that the National Guard be activated to police the Black Community. There would be rage, not by Whites though, they would applaud the idea. Liberal Democrat cities are a bastion of death, horror and mayhem. Anarchy prevails in all of them. And White Privilege, there is no such thing! Do you see Indians (from India) going on shooting sprees? Doesn’t happen, they obey the law, embrace education and family. Their success is empirical evidence that White Privilege doesn’t exist.
DOD equity chief Kelisa Wing has history of ant-white posts. What are the odds that she never gets canceled for overt racism?
The military, while providing for the nation’s defense, should punish racist actions in its ranks, writes QuinHillyer. It should not be pushing a racialist political agenda that divides its own personnel.
A key education specialist for the Department of Defense has made tweets so patently racist that it is evident she should never have been hired for her job. Then again, her job shouldn’t exist in the first place.
After GOP Sends Letter, Pentagon to Review ‘Woke’ DEI Chief’s Comments Disparaging White People
BREITBART
Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) applauded the Pentagon for looking into recently surfaced remarks disparaging white people made by the chief of diversity, equity and inclusion for the Department of Defense’s K-12 school system, after she and another Republican congressperson sent a letter to DOD.
“Following House Republicans’ advocacy, the Department of Defense will conduct a review of [Department of Defense’s Education Activity (DoDEA)’s woke diversity chief and her history of divisive rhetoric,” Stefanik said in a statement about Kelisa Wing.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/09/19/gop-letter-pentagon-review-woke-dei-chiefs-comments-disparaging-white-people/#:~:text=Wing%2C%20who%20oversees,don%E2%80%99t%20have%20power.%E2%80%9D
Wing, who oversees the DEI curriculum for all of the military’s K-12 schools that serve more than 66,000 children, disparaged white people on a number of occasions on social media.
Wing wrote in June 2020 on her Twitter account, “I’m exhausted with these white folx in these [professional development] sessions.”
She also tweeted in July 2020: “[T]his lady actually had the CAUdacity to say that black people can be racist too… I had to stop the session and give Karen the BUSINESS… [W]e are not the majority, we don’t have power.”
Caudacity” is a derogatory slang term combining “Caucasian” and “audacity.”
Wing has apparently deleted her Twitter account, but not before Fox News captured her tweets.
After Stefanik and Rep. Scott Franklin (R-FL) demanded answers from the Pentagon about these statements, a DOD spokeswoman said they would review the “matter.”
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, Republican of California, and Representative Elise Stefanik (R), Republican of New York and chair of the House Republican Conference, hold a press conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, June 9, 2022. (Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)
Navy Cmdr. Nicole Schwegman told Fox News, “We are aware of news reports concerning an official at DoDEA. The office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness is reviewing this matter.”
However, Schwegman added, “Diversity, Equity and Inclusion efforts in … [DoDEA] are an important part of building and sustaining an organizational culture where all students, educators, and staff are valued and respected. … Our focus remains on ensuring military-connected students, their families, and our employees have equitable access to opportunities and resources that support student achievement and readiness for college and careers.”
Stefanik said in a statement on Monday:
The fact that Ms. Wing’s history of advocating for extreme woke ideologies was not uncovered, or worse ignored, must be remedied. The Department of Defense must realign their priorities away from woke ideologies and back to strengthening our national defense. Our military’s focus should be keeping our nation safe, and I am committed to ensuring our service members are fully equipped to defend our country from the host of threats we face around the world. Right now, as the Pentagon fails to fill our military ranks and our adversaries around the world rapidly increase their capabilities, the Department of Defense has routinely prioritized adhering to woke ideologies instead of strengthening our national defense. This is shameful and an insult to the brave men and women who selflessly serve our nation. I am committed to continuing to work to restore Americans’ trust in our military by providing our service members with the resources needed to win our nation’s wars and support their families.
Follow Breitbart News’s Kristina Wong on Twitter, Truth Social, or on Facebook.
BRIAN KEMP ON HIS WAY TO VICTORY
A vote for Brian Kemp for Governor of Georgia is a vote for America.
https://secure.winred.com/kemp-for-governor/pg_search_stop-stacey-main_kgd_20220524_a?utm_source=Adwords&utm_campaign=KempB_stop-stacey-main_kgd_20220527&utm_medium=Search&utm_content=stop-stacey-main_kgd&utm_agency=PG
Voting for Abrams is tantamount of a vote for Castro, Chavez and Putin. Include the Latin American dictators of Nicaragua too. She has embraced the policies of North Koreans pugilist Kim Jong-un.
While Brian Kemp stands up for American, Abrams takes the knee.
PELOSI STEARS THE SHIP OF FOOLS INTO THE ABYSS
People across the Great Land of America are shredding Pelosi’s agenda into a pile sheetz. 
Americans have realized that the Democrat party stands for Anarchy, Chaos, Socialism. The coming election is between those who believe in the law and those who don’t.
We have seen Biden’s flouting the law as if it doesn’t exist, but during the past two years America has become a violent state. People are afraid to walk the streets, go to concerts, visit baseball games, show up at PTA meetings in the fear of being targeted or part of a mass killing. Thank Pelosi for this scenario.
BOOED OFF STATE IN THE ROTTEN APPLE
THEY TOOK US FOR GRANTED – NO MORE LOCK-STEP SAYS LATINOS
Beto O’Rourke blames Biden for more Texas Latinos voting GOP: ‘Didn’t spend a dime or day’ in border region
Texas Rep. Tony Gonzales told Fox News Digital that Latino voters and candidates are the ‘future of the Republican Party’
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
AUSTIN, Texas – Beto O’Rourke, who is facing off against Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott in November’s election, said that the rightward shift of Latino voters in recent years is partly due to a disregard for the demographic by Democrats.
“Candidate Biden didn’t spend a dime or day in the Rio Grande Valley or really anywhere in Texas, for that matter, once we got down in the homestretch of the general election,” O’Rourke told a crowd at the Texas Tribune Festival in Austin on Saturday. “You got to be locking eyeballs with the people that you want to fight for and serve and whose votes that you want to win.”
Despite losing the 2020 presidential election, Donald Trump carried 38% of the Latino vote, a 13 percentage point increase over the level of support that Republican candidates received from that group in the 2018 midterm elections, according to Pew research data.
Beto O’Rourke, Democratic gubernatorial candidate for Texas, during The Texas Tribune Festival in Austin, Texas, US, on Saturday, Sept. 24, 2022. (Jordan Vonderhaar/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
O’Rourke also said that Trump offered a “very strong, compelling economic message” during the last presidential election.
“It was literally one syllable one word, it was ‘jobs,’ and he kind of offered a false choice: ‘I can either keep you holed up in your house during this pandemic, or I can open up all places of employment and prioritize the economy,'” O’Rourke said Saturday. “What did we have on our side? Nothing.”
DEMOCRATS LOSING SUPPORT FROM HISPANIC VOTERS IN KEY NEVADA RACES, NEW POLL SHOWS
The trend appears to have continued in the past two years. Mayra Flores, the first Mexican-born congresswoman to serve in the House, flipped a House seat red during a special election in June for Texas’ 34th Congressional District, which has historically been a Democratic stronghold in south Texas.
Rep. Mayra Flores is the first Republican Latina ever elected to Congress from Texas, and she is also the first female Mexican-born member of the House of Representatives. (Fox News Photo/Joshua Comins)
Two other Latina women – Cassy Garcia in the 28th Congressional District and Monica De La Cruz in the 15th Congressional District – are also running as Republicans in the upcoming midterm elections.
2022 MIDTERM ELECTION NEWS AND UPDATES AS DEMOCRATS, REPUBLICANS FIGHT FOR CONTROL OF CONGRESS
Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-Texas, who represents a district that spans more than 800 miles along the US-Mexico border, said that the rightward shift of Hispanic voters will continue.
“We’re going to be winning races that no one thought we’d win before. And how are we going to do it? By leaning into our conservative values,” Gonzales told Fox News Digital on Saturday. “This is just the start of the future of the Republican Party. I’m excited to be a part of it.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Polls in recent weeks show O’Rourke as an underdog in his race against Abbott, but the Democratic candidate pledged not to make the same mistakes as others from his party.
“I am making sure that we do not commit the same sin as some Democrats before me have committed, which is to take voters of color, Black voters and Latinos, for granted,” O’Rourke said Saturday. 
A two-faced Democrat who will say anything to win.
BLUE STATE EXODUS – RED STATES BASK IN THE SUNSHINE
The map tells it all, the liberal states, run by Democrat tards, CRT pushers, dictated by anarchists and suicide bombers of their own creation have seen those with most to lose moving to Red States. Why pay CT or NY Five large, when Florida or Texas doesn’t levy an income tax? Governors of CT and NY are begging them to stay, but their calls fall on deaf ears. You really have to laugh at the Chutzpah these pervs have. Don’t forget CUOMO’s famous quote.
CUOMO CONFUSED: NY Gov Says Florida STEALING Residents, Blames High Taxes on TRUMP
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo deflected criticism from his state’s massive budget deficit this week; bizarrely blaming the Trump administration for the region’s ballooning taxes and accusing Florida of stealing wealthy residents.
“This week the Governor of New York blamed budget shortfalls on the state of Florida,” writes CUOMO CONFUSED: NY Gov Says Florida STEALING Residents, Blames High Taxes on TRUMP appeared first on Sean Hannity.
This story originally appeared in The Sean Hannity Show
PUTIN ORDERED ANOTHER CASE OF VODKA IN A VAIN ATTEMPT TO CURE HIS HEADACHE – BEATEN BEYOND REPAIR BY UKRAINE
Vlad the Impaler has fallen on his own sword. 
Apparently his call to arms has not gone well. His latest attempt to rally the troops has seen thousands of draftees flurrying to bordering states. “Why fight a war, we were not invaded” is the shibboleth from those fleeing. On top of that Putin is now one or maybe two steps away from a purge. And he realizes the bad situation he is in. Of course it is of his own making; rationalizing critics of his policies has not gone well. Protest are becoming ubiquitous as crowds against the war are gaining critical mass in Moscow and St. Petersburg.
Seems Vlad doesn’t want to lose face, therefore he is resorting to the old RUSSIAN stand-by, VODKA. “ZA MIR”, bottoms up Vlad.
One thing is certain, the Oligarchs are not downing any caviar after their yachts, homes and businesses have been confiscated. Does anyone believe that these, once Vlad’s Tovarish, are not plotting to do him in?
to·va·rish
/təˈväriSH/
noun
-
(in the former Soviet Union) a comrade (often used as a form of address)
Vladimir Putin’s ship of fools is sinking fast. Will he take everyone down with him?
The scale of the Kremlin’s strategic failures in Ukraine is epic – and the exploded myth of Russian power may lead to the unravelling of the regime.
More than ever, Vladimir Putin resembles the captain of the Titanic: steaming full speed ahead towards disaster, deluded by inaccurate assumptions about his ship’s invincibility, and blind to darkly looming hazards.
Everything the captain thinks he knows is wrong, the modern-day treasure hunter, Brock Lovett, says in the 1997 movie. And like the Titanic’s lookouts, wrong-headed Putin does not spot the iceberg until too late. There’s no avoiding catastrophe.
In Ukraine, that was not necessarily true until now. Putin’s speech last week, mobilising reserves, preparing territorial annexations, and threatening nuclear war, might easily have followed a different tack. Instead of escalating, he could have claimed victory, declared a ceasefire.
An offer of negotiations would have wrongfooted Kyiv, stymying its advance, freezing the conflict and dividing Moscow’s enemies. He could have won time to regroup. He could even have put his hand up, swallowed humble pie.
But he didn’t do any of that. Ever resentful and vindictive, Putin lacks the necessary courage and imagination. He got it wrong, again. And so a critical moment passed. Now it’s Russia’s regime, not Ukraine, that faces shipwreck.
From the moment he skulked into the limelight in 1999, using suspect terror bombings to fortify his image as a “kill them in a shithouse” tough guy, Putin looked like a wrong un. And the sceptical observers, it transpires, were right.
The tragic sinking in 2000 of the Russian nuclear-powered submarine Kursk, with the loss of more than 100 lives, gave an early glimpse of Putinism. He was slow to react, seemed uncaring and callous, and furiously rejected criticism.
Over the ensuing decades, Putin has run Russia the way his KGB cold war handlers taught him to run operations: co-opt, bribe or intimidate the people you need, silence or eliminate those you don’t. Corpses continue to pile up behind his throne.
During his national TV address, Putin’s lack of basic political skills was matched by a chilling absence of human warmth and animation. He might have been one of Gogol’s Dead Souls. His eyes were cold and lifeless as the grave.
The extent to which Putin is getting it wrong again over Ukraine is stupefying. The sheer scale of strategic failure is truly epic. Ukraine, a fragile democracy racked by political feuding and endemic corruption, has been united in nationhood in defiance of the aggressor.
The Nato alliance, blamed by Putin for causing the conflict and denigrated by his admirer, Donald Trump, is stronger than ever. European defence spending is rocketing. Neutrals Sweden and Finland scramble to join.
In sharp contrast, the poor performance of Moscow’s once-respected armed forces, their battlefield embarrassments, logistical nightmares and weak leadership, have exploded the myth of Russian superpower. That bubble has permanently popped.
Russia’s economy is bleeding out. And despite western worries about the Kremlin propaganda offensive in Africa and Asia, it is largely isolated internationally. In March, 141 out of 193 countries condemned the invasion in a UN vote. Most of the remainder abstained.
Last week the UN general assembly overruled Moscow and allowed Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, to make a virtual address, sketching a path to peace. He gained a standing ovation – and the initiative.
Even Putin was forced to take notice when China, hitherto straddling the fence, expressed “concern” at the damage he is doing. Narendra Modi, India’s prime minister, scolded him: “Today’s era is not an era of war”.
Kremlin strategists may argue they can live without India’s approval. But Russia increasingly needs China as a diplomatic partner, military ally, and market for its sanctioned oil, gas and arms exports.
The war is fundamentally shifting the power balance in Beijing’s favour. “That asymmetry is destined to become only more pronounced in the coming years as Putin’s regime depends on Beijing for its survival,” wrote analyst Alexander Gabuev. Putin was turning Russia into a “vassal state”.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/european-leader-warns-chinas-vast-array-coercion-instruments-countries-prepared
BLACKS IN GEORGIA ARE ARE JUMPING THE SLAVE SHIP – VOTING FOR HERSCHEL WALKER – PROUDLY AMERICAN
A political conversion is taking place, yes, who would have believed. But Democrats are fleeing the party before the house is torched by the likes of Branden and company.
Hard hitting, the man with drive, once a stalwart football player has crossed the 50 yard line in Georgia. Herschel Walker is on the path to victory.
The libtards have thrown everything in his path to no avail. Democrats in Georgia are sick and tired of his opponent. Anti American racist from way back.
VOTE HERSCHEL WALKER, VOTE AMERICA 
The problems Warnock faces are his mentoring by Fidel Castro and his anti-Israel, pro-terrorist radicalism. He embraces Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s preacher who said “God Damn America.”
GEORGIA, DUE WHAT IS RIGHT, MAKE THE PEACH TREE STATE PROUD ONCE AGAIN. DON’T LET LIBTARDS SET THE AGENDA OF AUTORITARIANISM, COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM. VOTE HERSCHEL WALKER IN NOVEMBER. 
Video of Rev. Raphael Warnock accusing America of being ‘racist’ and ‘sexist’ surfaces
“This country is every bit as sexist as it is racist,” Warnock can be heard saying during a sermon, which was posted on Twitter Wednesday.
Please let us know if you’re having issues with commenting.