Tag Archives: FBI


The Clinton Foundation was awash with Russian rubles that came pouring in non stop subsequent to Hillary Clinton bartering away our defense secrets for donations to the Clinton Foundation. This is treason. Why hasn’t the Bird been Jailed?

From the Wall Street Journal

Hillary Clinton touts her tenure as secretary of state as a time of hardheaded realism and “commercial diplomacy” that advanced American national and commercial interests. But her handling of a major technology transfer initiative at the heart of Washington’s effort to “reset” relations with Russia raises serious questions about her record. Far from enhancing American national interests, Mrs. Clinton’s efforts in this area may have substantially undermined U.S. national security.

Consider Skolkovo, an “innovation city” of 30,000 people on the outskirts of Moscow, billed as Russia’s version of Silicon Valley—and a core piece of Mrs. Clinton’s quarterbacking of the Russian reset.

Following his 2009 visit to Moscow, President Obama announced the creation of the U.S.-Russia Bilateral Presidential Commission. Mrs. Clinton as secretary of state directed the American side, and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov represented the Russians. The stated goal at the time: “identifying areas of cooperation and pursuing joint projects and actions that strengthen strategic stability, international security, economic well-being, and the development of ties between the Russian and American people.”

The Kremlin committed $5 billion over three years to fund Skolkovo. Mrs. Clinton’s State Department worked aggressively to attract U.S. investment partners and helped the Russian State Investment Fund, Rusnano, identify American tech companies worthy of Russian investment. Rusnano, which a scientific adviser to President Vladimir Putin called “Putin’s child,” was created in 2007 and relies entirely on Russian state funding.

What could possibly go wrong?


Hillary’s Strange Security Adviser
The Clinton Business Model . . .
Putin and Those Democratic Emails
Soon, dozens of U.S. tech firms, including top Clinton Foundation donors like Google, Intel and Cisco, made major financial contributions to Skolkovo, with Cisco committing a cool $1 billion. In May 2010, the State Department facilitated a Moscow visit by 22 of the biggest names in U.S. venture capital—and weeks later the first memorandums of understanding were signed by Skolkovo and American companies.
By 2012 the vice president of the Skolkovo Foundation, Conor Lenihan—who had previously partnered with the Clinton Foundation—recorded that Skolkovo had assembled 28 Russian, American and European “Key Partners.” Of the 28 “partners,” 17, or 60%, have made financial commitments to the Clinton Foundation, totaling tens of millions of dollars, or sponsored speeches by Bill Clinton.

Russians tied to Skolkovo also flowed funds to the Clinton Foundation. Andrey Vavilov, the chairman of SuperOx, which is part of Skolkovo’s nuclear-research cluster, donated between $10,000 and $25,000 (donations are reported in ranges, not exact amounts) to the Clinton’s family charity. Skolkovo Foundation chief and billionaire Putin confidant Viktor Vekselberg also gave to the Clinton Foundation through his company, Renova Group.

Amid all the sloshing of Russia rubles and American dollars, however, the state-of-the-art technological research coming out of Skolkovo raised alarms among U.S. military experts and federal law-enforcement officials. Research conducted in 2012 on Skolkovo by the U.S. Army Foreign Military Studies Program at Fort Leavenworth declared that the purpose of Skolkovo was to serve as a “vehicle for world-wide technology transfer to Russia in the areas of information technology, biomedicine, energy, satellite and space technology, and nuclear technology.”

Moreover, the report said: “the Skolkovo Foundation has, in fact, been involved in defense-related activities since December 2011, when it approved the first weapons-related project—the development of a hypersonic cruise missile engine. . . . Not all of the center’s efforts are civilian in nature.”

Technology can have multiple uses—civilian and military. But in 2014 the Boston Business Journal ran an op-ed placed by the FBI, and noted that the agency had sent warnings to technology and other companies approached by Russian venture-capital firms. The op-ed—under the byline of Lucia Ziobro, an assistant special agent at the FBI’s Boston office—said that “The FBI believes the true motives of the Russian partners, who are often funded by their government, is to gain access to classified, sensitive, and emerging technology from the companies.”

Ms. Ziobro also wrote that “The [Skolkovo] foundation may be a means for the Russian government to access our nation’s sensitive or classified research development facilities and dual-use technologies with military and commercial application.”

To anyone who was paying attention, the FBI’s warnings should have come as little surprise. A State Department cable sent to then-Secretary Clinton (and obtained via WikiLeaks) mentioned possible “dual use and export control concerns” related to research and development technology ventures with Moscow. And in its own promotional literature Skolkovo heralded the success of its development of the Atlant hybrid airship.

“Particularly noteworthy is Atlant’s ability to deliver military cargoes,” boasts the Made in Skolkovo publication: “The introduction of this unique vehicle is fully consistent with the concept of creating a mobile army and opens up new possibilities for mobile use of the means of radar surveillance, air and missile defense, and delivery of airborne troops.”

Even if it could be proven that these tens of millions of dollars in Clinton Foundation donations by Skolkovo’s key partners played no role in the Clinton State Department’s missing or ignoring obvious red flags about the Russian enterprise, the perception would still be problematic. (Neither the Clinton campaign nor the Clinton Foundation responded to requests for comment.) What is known is that the State Department recruited and facilitated the commitment of billions of American dollars in the creation of a Russian “Silicon Valley” whose technological innovations include Russian hypersonic cruise-missile engines, radar surveillance equipment, and vehicles capable of delivering airborne Russian troops.

A Russian reset, indeed.

Mr. Schweizer is president of the Government Accountability Institute and the author of “ Clinton Cash.” A larger report on the subject of this article is available at Cronyism.com.




What is more egregious is the Clinton response to Chris Wallace’s interview. She said that the FBI chief honcho gave her a clean bill of health. Lies keep pouring out of her mouth, verbal diarrhea from a killer. None other than the Washington Post to her to task. When they were through Hillary Clinton was eviscerated like a skinned catlies

CNN)The Washington Post’s Fact Checkers awarded Hillary Clinton four “Pinocchios” — their worst rating — after the former Secretary of State defended her use of a private email server in an interview Sunday by claiming the FBI director said she had been “truthful” about the subject.

In the interview on Fox News Sunday, Clinton had defended her use of a private email server, saying “[FBI Director James Comey] said my answers were truthful, and what I’ve said is consistent with what I have told the American people, that there were decisions discussed and made to classify retroactively certain of the emails.”
But the Fact Checkers at the Washington Post weren’t buying it.
“Clinton is cherry-picking statements by Comey to preserve her narrative about the unusual setup of a private email server. This allows her to skate past the more disturbing findings of the FBI investigation,” they wrote.
Parsing Clinton’s public statements and comparing them to Comey’s congressional testimony, the Post’s Fact Checkers determined that while Clinton’s answers to the FBI during its investigation may have been truthful, that description couldn’t reasonably be extended to everything she’s said in public — parts of which apparently contradict Comey’s description of the server.
As the Post’s Fact Checkers explained, “As we have seen repeatedly in Clinton’s explanations of the email controversy, she relies on excessively technical and legalistic answers to explain her actions. While Comey did say there was no evidence she lied to the FBI, that is not the same as saying she told the truth to the American public — which was the point of [Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace’s] question. Comey has repeatedly not taken a stand on her public statements.”
The Post continued, “Although Comey did say many emails were retroactively classified, he also said that there were some emails that were already classified that should not have been sent on an unclassified, private server. That’s the uncomfortable truth that Clinton has trouble admitting.”
Clinton campaign spokesperson Brian Fallon responded to the Washington Post’s verdict on Monday in an interview on MSNBC.
“I think that the question she got yesterday was sort of suggesting that she had misrepresented things to the American people over the last several months,” Fallon said,
“And what she attempted to indicate in her response was that Director Comey was very clear when he was asked in the hearing before Congress last month about the nature of the answers that she gave in her interview to the Justice Department. And Director Comey’s response was quite clear, that he had no reason to believe anything that she ever said to the Justice Department was at all untruthful, and what she was indicating in that interview to Chris Wallace was what she said to those Justice Department interviewers was entirely consistent with what she has said to the public for the last several months, and the many questions we’ve answered on this issue.”

(click)Washington Post hits Clinton with four ‘Pinnochios’ on emails


The true and tried technique utilized to open the lips of our enemies is Waterboarding

Whether waterboarding should be classified as a method of torture was not widely debated in the United States before it was alleged, in 2004, that members of the CIA had used the technique against certain suspected detained terrorists.

Subsequently, the U.S. government released a memorandum written in 2002 by the Office of Legal Counsel that came to the conclusion that waterboarding did not constitute torture and could be used to interrogate subjects. The OLC reasoned that “in order for pain or suffering to rise to the level of torture, the statute requires that it be severe” and that waterboarding did not cause severe pain or suffering either physically or mentally. 

So as they say the punishment fits the crime and in this case it certainly does. Looking at it from the perspective of those who talked – our mortal enemies such as KSM; the information gleaned from them was instrumental in not only saving but preventing the murder of thousands and perhaps millions. The technique does work well.

As of yesterday, July 2, 2016, Hillary Clinton offered up this statement: Clinton told MSNBC’s Chuck Todd Saturday evening that the interview was something “I had been eager to do.” “Secretary Clinton gave a voluntary interview this morning about her email arrangements while she was secretary,” Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said in a statement. “She is pleased to have had the opportunity to assist the Department of Justice in bringing this review to a conclusion.”

Does this lady think Americans are stupid as dirt? Voluntary! Are you kidding? When the FBI says jump and you jump, asking how high. Eager to meet with the FBI? Fooyee.  Clinton has destroyed government records, deleted emails, erased records, shared information with non-government employees, lied time and time again. The Lying Clinton said this was  a security inquiry . But Americans knew all along that it was a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION. Crimes were committed and it is time for her to FESS UP for her  CRIMINAL ACTS.

(click)JAIL THE BIRD – THE LADY IS A CHRONIC LIAR and a peddler of influence. This does not depend on the definition of (click here for more videos on the Clintons)”what is, is.


Hillary Clintstonewall’s lap dog, Cheryl Mills, was being interviewed by the FBI the other day; she didn’t like the questions asked by the agent because they were off limits, she temporarily got up and walked out. Now why would a government employee with nothing to hide do that? Why would anything be off limits? Well, the only thing that comes to mind is that she is guilty of sin. Answer the question, we don’d care if it is off limits. In the first place nothing should have been agreed upon in advance relating to what questions would be off limits.CHAPPAQUA

First he had the criminal Lois Lerner who targeted the Tea Party who clammed up, then her boss, the head of the IRS who shut the door in Congress’s face, then Hillary Clintstonewall who continues to call the investigation a security affair. We don’t know about you, but to us, when the government is no longer responsible to the people it is time to revolt and overthrow it. And they wonder why Donald Trump is leading the pack as we march into November.


The question now remains is the Bird going to jail.      CHAPPAQUA

Unnamed sources close to the investigation are reported to have said that the FBI has found no evidence to prove Clinton intended to violate the law.  That sounds important, but it is not.  The operative legal issue is not whether she intended to break the law, but whether she knowingly and intentionally stored classified information on her unauthorized server.  Here is the specific law:

“Whoever… knowingly removes (classified) documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.”   (18 U.S.C., section 1924)

The statute says nothing about an intent to violate the law. It is an important distinction.  Clearly, Clinton intended to create a private server for use as her exclusive means of conducting official business as Secretary of State.  She also knew it was not authorized because she never sought authorization from the relevant agencies.  At the same time, she knew her unauthorized server would collect, retain and transmit classified documents during her four year term and intended it to do so.

This would appear to violate the language of the statute. She can hardly claim she did not recognize classified material… because that would be arguing her own incompetence.

Ignorance of the Law
Is it possible for Clinton to argue that she did not know she was breaking the law?  She can try, but in a court of law it is no defense.  Ignorance of the law is never an excuse.  Otherwise, everyone accused of a crime would play dumb.  “Gee, I didn’t know my actions were a crime!”

Moreover, Clinton knew the law because she was specifically instructed on the law when she took office.  She received a “national security indoctrination” –a tutorial on the law of classified materials.  Thereafter, she signed a sworn “non-disclosure agreement” promising never to convey classified material to an unauthorized person or place.

In that same agreement, Clinton was also warned that classified material can be either marked or unmarked.  The content dictates its classification, not the markings.  So, her previous claims that nothing was marked classified is not a defense.  This is especially true since Clinton reportedly authored 104 of the classified emails herself.  Surely, she knew what she was writing.

Gross Negligence
President Obama recently called Clinton’s handling of the classified emails “careless”, but not intentional, as if that makes it okay.  However, carelessness is sufficient to be convicted of a crime.  The following statute specifically addresses this issue:

“Whoever… through gross negligence permits (classified information) to be removed from its proper place of custody… shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.”  (18 U.S.C., section 793-f)


If you believe what Ms. Clintstonewall says then we have a bridge to sell you. Husband slick willy, a known perv, impeached, lied, had sex with that girl, sued by Paula Jones, had an affair with Jennifer Flowers, groped other women etc, but Hillary stuck by her man. Doesn’t that remind you of the Fire Chief living with a known arsonist (a son), one who torched a building a day, relishing in the inhalation of burning timbers and invigorated by the hypnotic flames, but failed in his duty to turn the arsonist in. And she is fighting for women.

Hillary Rodham Clinton has committed a felony. That is apparent from the facts and in the plain-language of the federal statute that prohibits “Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information”, 18 U.S. Code § 793(e) and (f). This offense carries a potential penalty of ten years imprisonment.

It’s called a prima facie case: clear on the basis of known facts.

It’s up to prosecutorial discretion by the US Attorney as to what charges may be filed and when. Nonetheless, Mrs. Clinton is clearly chargeable for violation of federal law. As of right now, the matter is under FBI investigation. This isn’t just about violation of Departmental policy.

Secretary Clinton was trained in handling of classified materials, and acknowledges that she understood them. By transmitting and receiving email correspondence that contained information gleaned from foreign government sources on an unauthorized, insecure system, she violated the law. This was not something she did unwittingly, and that the foreign government sourced material was not stamped classified is irrelevant.

Click here for more on the story from the DAILY KOS. Dk logo med

Mishandling Classified Information

Executive Order 13526 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f) of the federal code make it unlawful to send of store classified information on personal email. Casey Harper at The Daily Caller delved into this angle:

“‘By using a private email system, Secretary Clinton violated the Federal Records Act and the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual regarding records management, and worse, could have left classified and top secret documents vulnerable to cyber attack,’ Cause of Action Executive Director Dan Epstein said in an email to reporters.

‘This is an egregious violation of the law, and if it were anyone else, they could be facing fines and criminal prosecution.’”

Harper goes on to point out that multiple violations of this law have been enforced recently, including in 1999, when former CIA Director John M. Deutch’s security clearance was suspended for using his personal email to send classified information.

Additionally, this past week, Gen. David Patraeus pleaded guilty for mishandling classified information by using a Gmail account instead of his official government email.

The truth is that Hillary Clintstonewall is fighting for Hillary Clintonstonewall. There is a reasonable doubt of her capabilities; a review of the Benghazi disaster where our Ambassador Chris Stevens was killed lend enough credence to question her judgement. In all respects she is not fit to serve in any government position.  And after 20 years of the Clintons America knows what and who they are.



Long time staffer given immunity to testify; Pagliano is spilling the beans. Previously Pagliano invoked the fifth. Contrary what the lying Clinton says, this is a criminal investigation not a security review. Once again, the lady is caught bare handed with the smoking gun.liesCHAPPAQUA

A request to interview her would have to be reviewed by top level officials at both the FBI and the Justice Department, a former official said.

As part of those interviews, the FBI would also seek to establish that Clinton and her aides understood the policies and protocols for handling classified information, former officials said.

It’s unclear whether Clinton and her aides would agree to an interview with the FBI because of the potential legal risks. However, if Clinton refused to cooperate with FBI investigators, the issue could become a political flashpoint in the campaign.


We know it is all political, if Jane Doe did what Hillary Clinton did she would be spending time in the slammer. There is a massive cover-up going on here; similar to the IRS Lerner taking the 5th. America will not believe the DOJ if they give Clinton a pass. She not only broke one law she broke close to a dozen more. On obtaining office she signed a non-disclosure agreement.

On January 22nd, 2009, Hillary Clinton signed a Non-Disclosure agreement, or NDA, where she agreed to protect highly classified information, and a failure to do so could result in criminal prosecution.

“I have been advised that any breach of this Agreement may result in my termination of my access to SCI (Sensitive Compartmented Information) and removal from a position of special confidence,”  the NDA reads.

“I have been advised that any authorized disclosure of SCI by me may constitute violations of United States criminal laws, including provisions of Sections 793, 794, 798 and 952, Title 18 United States Code…”  These are provisions of the Espionage Act, and as Fox recently reported, 18 USC 793 subsection (f) is of special interest to the FBI investigation as it includes “gross negligence” in the handling of national defense information.

The investigation is a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION contrary to Hillary Clinton’s repeatedly saying otherwise.

America wants justice. Lynch says she will look at the facts when presented to them by attorneys working with the FBI and DOJ. The question is this, “if they indicate she broke the law” will Lynch bring charges against her.

The time has come to jail the Bird, throw away the key for good.
Is Hillary Clinton Above the Law?

By Julia Limitone Published February 24, 2016 FBI FOXBusiness


During an interview with the FOX Business Network’s Maria Bartiromo, California Republican lawmaker Darryl Issa provided detailed analysis of Hillary Clinton’s email probe.

“It is a crime to release source and methods. Scooter Libby went to jail just for saying he didn’t remember something related to sources and methods that he actually didn’t have anything to do with. David Petreaus is now a convicted criminal because he released information to his biographer,” he said.

“It is serious business to release information that may be classified or to deal with in a way that is wrong…It’s not a punishable crime to have an email server. It is a punishable crime to use that in a way that is reckless to American secrets.”

Issa shared his views on FBI director James Comey in particular and how the Justice Department has handled the case so far.

“I hear you say he’s [Comey] a solid citizen. What I would say is this Justice Department, so far, including the FBI director haven’t found the ability to indict any members of the administration, including Lois Lerner… The fact is Lois Lerner was not presented to a Grand Jury — that was a failure to enforce a statute. We have a similar situation in that no matter what we send to the FBI, they don’t seem to find much and the case is closed,” he said.

He also discussed what’s next for the email investigation.


Hillary Clinton is in the midst of the greatest collapse in political history. Her run for the White House was essentially to be a cake walk. A waltz in the night leading to a triumphant march down Pennsylvania Avenue. However, the walk will not happen, but the ride to Sing Sing or Alcatraz is more likely. The latest Bonnie and Clyde duo, Hillary and Bill, are about to get busted; not one law broken but hundreds, a thriller, with death thrown in, murder in Benghazi and emails disappearing quicker than a magicians wand.

Bernie Sanders is now running neck and neck with the once invincible Clinton. He has connected to the people, where is Hillary has disconnected. Sort of like Bush, she brings in the family, but that doesn’t matter anymore. The emperor has no clothes is an apt description of this contemptuous liar. So many email/server stories have come out, even Hillary does not no which one is true.

Americans are patiently waiting for the FBI to bring out the bracelets. We are at wits end on why they have not acted yet. How much more evidence do they need to recommend an indictment? Why are they stalling, why is the State Department stalling? These are valid questions the American people deserve to know.


Hillary is running hard from three pursuers, Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders and the FBI; all three nibbling on on her tail. Like a robber or rapist who leaves their DNA at the scene then proceeds to flee with blood dripping from a knife wound, Hillary is about to be caught, arrested, indicted and jailed. Her only hope is to become President where she will be immune for the years of presidency, but this is not likely to happen.

Sanders has her number in Iowa and New Hampshire, remember Hillary was the 100% favorite, now she claims that the race would always be competitive. Who believes that. A Vermont Senator, one of socialist convictions, little known outside New England, an Independent at that, has now caught the chronological liar.

The FBI is about to bring a RICO case against her and Slick Willie and then there is Donald Trump. She tries to ignore him by touting that he is living in his own version of reality. Look at the audiences Hillary plays to, notice their lack of enthusiasm, no cheers, only silent murmurs. Trump on the other hand brings the crowd to its feet, SRO crowds, boisterous with vigor, the want to make America great again. The message has stuck.

America has learned from the past pandering politically correct politicians.


Hillary Clinton is involved in the biggest cover-up in a generation. The State Department she once headed is in cahoots with her by not coming clean regarding Top Secret emails she received. These were emails sent to her private server that were classified Top Secret from the beginning. These emails were originated by the CIA.  Clinton has obfuscated the process from the start, but now it is the State Department which is protecting her.

The findings have been transmitted to the State Department, which continues to challenge the intelligence community’s conclusions about the classification of all the emails. But the department has no authority to change the classification since it did not originate the information.

On Nov. 6, Politico reported that the intelligence community was retreating from the “top secret” classification, a development that could have helped Clinton’s presidential campaign deflect allegations about mishandling classified material. Fox News can confirm it is true the handling of one email has changed since it was drafted and sent, but this change has no bearing on the “top secret” nature of the emails when first received on Clinton’s server. And this is what matters to the FBI probe.

Hillary Clinton is a criminal, but the State Department is protecting her; America wants to know why and who is behind it.Click for Options