Tag Archives: democrat primary


Elizabeth Warren’s shuts her moth when it comes to sanctioning her friend Hillary Clinton and the Democrat party. As noted below the Democrats conspired to eliminate Sanders from the beginning. The fix was in. Consumers were left holding the bag. This was outright fraud, but you don’t hear Warren asking for an investigation, asking for indictments asking for penalties. When it comes to political fraud that goes your way the consumer advocate remains silent. She is the mother of all hypocrites.

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and John Podesta coordinated and planned the outcome of the Democrat primary, thereby eliminating Bernie Sanders from the start.


Prior to the opening of the Democrat Convention in August, Ms. Wasserman Schultz announced on Sunday she would step down from her post chairing the DNC after the convention. The announcement came after WikiLeaks had released an embarrassing trove of internal DNC communications that showed DNC staff tossing around the narrative that Sen. Bernard Sanders was running a mess of a campaign.

But newly disclosed hacked campaign documents published by WikiLeaks and a hacker who calls himself Guccifer 2.0 reveal in stark terms how Hillary Clinton’s staffers made Super PACs an integral part of her presidential campaign.


  • In a July 2015 memo addressed to Clinton herself, her campaign laid out plans for working with the Democratic National Committee and Correct the Record, a Super PAC. Correct the Record was created by David Brock, a longtime Clinton ally and the founder of Media Matters for America. One section of the memo instructed: “Work with CTR and DNC to publicize specific GOP candidate vulnerabilities.”
  • In October 2015, several Clinton staffers strategized over ways to attack author Ed Klein for attributing an apparently fake quote to former President Bill Clinton in his book. “I’m sure Brock and team would love to go at him. Nick, want me to put you in touch with them?” Clinton campaign communications staffer Christina Reynolds, wrote, referring to Clinton press secretary Nick Merrill. “I can reach out to David,” volunteered Karen Finney, another Clinton staffer on the email chain.
  • A month later, Reynolds emailed a list of agenda items for an upcoming campaign meeting. High on the list: determining how to frame Bernie Sanders, and whether attacks on Republicans “should go through HRC, surrogates, DNC, CTR,” another reference to Correct the Record.


As reported by FOX NEWS, Trump took out the broom yesterday, sweeping all five contests by wide margins.

Click here for yesterday’s results. Note the whooping Hillary took in RI.

Early returns are in, Trump forecasted to sweep CT, MD, RI and PA by wide margins, thereby  slamming the door in Cruz’s and Kasich’s face. Actually, those two contenders never had a chance. Trump’s message is getting across, the insiders are now outsiders, the outsiders are now insiders. As more returns come in we expect Trump to solidify his insurmountable lead. When the votes are fully counted look for Trump to break the 60% barrier. TRUMP

Trump’s yet to be opponent in November, Sanders or Clinton, face a tough challenge. The press has thrown in the towel on Trump all but conceding a Democrat victory. But what do they know?  Hillary Clinton is do disliked that many Democrats will sit out the election; they will be happy to see her lose. Punishing her for lying, cheating, scheming, killing, murdering, conniving, stealing and trafficking,

She has been pandering to those on the dole long enough. Hillary Clinton will get face slapped in November by the American Patriot. We can’t wait for her to step into the ring against Trump. A blood bath for sure.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/04/26/fox-news-projects-trump-wins-md-pa-conn-clinton-wins-md.html?intcmp=hpbt1  (Republicans calling for CRUZ to give it up)hillarydressedup Hillary Clinton has demanded that this photo be removed from the internet. 


The Democrat race in the early going was too close to call. What was once to be a walk in the park, a given, has now turned into horse race. Bernie has torched Clinton to the point that she is now wondering what happened. Whacked by a socialist, gee wasn’t she the socialist, but whacked indeed by a 74 year old curmudgeon from Vermont via N.Y.

Just eight years ago she was whacked by a newcomer from Chicago. Again Clinton is on the defensive, spreading falsehoods, pandering and doing what she does best lying to the American people. According to the latest results, Clinton captured 57% of the vote to Sander’s 43%, but what is telling that Clinton lost most of the state, picking up New York City and the Island on her road to victory.

So what’s the big deal, she won the Black and Hispanic vote, this was expected. The rest of the state told her to go back where you came from.

Click here for both the Republican and Democrat voting map. Very telling when it comes to Clinton’s pyrich victory.  The map spelled loser for Clinton.


Hillary’s once invincible lead has shrunk faster than a popped balloon; now leading Bernie Sanders by a measly 6 points.  Hillary’s campaign is now beginning to acknowledge the seriousness of the issue. In a nut shell, Hillary is one step away from being indicted, the public knows this and is beginning to show distance from the Berning Clinton.  Click here for more from NBC News.


The liar that she is continue on the same path, instead of admitting the truth and dropping our of the race, Hillary Clinton runs with the mouth. This is nothing new, Rodham then Clinton has laughed off, eviscerated, condemned, killed and murdered during the years subsequent to graduating Yale Law School. America and the World knows that she can’t be trusted.  Read below and listen to Fox News by clicking.

On the Friday before Monday’s caucuses, the State Department, which Clinton headed in President Obama’s first term, revealed that it discovered 22 top-secret emails on the private computer server to which Clinton diverted all her governmental email traffic. This acknowledgement marks a radical departure from previous State Department pronouncements and is a direct repudiation of Clinton’s repeated assertions.
She has repeatedly asserted that she neither sent nor received anything “marked classified” using her private email server. The State Department, until last Friday, has backed that up by claiming that while the substance of at least 1,300 of her emails was confidential, secret or top secret, they were not “marked” as such when she dealt with them.
These are word games. First, under the law, nothing is “marked classified.” The markings are “confidential” or “secret” or “top secret,” and Clinton knows this.

Second, under the law, it is not the markings on the email headers that make the contents state secrets; it is the vulnerability of the contents of the emails to impair the government’s national security mission that rationally characterizes them as secrets.
Clinton knows this because she signed an oath on Jan. 22, 2009 recognizing that state secrets retain their secrecy status whether “marked or unmarked” by any of the secrecy designations. She knows as well that, under the law, the secretary of state is charged with knowing state secrets when she comes upon them.
Yet, in order to further Clinton’s deceptive narrative, the State Department has consistently claimed that it retroactively marked at least 1,300 emails as state secrets. It did this until last Friday.
Last Friday, the State Department revealed that 22 emails it found on Clinton’s private server were in fact top secret, and were in fact marked top secret, and were in fact sent to or received from President Obama. This is a revelation that substantially undermines Clinton’s political arguments and is catastrophic to her legal position.

The latest news from Iowa continues to question the results of the Democrat primary. Democrats of Clinton are blaming the numbers others are not so sure, but the questioning continues; did Hillary and her supporters rig the win. The Des Moines Register is calling for a review of the election results.

The Des Moines Register is calling for a “complete audit” of the Iowa Democratic caucuses in light of concerns by Bernie Sanders about the razor-thin margin.

“Once again the world is laughing at Iowa. Late-night comedians and social media mavens are having a field day with jokes about missing caucusgoers and coin flips,” the Register’s editorial board writes Wednesday night.


“That’s fine. We can take ribbing over our quirky process. But what we can’t stomach is even the whiff of impropriety or error,” it wrote.
Hillary Clinton edged out Sanders by just 0.2 percentage points, a margin the Register notes would trigger recounts in other states. Sanders’ campaign has said it is working with its Iowa staff to confirm those results, which the party certified early Tuesday morning.

The caucuses are run differently than a typical primary process.

In the Democrats’ process, voters physically arrange themselves around the room to signal their support for a presidential candidate and are counted by precinct captains. Ties can be settled by coin flips, and reports out of Iowa suggest that a handful of delegates were assigned by pure chance.

That makes a full recount impossible, and a Democratic official confirmed to The Hill Monday night that there is no recount provision.

The Sanders campaign has called on the party to release the raw vote totals at each precinct. Historically, the party only publicly releases how many delegates the candidate won out of each precinct. Sanders has accused the party of failing to staff precincts with independent staffers.

The Register, which endorsed Clinton, is calling for a full audit that would include a release of raw vote totals and the results of coin tosses.

“Too many questions have been raised. Too many accounts have arisen of inconsistent counts, untrained and overwhelmed volunteers, confused voters, cramped precinct locations, a lack of voter registration forms and other problems,” the Register writes.

“Too many of us, including members of the Register editorial board who were observing caucuses, saw opportunities for error amid Monday night’s chaos.”

The Register notes that the party’s refusal to provide additional accountability “confirm[s] the suspicions, wild as they may be, of Sanders supporters.”

“Their candidate, after all, is opposed by the party establishment — and wasn’t even a Democrat a few months ago,” the board writes.

Sam Lau, a spokesperson with the Iowa Democratic Party, told The Hill in a statement that the party is working to address any concerns by the candidates of the “historically close contest.”
“We are working with all campaigns on individual concerns they are bringing to us, and addressing them on a case-by-case basis,” he said.
“Just yesterday, we met with the Sanders campaign who brought us a small amount of specific concerns, and the Clinton campaign has also asked us a small amount of questions. We will look into these concerns and reach out to our county party leadership with any questions.”


When Jim Webb dropped out of the Democratic race for President in October leaving Hillary and Sanders to fight it out. Webb at the time left open the possibility of running an independent run. Is he the Black Swan?

JIM WEBB on Twitter


Webb Attacks Clinton With Eye on Independent Run

Bloomberg20 hours ago

When Jim Webb quit the Democratic presidential race on Oct. 20 amid low poll numbers and …

Daily Caller20 hours ago


Image for the news result

The Virginia Senator has indicated that he is on the verge of making due his threat. This is sending shudders to the very bones of Hillary and her campaign. Of course it remains to be seen if this will have a material effect, but we do know the race will be tight and a 1% swing will be critical. There is no love lost between Webb and Hillary the Killer.

Hillary Clinton’s failed vision in Libya & the Arab Spring are foreign policy leadership at its worst. https://www.facebook.com/IHeardMyCountryCalling/photos/a.240139606175966.1073741828.232634213593172/421407398049185/?type=3