OBAMA and CARTER BOTH ISIS LOVERS
Back in 1979 Jimmy Carter, then President, made the fateful decision throwing the Shah to the wolves. Since the, the wolves have devoured their prey in one country after another. Obama see the success of the Carter paradigm doubled down on it. Leaving Iraq which gave Iran free reign to conquer the Middle East. Now Obama is presenting the Mullahs with the Mother of all Weapons, the nuclear bomb.
Obama continues to wage a war on America, adhering to the Chinese method of torture-death by a thousand cuts – the anointed one is losing one country after another. The shot heard around the world was Obama’s gutless cut and run from Iraq; the vacuum provided the incentive for the ruthless Islamist entity, ISIS, to run rampant overt Syria, Iraq and who knows what else. The second failure was Obama’s lack of intestinal fortitude in standing up to Russian regarding the Crimean incident, bowing one more time to Czar Putin.
Continuing on his quest to American serfdom he is cajoling the Jew hating, American hating, Western Civilization mullahs in Iran; next stop is the imploding situation in Yemen, Nigeria. Nor is he taking a cue from King Abudullah of Jordan to bomb ISIS into smithereens. By not supporting a all out war on the Islamic cancer, which is tantamount to surrender, the Muslim in the White House is guilty of treason. The only true friends of Jordan in the Middle East now are Israel, Saudi Arabia and UAE.
“Egypt’s President Abdel- Fattaha al-Sisi minced no words as he lectured the most prestigious Muslim clerics at the nation’s venerated seat of Theology, where he told them that without reforms akin to the western world’s Reformation and Enlightenment, Islam has no future: The president’s team however, still refuses to use the “I” word in identifying the ISIS, Boko Haram, Al Shabab, and al Qaeda “extremists” or “activists”, who continue their faith-based recruitment of young Muslims around the globe to their Islamist terror cults. Many of the president’s supporters are afraid that any such admission would feed another beast-Islamophobia.
1978. Failure to back Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, 
America’s friend in the Middle East, Carter pulled up stakes which allowed the self exiled Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini to seize power. 
Prior to Khomeini’s return, mass protests erupted, many deaths resulted, shocking the country and damaged any attempt at reconciliation between the Shah and the opposition. Khomeini immediately declared that “4,000 innocent protesters weremassacred by Zionists“, and gave him a pretext to reject any further compromise with the government.Add in the taking of American hostages under the watch of Jimmy Carter allowed the Iranian Mullah power grab to cement the theocratic rule by the Supreme Ruler. Additionally, the American embassy was seized and 52 hostages taken which united the country. Not until Ronald Reagan rode into office did Khomeini take heed. After 444 days the hostages were released. From then on Iran became a soviet type state in the hands of the Revolutionary Guards.
Today we Barack Hussein Obama bowing to, subservient to, supporting, guiding, patronizing, cheering for and most of all lobbying for the Iranian theocracy. For the past two years the Iranians have played theNorth Korean card; negotiate in bad faith while developing the nuclear weapons you swear on Allah not to develop. Obama is another Jimmy Carter by allowing the Iranians to enter the nuclear club.
(click for speech) General Abdel-Fattah al – Sissi did not let the Muslim Brotherhood do to Egypt what the Khomeini’s did in Iran, he took the necessary action that brought Egypt back from the brink. No one in the civilized world, accept Obama, will not admit that Egypt is a lot better off under the General. But for Obama the Egyptian coup was heresy; his Muslim Brotherhood was dealt a striking blow. When Israel, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the Emirates stand together against Obama the freedom loving people of the world know that Obama stands on the wrong side of history.
THE END JUSTIFIES THE MEANS
The End Justifies The Means
The President of the United States faces no opposition from either elected party in Congress as he imposes his vision of transforming our Republic. By relinquishing their power to check the President, Congress has thus become an enabler of their end while their constituents are forced to subsidize their own demise.
The President, having a mind disposed to adaptation according to political expedients that serve the contemporary policy agenda of his choosing, is acting akin to Machiavelli’s Prince knowing that the few who dare oppose him have no voice in Congress to address their appeals.
In The Prince, Machiavelli writes “Everybody sees what you appear to be, few feel what you are, and those few will not dare to oppose themselves to the many, who have the majesty of the state to defend them; and in the actions of men, and especially of princes, from which there is no appeal, the end justifies the means“.
The chilling meaning of this, as explained by John Wheeler of the Western Free Press, is that if “a goal is ‘morally’ important enough , any method of achieving it is acceptable”.
When progressives like Obama say one thing then later, usually in the very next sentence, contradict what they previously said and conservatives sputter in disbelief, it becomes humorous.
Humorous in the notion that you actually believed what they said in the first place as if their expected to be held accountable for their statements.
“They don’t feel bound by what they said because it was just a means to an end and if the end changes or the means to that end changes, that’s just the way it is”, writes Wheeler.
Wheeler further explains that there is “no real ‘moral’ or ‘ethical’ quandary because the end is still the goal, so as long as that is achieved, how they achieve it is not relevant”.
As for Obama, morals, principles and ethics do not exist.
“The issue is never the issue”, writes David Horowitz of Front Page Mag, “the issue is always power – how to wring power out of the democratic process, how to turn the political process into an instrument of control, how to use that control to fundamentally transform the United States of America, which is exactly what Barack Obama has done”.
With the mindset of a prince, the President on Wednesday extolled the “morals” of his majesty while discussing opposition to his executive amnesty at an Immigration town hall meeting in Miami.
First, he issued a threat to Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers if they dare disobey his orders to not deport illegal immigrants he is protecting via his executive actions on amnesty that Andrew Hansen, a Texas Federal Judge, blocked last week.
Judge Hansen held that Obama’s program of Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) is “actually affirmative action rather than inaction” because the program grants “legal presence to individuals Congress has deemed deportable or removable, as well as the ability to obtain Social Security numbers, work authorization permits, and the ability to travel.”
The Judge further went on to state that the Department of Homeland Security cannot “enact a program whereby it not only ignores the dictates of Congress, but actively acts to thwart them.”
Yet, a week later, responding to a question asked by Telemundo’s Jose Diaz-Balart regarding how the President will ensure his orders are followed, Obama stated “if somebody is working for ICE and there is a policy and they don’t follow the policy, there are going to be consequences to it”.
Obama then went on to dare Republicans to vote on whether or not his executive actions are legal.
“So in the short term, if Mr. McConnell, the leader of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House, John Boehner, want to have a vote on whether what I’m doing is legal or not, they can have that vote. I will veto that vote, because I’m absolutely confident that what we’re doing is the right thing to do.”
Knowing Republicans will not vote because the majority side with Obama’s executive actions on amnesty, the President stood defiant as he threatened “consequences” against officials who obeyed the federal judges’ ruling and the law.
Spoken in true dictatorial fashion, Obama further claimed that “What we’ve done is we’ve expanded my authorities under executive action and prosecutorial discretion”.
In the name of progress, the President concluded to a room full of illegal immigrants that, “We dream about the future. That’s what brings immigrants here, we’re future-oriented, we’re not past-oriented.”
These are the words of a despot, a tyrant, a prince, who flaunts his own expansion of authority unbound by “past-oriented” concepts such as the separation of powers.
The President now believes that he can outright threaten Border Patrol agents for not following his dictates that cynically demand the agents to ignore everything but Obama’s decrees.
To say that the President has come unhinged though, is naive for that solely focuses on the means and neglects to take into account the end. Obama is in control, make no mistake about it, and while critics argue over his means, the President is achieving his end.
In this instance, with regards to immigration, Obama is flooding our nation with illegal aliens in order to take away the power of the American electorate.
Using the means of prosecutorial discretion, executive action, and Presidential memorandum, Obama is slowly reshaping American politics.
By giving Social Security Numbers, work permits, and tens of thousands of dollars in back tax benefits to those who are here illegally, the President re-affirms the Marxist notion “from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs”.
The end result of this will inevitably lead to socioeconomic class warfare within our country as American citizens are forced to literally subsidize their own demise in order to give illegal immigrants an opportunity at achieving their American Dream.
Today, as noted by Mark Levin, “America is no longer a Constitutional Republic or a Federal Republic” for “we live in an administrative state under a massive 4th branch of government that we have no influence on whatsoever”.
Obama isn’t just re-writing the Constitution, he is supplanting it by rejecting the very principles that led to its creation.
40,000 CONSTRUCTION WORKERS GIVEN THE PIPE BY OBAMA
Obama’s veto of the 40,000 job Keystone XL pipeline bill gives the Republicans a chance in 2016 to win back the Reagan Democrats. To do this they must tread softly, but carry a big stick in explaining how their philosophy is in line with labor. Under Obama the labor movement (union run) has reverted to a crawl; state after state has slammed public unions. In fact Wisconsin started the ball rolling – its Governor, Scott Walker, is now mounting a campaign for the Presidency in 2016.
The Democrat bashing of the Republican free market laissez faire agenda is the only card they have; kill the messenger is their universal game plan ( the Saul Alinsky approach), spew unsupportable allegations blasting anyone and everyone who dares challenge you. However that is wearing thin for the country knows that the Republican agenda is a growth agenda, the Democrat agenda is a socialist agenda; for American’s know that it is better to have a job, union or not, than be on the dole?
THE CALIFORNIA INSANE ASYLUM – THE CUCKOO’S NEST
Dianne Feinstein: “All vets are mentally ill in some way and government should prevent them from owning firearms.”
Quote of the Day from the Los Angeles Times:
“Frankly, I don’t know what it is about California, but we seem to have a strange urge to elect really obnoxious women to high office. I’m not bragging, you understand, but no other state, including Maine, even comes close. When it comes to sending left-wing dingbats to Washington, we’re Number One. There’s no getting around the fact that the last time anyone saw the likes of Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein, Maxine Waters, and Nancy Pelosi, they were stirring a cauldron when the curtain went up on ‘ Macbeth ‘. The four of them are like jackasses who happen to possess the gift of blab. You don’t know if you should condemn them for their stupidity or simply marvel at their ability to form words.”
Columnist Burt Prelutsky,
Los Angeles Times
RESPONSE BY BOB LONSBERRY TO OBAMA”INCOME INEQUALITY SPEECH”
n early January 2014, Bob Lonsberry, a Rochester talk radio personality on WHAM 1180 AM said this in response to Obama’s “income inequality speech.”
Two Americas
The Democrats are right, there are two Americas. The America that works, and the America that doesn’t. The America that contributes, and the America that doesn’t. It’s not the haves and the have nots, it’s the dos and the don’ts.
Some people do their duty as Americans, obey the law, support themselves, contribute to society, and others don’t.
That’s the divide in America. It’s not about income inequality, it’s about civic irresponsibility. It’s about a political party that preaches hatred, greed and victimization in order to win elective office. It’s about a political party that loves power more than it loves its country. That’s not invective, that’s truth, and it’s about time someone said it.
The politics of envy was on proud display a couple weeks ago when President Obama pledged the rest of his term to fighting “income inequality.” He noted that some people make more than other people, that some people have higher incomes than others, and he says that’s not “just.” That is the rationale of thievery, not social justice. The other guy has it, you want it, Obama will take it for you. Vote Democrat. That is the philosophy that produced, and ultimately destroyed, Detroit. It is the electoral philosophy that is destroying America.
It conceals a fundamental deviation from American values and common sense because it ends up not benefiting, but betraying, people who support it. The Democrats have not empowered their followers, they have enslaved them in a culture of dependence and entitlement, of victimhood and anger, instead of ability and hope.
The president’s premise – that you reduce income inequality by debasing the successful – seeks to deny the successful the consequences of their choices and spare the unsuccessful the consequences of their choices. Because, by and large, income variation in society is a result of different choices leading to different consequences. Those who choose wisely and responsibly have a far greater likelihood of success; those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater likelihood of failure. Success and failure usually manifest themselves in personal and family income.
You choose to drop out of high school or to skip college – and you are apt to have a different outcome than someone who gets a diploma and pushes on with purposeful education and/or employment. You have your children out of wedlock and life is apt to take one course; you have them within a marriage, and life is apt to take another course. Most often in life our destination is determined by the course we take.
My doctor, for example, makes far more than I do. There is significant income inequality between us. Our lives have had an inequality of outcome, but, our lives also have had an inequality of effort. While my doctor went to college and then devoted his young adulthood to medical school and residency, I got a job in a restaurant. He made a choice, I made a choice, and our choices led us to different outcomes. His outcome pays a lot better than mine.
Does that mean he cheated and Barack Obama needs to take away his wealth? No, it means we are both free men in a free society where free choices lead to different outcomes. It is not inequality Barack Obama intends to take away, it is freedom. The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail.
There is no true option for success if there is no true option for failure.
The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot less when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you more happiness than the other guy. Even if the other guy sat on his arse and did nothing. Even if the other guy made a lifetime’s worth of asinine and shortsighted decisions. Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of outcome as a right, while completely ignoring inequality of effort.
The simple Law of the Harvest – “as ye sow, so shall ye reap.” Obama would turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of society and those who fail will be rewarded as wards of society. Entitlement will replace effort as the key to upward mobility in American society if Barack Obama gets his way. He seeks a lowest common denominator society in which the government besieges the successful and productive, to foster equality through mediocrity.
He and his party speak of two Americas, and their grip on power is based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other. America is not divided by the differences in our outcomes, it is divided by the differences in our efforts. It is a false philosophy to say one man’s success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man’s victimization.
What Obama offers is not a solution, but a separatism. He foments division and strife, and pits one set of Americans against another for his own political benefit. That’s what socialists offer, class warfare wrapped up with a bow.
Two Americas, coming closer each day to proving the truth to Lincoln’s maxim that “a house divided against itself cannot stand.”
OBAMA SET TO LIGHT THE FUSE
When those present yesterday rose to their feet in a standing ovation when listening to “Bibi” Netanyahu speak before congress, they meant it; for they knew that Israel will act with or without the United States OK. But when the same Congress gives an ovation to the President during the State of the Union speech the Republicans do so out of decorum. Obama did not listen to the speech, but did comment on it, as usual Obama chomped around the edges saying nothing has changed, saying no alternatives were given. Apparently he should have been there, but again if he was the world would see what a little man he really is. For comparing him to Netanyahu would show the world the difference between a man and a child; how little a man he is; Obama is part of the JV team, a bench warmer wannabee where Netanyahu plays in the major leagues without fearing anyone – for he has an arsenal backing him up and will use it when time comes; you can count on it.
When the deal with Iran is signed the fuse will be lit, the Saudi’s know it for they stood tall and commended Netanyahu yesterday. The difference between the two countries is most telling.
The Saudi Daily Al-Jazirah published an article written by Dr. Ahmad Al-Faraj, who supported Netanyahu’s decision to speak to the U.S. Congress against the upcoming deal with Iran. He called Obama “one of the worst American presidents” and said that Netanyahu’s campaign against the deal is justified because it also serves the interests of the Gulf States.
Here is a quote from Al-Faraj’s article:
“I will conclude by saying the following: Since Obama is the godfather of the prefabricated revolutions in the Arab world, and since he is the ally of political Islam, [which is] the caring mother of [all] the terrorist organizations, and since he is working to sign an agreement with Iran that will come at the expense of the U.S.’s longtime allies in the Gulf, I am very glad of Netanyahu’s firm stance and [his decision] to speak against the nuclear agreement at the American Congress despite the Obama administration’s anger and fury. I believe that Netanyahu’s conduct will serve our interests, the people of the Gulf, much more than the foolish behavior of one of the worst American presidents. Do you agree with me?”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/arab-commentators-back-netanyahu-speech-congress/#SBPUZxhIPM6oxCJv.99
QUESTION: WHY IS OBAMA SO UPSET THAT NETANYAHU IS ADDRESSING CONGRESS?
The Prime Minister of Israel will be addressing Congress tomorrow. The prospect of his appearance has greatly upset the anointed one to such a degree that he has sent out his pit bull libtards to attack the Prime Minister. The question arises. What is Obama afraid of?
In a nutshell expected Netanyahu to reveal more details of Iran’s nuclear capability that Secretary of State and President Obama are willing to admit. Not that Iran is moving toward the capability of manufacturing a nuclear weapon in the next ten years, but they are today on the verge of developing a nuclear bomb. Netanyahu will propose the one and only option available to Israel at this point in time.
JOHN KERRY’S VIEW FROM THE IVORY TOWER – THE WORLD IS SAFER THAN EVER
Expected from ISIS, but not from the Secretary of State, AKA as America’s Safety Officer, who weighs in on the safety of the world.
OBAMA’S PROLOGUE – WHAT HAS AMERICA DONE
From the (click)New York Post with excerpts from Obama’s memoir which included an updated version in 2004 of “The Dreams of My father.” Not only is this revealing but very alarming for an American President to have these beliefs.
the “desperation and disorder of the powerless,” and how they can “easily slip into violence and despair.” As far back as then Obama harbored ill feelings against America, now it is surfacing more than ever as he lobbies for the Mullahs of Iran. American, under Obama is on the verge of a dangerous mission which will lead to the eventual war with the Islamist terrorists of the Middle East, not to mention anarchy here at home.
“I know, I have seen, the desperation and disorder of the powerless; how it twists the lives of children on the streets of Jakarta or Nairobi.
So there we have it, way back then Obama was casting the blame on America. This coincides with the “they are (Islamist not mentioned) terrorists” because they have no jobs. It makes perfect sense why Obama hung with the likes of Bill Ayers, Louis Farrakhan and Reverend Wright. In addition to the number of influential Muslims in Obama’s inner circle there is his overt love affair with the Muslim Brotherhood. Just this week Egypt outlawed the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization.
Please click here for more on the warped mind of Obama and his Jihad John friends. To many in America, our President is better off with the moniker of Mohammad Barack Hussein Obama.