Tag Archives: Hillary Clinton

HILLARY AND THE MIND ERASER

I forgot, I have no recollection, what do you mean? These are answers from the lips of Lying Hillary. Apparently she developed a case of Stupiditis when interviewed by the FBI or on the second hand she is not capable of any discourse involving her tenure as Secretary of State. Whatever it is, there is something wrong here.

Did she have a frontal lobotomy? Does Hillary Clinton suffers from some type of malady; we all know that some of it can be attributed to liberalism, the worst disease known to man. When she fell on her head did some cerebral fluid leak from her brain? 

Image result for the mind eraserImage result for the mind eraser

 

Agents also asked Clinton about a 2011 cable, first documented by Fox News, that went out under her signature as secretary of state and advised State Department personnel against personal email use because of the high risk of cyber intrusion. Clinton told the FBI she could not recall the specific cable.

THE LADY IS NOT ONLY A LIAR, BUT A DAMN LIAR AT THAT!

ROMANIAN HACKER GETS 44 MONTHS – HILLARY GETS 44 MILLION

The acuteness of irony here is two fold, a (click)Romanian hacker breaks into Sidney Blumenthal’s computer which eventually lead to Hillary’s personal email address. His nomme de guerre is Guccifer, a play on Lucifer. The Romanian government has asked the U.S. to send Mr. Lazar back to Romania.

“For me, it was easy … easy for me, for everybody,” Lazar told Fox News from his Alexandria jail in May, claiming he used Blumenthal’s account as a stepping stone to the Clinton server.

In July, when asked by Congress about this claim, FBI Director James Comey said Guccifer lied about the breach. When Comey recommended against criminal charges for Clinton and her aides, over the use of multiple personal servers for government business, he emphasized that members of Clinton’s inner circle were hacked, suggesting the personal server was vulnerable.

Don’t dismiss the fact that Clinton’s server would not have been breached if she was on the SECURE STATE DEPARTMENT NETWORK. CLINTON IS GUILTY OF VIOLATING THE LAW.

Again the bottom line here is this, “the old boys network” stiffed the Romanian like he was Dracula, but the real criminal, the Lying Clinton, was not prosecuted for stealing government information, lying about it and covering it up. Corruption at the highest level is a disease which needs purging. Time for the Revolution. Jail the Bird.

HILLARY WENT YELLOW PANTS AFTER SEEING THE LATEST FOX NEWS POLL

The latest poll has sent Hillary Clinton’s campaign into a frenzy. Hunkered down in their bunker, her brain trust is unraveling faster than Obama’s Middle East policy, the one Hillary mapped out.

Donald J. Trump, the next President of the United States, has narrowed Hillary’s once insurmountable lead to 2 points, 41% to 39% in a four way race. This does not bode well for the Lying Clinton.

As we enter the Labor Day weekend, more and more cover ups are revealed; for instance the acid program utilized in destroying her private server. Huma Abedin’s work at State and the Clinton Foundation at the same time and Clinton sending CLASSIFIED INFORMATION subsequent to her leaving the State Department. Being in possession of this information is a class A felony. But that is not all, the pay to play scheme is now front and center with an on going FBI investigation. To top it off Hillary is expected to testify once again, but this time to a Congressional investigative committee. Expect fireworks!P1050269

 

CLINTON HAS GONE YELLOW PANTS AFTER SEEING THE LATEST POLL

(CLICK FOR THE LATEST FOX NEWS POLLThe race for the White House has narrowed.  A new Fox News Poll finds Donald Trump gaining ground in the head-to-head matchup, despite improvements from Hillary Clinton on top issues.  

In addition, this is the first time the poll offers a four-way presidential ballot (it preceded the two-way ballot).  

The poll finds Clinton garners 41 percent to Trump’s 39 percent, while Libertarian Gary Johnson receives 9 percent, and Green Party candidate Jill Stein gets 4 percent.  CHAPPAQUAhillarydog

JAIL THE BIRD

How is it possible that today’s Bonnie and Clyde have not been apprehended? Bonnieclyde f.jpgFBI director James Comey did not prosecute because of the evidence did not dictate that to be so. However, Comey’s independence must be brought to light. He was dictated to by the Clinton cabal. From Obama down to Lynch to the DNC to Clinton herself Comey had a pistol pointed to his head. As in the Godfather, either his brains or signature was to be on the result. Comey chose signature.

Clinton is a downright bold faced liar. So far the FBI has reclaimed 15,000 emails not handed over by Clinton. The time has come to JAIL THE BIRD. New revelations detail the method utilized to clean the server; no it was not a cloth but a program designed to delete the emails for good. This was an indication of premeditation. Destroying evidence that could be used against you. Hillary knew in advance what  to do and how to do it. We at the NBTP demand a polygraph test. Will she pass? That is a question that must be answered. Once a liar always a liar, road kill results in anyone questioning Clinton’s veracity. Trump is the only one who can stop her now. The corrupt government has been bought off. The do nothing Congress cannot be counted on to stop this power grab.

A MUST SEE VIDEO OF LYING CLINTON, IS HILLARY THE FEMALE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE PLUS TRUMP’S LATEST TV AD

Is Hillary Clinton’s behavior linked to a medical breakdown do to stress, or does she have post concussion symptoms or does she have a narcissistic psychological disorder.

CLICK HERE for the almost 2 hour video. Remember Clinton said she fell down and hit her head, but did she? Perhaps she had a stroke! Was this the case? If so, can she devote herself full time to the presidency? The video is very revealing, a must view by all Americans.

CLICK HERE FOR CLINTON’S AMERICA,  MESSAGE APPROVED BY DONALD TRUMP.

CLICK HERE FOR THE TRAILER OF THE ORIGINAL MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE. COULD IT BE THAT HILLARY HAS A CHIP IN HER HEAD? The Manchurian Candidate Poster

HILLARY CLINTON “THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FACT AND FICTION

Former Secretary of State, Colin Powell (Clinton is trying to pin it on me), is now the FALL GUY. Reminding you he served the country honorably under two presidents. However, he is now the target of the Lying Clinton.  Yes,  Hillary pulled out the Alinsky card once again; blaming Powell for giving her the wrong advice regarding emails. Who do you believe? Stupid question! Powell or the Lying Clinton.

The backdrop, one year into Clinton using her private server, at a dinner party hosted by Clinton. Madeline Albright asked former secretaries what advice they would offer to Clinton.
“Toward the end of the evening, over dessert, Albright asked all of the former secretaries to offer one salient bit of counsel to the nation’s next top diplomat,” Conason wrote. “Powell told her to use her own email, as he had done, except for classified communications, which he had sent and received via a State Department computer … [Powell] confirmed a decision she had made months earlier – to keep her personal account and use it for most messages.”

Powell’s office later released a statement to NBC News, saying he “has no recollection of the dinner conversation.” However, “He did write former Secretary Clinton an email memo describing his use of his personal AOL email account for unclassified messages and how it vastly improved communications within the State Department.” she asked Powell how he handled his emails. Powell’s office later released a statement to NBC News, saying he “has no recollection of the dinner conversation.” However, “He did write former Secretary Clinton an email memo describing his use of his personal AOL email account for unclassified messages and how it vastly improved communications within the State Department.”

RNC Chairman Reince Priebus hoped on the news as well as Powell’s comments, saying, Clinton “seems incapable of telling the truth.”
“Clinton’s pattern of serial dishonesty is completely unacceptable for a candidate seeking the nation’s highest office, and her refusal to tell the truth and own up to her poor judgment is a preview of how she would conduct herself if elected president,” Priebus said in a statement Monday. “Even worse, this news comes on the heels of the Clinton camp falsely trying to pin her email woes on Colin Powell, raising serious questions about whether she lied to the FBI.”
The bottom line here is that the LYING CLINTON is trying to cover her tracks.
CHAPPAQUA.

DID HILLARY CLINTON HAVE A BRAIN SEIZURE – LIKE FDR, DOES SHE BELONG IN A WHEEL CHAIR?

Not long ago Hillary Clinton took a HEAD dive resulting in a blood clot on her brain. Questions remain about her health, but recently they became more intent. Click here for Hillary the BOBBLEHEAD. Did her neurologist tell her to bobble in order to alleviate some kind of brain injury?

And what about the (click here) seizure, this was no fun thing, but a serious indication that there is something wrong with her health. Americans want to know what is wrong with the most corrupt politician since Eva Peron. Questions arise when she won’g release her medical records.

PLEASE CLICK HERE to VIEW THE COMPLETE VIDEO, IT IS IMPORTANT FOR THE VOTERS TO KNOW WHO THEY ARE CASTING A VOTE FOR. It is not only apparent, but obvious that Hillary the liar Clinton has a cognitive disorder; she is psychological unfit to become President?liesCHAPPAQUAhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqbDBRWb63s

Is Hillary have LSD flashbacks? Click here to watch Hillary go down like the Benghazi operation.

hillary-clinton-staircase-2016-drudge-screenshot-600

Is Hillary Clinton getting support from DEPEND?Depend FIT-FLEX UnderwearIs she suffering from incontinence?

Where to get Depend®

Get more from your adult diapers. Find discreet Depend® products online and in stores

DESTRUCTION OF AMERICA BY THE PROGRESSIVE AXIS

The Liberal-Progressive agenda got its start many moons ago. With the appointment of Supreme Court Justices with the liberal bent the road to Armageddon was began to take shape. Mind you this did not happen over night, it was a slow process similar to Chinese water torture. Decisions were beginning to be decided, not based on the Constitution, but based on political expediency. What politicians could not do by legislations was done by the Judge who legislated from the bench. We have seen that in the most recent decisions by the court. A most startling example is the requirement by North Carolina that a first time voter present a photo ID’s before voting.

The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against North Carolina in this case. The State has asked for a stay of the ruling. Barely three weeks after a federal appeals court issued a blistering ruling overturning a North Carolina voter registration law that it called a deliberate attempt to suppress the black vote, Republicans across the state are fighting back. What set the liberals off was the early voting period being reduced from (Click)17 to 10 days. This they said affected people of color and restricted their participation in elections.

However, this is only one instant of a Liberal Court dictating how far a state can go in setting voting requirements. It is beyond anyone’s imagination that voters can’t produce the required photo IDs. For instance, those citizens who will be voting no long in advance what the requirements are. For a first time 18 year old voter and an elderly person who never cast a vote procuring the required identification should not be a hardship. Both potential voters had at a minimum one year to secure the proper documents. So where is the hardship?

It doesn’t end here, recent comments by two of the most flaming liberals on the Supreme Court gives pause. Bader Ginsburg and Sotomayor went rogue, beyond the pale in their comments. Once again indicating their progressive agenda. How they can be impartial in rendering a decision is highly suspect.

In Ginsberg’s own words:

“He is a faker,” she said of the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, going point by point, as if presenting a legal brief. “He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. … How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that.”
Toobin: Justice crossed a line
Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s slam of Donald Trump  The Legend in Her Own Mind is mentally incompetent to sit on the bench; a biased mind formed at birth. Biased beyond belief for a sitting Judge to manifest personal comments regarding individual politicians. What gets our goat is she wonders how Trump got away with not turning over his tax returns; the irony here is that she didn’t mention Hillary Clinton not turning over all of her emails. Nor did she mention the pass on Obama back in 2008. 
Turning to the Latino on the bench, Sotomayor, another anti white bomb thrower if there was ever on. Her biases were also embedded at birth.

The Supreme Court issued an extraordinarily disappointing 5–3 decision on Monday, June 20, 2016 in Utah v. Strieff, a Fourth Amendment case about police searches. Yet the terrible ruling came with a bright spot: In a powerful and groundbreaking dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor lambasted the majority for its heartless and illogical rejection of Fourth Amendment freedoms, invoking the Justice Department’s Ferguson report, echoing Black Lives Matter, and even citing Ta-Nehisi Coates.

Mark Joseph SternMARK JOSEPH STERN

Mark Joseph Stern is a writer forSlate. He covers the law and LGBTQ issues.

Strieff itself involves a fairly simple question of constitutional law. Typically, when police illegally stop an individual on the street without reasonable suspicion, any fruits of that stop—such as the discovery of illegal drugs—must be suppressed in court, because the stop was “unreasonable seizure” under the Fourth Amendment. Strieff gave the justices an opportunity to affirm this constitutional rule. But instead, Justice Stephen Breyer joined the court’s four conservatives to add a huge loophole to that long-established doctrine. In an opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas, the court found that if an officer illegally stops an individual then discovers an arrest warrant—even for an incredibly minor crime, like a traffic violation—the stop is legitimized, and any evidence seized can be used in court. The only restriction is when an officer engages in “flagrant police misconduct,” which the decision declines to define.

Sotomayor, who dominated oral arguments in Strieff, refused to let the majority get away with this Fourth Amendment diminution without a fight. In a stunning dissent, Sotomayor explains the startling breadth of the court’s decision. “This case allows the police to stop you on the street, demand your identification, and check it for outstanding traffic warrants—even if you are doing nothing wrong,” Sotomayor writes, in a dissent joined in part by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. “If the officer discovers a warrant for a fine you forgot to pay, courts will now excuse his illegal stop and will admit into evidence anything he happens to find by searching you after arresting you on the warrant.”

“Most striking about the Court’s opinion,” Sotomayor notes “is its insistence that the event here was ‘isolated,’ with ‘no indication that this unlawful stop was part of any systemic or recurrent police misconduct.’ ” But in truth, “nothing about this case is isolated.” Sotomayor then dives into the widespread police misconduct that has dominated headlines for several years, focusing on the Department of Justice’s Ferguson report to demonstrate that “outstanding warrants are surprisingly common.”

The Department of Justice, Sotomayor writes, “recently reported that in the town of Ferguson, Missouri, with a population of 21,000, 16,000 people had outstanding warrants against them.” That means 76 percent of Ferguson residents have, under the court’s decision, effectively surrendered their Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizure. “In the St. Louis metropolitan area,” moreover, “officers ‘routinely’ stop people—on the street, at bus stops, or even in court—for no reason other than ‘an officer’s desire to check whether the subject had a municipal arrest warrant pending.’ ”

But Sotomayor’s bravest moment arrives when she announces that, “writing only for myself, and drawing on my professional experiences, I would add that unlawful ‘stops’ have severe consequences much greater than the inconvenience suggested by the name.” (Sotomayor cites previous opinions, citations that I’ve excised for clarity.)

Sotomayor forgets to address why the high percentage of existing warrants of those who live in the Black and Latino community. She fails to address that 75% of children are born out of wedlock, that there is a family breakdown due to the liberal progressive mindset that anything goes and it is “all whitey’s fault.”

“REVOLUTION IS THE ONLY SOLUTION”

THE BLACK CONUNDRUM COME NOVEMBER

You do have to admit that Blacks and Hispanics get the short end of the stick when it comes to public education. Yes there are exceptions but in the broad scheme of things minority school children attend, for the most part, failing schools. This is due to many causes. The majority of students in these schools are from single parent families; hence the teachers spend a great deal of time on discipline, secondly one parent families have many chores thereby neglecting their responsibility in helping the child with homework or in fact seeing that it was done in the first place. Another major cause of concern is the education of the parent, in many cases they were dropouts, so engaging their children in meaningful conversations become a dead issue.

The liberal elites designed today’s education experience, for the most part, particularly in suburbia it works fine. However, when one peers into the inner city experience he/she sees a different picture. Mayhem is everywhere. Teachers in many instances are on the defensive, fearful of what an irate student may do. This has been caused by state board’s of education and the progressive politician. Discipline is no longer the stick that it once was. For instance a teacher, in many states and localities, can’t lay a hand on a student, even to break up a fight. The cops are responsible for this. Disciplining destructive students is not any easy task. Classes are disrupted effectively limiting their classroom learning. Teachers now become baby sitters. This very rarely happens in suburbia. Who to blame for this?  We can point many fingers, but it is obvious the liberal progressive cabal put the rules in place.

As we enter prime time in November, the decision on who to vote for becomes more acute. The Black parents need to understand who they are voting for and why. This is not too difficult of a decision. Looking behind and in front of the scenes makes the choice easy. The American Federation of Teachers (AFT) has come out in favor of Hillary.  Resolution of the AFT, “Hillary Clinton is a tested leader who shares our values, is supported by AFT members, and is prepared for a tough fight in order to champion the interest of students, families and communities”

Why does the AFT support Hillary? There is a one word answer, UNIONS. Hillary Clinton is vehemently against Charter Schools because they do not fall under the rules. They are successful in their own right and challenge today’s paradigm. A reminder once again that tenure teachers who do not measure up to today’s standards cannot be fired; they end up in the minority districts teaching down the inner city youth.

Many issues are at work here; for instance the AFT supports illegal aliens. This is detrimental to legal students, especially Blacks. Extra time is necessary to bring Hispanics up to speed, money that would to into the hiring of support personnel, tutors, mentors etc, to help failing or below standard Black students is not available. In reality the Blacks are like slaves of the Education Plantation. Suffering meted out like the plantation whip.

A look at the New York Charter School System is a prime example of what can be done to what is being done. Success Academy is the quintessential example of the dichotomy between public and charter schools; one flunks the other succeeds. Charters are a threat to the TEACHER’S UNION who control the public education agenda.

The message to the Black Parents, when voting ask yourself who is best for your child, who is in the pockets of failing teachers and unruly unions. You can make a difference, cast your vote for the future not the past. Despite her public pronouncements you must look behind the scenes and only then you will see who is pulling the scenes. Don’t fall for this trap again. They take your vote for granted. Do the right thing for a change, break away from the plantation mindset. It will benefit your child in the long run.

Click here for a message from Donald Trump.