Monthly Archives: October 2015

HEY YOU, YES YOU, THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER, “DO YOU LIKE BAILING OUT LOW LIFES?”

1,273 Comments

Who are those low lifes? They are the people who reside in Puerto Rico. Same as the Greeks, living high off someone else’s hog. Now it is time to pay and they have no money. Oh, but wait, they have a rich uncle in Washington; his name is Obama, the Democrat liberal progressive Keynesian Obama. His solution to the Puerto Rico problem is to make it your problem. Yes you heard us right. Obama is going to saddle the United States Taxpayer with Puerto Rico’s $72,000,000,000 in debt ($72 billion). 

Why is he doing this? See most Puerto Ricans are Democrats, if they were Republicans Obama would throw them off the truck. But Democrats mean voters. You see where we are getting at. This is the old break the bank scenario perpetrated by Cloward -Piven strategy. 

“Puerto Rico, and the 3.5 million American citizens who call the island home, are facing a serious crisis that requires immediate congressional action. The Commonwealth has been mired in a decade long recession, during which more than 300,000 people left the island, the island’s economy shrank and unemployment soared, and the Commonwealth’s fiscal hole deepened. Puerto Rico has taken emergency actions to address these challenges, but those actions will be exhausted this winter.

FROM NEWT GINGRICH – ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED BY THE WASHINGTON TIMES

5 Comments
Gingrich Productions

Gingrich Productions Facebook Gingrich Productions Twitter

Hillary’s Benghazi Hearing and Public Trust

Originally published at the Washington Times

Hillary’s Benghazi Hearing and Public Trust

For people who say there is nothing left for the public to learn about Hillary Clinton’s emails or her actions surrounding the Benghazi terror attacks, Democrats on the House select committee spent an awful lot of time Thursday attacking colleagues who asked reasonable questions. And Secretary Clinton spent an awful lot of time filibustering to run out the clock.

Little more than a week after Clinton said in a presidential debate that the enemy she was proudest of is “probably the Republicans”, she, the media, and allies in her party tried their hardest to portray the hearing as nothing more than a partisan Republican charade.

Evidently they did not see “partisan” motives in Democrats questioning the Secretary like they were her team of defense attorneys, or in their personal attacks on Republican committee members in place of questions for Hillary, or in the repeated complaints about the committee’s very existence. (The committee, of course, was created when Congress discovered that the Obama administration had failed to produce relevant documents in defiance of a Congressional request.)

Only one Democrat, Tammy Duckworth, even bothered to ask real questions about the attack that left four Americans dead or the administration’s response to it.

As Hillary grinned in agreement, Adam Smith, a leading Democrat on the committee, used one of his entire rounds of questioning to complain that the public had learned “nothing new” during the hearing. This was a quite a grievance from someone who spent the entire day trying to debunk the effort to learn anything new. And no doubt we would know even less if Congressman Smith and Secretary Clinton had their way.

If he had listened to the questions of his professional colleagues, Mr. Smith might have noticed that the public did learn some significant information Thursday.

Congressman Jim Jordan revealed in his questioning that Secretary Clinton knew the night of the attack that the violence was planned and carried out by a terrorist group. She wrote it in an email to her family.

Then we learned that the next day she told the Egyptian Prime Minister, “We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film…It was a planned attack – not a protest.”

In other words, Secretary Clinton’s email and phone records immediately after attack directly contradict the statements she made to victims’ family members days later, and the statements many members of the Obama administration continued to make for weeks.

Secretary Clinton has repeatedly blamed “the fog of war” for the false information she helped spread about the source of the attacks.

The documents we learned about yesterday prove that she (and very likely other senior administration officials) were not nearly as confused as they led the public to believe.

It is remarkable that the Democrats on the committee were so completely uninterested in the discrepancy between what the administration knew and what it said publicly that they neglected to ask even a single question about the subject.

It is even more remarkable that the news media shows every sign of cooperating in this effort to paper over this new information.

We have a presidential candidate who began her career working for a Congressional committee examining Watergate, and we have a generation of journalists who supposedly idolize the writers who inspired that investigation.

Now respectively the subject and the reporters of equally serious questions of public trust, both insist there is nothing important to see here. And who’s partisan, again?

Your Friend,
Newt

P.S. Callista’s new children’s book, Christmas in America, and my new political thriller, Duplicity are now available!

LOIS LERNER WALKS

4 Comments

The old boys network has given a pass to another lying government employee; this time it is the IRS stooge, Lois Lerner.  She took the 5th which by itself is a guilty plea. Our employee, your employee invoking the 5th Amendment, this is some one paid by our taxes who will not tell us what she did, what she knows and who told her to do it.

Our Justice Department has failed us once again.  One bet w9rth taking if Lerner was a Republican and she targeted Democrats the DOJ no doubt would have prosecuted her. You can put that in the bank.

Folks, we are on step closer to the 2nd American Revolution.  With criminals running our government, the honest paying, hard working taxpayer and honest citizen alike has no choice but to revolt. We cannot go on the way we are with Criminals in Washington D.C.

Wake up America.

TIME TO BRING THE KILLER TO JUSTICE

9 Comments

Hillary Clinton, if she had any morals at all would accept responsibility for the Benghazi tragedy. But she did not, therefore, she is the killer of our Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others who died that September 11, 2012. Remember what she said, “what difference does it make.“

Clinton also said, I was not responsible for providing security at our Benghazi Embassy, Well then, who was? We guess nobody. The question now rises that CLINTON could not protect four Americans, can you imagine her as President trying to protect three hundred million. This will be an invitation to the Muslim world that nothing is off limits.

However, we have spoke about the “smoking before” but we are shocked because Clinton has handed it over to us; not literally, but it rested in an E Mail to her daughter. The lady is a bold face liar.  Clinton had revised her story untold times; for instance she then blamed a Muslim film, of course that was not true. Then she pushed out U.N. Susan Rice to tell America on national TV that a Muslim film was responsible for ramping-up the terrorist vengeance. This again was a big fat lie.

In the hours following the attacks, the Obama administration learned they were carefully planned assaults by Al Qaeda-related militants but Clinton and others would go on to tell a different tale: an anti-Muslim YouTube video caused spontaneous protests and angry mobs were to blame for the attacks.

The family of one of those killed said, “Mrs. Clinton is a serial liar.” “The thing that was shocking – one of the pinnacle moments – was the revelation she told her family there was a terrorist attack while she told America something else,” Smith’s uncle, Michael Ingmire, told FoxNews.com. “Mrs. Clinton is a serial liar.”

Tyrone Woods’ father, Charles, recalled meeting Clinton when his son’s body arrived at Andrews Air Force Base two days after the attacks.

“I gave Hillary a hug and shook her hand and she said, ‘We are going to have the filmmaker arrested who was responsible for the death of your son,” Woods said, reading the account from his journal.

“That was a complete bald-faced lie,” he told FoxNews.com Friday. “The day after the attack, she was talking to the Prime Minister of Egypt and she said the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the video.”

 

The father of slain former Navy SEAL Glen Doherty who was killed in the 2012 Benghazi, Libya terrorist attack has strong words for former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over her handling of Benghazi.

“She’s a scumbag, in my opinion,” said Ben Doherty in an interview with NECN published to coincide with Clinton’s testimony on Thursday before the House Select Committee on Benghazi.

 

“D” DAY TOMORROW FOR HILLARY CLINTON

3 Comments

Tomorrow HRC will lower her derriere into the hot seat; the main target of the House Benghazi committee headed by Trey Gowdy (enemy number 1 in Hillary’s book). Leading up to her appearance has been nothing but a circus. Ms. Clinton’s old paradigm, “rip, tear down, demean, arouse suspicion and personally attack your adversaries” has come full circle.

In other words, go to Saul Alinsky’s playbook, Rules for Radicals. Personally attack the executioner and their motives. Rule 10, 11 and 12 follows:

RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
* RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)
* RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

She and her cadre of progressive liars are at it night and day, but the evidence is there, the witnesses are there and in fact the cable from Ambassador Chris Stevens (who was one of the four killed in the Benghazi attack) requested more support in the form of men, troops, security and firepower to protect the embassy went unheeded by the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton. Therefore, it can be stated that Clinton is directly responsible for Chris Steven’s murder.

And don’t forget the cover-up on what caused the bombardment of our embassy. No it was not a Muslim film as Susan Rice would have us believe, but a well coordinated attack by Islamic Jihadists who incidentally never heard of the film. By the way the film was three months old. Gowdy, will do his best to get answers on  who was the one who pushed the film as an explanation. Remember that Ambassador Steven’s requests fell on deaf ears. Where was Clinton on the night of the Benghazi attack? She was sleeping.

Tomorrow is “D” day for Clinton. Either way she will be wounded, maybe not mortally but enough to put fear in her and her supporters.  Blood will flow tomorrow. We don’t expect the 5th, but don’t be surprised if it is invoked. Expect, “I don’t remember” or “my secretary never told me so.”  “Obfuscation” will be Clinton’s plan tomorrow. As the Russian General said, “mistakes will be made, but others will be blamed.” What the public will know when tomorrow is said and done is that Hillary Clinton is a bold face liar.lies

SWISS SWINGS TO THE RIGHT

35 Comments

Anti-Immigration SVP Wins Swiss Election in Swing to Right

Joshua Franklin, Reuters, October 19, 2015

 The anti-immigration Swiss People’s Party (SVP) won the biggest share of the vote in Sunday’s national parliamentary election, keeping pressure on Bern to introduce quotas on people moving from the European Union.

Success for the SVP, coupled with gains made by the pro-business Liberal Party (FDP), led political commentators to talk of a “Rechtsrutsch”–a “slide to the right”–in Swiss politics.

Immigration was the central topic for voters amid a rush of asylum seekers from the Middle East and North Africa to Europe.

“The vote was clear,” SVP leader Toni Brunner told Swiss television. “The people are worried about mass migration to Europe.”

{snip}

It won 29.4 percent of the vote, according to the final tally from Swiss broadcaster SRF, up from 26.6 percent in the 2011 vote and far exceeding expectations. It was the best performance by a party in at least a century.

This translated to an extra 11 seats in Switzerland’s lower house of parliament to bring its tally to 65, the highest for any party since the chamber’s membership rose to 200 in 1963.

The election gains for the SVP, which was already Switzerland’s biggest single party, come 20 months after the Swiss in a referendum backed limits on foreigners living in the Alpine nation. The SVP had strongly supported the restrictions.

Lawmakers have until 2017 to reconcile this referendum result with an EU pact that guarantees the free movement of workers, otherwise the Swiss government must write quotas into law regardless of any compromise with the EU.

The Swiss system of direct democracy means citizens decide most major issues in referenda regardless of parliament’s makeup.

But the latest right-wing gains should keep pressure on Bern to take a hard line with Brussels as it seeks to implement the immigration referendum.

{snip}

The left-leaning Social Democrats (SP) finished in second place. Their share of the vote rose 0.1 percentage points to 18.9 percent but they were set to lose three seats, according to SRF.

{snip}

With slogans like “Stay free!” it has also played to fears that Switzerland may head toward EU membership, while also producing tongue-in-cheek YouTube music videos in a bid to appeal to younger voters.

{snip}

Original Article

Anti-Immigration SVP Wins Swiss Election in Swing to Right

PRESIDENT OBAMA’S ACCOMPLISHMENTS – THIS LIST WILL SURPRISE YOU

121 Comments
Quit Bashing  Obama ! by COL. ROBERT F. CUNNINGHAM and PATRICK RISHOR, The  Gilmer  Mirror (Northeast Texas Newspaper)  
Quit trashing  Obama ‘s accomplishments. He has done more than any other President before him. Here is a list of his impressive accomplishments:
 
1. First President to be photographed smoking a joint.  
2. First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner.
3. First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in.
4. First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the United States.
5. First President to violate the War Powers Act.
6. First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.
7. First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party.
8. First President to spend a trillion dollars on “shovel-ready” jobs when there was no such thing as “shovel-ready” jobs.
9. First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters.
10. First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat.
11. First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those with criminal convictions.
12. First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.
13. First President to tell a CEO of a major corporation (Chrysler) to resign.
14. First President to terminate America’s ability to put a man in space.
15. First President to cancel the National Day of Prayer and to say that America is no longer a Christian nation.
16. First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.
17. First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.
18. First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke out on the reasons for their rate increases.
19. First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state it is allowed to locate a factory.
20. First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN).
21. First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago.
22. First President to actively try to bankrupt an American industry (coal).
23. First President to fire an inspector general of AmeriCorps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.
24. First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office.
25. First President to surround himself with radical left wing anarchists.
26. First President to golf more than 150 separate times in his five years in office.
27. First President to hide his birth, medical, educational and travel records.
28. First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it.
29. First President to go on multiple “global apology tours” and concurrent “insult our friends” tours.
30. First President to go on over 17 lavish vacations, in addition to date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends paid for by the taxpayers.
31. First President to have personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife.
32. First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense.
33. First President to fly in a personal trainer from Chicago at least once a week at taxpayer expense.
34. First President to repeat the Quran and tell us the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth.
35. First President to side with a foreign nation over one of the American 50 states (Mexico vs Arizona).
36. First President to tell the military men and women that they should pay for their own private insurance because they “volunteered to go to war and knew the consequences.”
37. Then he was the First President to tell the members of the military that THEY were UNPATRIOTIC for balking at the last suggestion.
I feel much better now. I had been under the impression he hadn’t been doing ANYTHING. 

 

GOVERNOR OF MINNESOTA TELLS CHRISTIANS “TO SHOVE IT”

308 Comments

Minnesota Governor: Find another State if You Don’t Want Muslim “Refugees” Here

Governor Mark Dayton attended a community conversation about race hosted by the St. Cloud NAACP and told people who have been questioning refugee resettlement in the central Minnesota region to “find another state.”

Earlier this week, in St. Cloud, MN, the Democrat Governor of the State—Mark Dayton—made it pretty clear to those who have been questioning the mass importation of Somali refugees to the state—too bad for you, find another place to live.

Oh, and following on the point I’ve been making over the last few days, here, here and here, the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) was there.  As I said, CAIR is now take an up front position on more refugee resettlement (and you can be sure it isn’t the Syrian Christians they are worried about!).

My guess is that CAIR was hoping the whole concept of the Hijra (Mohammed’s demand that Muslims migrate as a form of jihad) would not be out in the open and that we wouldn’t notice until it was too late, but we have.  So now they are openly pushing refugee resettlement.

CAIR Minnesota Executive Director Jaylani Hussein, who had previously addressed the crowd on his concerns on racial tension said his organization is not affiliated with terrorist groups.

See “Breeding terrorists in Minnesota,” here.

Minnesota has developed very active ‘Pockets of Resistance.’  See especially our lengthy archive on St. Cloud by clicking here.

Changing the subject slightly!

Find out what health problems refugees are bringing to Minnesota!

Metro Refugee Health Task Force, here.  “Medically complex cases” entering Minnesota!

Some of you involved in the resistance in the state should attend these important meetings (next one is Nov. 3).  Follow the links, but here is what they say about the September meeting and what was discussed (remember you are paying for all of this!):

The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Refugee and International Health Program (RIHP) staff presented on the latest refugee arrival  and health screening data; medically complex cases; special projects and community engagement; and emerging health issues.

I contend that if more Americans knew how much disease/parasites etc. were coming in with refugees they would be shocked into action—likely fearing disease more than Islamic terrorists!

Source

Pamela Geller’s commitment to freedom from jihad and Shariah shines forth in her books

<font=”georgia”>Don’t forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter.You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.


Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/10/minnesota-governor-find-another-state-if-you-dont-want-muslim-refugees-here/#FGXXRmoUmhAtExwE.99
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/10/minnesota-governor-find-another-state-if-you-dont-want-muslim-refugees-here/#FGXXRmoUmhAtExwE.99

THE WELFARE STATE EXPLAINED – GROWING NUMBER OF PARASITES

15 Comments

Welfare: Who’s on It, Who’s Not?

F. Roger Devlin and Henry Wolff, American Renaissance, October 14, 2015

FoodStamps
The numbers are even worse than we thought.

The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) has published a new report called “Welfare Use by Immigrant and Native Households.” The report’s principle finding is that fully 51 percent of immigrant households receive some form of welfare, compared to an already worrisomely high 30 percent of American native households. The new study is based on the most accurate data available, the Census Bureau’s Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). It also reports stark racial differences in the use of welfare programs.

Previous studies of welfare use have been based on the less accurate but more easily accessible data available from the Current Population Survey; this led to less alarming figures of 39 percent of immigrant households using welfare and 24 percent of native households. CIS’s Steve Camarota took the trouble to work with the SIPP data, which cover a larger number of welfare programs. His results have been independently verified by Decision Demographics, a company specializing in analysis of Census Bureau data.

The programs covered in Mr. Camarota’s study include Supplemental Security Income, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (what used to be most commonly called “welfare”), the Women, Infants and Children food program, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (“food stamps”), free and subsidized school lunches, Medicaid, and public housing and rent subsidies.

Needless to say, the percentage of immigrants using some form of welfare varies enormously according to the part of the world from which they come. Rates are highest for households from Central America and Mexico (73 percent), the Caribbean (51 percent), and Africa (48 percent). Those from East Asia (32 percent), Europe (26 percent), and South Asia (17 percent) have the lowest rates.

An appendix to the report includes some startling information on welfare use by race and ethnicity. In 2012, the most recent year for which figures are available, the percentages of each group that used at least one welfare program were as follow:

WelfareUseNativeHouseholds

A majority of native black and Hispanic households are on some form of means-tested welfare, compared to just 23 percent of native white households.

A disproportionate share of welfare is directed to households with children. For this group, the corresponding numbers for 2012 are even higher:

WelfareUseHouseholdsWithChildren

A striking 82 percent of black households with children receive welfare–double the white rate. Hispanic families are not far behind blacks.

Of course, different welfare programs are used at different rates. What follow are sets of charts showing, first, the welfare rates for all US households, and second, welfare rates only for households with children. The percentages for Hispanic and black immigrants include both legal and illegal immigrants.

CashAssistanceAllHouseholds

CashAssistanceHouseholdsChildren

Among natives, blacks receive cash handouts at more than three times the white rate; Hispanics at more than twice the white rate. Rates for black and Hispanic immigrants are relatively lower due to often-ignored restrictions on immigrant use of these programs.

FoodAidAllHouseholds

FoodAidHouseholdsChildren

Among all households, native blacks and Hispanics receive food handouts at three times the white rate; for Hispanic immigrants, the figure is four times the white rate. Among households with children, nearly all immigrant Hispanics–86 percent–get food aid. Native blacks and Hispanics aren’t far behind, with rates of 75 and 72 percent, respectively.

MedicaidAllHouseholds

MedicaidHouseholdsChildren

It’s clear, too, that non-whites benefit disproportionately from Medicaid, which helps explain why red states have opted out of Medicaid expansion.

HousingAllHouseholds

HousingHouseholdsChildren

Native Hispanics and blacks, especially, are also heavy users of housing assistance. Among households with children, native Hispanics use these programs at nearly four times the white rate and blacks at seven times the white rate. Some effort is made to limit the access of illegal immigrants to subsidized housing, which helps explain why Hispanic immigrants get housing handouts at less than half the rate for native Hispanics. Amnesty for illegals would mean a sharp rise in the percentage of Hispanics in public or subsidized housing.

Spreading the wealth around

For each of the four welfare categories presented above, the black and Hispanic rates are at least double the white rates. Native Asians appear to use welfare at slightly lower rates than whites, but their SIPP sample size is too small to be certain. Asian immigrants, who are not included in the charts above, exceed native white welfare rates by about 25 percent (see table A3 in the CIS report). The US has three times as many immigrant Asian households as native Asian households.

What little public discussion there is of disproportionate welfare use by blacks and Hispanics is inevitably muddied by the claim that the majority of those receiving welfare are white. This ignores the fact that there are five times as many whites as blacks and four times as many whites as Hispanics in the United States; what matter are differences in the rates at which each group uses welfare. Furthermore, at least in terms of households, this claim is no longer be true.

According to data in the CIS report, there are 39.88 million households in the US receiving some sort of means-tested welfare. Of those households, just 19.66 million–or 49 percent–are either native or immigrant whites (Middle Eastern immigrants are classified as “whites”). That means the majority of US households on welfare are now non-white.

As mass Third-World immigration continues, the US will have an ever-burgeoning dependent class of non-whites. Black voters will be joined by increasing number of Hispanic voters in their support for more handouts. When they vote in 2016, a majority of black and Hispanic households are likely to be on welfare–just as they were in 2012. Arguments about freedom and limited government will mean nothing to them. Obamacare is just the beginning.

Whites must decide if this is the future they want for their children and grandchildren. If they don’t take action soon, blacks and Hispanics will decide for them.

TOPICS: , , , ,

About F. Roger Devlin

VIEW ALL POSTS BY F. ROGER DEVLIN

F. Roger Devlin

Dr. Devlin is a contributing editor to The Occidental Quarterly and the author of Sexual Utopia in Power.

PIGS CAN FLY AFTER ALL

16 Comments
Today at 10:38 AM