|
Tea Party Views |
|
|
|
“IN GOD WE TRUST” |
||
|
“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776
For God and Country
|
|
|
| Dear American liberals, leftists, social progressives, socialists, Marxists and Obama supporters, et al: We have stuck together since the late 1950’s for the sake of the kids, but the whole of this latest election process has made me realize that I want a divorce. I know we tolerated each other for many years for the sake of future generations, but sadly, this relationship has clearly run its course.
Our two ideological sides of America cannot and will not ever agree on what is right for us all, so let’s just end it on friendly terms. We can smile and chalk it up to irreconcilable differences and go our own way. Here is our separation agreement: Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass each taking a similar portion. That will be the difficult part, but I am sure our two sides can come to a friendly agreement. After that, it should be relatively easy! Our respective representatives can effortlessly divide other assets since both sides have such distinct and disparate tastes. We don’t like re-distributive taxes so you can keep them. You are welcome to the liberal judges and the ACLU. Since you hate guns and war, we’ll take our firearms, the cops, the NRA and the military. We’ll take the nasty, smelly oil industry and the coal mines, and you can go with wind, solar and bio diesel. You can keep Oprah, Michael Moore and Rosie O’Donnell. You are, however, responsible for finding a bio-diesel vehicle big enough to move all three of them. We’ll keep capitalism, greedy corporations, pharmaceutical companies, Wal-Mart and Wall Street. You can have your beloved lifelong welfare dwellers, food stamps, homeless, homeboys, hippies, druggies and illegal aliens. We’ll keep the hot Alaskan hockey moms, greedy CEO’s and rednecks. We’ll keep Bill O’Reilly, and Bibles and give you NBC, Sharpton and Hollywood . You can make nice with Iran and Palestine and we’ll retain the right to invade and hammer places that threaten us. You can have the peaceniks and war protesters. We’ll keep our Judeo-Christian values. You are welcome to Islam, Scientology, Humanism, political correctness and Shirley McClain. You can also have the U.N. but we will no longer be paying the bill. We’ll keep the SUV’s, pickup trucks and over sized luxury cars. You can take every Volt and Leaf you can find. You can give everyone health care if you can find any practicing doctors. We’ll keep “The Battle Hymn of the Republic” and “The National Anthem.” I’m sure you’ll be happy to substitute “Imagine”, “I’d Like to Teach the World to Sing”, “Kum Ba Ya” or “We Are the World”. We’ll practice trickle-down economics and you can continue to give trickle up poverty your best shot. Since it often so offends you, we’ll keep our history, our name and our flag. Would you agree to this? If so, please pass it along to other like-minded liberal and conservative patriots and if you do not agree, just hit delete. In the spirit of friendly parting, I’ll bet you might think about which one of us will need whose help in 15 years. Sincerely, P.S.S. And you won’t have to press 1 for English when you call our country. Forward This Every Time You Get It ! Let’s Keep This Going, Maybe Some Of It Will Start Sinking In!! |
||
| Tony Passaro 843-520-6110 apassarorr@gmail.com Bel Air Tea Party Patriots Alliance of Americands Patriots Campaign For Liberty American for Prosperity Maryland Fair Tax American Tea Party Movement |
||
Category Archives: Uncategorized
SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT THIS HALLOWEEN – “SPIRIT”
Five hundred years ago Martin Luther posted his 95 Theses on the door of All Saints’ Church at Wittenberg Germany, the date, October 31, 1517. The Protestant Revolution had begun. As Luther told his accusers at the 1521 council known as the Diet of Worms:
“unless I am convicted by Scripture and plain reason-I do not accept the authority of popes and councils, for they have contradicted each other-my conscience is captive to the word of God.I am bound by the Scriptures I have quoted and my conscience is captive to the Word of God. I cannot and will not recant anything, since it is neither safe nor right to go against conscience. May God help me. Amen.”
Luther tapped into the root of revolutionary change: the human desire to know God. Luther contribution to the modern world: a doctrine of freedom of conscience, rooted in a religious view of human nature and the outward authority should compel or create.” What set Luther ablaze was the Church accepting coin from the poor for absolution although the Church’s wealth was greater than Crassus (the wealthiest man in Roman history). He built the Roman empire.
What we are leading into here is not the proposition that all religions are equal or that anyone should be dictated to by religious leaders that is adverse to their moral character. The point here is to remember that it is a spirit that leads us onto the path of righteousness.
The word spirit is often used metaphysically to refer to the consciousness or personality. The notions of a person’s spirit and souloften also overlap, as both contrast with body and both are believed to survive the bodily death in religion and occultism, and “spirit” can also have the sense of “ghost“, i.e. a manifestation of the spirit of a deceased person.
The term may also refer to any incorporeal or immaterial being, such as demons or deities. In the Bible, “the Spirit” (with a capital “S”), specifically denotes the Holy Spirit.
As we celebrate Halloween tonight it is the SPIRIT that guides us through life. It is a celebration observed in a number of countries on 31 October, the eve of All Hallows’ Day dedicated to remembering the dead, including saints(hallows), martyrs, and all the faithful departed.
THE WORST CRIMINAL IN HISTORY – WHY ISN’T SHE BEHIND BARS?
|
Subject A Huge Clinton Scam! -Be advised
A Huge Clinton Scam! The Clinton Foundation is “organized crime” at ts finest, and we are financing it. This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own purposes. All tax free. Here’s how it works: 1.You create a separate foreign “charity.” In this case one in Canada. 2.Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 did — contributing mega millions. I’m sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin’s buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity). 3.The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation. 4.The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors. 5.The Clinton Foundation then “spends” some of this money for legitimate good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 10%. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clinton’s, pay salaries to untold numbers of hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc. Again, virtually all tax free, which means you and I are subsidizing it. 6.The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world’s best accountants, somehow fails to report muchof this on their tax filings. They discover these “clerical errors” and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns. 7.Net result — foreign money, much of it from other countries, goes into the Clinton’s pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering. Oh, by the way, the Canadian “charity” includes as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted. Sarcasm aside, if you’re still not persuaded this was a cleverly structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton’s, ask yourself this: This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling. Warning: They could be back in the White House in January 2017. Don’t let it happen. Remember, most people are not well informed. You must inform and educate them. |
|
| Tony Passaro 843-520-6110 apassarorr@gmail.com Bel Air Tea Party Patriots Alliance of Americands Patriots Campaign For Liberty American for Prosperity Maryland Fair Tax American Tea Party Movement |
|
ETHANOLICS TO IOWA
Ethanol
Ethanol is a major market for Iowa corn – 47% of Iowa corn goes into ethanol production. Today, over 95% of all fuel sold in the U.S. is blended with 10% ethanol.
There are more choices for consumers to use more green fuel in their tank. One in ten vehicles sold in Iowa can fill up on E85, or midlevel blends like E30. The EPA approved E15 (that’s 15% ethanol) for 2001 and newer cars, light-duty trucks, medium-duty passenger vehicles (SUVs), and all flex-fuel vehicles (FFVs) and that’s over 80% of all vehicles on the road today.
Retailers need to hear from drivers like you that you want to drive with higher blends of a home-grown fuel from E15 to E85. The time is now to fill up with home-grown fuels. Tell your retailer today! Print this card and leave with the manager or attendant at the counter. Do your part to support Iowa!
All eyes are will be focused on Iowa in 2016. Why? The first presidential caucus is in Iowa on February 1, 2016; currently Ben Carter holds a lead over Donald Trump. One may wonder why Iowa is so liberal. Ethanol? The good people of Iowa are drunk on ethanol.
From watchdog.org. So what’s the hold-up on subjecting ethanol subsidies to the Hammers of Justi… ah, ‘market forces’? The largely Iowa-based ethanol lobby, of course. Speaking purely dispassionately, ending ethanol subsidies would cause a certain amount of disruption in that state. Speaking not quite as dispassionately… the vigorous defense of government subsidies is not precisely a conservative virtue.
Corn based ethanol increases the cost of food at the expense of subsidizing wealthy Iowa farmers. Where no politician dear to tread is the ethanol subsidy or now what is called the renewable fuel standard. America’s Renewable Future, is planning a multi-million-dollar media blitz to promote candidates who support the fuel standard and attack those who don’t in the run-up to state’s first-in-the-nation presidential caucuses.
“They’re going to be in real trouble if they don’t, because we’re going to educate people on where the candidates stand,” said Eric Branstad, the son of Iowa’s governor and the director of the pro-ethanol campaign, billed as the industry’s most aggressive entry into presidential politics.
Effectively, the campaign to keep ethanol in gasoline continues. Iowa reaps billions of dollars a year because of it and their soul motive is to keep the status quo. This is at your expense and their gain. “I think renewable fuels can be a big issue in the race,” said Monte Shaw, executive director of the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association. Shaw, who lost a Republican House primary in Iowa earlier this year, says about 10,000 households in the state are directly invested in or employed by the renewable fuels industry, and nearly 300,000 Iowans are “pretty much directly engaged in agriculture,” he said. “That’s a lot of voters.”
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/ethanol-fuels-iowa-109557#ixzz3pwEa4DmR
So in a nutshell America should understand why Iowa is as liberal a state as you can get; the corn farmers are hooked on government subsidies. Welfare to the rich is alive and well. It could be said another way, Iowan’s are eating your lunch.
HYPOCRISY
In case you missed it the recent plan to recruit border patrol agents on college campuses led to the accusations that racial profiling was the main factor in retaining illegals that invade our country from Mexico.
To think that Blacks, Chinese, Africans, Russians, Afghans, Iraqis and Syrians are a significant number of those who cross the border is a pipe dream. But there are those on college campuses who condone illegal behavior and accuse those who enforce the law of RACIAL PROFILING.
“The undocumented community is directly affected by deportation and detention policies that are carried out by Border Patrol, and having Border Patrol agents on campus is a blatant disregard to undocumented students’ safety and well-being.”
“NO MAS” is the new campus shibboleth.
We can’t hold our tongue any longer when it comes to Hillary Clinton. Seeking the presidential nomination she has continued to reach out to Wall Street bankers for donations. In fact most of the money raised by Clinton so far has come from the super rich. The mom and pop crowd has shown little enthusiasm in donating to her campaign and why should they? They aren’t expected. Their vote is their donation.
Secondly those who are pandered to, the moocher, the parasite, the welfare aficionado, those on the government dole are in no position to cough up a donation; after all they are broke. The truth of the matter is is that liberal Democrats don’t expect them to donate to their campaign.
These politicians pander to them not for donations, but for votes.
The more liberal the welfare policies, medicare qualifications, child care credits, food stamp programs, the larger the nanny state equates to more Democrat voters and therefore an avalanche of votes at election time. It is no wonder that most of the large cities in the country constantly vote for a Democrat candidate 90% of the time.
THE ASSAULT ON POLICE CONTINUES
Since the Black Lives Matter movement got underway the number of attacks against police have continued unabated. In fact the murdered policemen have been targeted by minorities; they feel that their lives are at stake therefore they have taken the law into their own hands; this is their version of street justice. The main culprit in the attacks is none other than President Obama.
Of the last 13 police officers who died on duty, 12 were the result of gunfire.
| 2015-6-19 | Police Officer Sonny Kim | Cincinnati Police Department, OH | Gunfire |
| 2015-7-12 | Patrolman John James Wilding | Scranton Police Department, PA | Foot pursuit (fall) |
| 2015-7-22 | Sergeant Scott Lunger | Hayward Police Department, CA | Gunfire |
| 2015-8-2 | Police Officer Sean Bolton | Memphis Police Department, TN | Gunfire |
| 2015-8-15 | Deputy Sheriff Carl Howell | Carson City Sheriff’s Department, NV | Gunfire |
| 2015-8-23 | Trooper Steven Vincent | Louisiana State Trooper, LA | Gunfire |
| 2015-8-26 | Officer Henry Nelson | Sunset Police Department, LA | Gunfire |
| 2015-8-28 | Deputy Sheriff Darren Goforth | Harris County Sheriff’s Department, TX | Gunfire |
| 2015-9-1 | Lieutenant Charles “Joe” Gliniewicz | Fox Lake Police Department, IL | Gunfire |
| 2015-9-13 | Trooper Joseph Cameron Ponder | Kentucky State Police, KY | Gunfire |
| 2015-9-22 | Deputy Sheriff Bill Myers | Okaloosa County Sheriff’s Office, FL | Gunfire |
| 2015-9-30 | Officer Gregory Thomas Alia | Forest Acres Police Department, SC | Gunfire |
| 2015-10-18 | Investigator Steven Martin Sandberg | Aitkin County Sheriff’s Office, MN | Gunfire |
| 2015-10-20 | Police Officer Randolph Holder | New York City Police Department, NY | Gunfire |
Randolph Holder was killed on October 20th, the fourth N.Y. officer killed in the past twelve months according to Commissioner William Bratton 
. So to think that there is a segment of the population that believes they are targeted by police is a complete falsehood. One that has gained momentum because of the inflammatory remarks of our President, Al Sharpton and Louis Farrakhan.
To rehash, this whole story started with the killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. The story line here is that Michael was an angel; in fact he was a bully who roughed up a store keeper before tangling with a police officer who shot him dead on the spot.
WHY LISTEN TO THE GOVERNMENT WHEN THEY STEAL FROM THE PEOPLE
Governments past and present are nothing more than magicians; they are adept at the three card monte where the taxpayer’s money disappears quicker than a vehicle vacuumed up by a Florida sinkhole. The best way to phrase the politician is a fugitive 180 degrees different from when they first became elected. In the majority of cases the political class summons the news media to put on a spectacle for the very few parasites who continue to mooch off the systems. The public in essence is to busy to protest such a prearranged spectacle. Always notice that the politician do gooder is always surrounded by his or her comrades. This is not because they believe in the policy or action to be taken, but to give support to a weaker member of the cabal.
The scheme of confiscation was initiated by FDR in 1933 when by executive order 6102 the gold window was abruptly shut. All citizens were required under edict to exchange their gold for paper. Think about this happening today. There would be lead flying in the streets. 
The main rationale behind the order was actually to remove the constraint on the Federal Reserve which prevented it from increasing the money supply during the depression; the Federal Reserve Act (1913) required 40% gold backing of Federal Reserve Notes issued. By the late 1920s, the Federal Reserve had almost hit the limit of allowable credit (in the form of Federal Reserve demand notes) that could be backed by the gold in its possession (see Great Depression). If gold can’t be legally owned, then it can’t be legally redeemed. If it can’t be legally redeemed, then it can’t constrain the central bank.
Numerous individuals and companies were prosecuted related to President Roosevelt’s Executive Order 6102. The prosecutions took place under subsequent Executive Orders 6111,[8] 6260,[9] 6261[10] and the Gold Reserve Act of 1934.
There was a need to strengthen Executive Order 6102, as the one prosecution under the order was ruled invalid by federal judge John M. Woolsey, on the grounds that the order was signed by the President, not the Secretary of the Treasury as required.[11]
The circumstances of the case were that a New York attorney, Frederick Barber Campbell, had on deposit at Chase National over 5,000 troy ounces (160 kg) of gold. When Campbell attempted to withdraw the gold Chase refused and Campbell sued Chase. A federal prosecutor then indicted Campbell on the following day (September 27, 1933) for failing to surrender his gold.[12] Ultimately, the prosecution of Campbell failed, but the authority of the federal government to seize gold was upheld, and Campbell’s gold was confiscated.
The bottom line here is that the government then became the authority on what amount of money was put into circulation. They, at their will, could print any amount sufficient to keep the scheme rolling. Today we have seen the result of a the printing at all costs paradyne.
For instance, during Obama’s almost seven years in office, debt has risen by $8 trillion. Yet we have an economy in tatters; don’t believe the official dogma of 5.1 % unemployment, counting those who have given up, the unemployment rate is close to 14%. Keep in mind that during the depression not one single human being gave up looking for work. But it is a different matter today because of social programs and the what not provide a safety net. Putting that aside, those who have given up look is not because of the safety net, but because there are no jobs available.
If the government paper hangers feel that gold was the enemy in the past and paper (fiat) currency is the panacea, then why not print trillions of dollars and hand out a ten million to every citizen. By the way that has been tried in Germany during the reign of Weimar. 
The confiscating of gold produced a monopoly in all countries that did not back their currency with gold or silver. Effectively we have turned over out lives to the Federal Reserve money mongers without our permission. Through printing the government has devalued an individuals assets over time. Soon the day of reckoning will be upon us. Very soon!
JEB BUSH – STILL IN DIAPERS ASKS DADDY AND MOMMY FOR ADVICE
His campaign imploding faster than the most dangerous hurricane which was expected to hit the Mexican riviera, Jeb Bush has paid a visit to his mommy and daddy. Apparently, Jeb’s diapers are still wet, needing a change he has turned to the old codger. Turning back the clock it was George Bush who said, “read my lips, no new taxes.” Of course the Democrats tricked him into raising taxes which led to the election of “Slick Willie.” 
As Ronald Reagan‘s vice president during the 1980s, Bush endorsed Reagan’s policy that tax increases were undesirable but sometimes necessary. In 1984, however, there was some controversy when Bush seemed to diverge somewhat from Reagan’s view. Responding toWalter Mondale‘s admission that if he were elected taxes would likely be raised, Bush also implied that tax increases might be necessary in the next four years. Reagan asserted that he had no plans to raise taxes in his second term, and Bush quickly argued that he had been misunderstood. Bush’s statements led some conservatives to begin doubting Bush’s dedication to tax cuts.
As Jeb enters the most important months of his campaign he finds himself slipping in the polls for the most obvious of reasons; he is another Bush. Secondly, the American voter is sick and tired of career politicians who speak with forked tongue.
At a rally in Florida Trump teased Bush, a former Florida governor, for his recent decision to lay off campaign staff and cut salaries by 40 percent, and for his planned retreat with donors in Texas on Sunday.
“Bush has no money, he’s meeting today with mommy and daddy, and they’re working on his campaign,” Trump said at the rally in downtown Jacksonville, Fla.
HEY YOU, YES YOU, THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER, “DO YOU LIKE BAILING OUT LOW LIFES?”
Who are those low lifes? They are the people who reside in Puerto Rico. Same as the Greeks, living high off someone else’s hog. Now it is time to pay and they have no money. Oh, but wait, they have a rich uncle in Washington; his name is Obama, the Democrat liberal progressive Keynesian Obama. His solution to the Puerto Rico problem is to make it your problem. Yes you heard us right. Obama is going to saddle the United States Taxpayer with Puerto Rico’s $72,000,000,000 in debt ($72 billion).
Why is he doing this? See most Puerto Ricans are Democrats, if they were Republicans Obama would throw them off the truck. But Democrats mean voters. You see where we are getting at. This is the old break the bank scenario perpetrated by Cloward -Piven strategy.
“Puerto Rico, and the 3.5 million American citizens who call the island home, are facing a serious crisis that requires immediate congressional action. The Commonwealth has been mired in a decade long recession, during which more than 300,000 people left the island, the island’s economy shrank and unemployment soared, and the Commonwealth’s fiscal hole deepened. Puerto Rico has taken emergency actions to address these challenges, but those actions will be exhausted this winter.
FROM NEWT GINGRICH – ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED BY THE WASHINGTON TIMES
|
|||
|
Hillary’s Benghazi Hearing and Public Trust
Originally published at the Washington Times
For people who say there is nothing left for the public to learn about Hillary Clinton’s emails or her actions surrounding the Benghazi terror attacks, Democrats on the House select committee spent an awful lot of time Thursday attacking colleagues who asked reasonable questions. And Secretary Clinton spent an awful lot of time filibustering to run out the clock.
Little more than a week after Clinton said in a presidential debate that the enemy she was proudest of is “probably the Republicans”, she, the media, and allies in her party tried their hardest to portray the hearing as nothing more than a partisan Republican charade.
Evidently they did not see “partisan” motives in Democrats questioning the Secretary like they were her team of defense attorneys, or in their personal attacks on Republican committee members in place of questions for Hillary, or in the repeated complaints about the committee’s very existence. (The committee, of course, was created when Congress discovered that the Obama administration had failed to produce relevant documents in defiance of a Congressional request.)
Only one Democrat, Tammy Duckworth, even bothered to ask real questions about the attack that left four Americans dead or the administration’s response to it.
As Hillary grinned in agreement, Adam Smith, a leading Democrat on the committee, used one of his entire rounds of questioning to complain that the public had learned “nothing new” during the hearing. This was a quite a grievance from someone who spent the entire day trying to debunk the effort to learn anything new. And no doubt we would know even less if Congressman Smith and Secretary Clinton had their way.
If he had listened to the questions of his professional colleagues, Mr. Smith might have noticed that the public did learn some significant information Thursday.
Congressman Jim Jordan revealed in his questioning that Secretary Clinton knew the night of the attack that the violence was planned and carried out by a terrorist group. She wrote it in an email to her family.
Then we learned that the next day she told the Egyptian Prime Minister, “We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film…It was a planned attack – not a protest.”
In other words, Secretary Clinton’s email and phone records immediately after attack directly contradict the statements she made to victims’ family members days later, and the statements many members of the Obama administration continued to make for weeks.
Secretary Clinton has repeatedly blamed “the fog of war” for the false information she helped spread about the source of the attacks.
The documents we learned about yesterday prove that she (and very likely other senior administration officials) were not nearly as confused as they led the public to believe.
It is remarkable that the Democrats on the committee were so completely uninterested in the discrepancy between what the administration knew and what it said publicly that they neglected to ask even a single question about the subject.
It is even more remarkable that the news media shows every sign of cooperating in this effort to paper over this new information.
We have a presidential candidate who began her career working for a Congressional committee examining Watergate, and we have a generation of journalists who supposedly idolize the writers who inspired that investigation.
Now respectively the subject and the reporters of equally serious questions of public trust, both insist there is nothing important to see here. And who’s partisan, again?
Your Friend,
Newt
P.S. Callista’s new children’s book, Christmas in America, and my new political thriller, Duplicity are now available!