Tag Archives: sanctuary cities

CRIMINAL ELEMENT -THE GANG RAPE OF AMERICAN BY SANCTUARY CITY DEMOCRATS AS THEY FULLY SUPPORT ILLEGALS, MURDERERS AND RAPISTS – FUTURE DEMOCRAT VOTERS

Criminal pro gang Democrats go to bed with MS-13 gangs.Image result for ms 13 gang  PELOSI AND SCHUMER DEMOCRATS WANT TO RAPE AMERICA by condoning violence. We can shoot them at the ballot box on November 6, 2018, at the ballot box. Chicago, St. Louis, Baltimore, New York, Los Angeles, all crime invested cities taken over by the criminal illegal element from Latin America. Murderers, rapers, killers, drug pushers, gang bangers, they all have one thing in common, they are supported by Democrats.  And that is not all these Democrat slime candidates up for reelection and those who collude with them are in violation of the law by not only condoning their action, but by supporting sanctuary cities. The cost to taxpayers is in the billions; we don’t even know how much it really cost, but if they were tossed out of our country, our bet is $100,000,000,000. One more Supreme Court Justice and the 14th Amendment will be history for these criminals and their anchor babies.

Since 1975, emigration from Honduras has accelerated as economic migrants and political refugees sought a better life elsewhere. A majority of expatriate Hondurans live in the United States. A 2012 US State Department estimate suggested that between 800,000 and one million Hondurans lived in the United States at that time, nearly 15% of the Honduran population. The large uncertainty about numbers is because numerous Hondurans criminals having broke into our country and live in the United States without a visa. In the 2010 census in the United States, 617,392 residents identified as Hondurans, up from 217,569 in 2000.

Take the worst of the worst criminal socialist commies who want free health care, free food, free education (Governor Cuomo for one) free housing and voting for all, no matter if you are a citizen or not, they must be stopped in their tracks. Thousand of criminals from Honduras are on their way to trespass our borders. Trump is expected to bring in the army. And we sincerely hope that, as the Patriots did back in 1773) shoot when they see the whites of their eyes. This is the only way to teach a lesson; others will then be forewarned that the next drop of blood will be theirs.

Trump must set an example; open borders are not United States borders. Our borders are closed to illegal aliens and the crime they bring to America.

CLICK HERE FOR FRIENDS OF PELOSI AND SCHUMER

 

PREVIOUS INFO ON THE 14TH AMENDMENT:

Two years after the Civil War, the Reconstruction Acts of 1867 divided the South into five military districts, where new state governments, based on universal manhood suffrage, were to be established. Thus began the period known as Radical Reconstruction, which saw the 14th Amendment, which had been passed by Congress in 1866, ratified in July 1868. The amendment resolved pre-Civil War questions of African American citizenship by stating that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States…are citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside.” The amendment then reaffirmed the privileges and rights of all citizens, and granted all these citizens the “equal protection of the laws.”

AN UN-GOING CRIME IS BEING COMMITTED – THE SUPREME COURT MUST ONCE AGAIN MUST STEP IN AND ADJUDICATE

the jurisdiction thereof.”

Overwhelming evidence against the interpretation of “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” or “not subject to any foreign power” as reaffirming the common law doctrine of citizenship by birth to aliens can be found following the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. In 1867 George Helm Yeaman, United States Minister to Denmark, in his well received treatise on allegiance and citizenship, which was presented to Secretary of State William H. Seward, said: “But the idea of a double allegiance and citizenship united in the same person, and having reference to two separate, independent, and sovereign nations or governments, is simply an impossibility.”

In the year 1873 the United States Attorney General ruled the word “jurisdiction” under the Fourteenth Amendment to mean, which Justice Gray would recognize in Elk v.Wilkins years later:

The word “jurisdiction” must be understood to mean absolute and complete jurisdiction, such as the United States had over its citizens before the adoption of this amendment… Aliens, among whom are persons born here and naturalized abroad, dwelling or being in this country, are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States only to a limited extent. Political and military rights and duties do not pertain to them. (14 Op. Atty-Gen. 300.)

House Report No. 784, dated June 22, 1874, stated, “The United States have not recognized a double allegiance. By our law a citizen is bound to be ‘true and faithful’ alone to our government.” There is no way in the world anyone can claim “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” affirms the feudal common law doctrine of birth citizenship to aliens because such doctrine by operation creates a “double allegiance” between separate nations.

If there is one inescapable truth to the text and debates, it is this: When Congress decided to require potential citizens to first be subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States they by default excluded all citizens of other nations temporarily residing in the U.S. who had no intention of becoming citizens themselves or, disqualified of doing so under naturalization laws. This was no oversight because it was too simple to declare the common law rule of jus soli if indeed that was truly the desired goal by these very competent lawyers (both Howard and Trumbull were lawyers).

Aaron Sargent, a Representative from California during the Naturalization Act of 1870 debates said the Fourteenth Amendment’s citizenship clause was not a de-facto right for aliens to obtain citizenship. No one came forward to dispute this conclusion.

Perhaps because he was absolutely correct.

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS BLOG