Monthly Archives: October 2018

THIS HAS GOT TO STOP – BUILD THE WALL

913 Comments

Tens of thousand Hondurans are massing for a million man march through Latin America heading toward the United States. This is intolerable. Among them are rapists, criminals, killers and parole violators; many have tried before but been repelled. They have destroyed their country and are hell bent on destroying ours. They’re not coming here because they fear death, they are coming for their economic well being. They will tear down our country like their brethren have torn down theirs. Honduras is one of the poorest countries in the world.

The conquistadors conquered Honduras early on in the fifth century. It was Christopher Columbus and later on his brother Bartholomew who pilfered the Mayan. It was Herman Cortes who finished the job forcing the Maya capitulated. During colonization the majority of Honduras’ indigenous population was killed or died of disease resulting in a more homogenous indigenous population compared to other colonies.

The World Bank categorizes Honduras as a low middle-income nation. The nation’s per capita income sits at around 600 US dollars making it one of the lowest in North America.

In 2010, 50% of the population were still living below the poverty line. By 2016 more than 66% was living below the poverty line. Estimates put unemployment at about 27.9%, which is more than 1.2 million Hondurans.

The proportion of the population below the age of 15 in 2010 was 36.8%, 58.9% were between 15 and 65 years old, and 4.3% were 65 years old or older.

Since 1975, emigration from Honduras has accelerated as economic migrants and political refugees sought a better life elsewhere. A majority of expatriate Hondurans live in the United States. A 2012 US State Department estimate suggested that between 800,000 and one million Hondurans lived in the United States at that time, nearly 15% of the Honduran population. The large uncertainty about numbers is because numerous Hondurans criminals having broke into our country and live in the United States without a visa. In the 2010 census in the United States, 617,392 residents identified as Hondurans, up from 217,569 in 2000.

 

THE GUILTY PLEAD THE FIFTH – THE INNOCENT TELL THE TRUTH

39 Comments

In a Washington Post opinion piece, former Obama-era State Department official Jonathan Winer acknowledged he had regular contact with ex-British spy Christopher Steele, the author of the controversial anti-Trump dossier.

Winer said that Steele alerted him in the summer of 2016 about “disturbing information regarding possible ties between Donald Trump, his campaign and senior Russian officials.” The two met in Washington in September 2016 to discuss what is now known as the “dossier.”

After he reviewed the documents, Winer said, he shared a summary with Victoria Nuland, the former assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs.

In February, Nuland confirmed to CBS News’ “Face the Nation” that the Steele dossier came to the attention of the State Department in July 2016.

“He [Steele] passed two to four pages of short points of what he was finding, and our immediate reaction to that was, ‘This is not in our purview,'” Nuland said. “‘This needs to go to the FBI, if there is any concern here that one candidate or the election as a whole might be influenced by the Russian Federation. That’s something for the FBI to investigate.'”

Nuland went further, saying that “our reaction when we saw this [was] … we can’t evaluate this. And frankly, if every member of the campaign who the Russians tried to approach and tried to influence had gone to the FBI as well in real time, we might not be in the mess we’re in today.”

Another person caught up in the dossier handoff is David J. Kramer, a former State Department official and associate of the late Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. In November 2016, he traveled to Surrey, England, to meet with and be briefed by Steele on the dossier. According to British court records reviewed by Fox, Steele told the British court that an arrangement was made so that Fusion GPS’s Simpson would provide hard copies of the dossier to McCain via Kramer.

In January 2017 the late Senator’s office posted to their website: “Late last year, I received sensitive information that has since been made public. Upon examination of the contents, and unable to make a judgment about their accuracy, I delivered the information to the Director of the FBI. That has been the extent of my contact with the FBI or any other government agency regarding this issue.”

Earlier this year, in an interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier, former FBI Director James Comey seemed vague about the dossier, when he learned about it as well as its political origins.

“Sometime in the fall (2016), I don’t remember exactly when,” Comey said, “I remember they briefed me on it, explained that it came from a reliable source I remember being given a copy of it I don’t know if it was September (sic) October some period in that time.”

Other information about Russian hacking was also provided to the FBI in 2016 by lawyer Michael Sussmann, whose firm, Perkins Coie, commissioned Simpson’s firm for the dossier. The FBI’s former general counsel, James Baker, recently confirmed that revelation during a closed-door deposition on Capitol Hill, say sources close to the congressional investigation.

A spokesman for Sussmann said in a recent statement: “Prior to joining Perkins Coie, Michael Sussmann served as a cybercrime prosecutor in the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice during both Republican and Democratic administrations. As a result, Sussmann is regularly retained by clients with complex cybersecurity matters.

“When Sussmann met with Mr. Baker on behalf of a client, it was not connected to the firm’s representation of the Hillary Clinton Campaign, the DNC or any Political Law Group client.”

Senate Oversight Committee Chairman Ron Johnson, R-Wis., sent a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray on Friday requesting all documents about Sussmann’s contact with the FBI, as well as the memos that document allegations Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein considered secretly taping the president. Rosenstein and the House Judiciary panel failed to agree on terms for his Capitol Hill appearance this week.

Fox News asked Sussmann’s spokesperson for additional comment in light of the Senate letter, but there was no immediate response.

DEMOCRATS WANT TO COUNT YOU OUT

215 Comments

Trump stumping for Hawley in bid to unseat McCaskill

Republican Senate candidate Josh Hawley delighted by the president’s endorsement in Missouri.

Josh Hawley, the Missouri Republican looking to unseat U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill in November, slammed the Democratic incumbent for opposing the 2020 U.S. Census question inquiring about citizenship status, saying McCaskill wants to give more power to California.

“Sen. McCaskill would love to give more representation to California. That’s what will happen,” Hawley, the state attorney general, said in an interview with the Washington Times.

He asserted that McCaskill’s aversion to the census question shows she’s beholden to the Democratic Party rather than her constituents in the Show Me State.

“Places like California and New York that have greater numbers of illegal immigrants, they are going to end up with more representation, and we’ll lose seats. She is fine with that, though,” he added. “That just strikes people in Missouri as craziness. They just don’t understand it. I don’t understand it.””Places like California and New York that have greater numbers of illegal immigrants, they are going to end up with more representation, and we’ll lose seats. She is fine with that, though.”

— Missouri Republican Senate candidate Josh Hawley

CENSUS RESPONDENTS MAY BE ASKED CITIZENSHIP STATUS IN 2020 SURVEY

The move to quiz U.S. residents on their citizenship status is a controversial one, dividing Washington along partisan lines. The Supreme Court will ultimately decide whether the question will appear on the census.

The citizenship question is controversial because House seats are apportioned by population, which includes everyone counted by the census. But critics say it would reduce the response rates by illegal immigrants who fear their information could be used to deport them. McCaskill herself criticized the proposal, calling it “blatantly political” and demanding a Senate panel hearing on the issue.

Republicans, meanwhile, said the citizen question is important to get a clear picture of the U.S. makeup.

Controversy surrounds citizenship question for 2020 censusVideo

VULNERABLE DEMS MCCASKILL, SINEMA TO ATTEND FUNDRAISER THROWN BY DONOR WHO CALLED TRUMP SUPPORTERS ‘TRAITORS,’ ‘LOW IQ’

The issue fits well into Hawley’s campaign to unseat McCaskill in a red state. He portrayed the Democrat as a pawn of the Democratic Party rather than the independent senator she often claims to be.

The Republican criticized McCaskill’s “no” vote on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation, saying the vote proves she’s following her party’s “extreme agenda.”

Sen. McCaskill says she'll vote 'no' on Judge KavanaughVideo

“Block conservative judges, throw open our borders, raise taxes on the middle class. That is their agenda,” he told the Washington Times. “They are hungry for power, and they will do just about anything to get it.

“That, versus the agenda that this state voted for in 2016, which is to rebuild this country. It is a stark choice and that choice is on the ballot,” he added.

The race between Hawley and McCaskill is in a dead heat, with the latest poll showing the Republican leading by 1 point.

McCaskill’s campaign didn’t respond to Fox News’ request for a comment.

Lukas Mikelionis is a reporter for FoxNews.com. Follow him on Twitter @LukasMikelionis.

ANARCHISTS (CLINTON-HOLDER) DECLARE WAR AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION

54 Comments

Democrat Loonies on the war path. And none other than the ex-Attorney General, Eric Holder (family roots from Barbados – were they undocumented?) . No doubt he and Obama are racists, guilty not by association but by word to the extreme that manifest White privilege and extreme Black bias. There is not a gun control law in the country that they don’t hate and why? Because they know full well who will suffer the most in an all out mano y mano shoot out.

During a meeting with a House subcommittee, Holder argued that the behavior (standing in a menacing way while brandishing a weapon) of the New Black Panther Party was not comparable to historical voter intimidation against minorities, which often involved acts of violence and murder. Holder said, “When you compare what people endured in the South in the ’60s to try to get the right to vote for African Americans, to compare what people subjected to that with what happened in Philadelphia… I think does a great disservice to people who put their lives on the line for my people. (indication of extremism, radicalism, racism)

See, the problem here is simply defined; they lost large. No longer can they count on legislation from the bench. Therefore, like little babies soiling their diapers, crying because they want attention, these malcontents are waging war against our Constitution, against law abiding Americans. They can’t sit idly by waiting for the political process to unfold, but seek to destroy democracy by raging war, breaking laws as they go. They seek ANARCHY.

CLICK HERE –LISTEN TO CLINTON AS SHE DECLARES WAR.

DIARRHEA FLOWS FROM HILLARY CLINTON’S FILTHY TRAP

6 Comments

Imagine this,  HRC, a lying dirt bag who got her ass handed to her on November 8, 2016, still can’t get over the pounding she received. And so, what does she do, she shoots diarrhea from the mouth hoping it will stick. Fat chance! The latest; She rejected the idea that Democrats should be “civil” with Republicans in the age of Donald Trump, embracing a more confrontational and aggressive political approach.

“You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about,” Clinton said.

Is she calling for a civil war? It seems like it, doesn’t it.

Imagine this putrid con artist, a product of the Saul Alinsky school of confrontation and personal take down and a sore loser to boot, threatening physical violence. A dastardly woman who had no guts to address her constituents on election eve because she was dead drunk with pants gone yellow.

During the heat of the campaign, way back in September 2016, Donald Trump said that he would not necessarily accept the results of the presidential election in the event that Hillary Clinton defeated him, reversing his statement four days earlier that he would “absolutely” respect them.

Come full circle, Hillary “jail the bird” Clinton runs with “da mout.”

CLINTON: There are lots of questions about its legitimacy, and we don’t have a method for contesting that in our system. That is why I have long advocated for an independent commission to get to the bottom of what happened.

Look, this is the first time we have ever been attacked by a foreign adversary, and then they suffer no real consequences. 

ANTIFA THUGS

8 Comments

Stunning video out of Portland shows leftist  (CLICK FOR VIDEO)Antifa thugs trying to block and direct traffic while threatening anyone who doesn’t obey with violence and calling them “white supremacists”.

The footage, which was filmed on Saturday, shows a group of about 20 leftists gathered at an intersection.

Andy C. Ngo
✔
@MrAndyNgo
This is the type of street anarchy that routinely happens where I live. Here is video from 6 Oct showing Antifa directing traffic in downtown & threatening people who don’t obey with violence. Mayor @tedwheeler, who really runs this town?

10:48 AM – Oct 8, 2018
26.4K
22.1K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Several members of the group attempt to direct traffic, blocking cars from turning left for no apparent reason while hurling obscenities at drivers.

“Just go that way,” one obese woman tells a driver. When he asks why, she snaps back, “Because I told you to!”

“Yeah, you little white little f**ker!” shouts another man wearing a black hoodie (despite being white himself).

The leftists then accuse the driver of “blocking traffic,” despite the fact that it is they who are blocking traffic.

The group then accuses the driver of being a “white supremacist” because he is from North Carolina.

“Go back to North Carolina where you came from. We don’t need your KKK in Portland Oregon!” shouts the man in the hoodie.

Another black man is also seen repeatedly threatening physical violence, shouting, “You’re lucky you didn’t hit me I’d have beat your ass!” at one pick up truck driver.

A female driver then confronts the leftists, telling them, “I pay my bills, shut the f**k up.”

At the end of the clip, one of the thugs strikes the back of a car after it beeps at him.

At one point, the footage show a police officer at the end of the block but he doesn’t appear interested in intervening.

Another clip shows an elderly man being chased down while one of the leftists encourages the others to beat him up.

Andy C. Ngo
✔
@MrAndyNgo
Replying to @MrAndyNgo
And here is video of an elderly man who didn’t heed their street orders — so they chased him down. #Portland

10:50 AM – Oct 8, 2018
9,802
8,759 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
“This is the type of street anarchy that routinely happens where I live. Here is video from 6 Oct showing Antifa directing traffic in downtown & threatening people who don’t obey with violence. Mayor @tedwheeler, who really runs this town?” commented journalist Andy Ngo.

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.

ECONOMIC DISASTER AHEAD – CLOUDS ARE FORMING

125 Comments

John Maynard Keynes, Milton Friedman, Adam Smith, legacy economists and monetarists to boot, who with religious verve touted their economic theories during the past three centuries.  All three of them believed, one way or another, that the economy can be fine tuned to perfection by the government or in the case Smith, left free of individuals to make their own purchase and supply decisions. Only one thing has gotten in their way and that is the printer of money, the central bank, has proved them wrong time and time again. However, we must admit that all of them had a good run.

Money by definition is a medium of exchange. After all you can’t walk into an auto dealer and exchange 30,000 bananas for a SUV, but the dealer will gladly accept $30,000 U.S. dollars. And in turn he deposits the dollars in to the bank for safe keeping. When needed he makes a withdrawal to exchange them for something else; this goes on and on in a loop of economic activity that keeps the economy churning. But what happens when the dollar is no longer accepted in return? Either of two things, one the seller of goods may require more dollars than before or as was the case until 1933 the holder of dollars could exchange them for a fixed amount of gold. So there was protection, a backup to the dollar; a universally excepted store of value going back millennium. That was the case until FDR closed the-gold exchange window in 1933.

As we enter the next decade (2020) storm clouds are not only forming on the horizon but rising as well. China and Japan for instance hold at least a trillion of our debt. One of these days it will occur to them that a different form of foreign exchange is needed. Notice that today, the dollar is not as good as gold. Gold will soon see its value as the medium of exchange throughout the world. Printing paper and creating money out of nothing has been tried before resulting in economic disasters. Ask Venezuela how are they doing?

Be aware of the Black Swan, an event that will occur, but is seldom expected. This is the caveat. Governments will always take advantage of a crisis; just ask our good old friend Rahm Emanuel. He knows all too well how to hammer down.

Today’s gold consensus on gold has a pessimistic bias, optimism languishes, however when the dark overtakes the light or when fear overtakes reason, expect the unexpected. Today’s markets show a robust stock market and a dissed precious metal market. Be reminded that they can turn on a dime. That doesn’t mean the bias to the downside won’t change in an instant; again a heads-up is worth listening too. Several times during the past century unforeseen events have occurred without notice. Take for instance the FDR edict that United States citizens turn in their gold. Imagine if that happened today? Major insurrection would occur.

The question remains though, when will the almighty dollar implode AND INFLATION SKYROCKET? OUR BET IS THAT IT IS COMING SOONER THAN ANYONE THINKS. Good times can’t last forever. 

CONFIRMED – A GREAT DAY FOR AMERICA

312 Comments

Today was a great day for America. The Senate confirmed a highly, maybe most qualified Justice to the Supreme Court, Judge Kavanaugh. The Democrats will never forget the head crushing defeat they incurred today.

The Republicans stood together to the very end. Great Job goes to Senator Mitch McConnell.

What brought us to this point was the very fact that America could not be duped by Hillary Clinton and the rest of her clan. Now the job to TAKE AMERICA BACK will turn to the Supreme Court. First on our list is the 14th Amendment. See below for details. Congratulations to the Republicans for a job well done. But please don’t turn your back for an instant as the Democrats have knife in hand and will stab you when you are not looking.

14TH AMENDMENT

Posted on  by 

Two years after the Civil War, the Reconstruction Acts of 1867 divided the South into five military districts, where new state governments, based on universal manhood suffrage, were to be established. Thus began the period known as Radical Reconstruction, which saw the 14th Amendment, which had been passed by Congress in 1866, ratified in July 1868. The amendment resolved pre-Civil War questions of African American citizenship by stating that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States…are citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside.” The amendment then reaffirmed the privileges and rights of all citizens, and granted all these citizens the “equal protection of the laws.”

AN UN-GOING CRIME IS BEING COMMITTED – THE SUPREME COURT MUST ONCE AGAIN MUST STEP IN AND ADJUDICATE

the jurisdiction thereof.”

Overwhelming evidence against the interpretation of “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” or “not subject to any foreign power” as reaffirming the common law doctrine of citizenship by birth to aliens can be found following the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. In 1867 George Helm Yeaman, United States Minister to Denmark, in his well received treatise on allegiance and citizenship, which was presented to Secretary of State William H. Seward, said: “But the idea of a double allegiance and citizenship united in the same person, and having reference to two separate, independent, and sovereign nations or governments, is simply an impossibility.”

In the year 1873 the United States Attorney General ruled the word “jurisdiction” under the Fourteenth Amendment to mean, which Justice Gray would recognize in Elk v.Wilkins years later:

The word “jurisdiction” must be understood to mean absolute and complete jurisdiction, such as the United States had over its citizens before the adoption of this amendment… Aliens, among whom are persons born here and naturalized abroad, dwelling or being in this country, are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States only to a limited extent. Political and military rights and duties do not pertain to them. (14 Op. Atty-Gen. 300.)

House Report No. 784, dated June 22, 1874, stated, “The United States have not recognized a double allegiance. By our law a citizen is bound to be ‘true and faithful’ alone to our government.” There is no way in the world anyone can claim “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” affirms the feudal common law doctrine of birth citizenship to aliens because such doctrine by operation creates a “double allegiance” between separate nations.

If there is one inescapable truth to the text and debates, it is this: When Congress decided to require potential citizens to first be subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States they by default excluded all citizens of other nations temporarily residing in the U.S. who had no intention of becoming citizens themselves or, disqualified of doing so under naturalization laws. This was no oversight because it was too simple to declare the common law rule of jus soli if indeed that was truly the desired goal by these very competent lawyers (both Howard and Trumbull were lawyers).

Aaron Sargent, a Representative from California during the Naturalization Act of 1870 debates said the Fourteenth Amendment’s citizenship clause was not a de-facto right for aliens to obtain citizenship. No one came forward to dispute this conclusion.

Perhaps because he was absolutely correct.

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS BLOG

"Where Revolution is the Solution" Taking back the Empire