WHY AMERICA NEEDS TRUMP

Is Trump Our Last Chance?

Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, August 20, 2015

TrumpInSC
Donald Trump may be the last hope for a president who would be good for white people.

Donald Trump’s new position paper on immigration makes it official: He is easily the best presidential candidate on border security and immigration since Pat Buchanan. And we can be sure he is not a bait-and-switch politician who excites supporters with a few sensible ideas and then betrays them. Mr. Trump has single-handedly made immigration the key issue of this election. His heart is in it when he says we need to build a wall, deport illegals, and have an immigration “pause” until every American who wants a job gets one.

But can he win? The white percentage of the electorate drops every election. It was 74 percent in 2012 and likely to be 72 percent in 2016. Time is running out for white people, but a unique set of circumstances in 2016 may give them a real chance–perhaps their last chance–to elect a president who would actually help them rather than hurt them.

But if Mr. Trump wins, can he deliver? Every institution in America would join forces against a president with sensible policies, but a bold, thick-skinned chief executive supported by a carefully picked cabinet could rewrite the rules about how Americans think and talk about their country.

Mr. Trump’s positions on immigration are built on three principles: 1. A nation without borders is not a nation. 2. A nation without laws is not a nation. 3. A nation that does not serve its own citizens is not a nation. It’s startling to hear a politician even talk about what defines “a nation,” much less get it more or less right. The idea that immigration should benefit Americans rather than foreigners is revolutionary by today’s standards.

Many of Mr. Trump’s specific proposals could be implemented without much fuss. He would make the E-Verify system mandatory for all employers, which would make it impossible for illegals to work for anything but under-the-table cash. Anybody caught hiring illegals would be punished. He would end the Earned Income Tax Credit for illegals, and would stop granting visas to any country that refuses to take back citizens we want to deport. He would kick out every criminal alien who has served his sentence, unlike Mr. Obama, who seems to like keeping them here.

Mr. Trump would triple the number of ICE officials and end the policy of catch-and-release, under which ICE often tells local authorities who have caught an illegal to let him go. He would make H1-B visas harder to get, and would enforce a policy of hiring Americans first. He would set up a tracking system to catch and deport anyone who overstays his visa. He would deport any illegal alien who is a gang member, and would stop all federal payments to so-called sanctuary cities. All immigrants would have to prove they have the means to support themselves. Although this is not included in his policy paper, Mr. Trump has also said ininterviews that he would scrap all of Mr. Obama’s executive amnesties. All these things could probably be done just by enforcing laws on the books or by changing regulations.

ICE

Some of Mr. Trump’s other ideas would take more work: his call for an end to birth-right citizenship, for example. Arguably, he could simply order agencies to issue passports and social security numbers only to children born of citizens and permanent residents. Or he could get Congress to pass legislation to this effect. In either case, the tangled  interpretations of the 14th Amendment would guarantee a legal challenge. Courts would probably find that the children of illegals are not citizens. Ideally, they would find that the 14th Amendment, which was passed to grant citizenship to former slaves, gives no child born of foreigners automatic citizenship.

Mr. Trump has also suggested in interviews that he wants to deport all illegals, not just criminals. This is by no means “impossible,” as critics claim. With E-Verify and employer sanctions, plenty of illegals would “self-deport,” just as Mitt Romney said they would.

The key, however, would be a few well publicized raids on non-criminal illegals. Television images of Mexican families dropped over the border with no more than they could carry would be very powerful. The vast majority of illegals would quickly decide to get their affairs in order and choose their own day of departure rather than wait for ICE to choose it for them. The main thing would be to convince illegals that ICE was serious about kicking them out. Ironically, the more ICE was prepared to do, the less it would have to do.

Deportation

But those same images of Mexican families would raise a world-wide stink. They would send the libs and legals into a gibbering frenzy, so a Trump administration would have to have backbone. Deporting illegals–even tearful families with “deep roots in the community”–is entirely consistent with current law, so there could be no court challenge. It would be a simple matter of ignoring the gibbering, and getting on with the job. If churches harbored illegals, ICE teams would have to haul them out. Getting serious about deportation would set a marvelous example for the Europeans and would bring illegal immigration to a dead stop.

We might not even need the wall Mr. Trump plans to build, though it’s certainly a good thing to have. The trick would be getting the Mexicans to pay for it, as Mr. Trump promises they will. The position paper says a Trump administration would divert remittances to Mexico from illegal immigrants, but it would be hard to verify which payments were from illegals, and plenty of them would love an excuse to stop sending money home anyway. The paper also says we could increase fees on visas issued to CEOs and diplomats, charge more for border-crossing cards, levy an entry fee at the Mexican border, and impose tariffs on Mexican goods. Making every Mexican who crossed the border pay a stiff fee until the wall was built sounds like a fine idea, but the others probably would not raise much money or would violate treaties.

One way Mr. Trump says he would make Mexico pay for the wall is to cut off foreign aid. Depending on how it’s calculated, handouts to Mexico runs to as much as $900 million a year. It’s hard to understand why Mexicans deserve even a dime of our taxes. Turning off the tap would be instant savings, whether to pay for a wall or not.

BorderWall

 

Finally, Mr. Trump’s “pause” in issuing green cards would be a wonderful thing, but it would probably require legislation. The Immigration Act of 1990 raised the annual number of visas passed out each year from 290,000 to 675,000 (not including refugee or H1-B visas and all kinds of other dubious waivers and exemptions) and set up the diversity-visa lottery that lets in another 55,000 a year. Every year there are about one million people who become lawful permanent residents (LPRs) or “green card holders.”

Of course, Mr. Trump could take a leaf out of Mr. Obama’s book and legislate by executive order. If President Obama can simply decide not to enforce the law against minors who were smuggled into the country–and then decide also to exempt the parents who smuggled them–President Trump could probably shut down the lottery and cut way back on family reunification.

There is no end to the good a president could do if he were really convinced that immigration should benefit us rather than foreigners. Today the executive branch is thick with people who make no secret of wanting “diversity” of every kind, and think immigration is the best way to get it. Imagine an executive run by people who were as sick of immigration–legal and illegal–as real Americans are. Imagine regular executive briefings on crimes committed by foreigners, on monthly deportation figures, on new miles of border wall completed, on frauds and criminals turned back at the border. Imagine an executive branch that cuts off funding to La Raza and MALDEF and all the “refugee” resettlement groups. Imagine a government that laughs at editorials in the New York Times, and that actually cares about the welfare of Americans.

USA/

A change in tone would be as dramatic as a change in policy because a president and his cabinet have tremendous influence that goes well beyond policy. They can put a subject on the national agenda just by talking about it. They can make it respectable just by continuing to talk about it. Actually looking at the pros and cons of immigrants could open the door to looking at the pros and cons of different groups of people. White, high-IQ, English-speaking people obviously assimilate best, and someone in a Trump administration might actually say so. A Trump presidency could completely change what is said about the difference between a crowd and a nation, and what it means to be an American.

So far, Mr. Trump has said little about race, but President Trump would certainly be no pushover for blacks. Al Sharpton–whom Mr. Trump has called a “professional conman”–would never darken the White House door again, and the Black Lives Matter frauds would get the cold shoulder.

And a Donald Trump presidency is no longer pure fantasy. He continues to widen his lead over Republican competitors. He is the first choice of 24 percent of registered Republicans—11 points ahead of his closest rival, Jeb Bush. He also comes in first as a second choice: 14 percent to Jeb Bush’s 10 percent. Sixty-nine percent of Republicans have a favorable view of Mr. Trump, which is eight points more than the 61 percent who view Mr. Bush favorably. A majority of Republicans who are likely to vote–57 percent–now think Mr. Trump will be the Republican candidate.

TrumpRally

Just as important, according to a CNN/ORC poll of potential voters, Mr. Trump has pulled to within 6 percentage points (51 to 45) in a theoretical contest with Hillary Clinton. Just last month he was 16 points behind. Mr. Trump would get 55 percent of the white vote and 53 percent of the male vote; only women and non-whites continue to be strong Hillary backers.

The coming election is a combination of circumstances that will never repeat itself. Mr. Trump is a brand new face in politics, at a time when public trust in the federal government is close to a record low. His Republican opponents are nonentities. The most likely Democratic candidate is a shopworn harridan even her supporters don’t entirely trust.

Mr. Trump is also prepared to spend up to $1 billion of his own money to win the election. He says he turned down $5 million from a lobbyist, because he doesn’t want to owe favors to anyone. As the campaign continues, more and more voters will be impressed by his complete independence from special interests. Finally, when the time comes for street-level canvassing and get-out-the-vote drives, Mr. Trump will have armies of committed volunteers instead of the party hacks who are pushing his rivals.

There will never be another campaign like this one. If Mr. Trump loses, this could be the last chance whites have to vote for a president who could actually do something useful for them and for their country.

TOPICS: ,

About Jared Taylor

VIEW ALL POSTS BY JARED TAYLOR

Jared Taylor

Jared Taylor is the editor of American Renaissance and the author of White Identity: Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century.

THE PROOF IS IN THE PUDDING

Since 1964 trillions of dollars have been spent to try to even the education gap. And every year the educator elites ask for more. However, the latest news from (click here)California is very disheartening. Blacks and Latinos have fallen farther behind Whites and Asians. In that subject, 69% of Asian students achieved the state targets compared to 49% of whites, 21% of Latinos and 16% of blacks. Two things stand out, one is that money does not solve all problems and two, the education industry has been misleading the taxpayers for four decades. The time has come to stop the charade and admit the truth.

MUSLIM PRESIDENT GIVES GREEN CARD TO MILLIONS OF MUSLIMS

Our first Muslim president, Barack Hussein Obama has extended greetings to millions of fellow Muslims. As reported by Breitbart News, hundreds of thousands have been allowed to enter the United States annually.

A Breitbart News review of State Department and Homeland Security data reveals that the United States already admits more than a quarter of a million Muslim migrants each year. President Obama intends to add another 10,000 Syrian migrants on top of that.

In 2013 alone, 117,423 migrants from Muslim-majority countries were permanently resettled within the United States— having been given lawful permanent resident status. Additionally in 2013, the United States voluntarily admitted an extra 122,921 temporary migrants from Muslim countries as foreign students and foreign workers as well as 39,932 refugees and asylees from Muslim countries.

TURKEY SHOOT

No we are not talking about bagging a bird for Thanksgiving, we are talking about culling Turkey from the NATO herd. So let’s talk Turkey. The Kurds are Turkey’s biggest problem, a thorn in their site poking away for more than a century. The Turkish War of Independence (1919–22), initiated by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk and his colleagues in Anatolia, resulted in the establishment of the modern Republic of Turkey in 1923. 

From Wikipedia: The country’s official language is Turkish, a Turkic language spoken natively by approximately 85 percent of the population. 70–75 percent of the population are ethnic Turks; the largest minority are the Kurds at roughly 20%, with the remainder consisting of Armenians, Greeks, Jews, Circassians, Arabs, Albanians, Bosniaks, Georgians, and others.

In the latter half of the 11th century, the Seljuk Turks began penetrating into medieval Armenia and the eastern regions ofAnatolia. In 1071, the Seljuks defeated the Byzantines at the Battle of Manzikert, starting the Turkification process in the area; the Turkish language and Islam were introduced to Armenia and Anatolia, gradually spreading throughout the region. Today there are more than 120,000 people of different Christian denominations, representing less than 0.2 percent of Turkey’s population. Islam is the dominant religion of Turkey with 99.8 percent of the population being registered as Muslim.

The slow transition from a predominantly Christian and Greek-speaking Anatolia to a predominantly Muslim and Turkish-speaking one was underway.[58] Alongside the Turkification of the territory, the culturally Persianized Seljuks set the basis for a Turko-Persian principal culture in Anatolia, which their eventual successors, the Ottomans would take over.

The Kurds, a distinct ethnic group, are the largest non-Turkic ethnicity, around 18-25 percent of the population or between fifteen and twenty million. Kurds are concentrated in the east and southeast of the country, in what is also known asTurkish Kurdistan. Unlike the Turkish people, the Kurds speak an Indo-European language. There are Kurds living in all provinces of Turkey, but are primarily concentrated in the east and southeast of the country, the region of Kurdistan. Click here for more on the Kurds.

The Kurdish people are an ethnic group whose origins are in the Middle East. They are one of the largest ethnic groups in the world that do not have a state of their own. The region of Kurdistan, the original geographic region of the Kurdish people and the home to the majority of Kurds today, covers contemporary Turkey, Iran,Iraq, and Syria. This geo-cultural region means “Land of the Kurds”. Iraqi Kurdistan is an autonomous region in northern Iraq, covering 40,643 square kilometres (15,692 sq mi) and has a population of approximately 4 million people. Kurdish populations occupy the territory in and around the Zagros mountains. These arid unwelcoming mountains have been a geographic buffer to cultural and political dominance from neighboring empires. Persians, Arabs, and Ottomans were kept away, and a space was carved out to develop Kurdish culture, language, and identity.

In a nutshell the Kurdish people are an ethnic group whose origins are in the Middle East. They are one of the largest ethnic groups in the world that do not have a state of their own. The region of Kurdistan, the original geographic region of the Kurdish people and the home to the majority of Kurds today, covers contemporary Turkey, Iran,Iraq, and Syria. This geo-cultural region means “Land of the Kurds”. Iraqi Kurdistan is an autonomous region in northern Iraq, covering 40,643 square kilometres (15,692 sq mi) and has a population of approximately 4 million people. Kurdish populations occupy the territory in and around the Zagros mountains. These arid unwelcoming mountains have been a geographic buffer to cultural and political dominance from neighboring empires. Persians, Arabs, and Ottomans were kept away, and a space was carved out to develop Kurdish culture, language, and identity. Counting the Kurds in Turkey there are somewhere between twenty two to thirty million. As a comparison, the Baltic country of Lithuania has approximately three million.

Turkey became a member of NATO in 1949 to cement its ties with the United States. This provided them with a hedge against the Soviet Union. But today Turkey finds itself in a different position. With a almost 100% Muslim population Turkey does not always tow the NATO line. In fact Turkey has thumbed its nose at the Western Powers in their fight against radical Islam. Their president, the diminutive Erdogan is seeking authority to rule by fiat. This is undemocratic and will no play out well with the NATO countries. And of course Turkey is anti Israel, Erdogan is an anti-Israel. In the scheme of things it is time that Turkey get booted from NATO. The sooner the better; having a half friend is like having a no friend. NATO should cull Turkey from the herd before Turkey does more damage in our fight against ISIS, not to mention Turkey being violently against Kurdish separatists who deserve their own country. Erdogan is anti Kurd and will do any thing to stop them from breaking free from Turkish hegemony. If Turkey was not a member of NATO, the United States would arm the Kurds in their goal for independence. 

As had been said before, when the going gets tough it will be very difficult for NATO to depend on the Muslim orientated country of TURKEY. 

 

“WIPED CLEAN” MAY NOT BE THE CASE

Further investigation has revealed that Hillary’s private server may not have been wiped clean. “Like what with a cloth?” This revelation is sending shivers up and down the spine of HRC.  From her own words, ” I deleted 30,000 personal emails.” To her they were personal emails, but to investigators that has yet to be determined.

“She is trying to be transparent as she possibly can.” Please Ms. Clinton stop with your lies, the public is sick and tired of your cover up. The facts are these Ms. Clinton, you stole government property, you caused the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others in our embassy in Benghazi, Libya. We don’t care what you turned over, we care what is on the emails that were subsequently deleted, these emails are the smoking gun. And please, you never sent or received top secret or sensitive emails. You said that you were aware of what is and what isn’t. Apparently, this was not the case. How can you as Secretary of State not received or sent one classified email. Impossible?

The company in charge of the server, Platte River has no knowledge of the server being wiped,” company spokesman Andy Boian told The Washington Post. “All the information we have is that the server wasn’t wiped.”

And Ms. Clinton, don’t try the blame game and say this is politically motivated. You are the one who put yourself in this position and we want the facts. You say the facts are coming out, coming out of where? Your mouth.

 

GUESS WHO ENDS UP PAYING FOR THE REFUGEES? CULTURAL CRISIS WILL LEAD TO THE RISE OF RIGHT WING

Locals, no matter they be in Europe or the United States are set to get the bill; not a one time bill, but a generation bill for housing, schools, hospitals, welfare. Put it in perspective, the socialist zealots that have connived their way to power have slapped the taxpayer in the face. As more and more parasitic refugees arrive the back lash will intensify.

The rise of Hitler during parallels today’s situation. There is always a bogeyman. Foreigners with a different culture and a deep disdain for Christianity have caused havoc in England, Germany and France targeting Charlie Hedbo and various Jewish enterprises. Customs that have endured for millennium are being tested. The invaders, many of which are natural born killers, demand their rights something they did not do in the countries they left while waving the white flag. Sleepy villages will see the building of mosques like there is no tomorrow; this is happening already in the United States. Count on this to precipitate the rise of a 21st century Hitler.

We have expected the “tolerance” speeches, but this wears thin when the crisis reaches critical mass. Think of ten million refugees in you backyard. Not a welcoming site is it? Christianity says “turn the other cheek”, however, today’s situation warrants a different reaction. The Pope added his two cents to the crisis. In a speech that touched on some of his major priorities as pope — the need to care for the elderly, the poor and the environment — Francis called for legislators to promote policies that create jobs and accept immigrants. “A Europe which is no longer open to the transcendent dimension of life is a Europe which risks slowly losing its own soul,” he said.

Will this crisis precipitate the slow death of Christianity? We call your attention to Turkey, once a bastion of Christendom, Constantinople was the center of Eastern Christianity; no more, out of 80,000,000 Turks only a small splinter of Christians reside in Turkey today, 200,000 at most. Europe is cutting off their nose to spite their face.

 

THE SOCIALIST POLICY FAILURE OF CROSS BORDERS IN EUROPE – AN UNSTOPPABLE DISEASE

Germany, England and France have allowed millions from Muslim countries to infiltrate their societies. Most of the Muslim immigrants live in ghettos. Germany for instance had an insatiable need for Turks to do their dirty work. France allowed Algerians to enter the country from their once colony. England the same, Indians, Pakistanis and Afghans have come to Great Britain in droves. All of this immigration would be of no consequence except for the culture of these immigrants; mostly Muslim, they do not subscribe to Christian values.

Now it is too late to stop the surge. Due to ISIS grabbing parts of Iraq and Syria with Turkey on the horizon, the influx of refugees have become overwhelming. Cultural diversity does not sit well with many of the European countries. In fact there is a major upheaval brewing.  This is only the start. Once the bills start coming in we look for mass demonstrations across England, Germany and France. Why pick up the tab for them? These countries will be the first to lose their Christian culture. Not today, but tomorrow can bring civil wars throughout Europe.

TOPSHOTS Participants hold flags and a banner during an anti-immigration rally organised by an initiative called "Stop Islamisation of Europe" and backed by the far-right "People's Party-Our Slovakia" on September 12, 2015 in Bratislava, Slovakia. AFP

HILLARY CLINTON’S CAMPAIGN – A “DISASTER” – HILLARY CLINTON – A “DISASTER”

Not mincing words here, the Clinton spokesman when queried by a reporter regarding the “disaster” in the making, when referring to HRC’s campaign said, “we always new this would not be easy.” Talk about putting a bright face on a DISASTER. A year ago Hillary was pitching a no hitter, now she is watching the bull pen where the call went out for the the relievers to start warming up.

You have to hand it to Hillary, no matter how many lies she utters, she continues to believe in herself. That’s funny because most of America, 61% at last count think she is untrustworthy. Speaking about the campaign, how many times has it been restarted? Four, five, six times. The honorable thing for her to do is drop out; as winter approaches it will become obvious that the long list of lies has finally caught up with her.

Believing her is in the same category as believing Obama. “We will put it on C-span.”  The latest poll reflects voters distaste for Hillary. As we near January 2016 expect the campaign to be floundering like a beached whale unable to get off the rocks.

But don’t put it past the press to surreptitiously promote candidates on the Republican side to counter the Trump surge. The media knows that Trump will easily be Clinton which they see is a major threat to the Obama agenda. By promoting less popualr candidates the media is gaming the system.

Trump’s key to winning the Presidency. African Americans have long been receptive to the anti-immigrant concepts behind Trump’s campaign. Simply put, the jobs, housing and other opportunities that immigrants take come largely at the expense of blacks who were born in the United States.

LLOYD MARCUS WEIGHS IN ON CHRISTIANITY

Lloyd Marcus, a Tea Party favorite does not hold back any punches when it comes to being politically correct. Marcus tells it like it is, something the canned talk politicians fail to grasp.

Jail Time for Christians: No Longer a Hypothesis

Posted by Lloyd Marcus

  • gay marriage

So this is how the game is played.  Leftist operatives in the courts (supreme and state) create unconstitutional laws to further their anti-God agenda.  Then leftists say those who disobey their lawless laws are not behaving like Christians and good Americans.  Many on our side fall for it.

The SCOTUS’ ruling on Obamacare and homosexual marriage means the Constitution will now say whatever leftists want it to say.  Folks, do you realize that based on this new precedent, the left can make anything they want a law?  Incest, pedophilia, bestiality, and so on?

Before you call me crazy, leftists are already clamoring for the normalization of these sins.  Have you heard of NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association)?

Suppose our kangaroo Supreme Court decreed that ending slavery was unconstitutional.  All blacks must report to government for their slavery assignments.  How many idiots on our side would comply because Christians and good Americans must obey the law?

Meanwhile, it goes without saying that Obama is the most lawless president in U.S. history, refusing to obey laws he dislikes.  Sanctuary cities run by Democrats defiantly disobey federal immigration law at the cost of endangering and even killing American citizens.  It is insane to allow these conniving vipers to claim the moral high ground over us, lecturing us about obeying the law.

Click here for more by Lloyd Marcus.

Laura J Alcorn

Let’s
 Invite More to our social network.
 

Send these post to your email groups and friends. Like us on
 Facebook 

 

Visit America Conservative 2 Conservative at: http://americac2c.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

THE REPUBLICAN WAKE UP CALL – TRUMP THIS

Donald Trump is on the threshold of greatness. A 100-1 long shot, now with a sizable lead in the polls, it is obvious that he is the odds on choice of winning the nomination. With the Perry’s dropping out like flies, others can’t be far behind. Actually, those who have no chance, for instance George Pataki, Rick Santorum, Chris Christie, Jim Gilmore (who is he), Lindsay Graham, Scott Walker, Bobby Jindal, Rand Paul, Marco Rubio should see the light. For them, their ego is too big to do the right thing, but in reality they are wasting everyone’s time. So it is needless to say, but we will say it anyway, if they were elected they would be doing the same thing; wasting time.

The lame stream press is not having a field day with “The Donald” in the race; every faux  pas is either brushed off by the voters or fails to get transaction from the inkers. The Republican machine is very much in trouble, they see Trump as an outsider who will shake up the Party to its core. Currently they are bringing together party stalwarts, ostensibly to stop Trump in his tracks. Not happening!

Governor Bobby Jindal has pulled the Democratic card of personal demonization calling Trump every name in the book. The Cajun State Governor pulled no punches against Donald Trump on Thursday, raining down a deluge of criticisms on the current Republican leader in the polls, calling him “a narcissist,” “an egomaniac,” “non-serious,” “substance-free,” “insecure,” “weak,” “shallow,” “unstable,” among other knocks.

Not a smart move by other Republicans who feel that the quickest way to save their campaign is to blast Trumps. This is very foolish from two stand points. It does not sit well with voters and secondly it shows how low the Republican candidates will go to win the nomination. The closer we get to the primaries expect more name calling. Bundlers, long time political operatives, maga donors who have skin in the game are working behind the scenes to stop Trump. For example Bush has raised over $100,000,000, think of the influence that will buy if elected.

Click here to read about the SRO Dallas sellout.