OBAMA – THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE

UPDATE: NEED WE SAY MORE – TIME TO ARREST OBAMA FOR SEDITION

Obama administration granted citizenship to 2,500 Iranians during nuclear deal: Iran official

The Obama administration granted citizenship to 2,500 Iranians, including family members of government officials, while negotiating the Iran nuclear deal, a senior cleric and member of parliament has claimed.

Hojjat al-Islam Mojtaba Zolnour, who is chairman of Iran’s parliamentary nuclear committee and a member of its national security and foreign affairs committee, made the allegations during an interview with the country’s Etemad newspaper, cited by the country’s Fars News agency.

He claimed it was done as a favor to senior Iranian officials linked to President Hassan Rouhani, and he alleged the move sparked a competition among Iranian officials over whose children would benefit from the scheme.

The Washington Post

The Manchurian Candidate Poster

 – – Sunday, July 1, 2018

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

After returning from a tour of some of the war zones in the Middle East — which ended with the Free Iran Gathering 2018 in Paris — I am struck by the realization that America really did have a Manchurian Candidate in The White House for eight years. If you look at the evidence, there really is no other conclusion. The calamitous consequences of the Obama presidency will be felt for the foreseeable future.

In the short year and a half that President Trump has been in office, he has put in place policy that has mitigated the damage that President Obama inflicted on our national security and on our allies. The speed with which Trump has been able to turn things around points to the diabolical depths the Obama administration went to in order to undermine our national strength and way of life. All Trump had to do was stop doing things that hurt America; America could then take care of itself. The results are plain as day. However, it will take decades for the Obama damage to be completely undone. The deviousness of the Obama sedition runs deep.

Think about it or a moment. If you wanted peace in the Middle East, why would you throw away the trillions of dollars spent, as well as the lives of thousands of American souls, by irresponsibly pulling out ALL American troops from Iraq? No matter your thoughts on starting the war, pulling out was an irresponsible thing to do. We still have troops in Germany, Korea and Japan, for God’s sake. Why? For stability, that’s why. As Colin Powell said, we broke it, now we own it. It was a given that instability would follow the force withdrawal. When you combine this act with the reality that Obama never really did try to defeat the Islamic State, what conclusion can you come up with? Trump defeated them in a few months. The conclusion is obvious: Obama really didn’t want to destroy them.

Why did Obama and Hillary take down Moammar Gadhafi, who had already given up his nuclear weapons? Was it to destabilize Libya, where ISIS could gain another foothold? Why did Obama help install the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt? What was the agenda behind the so-called Arab Spring?

However, the coup-de-grace of anti-American activity was the JCPOA, or, to say it another way, the agreement to give Iran everything it wanted, including nuclear weapons and money — lots of money — which it immediately used to further destabilize the region, and existentially threaten the only democracy in the Middle East, Israel. To take it a step further, why didn’t Obama support the opposition against the Mullahs in 2009 when there was an obvious chance for regime change in Iran? Why didn’t Obama confront Bashar Assad’s chemical weapons use? One of the main unanswered questions is what ties did Valerie Jarrett really have to the Iranian regime?

I won’t go into why Obama ran up more debt for the United States than all previous presidents combined. I won’t ask why he weakened our armed forces. I won’t ask why he used tyrannical policies, like using the agencies of the federal government to go after his political opposition. I won’t ask why he politicized our security apparatus in an attempt to frame President Trump.

What I will say is that there was a big fox in the hen house for eight long years. Eight long years for people like Brennan, Hillary, Kerry, Clapper, Comey and Jarrett to really hurt us regarding our safety and security.

Trump has a lot of house cleaning to do. Thank goodness he’s being quick about it.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

Popular In the Community
PAUL MANAFORT CASE RULING LED TO ROBERT MUELLER’S EXTENSIVE INVESTIGATION
Michael
11h
We are finally at the point that it doesn’t matter what President Trump does with the DOJ … the dims will scream and holler and the rino’s will support them … however, the sane folks, i.e., real patriots have had enough and want the witch hunt to be over. I personally want mueller fired and investigated himself. Sedition and treason, i.e., trying to unseat a legally elected President is a crime and in my opinion mueller is definitely guilty.
AP FACT CHECK: TRUMP’S TAX ‘MIRACLE,’ IMMIGRATION FLIP-FLOPS
OliveUmbrella
15m
What? Trump´s alternative facts checked in The Washington Times….OMG!!!
PETER FONDA: BARRON TRUMP SHOULD BE ‘RIPPED’ FROM MELANIA, PLACED IN ‘CAGE WITH PEDOPHILES’
BlueCoathanger
20 Jun
Most definitely the brother of his sister.
MICHAEL MOORE’S MADNESS: WE MUST ‘PUT OUR BODIES ON THE LINE’
OrangeFries
2d
“The despair that I have in going forward and making movies is when are people going to get off the couch and when are we going to rise up. The only way that we’re going to stop this is eventually we’re all going to have to put our bodies on the line. You’re going to have to be willing to do this.Oh, that’s rich coming from Jabba the Hutt…that guy couldn’t get off his couch if his life depended upon it…
SUPREME COURT DELIVERS ON TRUMP’S PROMISES TO RESTORE THE LAW
Waiting4Godot
14h
Not tired of winning, but I am getting tired of the whining. November can’t get here soon enough to suit me.
THE THIN LINE BETWEEN DENOUNCING SPEECH AND REGULATING IT
Zorba dog
21h
Discus is the American Gestapo. If you are banned on Discus you will be banned on every publication that subscribes to Discus.
MAGGIE HASSAN DEFENDS INTERN CAITLIN MARRIOTT’S ONE-WEEK SUSPENSION FOR YELLING ‘F– YOU’ AT TRUMP
Jay Hanig
5d
I wonder how outraged the good Senatress would be if her intern had shouted in a similar manner to Obama. Would there be a different standard applied? Do I even have to ask?
DEMOCRATS’ 1968 RERUN WILL HAVE A NOVEMBER LIKE LAST
donald sjulstad
9h
George Soros politics……
DONALD TRUMP’S NORTH KOREA SANCTIONS DEADLINE TOO LONG FOR TRADERS
Dave Miller
25m
Due to North Korea continuing to enrich uranium, now is the time to STEP UP sanctions!
NSA DELETES 685 MILLION CALL RECORDS OBTAINED SINCE 2015
fastboat
22h
All the phone records between Hillary and obama were the first to go, then all of Hillary’s other calls, then all the records of calls to and from the the Clinton Foundation.
THE DEMOCRATS FLIRT WITH AN OLD FANTASY
formwiz
3d
When socialism arrived in America in the clothes of the Democratic Party, it was 86 years ago and wore the cigar holder of Franklin Roosevelt. It’s interesting to note that Mizz Ocasio-Cortez is advocating many of the same things the last Democrat President did, for which Donald Trump is winning accolades for destroying.In truth, it isn’t the Democrats flirtation with an old fantasy as much as it is their flirtation with their perpetual fantasy. This is the same hustle they’ve been offering for a very long time and only those softer in the head than they are in the heart buy it.She’ll probably win the race, but that’s because it’s the Bronx. In other precincts where reality reigns, she may not fare so well.
CONOR BERRY, THE REPUBLICAN REPORTER, RESIGNS OVER FALSE CLAIM CAPITAL SHOOTER WORE MAGA HAT
Rachel Guess
2d
He got what he deserved. Journalists actually confirm what they are writing before putting it in print, via tweets or otherwise. Perhaps this little incident will cause other liberals to actually think before making stupid claims…oops, I put the words think and liberals in the same sentence and I know they are oxymorons.
‘EVEN A BLIND PERSON’ CAN SEE MUELLER USING MANAFORT TO ‘TARGET’ TRUMP: FEDERAL JUDGE
commenter399
3d
Author: It is President Trump, you may hate him, but show some respect and address him correctly.
HOW LEGAL IMMIGRANTS CONTRIBUTE TO THE ECONOMY
RedPin
10h
The author is completely disinformed and absolutely disconnected from the reality… The fact that respectable news outlet prints something like that is just terrifying… Highly skilled????? why do they need to be trained by Americans they are replacing???? The worst part is that there is no more diversity in American IT. It takes one manager from India to replace all Americans in the company. If the manager is Indian, Americans should not even bother to try to get a job …. Diversity …. Wow….the conference room in your office will be called Taj Mahal no joke…. how many well educated Americans with masters and PHDs loosing their jobs and livelihoods will it take for the media to see the reality and for our government to take action and take care of their own citizens???? Indian managers are the worst because they are slave drivers , worst racists and create atmosphere of fear and secrecy and will fire you the moment you protest…. that’s the reality …
DONALD TRUMP’S SUPREME COURT NOMINATION TO PRESSURE RED-STATE DEMOCRATS
Nemesis Winterborn
12h
1973 Roe v. Wade decision, saying such a position would violate respect for judicial precedent. Uh… You mean like after they changed their minds about slavery?

 

JAIL THE BIRD – GAVE STATE SECRETS TO RUSSIA IN RETURN FOR DONATIONS

The Clinton Foundation was awash with Russian rubles that came pouring in non stop subsequent to Hillary Clinton bartering away our defense secrets for donations to the Clinton Foundation. This is treason. Why hasn’t the Bird been Jailed?

From the Wall Street Journal

Hillary Clinton touts her tenure as secretary of state as a time of hardheaded realism and “commercial diplomacy” that advanced American national and commercial interests. But her handling of a major technology transfer initiative at the heart of Washington’s effort to “reset” relations with Russia raises serious questions about her record. Far from enhancing American national interests, Mrs. Clinton’s efforts in this area may have substantially undermined U.S. national security.

Consider Skolkovo, an “innovation city” of 30,000 people on the outskirts of Moscow, billed as Russia’s version of Silicon Valley—and a core piece of Mrs. Clinton’s quarterbacking of the Russian reset.

Following his 2009 visit to Moscow, President Obama announced the creation of the U.S.-Russia Bilateral Presidential Commission. Mrs. Clinton as secretary of state directed the American side, and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov represented the Russians. The stated goal at the time: “identifying areas of cooperation and pursuing joint projects and actions that strengthen strategic stability, international security, economic well-being, and the development of ties between the Russian and American people.”

The Kremlin committed $5 billion over three years to fund Skolkovo. Mrs. Clinton’s State Department worked aggressively to attract U.S. investment partners and helped the Russian State Investment Fund, Rusnano, identify American tech companies worthy of Russian investment. Rusnano, which a scientific adviser to President Vladimir Putin called “Putin’s child,” was created in 2007 and relies entirely on Russian state funding.

What could possibly go wrong?

RELATED ARTICLES

Hillary’s Strange Security Adviser
The Clinton Business Model . . .
Putin and Those Democratic Emails
Soon, dozens of U.S. tech firms, including top Clinton Foundation donors like Google, Intel and Cisco, made major financial contributions to Skolkovo, with Cisco committing a cool $1 billion. In May 2010, the State Department facilitated a Moscow visit by 22 of the biggest names in U.S. venture capital—and weeks later the first memorandums of understanding were signed by Skolkovo and American companies.
By 2012 the vice president of the Skolkovo Foundation, Conor Lenihan—who had previously partnered with the Clinton Foundation—recorded that Skolkovo had assembled 28 Russian, American and European “Key Partners.” Of the 28 “partners,” 17, or 60%, have made financial commitments to the Clinton Foundation, totaling tens of millions of dollars, or sponsored speeches by Bill Clinton.

Russians tied to Skolkovo also flowed funds to the Clinton Foundation. Andrey Vavilov, the chairman of SuperOx, which is part of Skolkovo’s nuclear-research cluster, donated between $10,000 and $25,000 (donations are reported in ranges, not exact amounts) to the Clinton’s family charity. Skolkovo Foundation chief and billionaire Putin confidant Viktor Vekselberg also gave to the Clinton Foundation through his company, Renova Group.

Amid all the sloshing of Russia rubles and American dollars, however, the state-of-the-art technological research coming out of Skolkovo raised alarms among U.S. military experts and federal law-enforcement officials. Research conducted in 2012 on Skolkovo by the U.S. Army Foreign Military Studies Program at Fort Leavenworth declared that the purpose of Skolkovo was to serve as a “vehicle for world-wide technology transfer to Russia in the areas of information technology, biomedicine, energy, satellite and space technology, and nuclear technology.”

Moreover, the report said: “the Skolkovo Foundation has, in fact, been involved in defense-related activities since December 2011, when it approved the first weapons-related project—the development of a hypersonic cruise missile engine. . . . Not all of the center’s efforts are civilian in nature.”

Technology can have multiple uses—civilian and military. But in 2014 the Boston Business Journal ran an op-ed placed by the FBI, and noted that the agency had sent warnings to technology and other companies approached by Russian venture-capital firms. The op-ed—under the byline of Lucia Ziobro, an assistant special agent at the FBI’s Boston office—said that “The FBI believes the true motives of the Russian partners, who are often funded by their government, is to gain access to classified, sensitive, and emerging technology from the companies.”

Ms. Ziobro also wrote that “The [Skolkovo] foundation may be a means for the Russian government to access our nation’s sensitive or classified research development facilities and dual-use technologies with military and commercial application.”

To anyone who was paying attention, the FBI’s warnings should have come as little surprise. A State Department cable sent to then-Secretary Clinton (and obtained via WikiLeaks) mentioned possible “dual use and export control concerns” related to research and development technology ventures with Moscow. And in its own promotional literature Skolkovo heralded the success of its development of the Atlant hybrid airship.

“Particularly noteworthy is Atlant’s ability to deliver military cargoes,” boasts the Made in Skolkovo publication: “The introduction of this unique vehicle is fully consistent with the concept of creating a mobile army and opens up new possibilities for mobile use of the means of radar surveillance, air and missile defense, and delivery of airborne troops.”

Even if it could be proven that these tens of millions of dollars in Clinton Foundation donations by Skolkovo’s key partners played no role in the Clinton State Department’s missing or ignoring obvious red flags about the Russian enterprise, the perception would still be problematic. (Neither the Clinton campaign nor the Clinton Foundation responded to requests for comment.) What is known is that the State Department recruited and facilitated the commitment of billions of American dollars in the creation of a Russian “Silicon Valley” whose technological innovations include Russian hypersonic cruise-missile engines, radar surveillance equipment, and vehicles capable of delivering airborne Russian troops.

A Russian reset, indeed.

Mr. Schweizer is president of the Government Accountability Institute and the author of “ Clinton Cash.” A larger report on the subject of this article is available at Cronyism.com.

 

 

 

What is more egregious is the Clinton response to Chris Wallace’s interview. She said that the FBI chief honcho gave her a clean bill of health. Lies keep pouring out of her mouth, verbal diarrhea from a killer. None other than the Washington Post to her to task. When they were through Hillary Clinton was eviscerated like a skinned catlies

CNN)The Washington Post’s Fact Checkers awarded Hillary Clinton four “Pinocchios” — their worst rating — after the former Secretary of State defended her use of a private email server in an interview Sunday by claiming the FBI director said she had been “truthful” about the subject.

In the interview on Fox News Sunday, Clinton had defended her use of a private email server, saying “[FBI Director James Comey] said my answers were truthful, and what I’ve said is consistent with what I have told the American people, that there were decisions discussed and made to classify retroactively certain of the emails.”
But the Fact Checkers at the Washington Post weren’t buying it.
“Clinton is cherry-picking statements by Comey to preserve her narrative about the unusual setup of a private email server. This allows her to skate past the more disturbing findings of the FBI investigation,” they wrote.
Parsing Clinton’s public statements and comparing them to Comey’s congressional testimony, the Post’s Fact Checkers determined that while Clinton’s answers to the FBI during its investigation may have been truthful, that description couldn’t reasonably be extended to everything she’s said in public — parts of which apparently contradict Comey’s description of the server.
As the Post’s Fact Checkers explained, “As we have seen repeatedly in Clinton’s explanations of the email controversy, she relies on excessively technical and legalistic answers to explain her actions. While Comey did say there was no evidence she lied to the FBI, that is not the same as saying she told the truth to the American public — which was the point of [Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace’s] question. Comey has repeatedly not taken a stand on her public statements.”
The Post continued, “Although Comey did say many emails were retroactively classified, he also said that there were some emails that were already classified that should not have been sent on an unclassified, private server. That’s the uncomfortable truth that Clinton has trouble admitting.”
Clinton campaign spokesperson Brian Fallon responded to the Washington Post’s verdict on Monday in an interview on MSNBC.
“I think that the question she got yesterday was sort of suggesting that she had misrepresented things to the American people over the last several months,” Fallon said,
“And what she attempted to indicate in her response was that Director Comey was very clear when he was asked in the hearing before Congress last month about the nature of the answers that she gave in her interview to the Justice Department. And Director Comey’s response was quite clear, that he had no reason to believe anything that she ever said to the Justice Department was at all untruthful, and what she was indicating in that interview to Chris Wallace was what she said to those Justice Department interviewers was entirely consistent with what she has said to the public for the last several months, and the many questions we’ve answered on this issue.”

(click)Washington Post hits Clinton with four ‘Pinnochios’ on emails