TRUMP OUTING THE CRIMINAL LEFT

Criminals come in all colors and sizes, but one is most dangerous to democracy, the PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRAT. Donald J. Trump’s ascent (Podesta on election eve, a very deceptive speech- at that time he knew she got trounced)to the White House is not palatable to the inbred. Incest has taken its toll and permeated the minds of the liberal; from grade school to college they have absorbed propaganda through the education lobby ruled by union thugs. On the other hand, the conservatives among us not only question the perverse holy sanctimonious positions of the brain washed educators, we demand facts to back up their claims. However, none ever are presented. That in itself is evidence enough to belittle those with brains no larger than a pea. And Trump is taking to them. While the tornado investigation sucks up more debris, that’s all it is, only debris, Trump tweets.

President Trump Says Son ‘Openly’ Shared His Emails While Hillary Clinton ‘Acid Washed’ Hers

(WASHINGTON) — Hours before he was to help commission a new aircraft carrier at a patriotic ceremony on the Virginia coast, President Donald Trump fired off a volley of early morning tweets that again showed how furious he remains over multiple investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

The tweets were unusual in their breadth and scope, even for Trump, given the wide variety of topics he touched on as Saturday dawned. His 10 tweets, all sent within two hours starting before 6:30 a.m., ranged from the Russia investigation and Attorney General Jeff Sessions to Hillary Clinton, the health care effort and his newly appointed White House communications director.

Trump said in one missive: “While all agree the U. S. President has the complete power to pardon, why think of that when only crime so far is LEAKS against us. FAKE NEWS.”

President Trump Says Son ‘Openly’ Shared His Emails While Hillary Clinton ‘Acid Washed’ Hers

(WASHINGTON) — Hours before he was to help commission a new aircraft carrier at a patriotic ceremony on the Virginia coast, President Donald Trump fired off a volley of early morning tweets that again showed how furious he remains over multiple investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

The tweets were unusual in their breadth and scope, even for Trump, given the wide variety of topics he touched on as Saturday dawned. His 10 tweets, all sent within two hours starting before 6:30 a.m., ranged from the Russia investigation and Attorney General Jeff Sessions to Hillary Clinton, the health care effort and his newly appointed White House communications director.

Trump said in one missive: “While all agree the U. S. President has the complete power to pardon, why think of that when only crime so far is LEAKS against us. FAKE NEWS.”

The Washington Post recently reported that Trump has inquired about the authority he has as president to pardon aides, relatives or even himself in connection with the widening investigation into Russian interference in the election and whether any Trump associates were involved.

The president has long criticized leaks of information about the investigation and has urged authorities to prosecute leakers.

Trump maintains that no crimes have been committed.

One of Trump’s attorneys, Jay Sekulow, said the president has not discussed the issue of pardons with his outside legal team.

Next week, Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr.; his son-in-law and White House adviser, Jared Kushner; and Paul Manafort, a former campaign chairman, are scheduled to appear before Senate committees investigating Russian meddling.

Trump defended his son, saying he “openly gave his e-mails to the media & authorities whereas Crooked Hillary Clinton deleted (& acid washed) her 33,000 e-mails!” Trump’s namesake has become a focus of the investigation after it was revealed that he, Kushner and Manafort met with Russian representatives at Trump Tower in June 2016. Trump Jr. later released email exchanges concerning the meeting on Twitter, after learning that The New York Times was about to publish them.

The FBI investigated Clinton for using a private email server as secretary of state. She turned thousands of emails over to the government, but deleted thousands of others that she said were personal or unrelated to her work as the nation’s top diplomat.

Trump also complained Saturday about a Washington Post report that the Russian ambassador to the U.S. said he discussed election-related issues with Jeff Sessions when the men met during the 2016 presidential race. Sessions, now the attorney general, at the time was a U.S. senator and foreign policy adviser to Trump.

Trump tweeted: “A new INTELLIGENCE LEAK from the Amazon Washington Post,this time against A.G. Jeff Sessions.These illegal leaks, like Comey’s, must stop!”

The Post on Friday cited anonymous U.S. officials who described U.S. intelligence intercepts of Ambassador Sergey Kislyak’s descriptions of his meetings with Sessions.

The Justice Department said Sessions stands by his previous assertion that he never had conversations with Russian officials about any type of interference with the election.

Trump also said “Republican Senators must step up to the plate and, after 7 years, vote to Repeal and Replace” the Obama-era health care law. An effort to advance legislation collapsed in the Senate earlier this week after several Republicans said they wouldn’t vote for the bill.

Click here for Trump defending son.

For a laugh click here.

“WE DEMAND AN APOLOGEE” – WHY HAVEN’T THE MEDIA ASKED CLINTON WHAT SHE THINKS OF HER STAFF AND WORKERS TAKING THE 5TH

To our most ardent troops, our party stalwarts, we offer up this suggestion, a recommendation of sorts. If at all possible, show up at a Hillary Clinton rally,  interrupt her during the speech, shout out so the audience can hear you say, “so I am a Deplorable” Ms. Clinton; you have the audacity to call me a Deplorable, I demand an apology.

“Bring it on” to all her rallies, put her in the defensive mode, disrupt her until she apologizes; we doubt she will, but our point will be made and the news coverage will do wonders. Let’s shake, rattle and roll HRC for the next 7 weeks.

The Fifth Amendment has confronted America full force and center. The latest being Clinton’s workers and against, those who set up the server in Chappaqua and many members of her staff (government workers) who took the 5th. This is not rocket science here; some of these conspirators were given immunity and still to this very day did not show up for questioning by the House. Jason Chaffetz is appalled.CHAPPAQUA

THE ONLY SOLUTION IS REVOLUTION. BRING IT ON DONALD J. TRUMP, throw the rascals in jail.

One added fact, it does appear that Hillary Clinton’s quest for the White House is a metaphor for the collapse she took at Ground Zero.  The only thing Clinton can give America is, to quote Donald Trump, is a WELFARE CHECK.

Again HRC proves the old adage that the DISEASE IS WORSE THAN THE CURE

ROMANIAN HACKER GETS 44 MONTHS – HILLARY GETS 44 MILLION

The acuteness of irony here is two fold, a (click)Romanian hacker breaks into Sidney Blumenthal’s computer which eventually lead to Hillary’s personal email address. His nomme de guerre is Guccifer, a play on Lucifer. The Romanian government has asked the U.S. to send Mr. Lazar back to Romania.

“For me, it was easy … easy for me, for everybody,” Lazar told Fox News from his Alexandria jail in May, claiming he used Blumenthal’s account as a stepping stone to the Clinton server.

In July, when asked by Congress about this claim, FBI Director James Comey said Guccifer lied about the breach. When Comey recommended against criminal charges for Clinton and her aides, over the use of multiple personal servers for government business, he emphasized that members of Clinton’s inner circle were hacked, suggesting the personal server was vulnerable.

Don’t dismiss the fact that Clinton’s server would not have been breached if she was on the SECURE STATE DEPARTMENT NETWORK. CLINTON IS GUILTY OF VIOLATING THE LAW.

Again the bottom line here is this, “the old boys network” stiffed the Romanian like he was Dracula, but the real criminal, the Lying Clinton, was not prosecuted for stealing government information, lying about it and covering it up. Corruption at the highest level is a disease which needs purging. Time for the Revolution. Jail the Bird.

JAIL THE BIRD – GAVE STATE SECRETS TO RUSSIA IN RETURN FOR DONATIONS

The Clinton Foundation was awash with Russian rubles that came pouring in non stop subsequent to Hillary Clinton bartering away our defense secrets for donations to the Clinton Foundation. This is treason. Why hasn’t the Bird been Jailed?

From the Wall Street Journal

Hillary Clinton touts her tenure as secretary of state as a time of hardheaded realism and “commercial diplomacy” that advanced American national and commercial interests. But her handling of a major technology transfer initiative at the heart of Washington’s effort to “reset” relations with Russia raises serious questions about her record. Far from enhancing American national interests, Mrs. Clinton’s efforts in this area may have substantially undermined U.S. national security.

Consider Skolkovo, an “innovation city” of 30,000 people on the outskirts of Moscow, billed as Russia’s version of Silicon Valley—and a core piece of Mrs. Clinton’s quarterbacking of the Russian reset.

Following his 2009 visit to Moscow, President Obama announced the creation of the U.S.-Russia Bilateral Presidential Commission. Mrs. Clinton as secretary of state directed the American side, and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov represented the Russians. The stated goal at the time: “identifying areas of cooperation and pursuing joint projects and actions that strengthen strategic stability, international security, economic well-being, and the development of ties between the Russian and American people.”

The Kremlin committed $5 billion over three years to fund Skolkovo. Mrs. Clinton’s State Department worked aggressively to attract U.S. investment partners and helped the Russian State Investment Fund, Rusnano, identify American tech companies worthy of Russian investment. Rusnano, which a scientific adviser to President Vladimir Putin called “Putin’s child,” was created in 2007 and relies entirely on Russian state funding.

What could possibly go wrong?

RELATED ARTICLES

Hillary’s Strange Security Adviser
The Clinton Business Model . . .
Putin and Those Democratic Emails
Soon, dozens of U.S. tech firms, including top Clinton Foundation donors like Google, Intel and Cisco, made major financial contributions to Skolkovo, with Cisco committing a cool $1 billion. In May 2010, the State Department facilitated a Moscow visit by 22 of the biggest names in U.S. venture capital—and weeks later the first memorandums of understanding were signed by Skolkovo and American companies.
By 2012 the vice president of the Skolkovo Foundation, Conor Lenihan—who had previously partnered with the Clinton Foundation—recorded that Skolkovo had assembled 28 Russian, American and European “Key Partners.” Of the 28 “partners,” 17, or 60%, have made financial commitments to the Clinton Foundation, totaling tens of millions of dollars, or sponsored speeches by Bill Clinton.

Russians tied to Skolkovo also flowed funds to the Clinton Foundation. Andrey Vavilov, the chairman of SuperOx, which is part of Skolkovo’s nuclear-research cluster, donated between $10,000 and $25,000 (donations are reported in ranges, not exact amounts) to the Clinton’s family charity. Skolkovo Foundation chief and billionaire Putin confidant Viktor Vekselberg also gave to the Clinton Foundation through his company, Renova Group.

Amid all the sloshing of Russia rubles and American dollars, however, the state-of-the-art technological research coming out of Skolkovo raised alarms among U.S. military experts and federal law-enforcement officials. Research conducted in 2012 on Skolkovo by the U.S. Army Foreign Military Studies Program at Fort Leavenworth declared that the purpose of Skolkovo was to serve as a “vehicle for world-wide technology transfer to Russia in the areas of information technology, biomedicine, energy, satellite and space technology, and nuclear technology.”

Moreover, the report said: “the Skolkovo Foundation has, in fact, been involved in defense-related activities since December 2011, when it approved the first weapons-related project—the development of a hypersonic cruise missile engine. . . . Not all of the center’s efforts are civilian in nature.”

Technology can have multiple uses—civilian and military. But in 2014 the Boston Business Journal ran an op-ed placed by the FBI, and noted that the agency had sent warnings to technology and other companies approached by Russian venture-capital firms. The op-ed—under the byline of Lucia Ziobro, an assistant special agent at the FBI’s Boston office—said that “The FBI believes the true motives of the Russian partners, who are often funded by their government, is to gain access to classified, sensitive, and emerging technology from the companies.”

Ms. Ziobro also wrote that “The [Skolkovo] foundation may be a means for the Russian government to access our nation’s sensitive or classified research development facilities and dual-use technologies with military and commercial application.”

To anyone who was paying attention, the FBI’s warnings should have come as little surprise. A State Department cable sent to then-Secretary Clinton (and obtained via WikiLeaks) mentioned possible “dual use and export control concerns” related to research and development technology ventures with Moscow. And in its own promotional literature Skolkovo heralded the success of its development of the Atlant hybrid airship.

“Particularly noteworthy is Atlant’s ability to deliver military cargoes,” boasts the Made in Skolkovo publication: “The introduction of this unique vehicle is fully consistent with the concept of creating a mobile army and opens up new possibilities for mobile use of the means of radar surveillance, air and missile defense, and delivery of airborne troops.”

Even if it could be proven that these tens of millions of dollars in Clinton Foundation donations by Skolkovo’s key partners played no role in the Clinton State Department’s missing or ignoring obvious red flags about the Russian enterprise, the perception would still be problematic. (Neither the Clinton campaign nor the Clinton Foundation responded to requests for comment.) What is known is that the State Department recruited and facilitated the commitment of billions of American dollars in the creation of a Russian “Silicon Valley” whose technological innovations include Russian hypersonic cruise-missile engines, radar surveillance equipment, and vehicles capable of delivering airborne Russian troops.

A Russian reset, indeed.

Mr. Schweizer is president of the Government Accountability Institute and the author of “ Clinton Cash.” A larger report on the subject of this article is available at Cronyism.com.

 

 

 

What is more egregious is the Clinton response to Chris Wallace’s interview. She said that the FBI chief honcho gave her a clean bill of health. Lies keep pouring out of her mouth, verbal diarrhea from a killer. None other than the Washington Post to her to task. When they were through Hillary Clinton was eviscerated like a skinned catlies

CNN)The Washington Post’s Fact Checkers awarded Hillary Clinton four “Pinocchios” — their worst rating — after the former Secretary of State defended her use of a private email server in an interview Sunday by claiming the FBI director said she had been “truthful” about the subject.

In the interview on Fox News Sunday, Clinton had defended her use of a private email server, saying “[FBI Director James Comey] said my answers were truthful, and what I’ve said is consistent with what I have told the American people, that there were decisions discussed and made to classify retroactively certain of the emails.”
But the Fact Checkers at the Washington Post weren’t buying it.
“Clinton is cherry-picking statements by Comey to preserve her narrative about the unusual setup of a private email server. This allows her to skate past the more disturbing findings of the FBI investigation,” they wrote.
Parsing Clinton’s public statements and comparing them to Comey’s congressional testimony, the Post’s Fact Checkers determined that while Clinton’s answers to the FBI during its investigation may have been truthful, that description couldn’t reasonably be extended to everything she’s said in public — parts of which apparently contradict Comey’s description of the server.
As the Post’s Fact Checkers explained, “As we have seen repeatedly in Clinton’s explanations of the email controversy, she relies on excessively technical and legalistic answers to explain her actions. While Comey did say there was no evidence she lied to the FBI, that is not the same as saying she told the truth to the American public — which was the point of [Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace’s] question. Comey has repeatedly not taken a stand on her public statements.”
The Post continued, “Although Comey did say many emails were retroactively classified, he also said that there were some emails that were already classified that should not have been sent on an unclassified, private server. That’s the uncomfortable truth that Clinton has trouble admitting.”
Clinton campaign spokesperson Brian Fallon responded to the Washington Post’s verdict on Monday in an interview on MSNBC.
“I think that the question she got yesterday was sort of suggesting that she had misrepresented things to the American people over the last several months,” Fallon said,
“And what she attempted to indicate in her response was that Director Comey was very clear when he was asked in the hearing before Congress last month about the nature of the answers that she gave in her interview to the Justice Department. And Director Comey’s response was quite clear, that he had no reason to believe anything that she ever said to the Justice Department was at all untruthful, and what she was indicating in that interview to Chris Wallace was what she said to those Justice Department interviewers was entirely consistent with what she has said to the public for the last several months, and the many questions we’ve answered on this issue.”

(click)Washington Post hits Clinton with four ‘Pinnochios’ on emails

WATERBOARD HILLARY CLINTON – SHE WILL SING LIKE A CANARY

The true and tried technique utilized to open the lips of our enemies is Waterboarding

Whether waterboarding should be classified as a method of torture was not widely debated in the United States before it was alleged, in 2004, that members of the CIA had used the technique against certain suspected detained terrorists.

Subsequently, the U.S. government released a memorandum written in 2002 by the Office of Legal Counsel that came to the conclusion that waterboarding did not constitute torture and could be used to interrogate subjects. The OLC reasoned that “in order for pain or suffering to rise to the level of torture, the statute requires that it be severe” and that waterboarding did not cause severe pain or suffering either physically or mentally. 

So as they say the punishment fits the crime and in this case it certainly does. Looking at it from the perspective of those who talked – our mortal enemies such as KSM; the information gleaned from them was instrumental in not only saving but preventing the murder of thousands and perhaps millions. The technique does work well.

As of yesterday, July 2, 2016, Hillary Clinton offered up this statement: Clinton told MSNBC’s Chuck Todd Saturday evening that the interview was something “I had been eager to do.” “Secretary Clinton gave a voluntary interview this morning about her email arrangements while she was secretary,” Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said in a statement. “She is pleased to have had the opportunity to assist the Department of Justice in bringing this review to a conclusion.”

Does this lady think Americans are stupid as dirt? Voluntary! Are you kidding? When the FBI says jump and you jump, asking how high. Eager to meet with the FBI? Fooyee.  Clinton has destroyed government records, deleted emails, erased records, shared information with non-government employees, lied time and time again. The Lying Clinton said this was  a security inquiry . But Americans knew all along that it was a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION. Crimes were committed and it is time for her to FESS UP for her  CRIMINAL ACTS.

(click)JAIL THE BIRD – THE LADY IS A CHRONIC LIAR and a peddler of influence. This does not depend on the definition of (click here for more videos on the Clintons)”what is, is.

SOMETHING “SLICK” IS GOING ON HERE – TIME TO JAIL THE BIRD

hillarysuckersvote“Guccifer” the Romanian hacker,  has been arrested for breaking into the former Secretary of State’s home alone computer. He has been interviewed, spilled the beans and sincerely we hope and gave the prosecutors some very valuable information in return for a lesser sentence.

What puzzles us is why a two bit hacker from Romania was extradicted in the first place; then arrested and convicted, well actually he did a plea deal for a petty crime. But on the other hand the Secretary of State who deleted documents, top secret ones at that, broke the law on securing them, ran her own server, lied about it for the umpteen time and she is walking free? Something is wrong with this picture.

Clinton was running a secret ‘shakedown operation’ which was beyond the sight of government. She struck deals with foreign entities, skirted the pay to play rules, ran a criminal organization with tentacles spread far and wide, yet she has not been arrested. Why?

If Loretta Lynch does not bring charges against her, we will finally understand that that the State Department and Justice Department are run by the same CROOKS.hillarydressedup

The most egregious crime Clinton has committed is failure to have a secure server.  Former State Department watch dog report concluded Clinton’s use of a private server and account was not approved, and broke agency rules. The report said by the time she became secretary, the rules had repeatedly been updated, and were “considerably more detailed and more sophisticated.”

The time has come to JAIL THE BIRD 

Click here for the latest on Cheryl Mills deposition brought to you by Fox News. Another blabber mouth but when it comes time to release the pearl her mouth closes tight as a clam.

FBI CLOSING IN ON THE BIRD

The question now remains is the Bird going to jail.      CHAPPAQUA

Unnamed sources close to the investigation are reported to have said that the FBI has found no evidence to prove Clinton intended to violate the law.  That sounds important, but it is not.  The operative legal issue is not whether she intended to break the law, but whether she knowingly and intentionally stored classified information on her unauthorized server.  Here is the specific law:

“Whoever… knowingly removes (classified) documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.”   (18 U.S.C., section 1924)

The statute says nothing about an intent to violate the law. It is an important distinction.  Clearly, Clinton intended to create a private server for use as her exclusive means of conducting official business as Secretary of State.  She also knew it was not authorized because she never sought authorization from the relevant agencies.  At the same time, she knew her unauthorized server would collect, retain and transmit classified documents during her four year term and intended it to do so.

This would appear to violate the language of the statute. She can hardly claim she did not recognize classified material… because that would be arguing her own incompetence.

Ignorance of the Law
Is it possible for Clinton to argue that she did not know she was breaking the law?  She can try, but in a court of law it is no defense.  Ignorance of the law is never an excuse.  Otherwise, everyone accused of a crime would play dumb.  “Gee, I didn’t know my actions were a crime!”

Moreover, Clinton knew the law because she was specifically instructed on the law when she took office.  She received a “national security indoctrination” –a tutorial on the law of classified materials.  Thereafter, she signed a sworn “non-disclosure agreement” promising never to convey classified material to an unauthorized person or place.

In that same agreement, Clinton was also warned that classified material can be either marked or unmarked.  The content dictates its classification, not the markings.  So, her previous claims that nothing was marked classified is not a defense.  This is especially true since Clinton reportedly authored 104 of the classified emails herself.  Surely, she knew what she was writing.

Gross Negligence
President Obama recently called Clinton’s handling of the classified emails “careless”, but not intentional, as if that makes it okay.  However, carelessness is sufficient to be convicted of a crime.  The following statute specifically addresses this issue:

“Whoever… through gross negligence permits (classified information) to be removed from its proper place of custody… shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.”  (18 U.S.C., section 793-f)

“I’M FIGHTING FOR US”

If you believe what Ms. Clintstonewall says then we have a bridge to sell you. Husband slick willy, a known perv, impeached, lied, had sex with that girl, sued by Paula Jones, had an affair with Jennifer Flowers, groped other women etc, but Hillary stuck by her man. Doesn’t that remind you of the Fire Chief living with a known arsonist (a son), one who torched a building a day, relishing in the inhalation of burning timbers and invigorated by the hypnotic flames, but failed in his duty to turn the arsonist in. And she is fighting for women.

Hillary Rodham Clinton has committed a felony. That is apparent from the facts and in the plain-language of the federal statute that prohibits “Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information”, 18 U.S. Code § 793(e) and (f). This offense carries a potential penalty of ten years imprisonment.

It’s called a prima facie case: clear on the basis of known facts.

It’s up to prosecutorial discretion by the US Attorney as to what charges may be filed and when. Nonetheless, Mrs. Clinton is clearly chargeable for violation of federal law. As of right now, the matter is under FBI investigation. This isn’t just about violation of Departmental policy.

Secretary Clinton was trained in handling of classified materials, and acknowledges that she understood them. By transmitting and receiving email correspondence that contained information gleaned from foreign government sources on an unauthorized, insecure system, she violated the law. This was not something she did unwittingly, and that the foreign government sourced material was not stamped classified is irrelevant.

Click here for more on the story from the DAILY KOS. Dk logo med

Mishandling Classified Information

Executive Order 13526 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f) of the federal code make it unlawful to send of store classified information on personal email. Casey Harper at The Daily Caller delved into this angle:

“‘By using a private email system, Secretary Clinton violated the Federal Records Act and the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual regarding records management, and worse, could have left classified and top secret documents vulnerable to cyber attack,’ Cause of Action Executive Director Dan Epstein said in an email to reporters.

‘This is an egregious violation of the law, and if it were anyone else, they could be facing fines and criminal prosecution.’”

Harper goes on to point out that multiple violations of this law have been enforced recently, including in 1999, when former CIA Director John M. Deutch’s security clearance was suspended for using his personal email to send classified information.

Additionally, this past week, Gen. David Patraeus pleaded guilty for mishandling classified information by using a Gmail account instead of his official government email.

The truth is that Hillary Clintstonewall is fighting for Hillary Clintonstonewall. There is a reasonable doubt of her capabilities; a review of the Benghazi disaster where our Ambassador Chris Stevens was killed lend enough credence to question her judgement. In all respects she is not fit to serve in any government position.  And after 20 years of the Clintons America knows what and who they are.